|
On April 07 2013 09:53 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 09:48 DarthPunk wrote:On April 07 2013 09:42 marvellosity wrote:
Saying there is "no way" sciberbia should be up for the lynch and "scum could be hiding in this silliness" does not equate to him being a decent lynch, which you just implied.
"silliness" != 3rd best lynch. Marv what exactly have you said to make sciberbia scum aside from associations with someone you just unvoted? On April 06 2013 20:30 marvellosity wrote:
It's a combination of sciberbia not mentioning WoS for a very long time, and then seemingly giving WoS an out as you mention.
On April 06 2013 19:48 marvellosity wrote:
I actually have some connection feelings between WoS and sciberbia too, but I'll wait until if/when WoS flips red to talk about that On April 06 2013 20:02 marvellosity wrote:
I might as well say it given I alluded to it; I think a WoS red-flip heavily implicates sciberbia as red. Which is an underneath reason why I want to lynch WoS today. Seems like you are trying to make an association case before the flip and the association is now with someone you are unwilling to lynch. So when you say to look in your filter for the reason behind your sciberbia vote with ZERO justification and all I find is the above quotes. I don't know What the fuck you are talking about. Here: Show nested quote +On April 06 2013 19:44 marvellosity wrote:
Alright. You don't realise this because I've kept my cards close to my chest so far this game, but I agree completely with everything you've said about the people I'm suspicious of. I agree about the big post on oats/iamp. He spent several paragraphs defending iamp when he only had one serious detractor at the time (DP) and I didn't find the push on Oats very reasonable either (maybe you can guess this from my reaction). Also agreed with the validation thing - talking about setup is fine, except he kinda didn't even really give an opinion, he was just fawning at you.
It's essentially just agreeing with Palmar, because I... agreed with Palmar. No need to rehash everything.
So. Despite the fact that this was buried in a vote for WoS and is essentially using more words to repeat what palmar said in two sentences you didn't think it was a good idea to provide anything with your vote or EVEN MENTION SCIBERBIA AT ALL?!?
Forgive me if I am mistaken but the major reason for wanting to lynch sciberbia is pushing oats. But when I push oats far harder than sciberbia did you don't call me out for pushing oats?
Rehashing 2 sentences in one post voting for someone else is not a good enough reason to lynch someone. And it is CERTAINLY not good enough that you are not required to even mention that person when you vote for them.
|
On April 07 2013 09:46 marvellosity wrote:
Oats is (and I said it to him pre-game) a pretty popular target for mafia ire, because outwardly he does "scummy" things, like contradictions and other similar crap. If a mafia is looking to push a mislynch on to someone, Oats is the kinda guy to push it on, because he's easy to make a case on.
I would have hoped, as town, that you would be able to take a broader view of Oats' play; some loud dude, pointing fingers and generally being all over the place on Day 1 - this is literally THE classic mislynch in Newbie games. So meh.
Well there are two issues at hand here. One is my alignment and the other is Oats's alignment. Based on the votecount and the fact that I'm 100% sure of my own alignment, I'm just going to stick to that issue for now, and look at Oats again when I catch a break.
You should note that I didn't attack Oats for being loud, contradicting himself, or pointing fingers. I stated suspicion on him for making a very safe entrance to the thread, promoting a negative town atmosphere (which I think he has continued to do), and making several posts that were a bit "out there". I think these are all legitimate scumtells and cause for concern. I'm not sure why you disagree.
I would also like to reiterate that I would not push a case that I think is bad even if I were scum, especially with a player list like this where there are several players that I have played for and have respect for.
As a side note, I strongly disagree with your characterization of my initial setup musings as fawning at Palmar. I did give my own opinion. It seems to me that optimal town play is to extend days for a long time. As I said.
|
@ AXELGREASER You need to stop tunnelling WoS or I am going to lynch you. Your play is worrying.
|
i haven't a clue what's going on
|
i never understand ace but in this game it's even harder. he seems to be arguing about stuff that's really not going to help anybody out like the oats-is-scum-if-he-doesn't-stop-being-all-over-the-place debate with whoever. i don't like that and i think it's scummy.
WoS is apparently being unvoted because he did something when he was about to get lynched, alright.
btw, i think the claim he was referring to was his claim in the beginning of the game, when he claimed town.
|
##vote marvellosity
I think DP's posts have merit and highlight suspicions I already have of marv.
|
i don't see the part where WoS acted in some way that he wouldn't get lynched, he wrote a few small posts and then he just left the thread. that's not really fighting for your life or anything that i think most people usually do. it seems much more collected.
|
|
|
@prp what don't you understand? I think my thought process this game is easy to follow but I'll clear anything up you have questions about.
|
##unvote
##vote marvellosity
|
On April 07 2013 10:17 prplhz wrote:
i don't see the part where WoS acted in some way that he wouldn't get lynched, he wrote a few small posts and then he just left the thread. that's not really fighting for your life or anything that i think most people usually do. it seems much more collected.
I don't want to misunderstand here. Are you surprised that WoS didn't get lynched?
|
On April 07 2013 10:19 Palmar wrote:
##unvote
##vote marvellosity
This is not good enough either.
|
On April 07 2013 10:20 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 10:17 prplhz wrote:
i don't see the part where WoS acted in some way that he wouldn't get lynched, he wrote a few small posts and then he just left the thread. that's not really fighting for your life or anything that i think most people usually do. it seems much more collected. I don't want to misunderstand here. Are you surprised that WoS didn't get lynched?
well if i think about it i'm a little surprised. i didn't think so before considering it now that you just asked me though.
|
Votecount:
sciberbia (2): AxleGreaser, raynpelikoneet
WaveofShadow (3): Tunkeg, prplhz, Oatsmaster
Oatsmaster (1): DarthPunk
prplhz (2): iamperfection, WaveofShadow
marvellosity (2): Ace, Palmar
Not voting (2): sciberbia, marvellosity
7 votes needed to lynch.
|
i never really thought anybody would hammer today since in these majority lynch games you usually have 72 hours and there's hardly any reason not to use them all.
|
##Unvote: Oatsmaster
##Vote: Marvellosity
|
On April 07 2013 08:40 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay, i want to kill Ace...
but do you have reason to?
|
On April 07 2013 10:11 DarthPunk wrote:
@ AXELGREASER You need to stop tunnelling WoS or I am going to lynch you. Your play is worrying.
Some people determine alignment by ......... , I ask questions an listen to answers or the lack of them.
How are you trying to determine alignment?
|
##unvote
simply because marv has probably gone to sleep and I'm going to sleep too.
|
I'm just catching up right now, but I never lied.
Did all of you seem to forget my claim in my very first post?
It wasn't a joke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
