• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:27
CEST 05:27
KST 12:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)12Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week3Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer12Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025) The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL
Tourneys
EWC 2025 Online Qualifiers (May 28-June 1, June 21-22) WardiTV Mondays RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House
Brood War
General
Who wrote this nonsense about Flash? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ bonjwa.tv: my AI project that translates BW videos BW General Discussion StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest
Tourneys
[BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - LB Round 4 & 5 [ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - WB Finals & LBR3 The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Echoes of Revolution and Separation
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Pro Gamers Cope with Str…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 34594 users

TL Mafia LXI

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
March 24 2013 18:33 GMT
#37
/in
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
March 24 2013 20:28 GMT
#41
On March 25 2013 05:24 Blazinghand wrote:
none of that is as dumb as the presence of the snitch in quidditch

Meanwhile, multiple immortallity stones fall by the wayside.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 10 2013 12:15 GMT
#143
On March 25 2013 03:33 Hopeless1der wrote:
/in

Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 19 2013 12:07 GMT
#201
/in
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 04:15 GMT
#254
BH DUCKS FORE CRIPS PASS IT ON
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 15:21 GMT
#329
@palmar's read on vivax:
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 21 2013 19:36 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2013 18:28 Vivax wrote:
Well I don't care that you say no, I'll treat everyone who posted before me as confirmed town for a while.


I think the absurdity and yet strange value of this heuristic makes Vivax very likely to be town. To the point that almost nothing would make me want to lynch him today.

Discuss.


"Absurd" I agree with. "Strange value" however...could you expand on how his heuristic is useful at discerning OTHER people's alignment, because I don't see it.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 15:43 GMT
#334
On April 22 2013 00:33 VisceraEyes wrote:
The idea is that anyone who posted before him is invested enough to at the very least look elsewhere - unless I'm missing something.

That's a terrible heuristic if it is that simple. Simply posting in the thread, especially in the first ~2ish hours does not a townie make.

On April 22 2013 00:31 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 00:21 Hopeless1der wrote:
@palmar's read on vivax:
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 21 2013 19:36 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2013 18:28 Vivax wrote:
Well I don't care that you say no, I'll treat everyone who posted before me as confirmed town for a while.


I think the absurdity and yet strange value of this heuristic makes Vivax very likely to be town. To the point that almost nothing would make me want to lynch him today.

Discuss.


"Absurd" I agree with. "Strange value" however...could you expand on how his heuristic is useful at discerning OTHER people's alignment, because I don't see it.


I would like to know what motivates you to ask Palmar that question. Are you feeling uncomfortable with the fact that he's giving me a townread? Do you see scum motivation in doing so or do you think I'm scum?

Yes I am uncomfortable with him giving you a townread off of something I read as non-indicative. I also want to know why he suggests there is any value in the heuristic you used because it's nonsense imo.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 15:48 GMT
#338
I value being able to read things. Use the preview tabs plox.
On April 22 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 00:39 VisceraEyes wrote:
On April 22 2013 00:14 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
On April 22 2013 00:11 TheRavensName wrote:
On April 21 2013 23:50 Palmar wrote:
On April 21 2013 23:01 TheRavensName wrote:
On April 21 2013 22:52 Vivax wrote:
On April 21 2013 22:48 TheRavensName wrote:
On April 21 2013 22:42 Vivax wrote:
On April 21 2013 22:38 TheRavensName wrote:
Huh... I was curious to see how big boys start playing the game... and less then a page's worth of posting totals I see an OMGuS. I feel somewhat surprised; apparently the way newbies open mafia games is the right way?

PS: Bill Murray yelling indoors is really mean.


Oooo, an omgus, interesting.
Are you okay with the way Oats is playing the game?

I'm not a 100% sure what hes doing, but if you want to call it playing then... maybe? Truth be told the fact that palmer just randomly takes offense to a baseless acucsation in a game that just started doesn't make a lot of since to me.


He's asking for a base to the accusation, precisely.
Do you have any ideas to get some discussion started? Your entrance kinda looked like you tried to downplay what's going on in the thread, which in turn makes me think you're trying to communicate reasons for not doing anything.
Do you think this description fits your play or did your posts have other purposes?


I thought it just genuinely showed disapointment. I've always had difficulty understand what to do at the start of day 1, and I see that there really is no good way to start day 1 in a purely productive way. So I suppose your right, I'm trying to downplay what happens because it doesn't seem productive, unless of course we need to know why Yamato has many weapons that arn' t guns.....

And I think its more suspicious to ask in that way rather than, just ask.... seeing as how he didn't even vote baselessly or hasn't made an ssue out of it yet. If we went after everyone who accused someone day 1 just kinda in passing, we'd never get anything resembling a case or something.


3. You seem confused as to what to do on day 1. I gave a short explanation not long ago on hapa/drh's podcast thingee. The goal of day 1 is to make people fear for their lives, which is precisely what I mean to do with Oats.



Which one?


https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BztYu18cOor9cTdUMTFjdmYtVXM/edit?usp=sharing

protown cheese is protown, sharing all the protown information.

On April 10 2013 10:30 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
On April 10 2013 10:28 Promethelax wrote:
But CC isn't protown as town. 100% real heuristic.



I'm confirmed scum :o

Kush probably town. ^
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 16:05 GMT
#351
On April 22 2013 00:52 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 00:43 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 22 2013 00:33 VisceraEyes wrote:
The idea is that anyone who posted before him is invested enough to at the very least look elsewhere - unless I'm missing something.

That's a terrible heuristic if it is that simple. Simply posting in the thread, especially in the first ~2ish hours does not a townie make.

On April 22 2013 00:31 Vivax wrote:
On April 22 2013 00:21 Hopeless1der wrote:
@palmar's read on vivax:
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 21 2013 19:36 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2013 18:28 Vivax wrote:
Well I don't care that you say no, I'll treat everyone who posted before me as confirmed town for a while.


I think the absurdity and yet strange value of this heuristic makes Vivax very likely to be town. To the point that almost nothing would make me want to lynch him today.

Discuss.


"Absurd" I agree with. "Strange value" however...could you expand on how his heuristic is useful at discerning OTHER people's alignment, because I don't see it.


I would like to know what motivates you to ask Palmar that question. Are you feeling uncomfortable with the fact that he's giving me a townread? Do you see scum motivation in doing so or do you think I'm scum?

Yes I am uncomfortable with him giving you a townread off of something I read as non-indicative. I also want to know why he suggests there is any value in the heuristic you used because it's nonsense imo.


What I regard as important about your question is that you seem to assume that scumPalmar would give me an easy townread, when it wouldn't serve any purpose for him, unless you know of one and want to talk about it.

Your question's whole purpose seems to be attacking Palmar's townread on me, which makes me curious. Cause town's goal is to find reasons for someone being scum, and not for heuristics to get townreads not being correct, that is mafia's goal cause it reduces the pool of people they could get lynched.

So unless you see me or Palmar as scummy for some reason you aren't citing, I see the question you're asking as something that looks like scum agenda, as you criticize someone for issuing a townread on another guy.

Then, why Palmar specifically? CC called everyone in the thread town at a certain point, and I called everyone posting before me town, yet you deem Palmar most interesting for issuing a single townread.

Palmar's explanation for why he gave you a townread doesn't make sense to me and I want to question it. No one is confirmed fuck-all until they flip, but you throw it around based on the fact that they posted in the thread before you. I'd call that as you being reckless. Not scum, not town. Palmar disagrees and has cited some kind of reasoning. I wish to hear it.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 16:07 GMT
#353
On April 22 2013 00:58 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2013 23:02 VisceraEyes wrote:
THANKS FOR MAKING ME HAVE TO READ THE DAMNED OP BH THAT WAS COOL OF YOU NOT

Sup guys I'm here and I'm very town. So whazzup?


also something i noticed...
i think this is borderline cheating for talking about the PM but I also think it points heavily to town.

I don't understand what you're talking about. Assume I am 5 years old. Please explain.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 16:16 GMT
#356
On April 22 2013 01:08 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 01:05 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 22 2013 00:52 Vivax wrote:
On April 22 2013 00:43 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 22 2013 00:33 VisceraEyes wrote:
The idea is that anyone who posted before him is invested enough to at the very least look elsewhere - unless I'm missing something.

That's a terrible heuristic if it is that simple. Simply posting in the thread, especially in the first ~2ish hours does not a townie make.

On April 22 2013 00:31 Vivax wrote:
On April 22 2013 00:21 Hopeless1der wrote:
@palmar's read on vivax:
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 21 2013 19:36 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2013 18:28 Vivax wrote:
Well I don't care that you say no, I'll treat everyone who posted before me as confirmed town for a while.


I think the absurdity and yet strange value of this heuristic makes Vivax very likely to be town. To the point that almost nothing would make me want to lynch him today.

Discuss.


"Absurd" I agree with. "Strange value" however...could you expand on how his heuristic is useful at discerning OTHER people's alignment, because I don't see it.


I would like to know what motivates you to ask Palmar that question. Are you feeling uncomfortable with the fact that he's giving me a townread? Do you see scum motivation in doing so or do you think I'm scum?

Yes I am uncomfortable with him giving you a townread off of something I read as non-indicative. I also want to know why he suggests there is any value in the heuristic you used because it's nonsense imo.


What I regard as important about your question is that you seem to assume that scumPalmar would give me an easy townread, when it wouldn't serve any purpose for him, unless you know of one and want to talk about it.

Your question's whole purpose seems to be attacking Palmar's townread on me, which makes me curious. Cause town's goal is to find reasons for someone being scum, and not for heuristics to get townreads not being correct, that is mafia's goal cause it reduces the pool of people they could get lynched.

So unless you see me or Palmar as scummy for some reason you aren't citing, I see the question you're asking as something that looks like scum agenda, as you criticize someone for issuing a townread on another guy.

Then, why Palmar specifically? CC called everyone in the thread town at a certain point, and I called everyone posting before me town, yet you deem Palmar most interesting for issuing a single townread.

Palmar's explanation for why he gave you a townread doesn't make sense to me and I want to question it. No one is confirmed fuck-all until they flip, but you throw it around based on the fact that they posted in the thread before you. I'd call that as you being reckless. Not scum, not town. Palmar disagrees and has cited some kind of reasoning. I wish to hear it.


I'll interject here, to try and be all protown and useful.

Is recklessness not a town trait? Personally I know, as scum, I'm pretty careful about what I post in the way of reads. Especially sweeping generalizations like that. It's a towntell because Vivax isn't caring what people think about him, and he the post itself clearly was not premeditated as to seem like he were doing something. I think Palmar went over-the-top with the ultra super mega awesome townread, but hey you've got to generate discussion somewhere. I believe it's a townie thing to do as opposed to a scum thing.

I don't see it as particularly telling of either alignment as it was Vivax's first post. I read it and just kind of shook my head. I can follow not wanting to lynch him based on being reckless, though not with the certainty that Palmar has suggested. I'm specifically interested in the bolded.
On April 21 2013 19:36 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2013 18:28 Vivax wrote:
Well I don't care that you say no, I'll treat everyone who posted before me as confirmed town for a while.


I think the absurdity and yet strange value of this heuristic makes Vivax very likely to be town. To the point that almost nothing would make me want to lynch him today.

Discuss.

Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 16:17 GMT
#359
On April 22 2013 01:17 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 01:07 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 22 2013 00:58 kushm4sta wrote:
On April 21 2013 23:02 VisceraEyes wrote:
THANKS FOR MAKING ME HAVE TO READ THE DAMNED OP BH THAT WAS COOL OF YOU NOT

Sup guys I'm here and I'm very town. So whazzup?


also something i noticed...
i think this is borderline cheating for talking about the PM but I also think it points heavily to town.

I don't understand what you're talking about. Assume I am 5 years old. Please explain.

do you know what VE is talking about?

I do not. If I did, I would probably understand what you're going on about.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 16:21 GMT
#362
On April 22 2013 01:19 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 01:17 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 22 2013 01:17 kushm4sta wrote:
On April 22 2013 01:07 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 22 2013 00:58 kushm4sta wrote:
On April 21 2013 23:02 VisceraEyes wrote:
THANKS FOR MAKING ME HAVE TO READ THE DAMNED OP BH THAT WAS COOL OF YOU NOT

Sup guys I'm here and I'm very town. So whazzup?


also something i noticed...
i think this is borderline cheating for talking about the PM but I also think it points heavily to town.

I don't understand what you're talking about. Assume I am 5 years old. Please explain.

do you know what VE is talking about?

I do not. If I did, I would probably understand what you're going on about.


All role PMs were just the name. I.E. Brave Wizard. None of us know wtf that is unless we read the OP. And such is what VE was talking about -- when he got his PM, he was like FUCK, gotta read dat OP so I know what I am.

okay. that is true of every single player in the game. Why does this imply VE is town? (Kush?)
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 16:26 GMT
#369
On April 22 2013 01:25 kushm4sta wrote:
@hopeless did you have to check the OP?
if you did, then why didn't you understand what VE said?

[sarcasm]No, I don't read role pm's[/sarcasm]
I didn't understand how that makes him town.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 16:32 GMT
#376
On April 22 2013 01:29 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
-snip-
Not sure if retarded..... or kush....

Same thing really. This was bound to happen, but kush gets a townread from me for it.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 16:33 GMT
#379
On April 22 2013 01:32 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 01:31 VisceraEyes wrote:
How about we stop trying to use the role PM to discern alignments KTHX

I already did though!
VE town
CC town
Hopeless scum

2/3, not bad. owaitshit
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 16:50 GMT
#394
On April 22 2013 01:48 getmoript wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 01:25 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
On April 22 2013 01:23 kushm4sta wrote:
WE knew that's what VE meant because we are town. Scum prob didn't know what he meant. Now you just explained it to them.


Why wouldn't scum know what he meant? They had to do the exact same thing, the only difference is they had a QT in their PM. They still have to look up if they are framer,rber,godfather or whatever. Literally every person has to reference the op for their role, regardless of alignment.

How would you even know this? Are you scum? Did you receive a QT in your PM? Did you receive the QT in the same pm or a different pm? You are treading on highly suspicious ground for me because as a hydra I received my hydra QT in the same PM. You aren't a hydra clearly. How would you know that?


On March 22 2013 20:48 Blazinghand wrote:
Sample PMs:

Auror
Brave Wizard
Harry Potter
Rita Skeeter
Voldemort, your QT: _____
Lucius Malfoy, your QT: _____


How the fuck is this so difficult to understand?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 17:00 GMT
#401
On April 22 2013 01:57 Palmar wrote:
Geript rerrible or scum?

Terrible.

Can you explain the strange value in Vivax's heuristic? I can follow how you discerned Vivax's alignment from his post, but not how you might figure out others based on it/the heuristic he used.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 21:01 GMT
#471
theres scarcely the need for a separate qt when you're scum. its not 100% but I actually agree with kush for a change.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 21:06 GMT
#474
Palmar, are you ever going to elaborate on the bolded?
On April 21 2013 19:36 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2013 18:28 Vivax wrote:
Well I don't care that you say no, I'll treat everyone who posted before me as confirmed town for a while.


I think the absurdity and yet strange value of this heuristic makes Vivax very likely to be town. To the point that almost nothing would make me want to lynch him today.

Discuss.

Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 21 2013 21:14 GMT
#478
On April 22 2013 06:07 WaveofShadow wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 06:01 Hopeless1der wrote:
theres scarcely the need for a separate qt when you're scum. its not 100% but I actually agree with kush for a change.

I suppose that's true but until marv confirmed it himself it wasn't as clear. He could also be 3p btw.

Yes, that is a thing I skipped over, so thx.

On April 22 2013 06:07 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 06:06 Hopeless1der wrote:
Palmar, are you ever going to elaborate on the bolded?
On April 21 2013 19:36 Palmar wrote:
On April 21 2013 18:28 Vivax wrote:
Well I don't care that you say no, I'll treat everyone who posted before me as confirmed town for a while.


I think the absurdity and yet strange value of this heuristic makes Vivax very likely to be town. To the point that almost nothing would make me want to lynch him today.

Discuss.



geript already explained it to you.

As a rule of thumb, it's more likely town players storm into the thread asap, it's certainly not very valuable, but it does have some value.


I'd consider that a poor rule of thumb, but alright...how's your read on Oats doing?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 22 2013 12:30 GMT
#718
What the fuck is this suspicion on me based on? My determination to "Shut down townreads"? Yes, when you're handing them out like hotcakes and trying to hold hands singing kumbya. This is Mafia, not summer camp singalong.

I'm not discouraging reasonable townreads, I'm trying to keep things objective and informed. The two points against me are my comments on VE's entrance and Vivax/Palmar's entrance posts.

For VE, watch carefully:

+ Show Spoiler +
On April 22 2013 01:50 Hopeless1der wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 01:48 getmoript wrote:
On April 22 2013 01:25 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
On April 22 2013 01:23 kushm4sta wrote:
WE knew that's what VE meant because we are town. Scum prob didn't know what he meant. Now you just explained it to them.


Why wouldn't scum know what he meant? They had to do the exact same thing, the only difference is they had a QT in their PM. They still have to look up if they are framer,rber,godfather or whatever. Literally every person has to reference the op for their role, regardless of alignment.

How would you even know this? Are you scum? Did you receive a QT in your PM? Did you receive the QT in the same pm or a different pm? You are treading on highly suspicious ground for me because as a hydra I received my hydra QT in the same PM. You aren't a hydra clearly. How would you know that?


On March 22 2013 20:48 Blazinghand wrote:
Sample PMs:

Show nested quote +
Auror
Show nested quote +
Brave Wizard
Show nested quote +
Harry Potter
Show nested quote +
Rita Skeeter
Show nested quote +
Voldemort, your QT: _____
Show nested quote +
Lucius Malfoy, your QT: _____


How the fuck is this so difficult to understand?


Am I trying to prevent townreads? You could say that. However, the reasoning used to attain a townread on VE was true of literally every player in the game. It's the equivalent of calling anyone who doesn't post for more than an hour scum. Man's gotta sleep right? Same way he has to READ THE OP TO LEARN WHAT HIS ROLE IS???




Vivax/Palmar's openings:

Palmar, based on the plethora of information from Vivax's two posts, the first ones in the game, declares Vivax to be unlynchable. Just like that. And that was alright because I felt similar about it. I mean I'd still have an open mind, but Vivax's post did put me onto a townier side of Vivax. My problem with Palmar's post was that he called something really fucking stupid a valuable towntell heuristic.

Let me break this shit down:

DAY 1 POST timestamp
On April 21 2013 16:55 Blazinghand wrote:

Vivax's first posts, the ones Palmar was referring to
On April 21 2013 18:23 Vivax wrote:
Good morning.
Is it safe to assume scum didn't post yet?

On April 21 2013 18:28 Vivax wrote:
Well I don't care that you say no, I'll treat everyone who posted before me as confirmed town for a while.

So roughly an hour and a half. In addition there were 15ish posts between 6 players, obs notwithstanding. Also, the game started in the dead of night where I am.

Hydra Mini
scum in ~30 minutes, 33 posts into the game.

Ego Mini:
scum posted within an hour of game start. 34 posts in.

Noir Mini:
scum four minutes and 6 posts into the game

British Empire II
second post of the game 3 minutes in.

Red team's prize
Scum in under an hour, 25 posts in.

The Game
scum 5 minutes in, second post

All of these games violate Vivax's heuristic, but fuck me for pointing it out (without proof i guess) and questioning Palmar as to why he felt it was valuable, eh guys? . These are literally games just going down the list of the TL Mafia forum. I'm obviouscum trying to derail town from giving out
Completely valid and well thought out town reads based on sound reasoning.

Nah, you can all go die in a fire if you want to lynch me for this.



As of right now, I'm on Sharrant's side and would lynch rayn. I disllike his backpedal about "policy" miller lynching. I dislike his case overall as it is largely OMGUS, but still asks questions of the person he is accusing. However, his preface to his case was here:

On April 22 2013 12:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Wait what Sharrant.. Are you seriously saying that i'm trying to gain credit from town!TRN lynch on D1 as mafia? That's your conclusion?

On April 22 2013 12:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes Sharrant, where are the other mafia players voting for TRN so that i can gain credit from the lynch?

These two quotes don't accomplish anything to me. He's just throwing the question back at sharrant like a stall tactic of feigning disbelief. For having come up with a scumread on Sharrant it seems grounded in the fact that Sharrant is wrong, not necessarily scum.

On April 22 2013 12:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I fail to see how Sharrant can possibly think i am taking his "bait" and defending town!TRN (as he's now saying) as mafia. If TRN was my lynchbait, i would need my teammates to vote for him to gain the credit, otherwise defending him is useless for me. There is/was noone else voting for TRN.

That's the worst reasoning to backpedal from a scumread i have ever heard. On top of that, Sharrant obviously hasn't even read why i think TRN is town. Hint: The post where i answer OO about him.

"If I WERE mafia, blah blah blah" No. I say you ARE mafia.

##Vote: raynpelikoneet
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 22 2013 13:35 GMT
#725
On April 22 2013 06:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 05:48 ObviousOne wrote:
One more filter then I'm going to go level my Priest some more.

Oh. My. God. Tube is in this game. LOL. HI TUBE! (we played in a newbie together, my first game! He hasn't posted anything so skipping for now.)

Raynpelikoneet, sorry to pick on you again for like the third straight game in a row together. You want to lynch the "claimed miller" Bill Murray, you have made your stance on lynching millers abundantly clear, but I don't see anything that looks like it's developing into an actual scum read. Why are you leaning so heavily on your policy lynch when there are mafia to be lynched? Also, assume BM isn't here for a moment, who do you lynch?


I read BM's post as a miller claim. If it wasn't, he needs to explain this:
- What was the purpose of making that post? There is no reason for a townie to say anything that does not lead into finding scum or proving their towniness. I don't see that post achieving either of those things.

If the claim was actually real, i want BM to explain why he thought it was a good idea to claim miller D1. Millers should not claim. All it does is that it tells the thread that they will give out a red result if checked by a cop. Why would you be a good cop check in the first place if you are town? You should prove you are town by your actions so that there is no reason for anyone to assume you are mafia, and the cops should check suspicious people instead. Claiming miller on D1 is extremely suspicious because it already shows you are afraid of being checked by a cop. If you are a miller, and are checked, so what? Tough luck, then you claim and town will believe you or not. But the place to claim is not the start of D1.

This is not a policy lynch, BM's miller claim post is scummy.


About Sharrant. Sharrant accuses TRN of things. The case in itself is not scummy and i could see someone seeing TRN's posts in that light, i just don't get the same feeling from TRN's posts. Having played with him on NMXXXIX, i can tell that he has no idea how to act in the start of the game. Here he seems to be trying to figure out things and share his thoughts about stuff he is asked about. Fine, why is Sharrant scummy?

- He's discussing the "policy lynch BM" matter but does not reach any kind of a conclusion that points towards this particular situation.
- Asks TRN about his last games. It's not TRN's job to find those games to him. It's Sharrant's job to find out TRN's affiliation and TRN wasting time on telling him about his last games is a waste of time that does not help TRN find mafia. Seems like Sharrant is lazy and does not want to find out things on his own. Townies should not do that.

Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 22 2013 16:35 GMT
#751
On April 23 2013 01:32 Vivax wrote:
I'll probably take hopeless out of my scumspects for now. Not every bad idea is necessarily a scum agenda, meh. I do hold in high regard that he actually goes against Rayn, as he's another guy I'd lynch.

Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 01:25 TheRavensName wrote:
On April 23 2013 01:15 Vivax wrote:
CC, let's talk a little. Who do we lynch? I do like ShiaoPi as lynch as well, so do we start making cases and stuff or do you think we should stick to a policy?

What policy are you advocating/open to exactly? A lurker lynch or did I miss anoth
er policy that wasn't the miller claim one?



Either Drazak for excusing himself out (ask for replacement if you can't play the game), or people showing up late in the day without some damn good contributions. A damn good contribution isn't a huge post with a vote at the end, like RyuSuzaku in The game™, who rolled scum.

you wanna clear that vote you have on me that went relatively unnoticed?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 22 2013 16:42 GMT
#754
so...its a pressure vote on someone you think is less scum than other players....are you sure you know how to play this game?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 22 2013 16:44 GMT
#756
On April 23 2013 01:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 00:02 Sharrant wrote:
It's a good try, Rayne, but no.

Let's get this out of the way quickly because I have to leave, and there's more important things to do when I'm back.

The reason I looked into you is because of your chainsaw defense of TRN. That fit exactly what I was looking for, so I went through your filter.

I am not trying to lynch you on the merit of you defending TRN, get that through your head. I am going to get you lynched because you are scum. You claim that after posting several times about how miller claims should be a policy lynch, you say that it's not a policy lynch you're pushing on BM. The closest you come to make to a case is "This isn't a miller lynch policy, I'm lynching him because he claimed miller which is scummy" which is exactly the same as saying "No, this isn't a lurker lynch, I'm just lynching because his low activity is scummy". It's just attempting to disguise that you were trying to policy lynch him.

The post I voted for you details exactly why I have you as a scum read. The possibility that you were a townie who made some crazy defense on TRN went out the window when I read through your filter.

If you can't understand that, I can't help you.


Ahh so you went back on the policy lynch thing. Then why did you say you agreed with me?
Show nested quote +
I will deal with this post after BM gets back, but as I have agreed with Rayne I will not discuss this any farther until such time.

I did not know if BM claimed miller or not, that's the sole reason why it can't be a policy lynch. Yes, i would lynch anyone who claimed miller on D1, but i can't policy lynch BM because i didn't know if he claimed miller or not, so this particular situation is not a disguise to policy lynch someone because it CANNOT BE SO IN THE FIRST PLACE!
Fuck, why is reading so hard for you guys?


- Why did you agree with your scumread TRN about me saying stuff that i have never said?
- Why did you make a big post focusing on entire different things on me being scum than in the post you voted me on?
- Why did you agree with me and now again backpedal from your latest theory?


On April 22 2013 06:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 05:48 ObviousOne wrote:
One more filter then I'm going to go level my Priest some more.

Oh. My. God. Tube is in this game. LOL. HI TUBE! (we played in a newbie together, my first game! He hasn't posted anything so skipping for now.)

Raynpelikoneet, sorry to pick on you again for like the third straight game in a row together. You want to lynch the "claimed miller" Bill Murray, you have made your stance on lynching millers abundantly clear, but I don't see anything that looks like it's developing into an actual scum read. Why are you leaning so heavily on your policy lynch when there are mafia to be lynched? Also, assume BM isn't here for a moment, who do you lynch?


I read BM's post as a miller claim. If it wasn't, he needs to explain this:
- What was the purpose of making that post? There is no reason for a townie to say anything that does not lead into finding scum or proving their towniness. I don't see that post achieving either of those things.

If the claim was actually real, i want BM to explain why he thought it was a good idea to claim miller D1. Millers should not claim. All it does is that it tells the thread that they will give out a red result if checked by a cop. Why would you be a good cop check in the first place if you are town? You should prove you are town by your actions so that there is no reason for anyone to assume you are mafia, and the cops should check suspicious people instead. Claiming miller on D1 is extremely suspicious because it already shows you are afraid of being checked by a cop. If you are a miller, and are checked, so what? Tough luck, then you claim and town will believe you or not. But the place to claim is not the start of D1.

This is not a policy lynch, BM's miller claim post is scummy.


About Sharrant. Sharrant accuses TRN of things. The case in itself is not scummy and i could see someone seeing TRN's posts in that light, i just don't get the same feeling from TRN's posts. Having played with him on NMXXXIX, i can tell that he has no idea how to act in the start of the game. Here he seems to be trying to figure out things and share his thoughts about stuff he is asked about. Fine, why is Sharrant scummy?

- He's discussing the "policy lynch BM" matter but does not reach any kind of a conclusion that points towards this particular situation.
- Asks TRN about his last games. It's not TRN's job to find those games to him. It's Sharrant's job to find out TRN's affiliation and TRN wasting time on telling him about his last games is a waste of time that does not help TRN find mafia. Seems like Sharrant is lazy and does not want to find out things on his own. Townies should not do that.


Readings not so bad....
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 22 2013 17:03 GMT
#761
On April 23 2013 01:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yes and right after:
"If it wasn't, he needs to explain this:"

You didn't give a shit when you voted him
On April 22 2013 01:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 01:11 Vivax wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 22 2013 01:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 00:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:

On April 22 2013 00:08 Vivax wrote:
Not sure what to make of BM "claiming" snape like that. If I were to make a crazy guess, he's checking whether the real snape shows up contesting the claim, then say he posted some random shit cause he was drunk (cause that's what his posts look like ). And if the real snape doesn't show up, he will claim he's snape.

That'd be pretty ballsy, but effective scumplay. Let's see what BM has to say regarding this.


What's in your opinion the point of doing this as we can't know how many of each roles are in the game? If there is someone who claims snape, why can't BM be another one?

Vivax could you answer this?


I don't think there can be two self-aware millers. Don't see much point in discussing that atm, why does it concern you at this point? BM didn't even answer yet.

Because the OP clearly states there can be multiple number of same roles, so discussing if there are one or more self-aware millers in stupid in the first place.

Anyone who claims miller on D1 should be lynched.

##Vote: Bill Murray

Note that your vote post cites a lynch all miller claims as a policy for your vote.

raynpelikoneet, Do you disagree? This is a 'yes' or 'no' question specifically referencing whether or not you used a policy to justify your initial vote on Bill Murray.




Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 22 2013 17:12 GMT
#764
On April 23 2013 02:06 Vivax wrote:
Hopeless, can I ask

To me, early game:
Show nested quote +

Palmar's explanation for why he gave you a townread doesn't make sense to me and I want to question it. No one is confirmed fuck-all until they flip, but you throw it around based on the fact that they posted in the thread before you. I'd call that as you being reckless. Not scum, not town. Palmar disagrees and has cited some kind of reasoning. I wish to hear it.


About me, lately in big post:
Show nested quote +

Palmar, based on the plethora of information from Vivax's two posts, the first ones in the game, declares Vivax to be unlynchable. Just like that. And that was alright because I felt similar about it. I mean I'd still have an open mind, but Vivax's post did put me onto a townier side of Vivax. My problem with Palmar's post was that he called something really fucking stupid a valuable towntell heuristic.


why first you say my post was null, and then say it puts me on the townier side of things, all the while arguing against the heuristic?

You had two posts that were being referenced. The first was that everyone before you was town. That was nonsense and the reckless part I refer to. The flippant response to ShiaoPi gave me a similar vibe to what Palmar cited.

My issue with Palmar's post was that it did not seem well thought out and was actively putting on blinders regarding your alignment. He supported his read with some throwaway reasoning and it read as sketchy buddying to me. VE pointed out that it is unlikely to come from Palmar, but that's how I viewed it and wanted to see what was up. As a general feel, I can see how someone might believe that scum are more likely to lurk in their qt at first, but...just no. Not true at all, especially in the way that you used it and in the way that Palmar supported your foolishness.

At the end of all this it scarcely matters because Palmar remains on my "look at when he's still alive day 3" list.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 22 2013 17:28 GMT
#768
On April 23 2013 02:23 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 02:12 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 23 2013 02:06 Vivax wrote:
Hopeless, can I ask

To me, early game:

Palmar's explanation for why he gave you a townread doesn't make sense to me and I want to question it. No one is confirmed fuck-all until they flip, but you throw it around based on the fact that they posted in the thread before you. I'd call that as you being reckless. Not scum, not town. Palmar disagrees and has cited some kind of reasoning. I wish to hear it.


About me, lately in big post:

Palmar, based on the plethora of information from Vivax's two posts, the first ones in the game, declares Vivax to be unlynchable. Just like that. And that was alright because I felt similar about it. I mean I'd still have an open mind, but Vivax's post did put me onto a townier side of Vivax. My problem with Palmar's post was that he called something really fucking stupid a valuable towntell heuristic.


why first you say my post was null, and then say it puts me on the townier side of things, all the while arguing against the heuristic?

You had two posts that were being referenced. The first was that everyone before you was town. That was nonsense and the reckless part I refer to. The flippant response to ShiaoPi gave me a similar vibe to what Palmar cited.

My issue with Palmar's post was that it did not seem well thought out and was actively putting on blinders regarding your alignment. He supported his read with some throwaway reasoning and it read as sketchy buddying to me. VE pointed out that it is unlikely to come from Palmar, but that's how I viewed it and wanted to see what was up. As a general feel, I can see how someone might believe that scum are more likely to lurk in their qt at first, but...just no. Not true at all, especially in the way that you used it and in the way that Palmar supported your foolishness.

At the end of all this it scarcely matters because Palmar remains on my "look at when he's still alive day 3" list.


Well, what gave me reason for concern was your motivation behind that attack, not if you were right on the heuristic, cause that (and you also questioning somebody else's townread on VE) gave me the impression that your goal in this game is to antagonize townreads, not argue why somebody is scum, which is something you clearly were doing, and doesn't seem like something a townie would feel like doing, since you would be attempting to reduce confusion about people's alignments and persuade others about them, not trying to keep alive the confusion by arguing over townreads.

Not sure if it was just bad play, since it could easily be scumplay too. But if you want to do something more useful than stopping others from getting townreads, then point us towards your scumreads please.

Yeah, my motivation is that Palmar could have been buddying you and his townread was based on next to nothing. At the moment, i'm waiting to see if rayn can handle a simple yes or no question, but he's my scumread.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 23 2013 12:39 GMT
#1086
Vivax where did your unofficial count come from it looks wonky...

in any case, this should be L-1 on Oats
##Unvote: raynpelikoneet
##Vote: Oatsmaster
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 23 2013 13:37 GMT
#1102
On April 23 2013 21:42 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 21:22 Vivax wrote:
Me and ace are basically the only ones asking people to switch to Oats, others say "can do", others say it looks like a policy, or try to push other cases.

If this was a wagon on a townie, scum could be pushing it easily at this point.
Why didn't any of this happen yet? There's resistance here.

Again, worst reasoning ever.
Cause im town. Yeah.

Hopeless. Why am I scum?

I think you're too trolly in the face of dieing to be town. I'm not even certain you have a scum read on anyone at all. You've provided next to nothing. A shitty list post where your strongest scum read is "well someone has to be scum, why not Ace". gtfo.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 23 2013 15:20 GMT
#1153
uhh according to the official counts, Oats is hammered
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 23 2013 15:25 GMT
#1159
Pretty sure people took vivax's count at face value...he missed getmoript and CC in his count which I really do not understand how that shit happens, nor how I'm the only one that's noticed. Like wtf
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 24 2013 18:32 GMT
#1411
On April 25 2013 03:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Palmar if you at any point flip town in this game and VE is alive i make sure he hangs.

you shall have my axe
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 25 2013 15:41 GMT
#1666
Contrary to popular opinion, reading the OP is actually a good skill toi have
On March 22 2013 20:48 Blazinghand wrote:
Death Eaters

Scum KP is # of scum / 2, rounded down. Scum KP is delivered factionally and cannot be roleblocked. Scum will return normal-looking roles to rolecop checks (ie Scum Vigilante returns Vigilante, Scum Goon returns Vanilla, Scum Framer returns Cop) but with the exception of the Godfather, return Red to DT checks.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 25 2013 21:25 GMT
#1768
Someones bound to point out that Palmar's list was immediately followed up with
On April 23 2013 00:31 Palmar wrote:
notice how I omitted VE.

That's how I feel about him right now.

On April 23 2013 00:33 Palmar wrote:
lazy ve is scum ve

##Vote VisceraEyes


Note the timestamps for reference, he knew what he was doing with that list. However, I agree with VE that Palmar has yet to take hold of the town in any meaningful capacity.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 25 2013 21:36 GMT
#1776
On April 26 2013 06:32 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2013 06:25 Hopeless1der wrote:
Someones bound to point out that Palmar's list was immediately followed up with
On April 23 2013 00:31 Palmar wrote:
notice how I omitted VE.

That's how I feel about him right now.

On April 23 2013 00:33 Palmar wrote:
lazy ve is scum ve

##Vote VisceraEyes


Note the timestamps for reference, he knew what he was doing with that list. However, I agree with VE that Palmar has yet to take hold of the town in any meaningful capacity.

Want some syrup with that waffle?

nah i'm watching my figure..
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 26 2013 17:20 GMT
#2052
Someone read through Sharrant's filter and explain to me how he's all buddy-buddy with raynpelikoneet now. Also who are the two scumreads from
On April 25 2013 03:47 Sharrant wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 25 2013 03:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I'm glad you seem to understand me Sharrant. I feel sorry for you (us) for wasting a good portion of D1.. :/


I'm certainly not sorry for it, I think it bagged us two scum.

Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 26 2013 18:32 GMT
#2067
rayn why is sharrant so cool with you now?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 26 2013 18:51 GMT
#2072
On April 27 2013 03:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Hopeless who is your preferred lynch today?


tbh Sharrant until someone can explain how he gets away from his scumread on you, as evidenced from

On April 22 2013 13:26 Sharrant wrote:
--SNIP--

At this point I am less sure about Rayn being scum than I was then, because his conversations with other players has generally been good since that time, but he's still in my top 3 to lynch. I just haven't decided if there's someone I'd rather lynch more, like say Hopeless.

Any more questions?

On April 23 2013 00:02 Sharrant wrote:
It's a good try, Rayne, but no.

Let's get this out of the way quickly because I have to leave, and there's more important things to do when I'm back.

The reason I looked into you is because of your chainsaw defense of TRN. That fit exactly what I was looking for, so I went through your filter.

I am not trying to lynch you on the merit of you defending TRN, get that through your head. I am going to get you lynched because you are scum. You claim that after posting several times about how miller claims should be a policy lynch, you say that it's not a policy lynch you're pushing on BM. The closest you come to make to a case is "This isn't a miller lynch policy, I'm lynching him because he claimed miller which is scummy" which is exactly the same as saying "No, this isn't a lurker lynch, I'm just lynching because his low activity is scummy". It's just attempting to disguise that you were trying to policy lynch him.

The post I voted for you details exactly why I have you as a scum read. The possibility that you were a townie who made some crazy defense on TRN went out the window when I read through your filter.

If you can't understand that, I can't help you.

Those important things, like not lynching your primary scumread? He doesnt return to 'get things done" until Oats is lynched.

Clarity's spiel about 'easy outs' doesnt look that stupid to me considering how Sharrant's read on rayn went into the abyss with no comment at all. He just dropped his read with no explanation that I can find. What gives?

There's also what I view as feigned contribution. I realize he's posted way more than I have, but when you post
On April 25 2013 01:29 Sharrant wrote:
Is there anyone around who feels like chatting? I don't want to put up any large posts until it's just about daybreak (which I think is in about 2 and a half hours if someone could confirm).


and then don't drop a wall of text in some regard, it looks like faked activity to me. This is also his first post after insisting he has shit to do upon his return, but I cant find these amazing things he's done. He's focused his attention towards clarity, but clarity barely existed at this point. Where are these "better things" sharrant promised?

##Vote: Sharrant
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 26 2013 19:46 GMT
#2085
On April 27 2013 04:22 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2013 04:20 VisceraEyes wrote:
ShiaoPi isn't even reading the thread. He insists that Kush's vote is on me because that's what the votecount says, but Kush is "1 trillion percent sure" that I'm town and is voting Palmar because he agrees with me and BC.


/willing to hammer shiaopi

Srsly, can someone check on what I've asked about Sharrant? Why is rayn a townread to Sharrant?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 26 2013 19:51 GMT
#2087
On April 27 2013 04:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Hopeless i kinda stopped looking at Sharrant when he had reasonable answers to my questions to him at the start of D2, that made me think he is town.

What do you think of Sylencia / WoS?

WoS looks townie enough to me, I havent really analyzed his filter but at a glance I get town vibes.

Sylencia does not, but not strongly enough that I want to consider him for a lynch right this minute.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 26 2013 19:53 GMT
#2088
On April 27 2013 04:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2013 04:46 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 27 2013 04:22 VisceraEyes wrote:
On April 27 2013 04:20 VisceraEyes wrote:
ShiaoPi isn't even reading the thread. He insists that Kush's vote is on me because that's what the votecount says, but Kush is "1 trillion percent sure" that I'm town and is voting Palmar because he agrees with me and BC.


/willing to hammer shiaopi

Srsly, can someone check on what I've asked about Sharrant? Why is rayn a townread to Sharrant?

I don't think anyone but Sharrant can answer that. My opinion is the most biased obviously, as i know i am town.

One of my problems now is that he didnt answer it when given the opportunity when I first asked the question just a couple hours ago. Not sure if he's trying to sweep it under the rug now or what, but I cannot reconcile his actions to a town mindset, it just does not add up. Did I completely miss something in his filter that explains this?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 26 2013 20:02 GMT
#2091
On April 27 2013 04:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I got the impression that he agreed with a lot of my reads when i posted them on N1. Other than that idk.

and yet his previous mention of you was that "I (Shar) am going to get you (rayn) lynched because you are scum".
That doesn't bother you that he just dropped it like it was nothing? Where the hell is everyone?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 26 2013 20:23 GMT
#2097
welp i guess im on shiaopi then

##Unvote: Sharrant
##Vote: ShiaoPi
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 00:54 GMT
#2407
Yeah no one has ever exaggerated in their life, right Ryan?
...any who I need to eat my words on sharrant. My main reason in voting shiao was that I didn't trust sharrant. There is no good reason for him to be scum at this point. You don't suicide your vig into a teammate who proceeds to tear you a new one. I agree with most of the proposed big shots. Ie. Sketch bags on shiao's wagon. Unless shiao is ALSO a vig, he really should be considered town. Depending on flips and such, I'd consider him semi confirmed.

My personal choices for shots is sylencia and stutters. Obviously don't shoot me (herpderp), and I marginally believe wos.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 01:07 GMT
#2411
On April 28 2013 09:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Have i said you have exaggerated? What do you think of WoS straight out lying about him claiming if being in danger of getting lynched/killed?

I think he embellished a tad, that's what I was referring to. I should have been more specific. I can't fathom how scum come to the conclusion that claiming snape is a good idea at this point. KISS = he's telling the truth as depressing as that may be.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 01:13 GMT
#2414
Hey OO, both of those things are D2. Also, I'd say I chainsawed on clarity's behalf than actually defended him. By chainsaw I mean I attacked his attacker. Granted he struck first (and quite poorly on hindsight) but that's where my motivation came from. I got caught up in Shar dropping of his rayn read and tunnel visioned.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 01:14 GMT
#2415
On April 28 2013 10:10 yamato77 wrote:
Hopeless, want to talk about your vote on Oats D1 that I pointed out?

Looks pretty bad.

Yes it does. The epitome of apathy. I policy voted by virtue of troll.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 01:18 GMT
#2416
On April 28 2013 10:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Could you give me an exact quote from Ego where WoS claims when he's at L-1 on D1?

I won't check, but I'll hazard a guess at no I cannot because he didn't? That's not proof that he's lying now, and if you don't understand the falicy in believing that he's lying about his claim based on his "I always claim" I wonder if you are stuck in a tunnel.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 01:36 GMT
#2418
It has been made abundantly clear that miller claims are worth precisely dick. I think his lie was just an exaggeration. I don't think its scummy that he posits that his town meta is to always claim, when you can pull from memory it seems an instance that it is a false statement. I think he is Severus Snape. If he was going to fake claim, why not go whole hog and claim doc or joat or something NOT miller?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 01:46 GMT
#2420
Except if he thinks the truth will set him free. Obviously your mind is made up. I disagree with you. Let's leave it at that , shall we? I'm not a big, I don't know if you are. There is not much more to be gained here.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 01:47 GMT
#2421
Ebwop: I'm not a VIG.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 01:59 GMT
#2423
He's trying to avoid a bullet, not the rope. I get where your coming from but his claim isn't the dumbest thing i could think of. BM trying to push kush outranks wos' claim, but I think all parties are town right now. (You, kush, bm, wos)
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 02:20 GMT
#2427
I'd rather wait for flips but at the moment I'd want to lynch yamato, vig sylencia/stutters, and potentially lynch a vet who will remain nameless because I legitimately don't one which one I think is "faking it". I guess I don't want to lynch VE, but palmar ace and BC are up in the air.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 02:27 GMT
#2429
"He's alive" is all I've got right now.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 02:40 GMT
#2435
On April 28 2013 11:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Actually considering you have yamato as your #1 lynch target, why not just say the vet you are talking about is Palmar? Or do you think yamato/BC are faking their suspicion against each other?

I'm very wary of ace in general and I'm not convinced of any bus shenannies. VE is cleared because I read him as giving a shit, not because of his interactions with yamato.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 03:02 GMT
#2439
On April 28 2013 11:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 28 2013 11:40 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 28 2013 11:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Actually considering you have yamato as your #1 lynch target, why not just say the vet you are talking about is Palmar? Or do you think yamato/BC are faking their suspicion against each other?

I'm very wary of ace in general and I'm not convinced of any bus shenannies. VE is cleared because I read him as giving a shit, not because of his interactions with yamato.

So you think it's possible that Ace decided it's a good idea to let their vigi die and remove 2 KP from their team when he could probably have easily come up with reasons to lynch ShiaoPi over Clarity. No fucking way Ace is mafia.

In exchange for infinite towncred? Fuck yeah. I'm not saying that's what I think happened but he's not confirmed in my mind just yet.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 03:25 GMT
#2450
K I'll be back tomorrow but if nothing pressing arises I'll wait until flips before I get into the thick of things. One thing I'll note is that I seem to be a back pocket option for a couple players and its a little disconcerting. However those players include town reads so that's probably null in the grande scheme of things.

@WoS fuck Rayn's accusations and give town what you've got. If you still get shot you did what you could, right?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 28 2013 03:46 GMT
#2464
Oo I'm not seeing your point. I'm five years old. Explain it to me.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 29 2013 18:21 GMT
#3224
On April 29 2013 21:49 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Sanity doesnt flip on death.

That sucks, lynch shaiopi tomorrow, d2 looks like it was between 2 scum after all.

Where did we learn sanity doesn't flip? I don't see it anywhere.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 29 2013 18:24 GMT
#3226
On April 30 2013 03:22 yamato77 wrote:
HOLY FUCK

LOOK AT THAT

you're so cool yamato. so cool.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 29 2013 18:27 GMT
#3231
On April 30 2013 03:25 Sharrant wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 30 2013 03:16 Stutters695 wrote:
As I've said, I'm in the midst of finals and replacing in was really a mistake. Yet despite that, in my minute filter I've already said more than Shiao. Haven't really looked at giggles.


I'm not sure how I feel about this quote. Stutters calling GiygaS "giggles" reads to me as someone who has more familiarity with the thread than Stutters would. It seems more likely a habit that would be picked up from quickly chatting with people in the scum QT to try and figure out what his best move would be.

Does anyone else get that vibe, or am I reaching on this?

Show nested quote +
On April 30 2013 03:19 yamato77 wrote:
Wondering where hopelesswunder went


I'm wondering where the conversation about Hopeless1der went. You are making me a little sad that I didn't post my alliteration about Ace's actions and accusations.

I got swept underneath the cop claimings and whatnot. I think the best course of action is to verify whether sanity gets flipped and then follow through on CC's claims, pending NK information.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 29 2013 18:29 GMT
#3234
On April 30 2013 03:26 Sharrant wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 30 2013 03:21 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 29 2013 21:49 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Sanity doesnt flip on death.

That sucks, lynch shaiopi tomorrow, d2 looks like it was between 2 scum after all.

Where did we learn sanity doesn't flip? I don't see it anywhere.


Do you think it's scummy he's saying that, when you don't know?

I don't know if he A) got a PM from a mod, B) got it from a QT somewhere, C) its actually in the thread and I'm blind or D)he's talking out of his ass. Its kind of important to know if the information is in fact available in case we decide to for whatever reason lynch a cop before his claim.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 29 2013 18:34 GMT
#3240
On April 30 2013 03:31 Sharrant wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 30 2013 03:29 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 30 2013 03:26 Sharrant wrote:
On April 30 2013 03:21 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 29 2013 21:49 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Sanity doesnt flip on death.

That sucks, lynch shaiopi tomorrow, d2 looks like it was between 2 scum after all.

Where did we learn sanity doesn't flip? I don't see it anywhere.


Do you think it's scummy he's saying that, when you don't know?

I don't know if he A) got a PM from a mod, B) got it from a QT somewhere, C) its actually in the thread and I'm blind or D)he's talking out of his ass. Its kind of important to know if the information is in fact available in case we decide to for whatever reason lynch a cop before his claim.


That wasn't an answer. That was a summary of options. Do you think it is scummy that he is claiming knowledge not readily available in the thread?

Uhhhhh yes?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 29 2013 18:40 GMT
#3244
On April 30 2013 03:37 Sharrant wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 30 2013 03:32 TheRavensName wrote:
On April 30 2013 03:25 Sharrant wrote:
On April 30 2013 03:16 Stutters695 wrote:
As I've said, I'm in the midst of finals and replacing in was really a mistake. Yet despite that, in my minute filter I've already said more than Shiao. Haven't really looked at giggles.


I'm not sure how I feel about this quote. Stutters calling GiygaS "giggles" reads to me as someone who has more familiarity with the thread than Stutters would. It seems more likely a habit that would be picked up from quickly chatting with people in the scum QT to try and figure out what his best move would be.

Does anyone else get that vibe, or am I reaching on this?
.


I called him giggleS recently, and I believe that post was in response to something I said.


Ah, that makes sense. Very well, then.

Show nested quote +
On April 30 2013 03:34 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 30 2013 03:31 Sharrant wrote:
On April 30 2013 03:29 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 30 2013 03:26 Sharrant wrote:
On April 30 2013 03:21 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 29 2013 21:49 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Sanity doesnt flip on death.

That sucks, lynch shaiopi tomorrow, d2 looks like it was between 2 scum after all.

Where did we learn sanity doesn't flip? I don't see it anywhere.


Do you think it's scummy he's saying that, when you don't know?

I don't know if he A) got a PM from a mod, B) got it from a QT somewhere, C) its actually in the thread and I'm blind or D)he's talking out of his ass. Its kind of important to know if the information is in fact available in case we decide to for whatever reason lynch a cop before his claim.


That wasn't an answer. That was a summary of options. Do you think it is scummy that he is claiming knowledge not readily available in the thread?

Uhhhhh yes?


And what is it that makes that scummy to you? I see it much more likely being a town tell. There's the possibility a mafia could make that post, but it seems much more likely to come from town in my opinion.

I don't have the information. He seems to have it and I want to know how he has it. It helps to decide how I want to follow the cop claim chains or if I just want to say fuck it and scumhunt like a normal person. If you think its a towntell, enlighten me. I cannot tell what the fuck you want from me here.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 29 2013 19:33 GMT
#3259
On April 30 2013 04:26 yamato77 wrote:
Mr. CC confirmed telling truth.

No reason to be suspicious that he asked a question about his own role to the host.

hopeless=mafia

coolstorybro
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 30 2013 13:39 GMT
#3575
On April 30 2013 22:27 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
OK so as I have been thinking recently.

We know there is one jailkeeper running around.
We know there are 3 dt claims(one now dead)
We know there is one mason still masoning, and one who is dead
We know we have 1 dead miller and 1 claimed miller(wos)
We know a mafia vig and a mafia framer are dead
We know a second rb happened n1. This means
a) palmar is lying
b) I am lying
c) An inactive town is a jailkeeper and has been mia for all nights since.

Given 2 millers, 1 framer. I find it extremely unlikely that we have two dts who have fucked up sanities. Insane is very easy to prove, as is insane. We know based on checks that obviousone is town, and palmar has a guilty check on him, I know I am town and he has a guilty check on me. Given that we have only been seeing 1 rb since n1 and joats can't rb as a power I am inclined to say Palmar is scum.

We know 100% that shiaopi is scum based on CC however I believe Palmar should be dealt with next at this time.

I pretty much agree with all of this, except ShiaoPi could have been framed so its not 100%. Nevertheless, the correct move is to lynch him right now.

##Vote:ShiaoPi
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 30 2013 13:46 GMT
#3582
On April 30 2013 22:40 Bill Murray wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 30 2013 22:27 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
OK so as I have been thinking recently.

We know there is one jailkeeper running around.
We know there are 3 dt claims(one now dead)
We know there is one mason still masoning, and one who is dead
We know we have 1 dead miller and 1 claimed miller(wos)
We know a mafia vig and a mafia framer are dead
We know a second rb happened n1. This means
a) palmar is lying
b) I am lying
c) An inactive town is a jailkeeper and has been mia for all nights since.

Given 2 millers, 1 framer. I find it extremely unlikely that we have two dts who have fucked up sanities. Insane is very easy to prove, as is insane. We know based on checks that obviousone is town, and palmar has a guilty check on him, I know I am town and he has a guilty check on me. Given that we have only been seeing 1 rb since n1 and joats can't rb as a power I am inclined to say Palmar is scum.

We know 100% that shiaopi is scum based on CC however I believe Palmar should be dealt with next at this time.

...you mean sane?

i'm not going to rely on ___ is town or ___ is scum based upon checks until I see some/a flip(s)

On April 29 2013 10:22 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Hell. I didn't want to claim but fuck I guess I have to now that Palmar is being retarded if he really is another cop.

I'm an Alignment Cop

NIGHT 1 = SHIAOPI INNOCENT

NIGHT 2 = SYLENCIA GUILTY

I wanted to lynch ShaioPi yesterday because I didn't know his alignment despite my check. It would help confirm my sanity. I now know that I cannot be paranoid or naiive, so I'm sane or insane. I'm going to trust Shia is town based on yesterdays events. I am SANE. Sylencia is mafia.

I didn't think I'd have to claim today if I could just case Syl T.T

On April 29 2013 15:58 Blazinghand wrote:
Night 3

Sylencia the Brave Wizard is dead




Night 3 lasts for 24 hours from this post. gogo.


Most likely conclusion:
Mr.CC was insane.

Alternatives: Framer problems. I don't think naivety/paranoia can result in two different checks regardless of framing, millers etc.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 30 2013 13:48 GMT
#3584
On April 30 2013 22:44 TheRavensName wrote:
So random question, if there is only 1 scum, based off the front page does that mean they get 0 kp? Because it doesn't say minimum of one. If so, then we can defently figure out if we have a sk or not.

I tentatively accuse Ace of being SP.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 30 2013 13:51 GMT
#3585
Does Mafia KP have a minimum value or is it possible to have 0 factional KP?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 30 2013 14:33 GMT
#3598
ShiaoPi is at L-1. Hammer with care.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 30 2013 15:19 GMT
#3622
On May 01 2013 00:13 ShiaoPi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2013 00:01 yamato77 wrote:
On April 30 2013 23:48 ShiaoPi wrote:
On April 30 2013 23:47 yamato77 wrote:
On April 30 2013 23:43 ShiaoPi wrote:
yo guys,
kill gigyas, stutters and VE thats the scum team and kush or the cobbler are 3rd party....

What is this supposed to be?


Just leaving behind my point of view, before someone stupid hammers me

Looks like a WifomBomb®


you dont say?
Lets kill yamato too while we are at it

so you're calling three scum, two 3rd parties and a Planar Dragon in there somewhere?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 01 2013 15:13 GMT
#4021
On May 01 2013 16:01 GiygaS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 01 2013 15:55 ObviousOne wrote:
You could say that based on that, him living another day seems pretty



Hopeless

I award you THREE OO-points and may God have mercy on his soul.

I wonder how many times Hopeless has seen that joke. That is a pretty damn good case on the dude though.

Page 80: MUST KEEP GOING.

I aint even mad

Decent work Yamato. It only took you a year to finally put it together. I find it very alarming that no one else has taken the time to actually sit down and explain why i'm scummy up until now, and sadly there arent enough scum remaining for me to accuse the sheep. I'm hoping VE clears me somehow, not that anyone will believe it.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 01 2013 15:39 GMT
#4027
On May 02 2013 00:35 VisceraEyes wrote:
Yamato the Hopeless case is sound.

That wasn't so hard was it?

its still false, but I dont disagree...
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 01 2013 22:04 GMT
#4098
Reasons palmar is likely to flip red in my eyes:

- Eager to look active by declaring Vivax town for a really stupid reason. I've been through this before, as noted by why most people accused me of being scum in the first place.
- pointing out "modkillable" behavior but neglecting to follow through in any form:
(from VE's filter)
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 26 2013 05:52 VisceraEyes wrote:
Something else that really bothers me is that a couple of times Palmar has talked about players who should be modkilled or how HE modkills in his games (like that's pertinent to finding scum in the LEAST anyway)

Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 06:06 Palmar wrote:
On April 22 2013 05:33 getmoript wrote:
On April 22 2013 05:29 Blazinghand wrote:
Marvellosity (and only marvellosity) has been removed from the game for repeated refusal to follow the rules for out of game communication and being a dick to me.

Please keep all discussions of modkills until the post-game.

Getmoript has not been modkilled.


Ok. I'll tell you how it is given BH is being an enormous megalomaniac.

geript and I had a QT made for ourselves, which we have been using quite happily. BH decided that we should use the QT that he made, because he's a power-mad weirdo.

I said we're fine with the QT that geript and I made thank you, and BH is now swinging his dick around, saying we're forced to use a QT that he made, despite the rules saying nothing about this, and despite the rules only having this restriction, which we followed:

On March 22 2013 20:48 Blazinghand wrote:
Hydras:
If one of the players would like to hydra with someone else, that is acceptable. Please inform me. Your hydra can have any name, but the signature should be something like "Hydra of Blazinghand and Ange777 for TL Mafia LXI" so that people know what's up.


There were no such rules for out-of-game communication other than that that BlazingHand just edited in to the rules so that he'd be justified being a douchebag.

Anyway, glhf everyone!!

~marv



tbh this should result in a modkill.

It's super unfair to the mafia that he's allowed to reveal information about the nature of the hydra and how it interacts with the host that results in everyone just assuming they're town.

It's also super unfair to town if they're somehow mafia despite all this.

Show nested quote +
On April 25 2013 05:44 Palmar wrote:
On April 25 2013 05:35 Ace wrote:
Green font it and see if the mods make that info public.


well yeah. In my games you get modkilled for directly asking the host a question in the thread, although I guess I also run my games a bit differently. In fact, what I did, imply that I was going to ask the host a question would probably get me modkilled in my own game anyway.

So I wish I had just kept my mouth shut about it until BH clarified.

thanks BH, for explaining.


But when it comes to actual real modkillable offenses he's completely silent. Like tube's lack of posting for example. Why is Palmar ignoring tube, a player who has made literally one post in the game when Palmar has said the following?

Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 00:48 Palmar wrote:
also being inactive in this game is unusally scummy because BH sent a pm to everyone in the game 24 hours before the game started which required a response to be in the game.

So everyone here is fully aware when the game started and reminded of it very close to the start of the game. So being afk or saying nothing is almost inexcusable.



- case of the cba, even now in the face of the next point:
- Unverified cop claim, which is now thought to be "paranoid". Grats on trying to get BC lynched for no good reason.
- he's alive (so are Ace and BC, but Palmar looks worst of the vets)




I'm going to try to filter through all the players remaining and read dump tonight/tomorrow morning, so try not to hammer me before I do that please and thank you.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 00:29 GMT
#4114
He literally quoted it...can we lynch giggles for failure to read?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 02:00 GMT
#4139
On May 02 2013 10:40 yamato77 wrote:
VE is wrong.

It happens, you know.

I kinda want to say fuck it and watch town burn for this.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 02:04 GMT
#4142
yeah but bashing VE after all the work hes done? fuck you bro
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 02:07 GMT
#4145
But Yamato, I AM town.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 02:07 GMT
#4147
On May 02 2013 11:05 kushm4sta wrote:
hmm scummy response from hopeless I would say. Feeling even more confident about his lynch atm.

kush i expect nothing less from you, but still you manage to achieve a new level of excellence.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 02:08 GMT
#4148
On May 02 2013 11:07 yamato77 wrote:
You don't look town.

I never said I looked town.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 02:11 GMT
#4152
On May 02 2013 11:09 yamato77 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2013 11:08 Hopeless1der wrote:
On May 02 2013 11:07 yamato77 wrote:
You don't look town.

I never said I looked town.

Then how do you expect me to believe that you're town?

because i said so, duh...
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 02:13 GMT
#4154
On May 02 2013 11:12 yamato77 wrote:
Definitely mafia Hopeless.

hold your horses im reading filters right now.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 04:06 GMT
#4169
WaveofShadow
Overall have him as town. A bit in this quote i like
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 22 2013 08:40 WaveofShadow wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 08:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On April 22 2013 08:31 Vivax wrote:
On April 22 2013 08:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Vivax what makes Oats scummy to you?


Mostly meta differences between his town and scum play. You'll hear the exact reasons once I feel like making a case.

Could you see WoS being scum or do you feel safe in assuming he's town?

I'm gonna look more into Oats tomorrow when i wake up.

Atm i'm leaning more onto WoS being town, mainly because afaik he has never rolled scum (at least before this game) and him claiming town in his early post reads out genuine to me. But that being said:
I want to hear more from CC or kush at the moment.

WoS: Why do you want to hear more specifically from those guys?

lol this is a terrible reason for not thinking I'm scum but whatever.
CC because of his scumread on Geript; especially since it was before the 'mod-confirmed' horseshit, I want to see if he changes his mind.

Kush for similar reasons since he threw a vote on geript as well right before the 'confirmation' and right after agreed that this confirms geript as town without removing his vote. Want to gain some insight into his thoughts processes as well regarding his townreads.

Reading carefully and noting something that seems wrong/stupid. Town points from me. Looks like he was suspicious of buddying to me.

I dont think mafia would target amongst themselves like WoS picked ShiaoPi out at the end of this quote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 23 2013 09:21 WaveofShadow wrote:
I didn't say VE is scum. I said an inactive VE is often scum. but I was thankful that he has started posting more because that probably means he's NOT scum and fits with my townread.

Don't put words in my mouth, Vivax.

Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 09:11 Bill Murray wrote:
I kind of disagree, WOS ^

I feel like his case is subjective, where it's largely meta based, and that's the reason I agree with it. I don't feel like he has much objectivity with it... in fact, he keeps saying he's going to be trying to catch the entire team, but I have only seen him tunneling, in general... sorry to overgeneralize

i'll try to be more specific... he's beating a dead horse

Objective was the wrong word to use, yeah. What I meant was everything he says about VE makes sense considering his actions in the games I've played with him, but again there's something in VE's play that has been assuring me he's town...I'll call it a gutread.

If Oats flipped town? I'd honestly be tempted to destroy a lot of the lurk going on but they're probably getting replaced and I also know that's not great right now. As far as 'active' posters go ShiaoPi's attack on a town Sharrant doesn't look great to me. I don't have other strong scumreads atm and am going to have to go through and look if you want more than that.


There is also his miller claim. I went through it already hereish and a bit more in that area of the thread. Ultimately I see it as a townie claiming.




Bill Murray

One of the first to call out Clarity. Kind of flipflops a bit but pulls through in the end.
Also, Clarity with the rage
On April 24 2013 07:35 Bill Murray wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 07:22 Clarity_nl wrote:
READ MY FUCKING POSTS DIPSHIT

not only am i reading them, but i'm reading them in context. notice how i posted MY post on you ELEVEN minutes after? Yeah... I didn't even get to read a page in that time.... and I'm a fast reader


In spite of this, I have BM as slightly scummy. He never actually follows through on voting Sharrant like he said he would just above that flip-flop post I linked above. (in thread)
Going though his filter he jumps to kush-ve scumteam, with clarity as a LAL target and giggles for "parrotting", which is what he accused WoS and CC of in his flipflop dilemma.

He goes on to associate case / omgus rayn with his kush read
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 28 2013 06:45 Bill Murray wrote:
yo

Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 01:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On April 22 2013 01:11 Vivax wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 22 2013 01:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 00:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:

On April 22 2013 00:08 Vivax wrote:
Not sure what to make of BM "claiming" snape like that. If I were to make a crazy guess, he's checking whether the real snape shows up contesting the claim, then say he posted some random shit cause he was drunk (cause that's what his posts look like ). And if the real snape doesn't show up, he will claim he's snape.

That'd be pretty ballsy, but effective scumplay. Let's see what BM has to say regarding this.


What's in your opinion the point of doing this as we can't know how many of each roles are in the game? If there is someone who claims snape, why can't BM be another one?

Vivax could you answer this?


I don't think there can be two self-aware millers. Don't see much point in discussing that atm, why does it concern you at this point? BM didn't even answer yet.

Because the OP clearly states there can be multiple number of same roles, so discussing if there are one or more self-aware millers in stupid in the first place.

Anyone who claims miller on D1 should be lynched.

##Vote: Bill Murray

anyone remember this post? all i said was "sheverus shnape"
i didnt claim ANYTHING
town vivax is wanting to question me
scum rayn is wanting to push a mislynch on a vet
FoS rayn

Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 01:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On April 22 2013 01:11 Vivax wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 22 2013 01:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 00:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:

On April 22 2013 00:08 Vivax wrote:
Not sure what to make of BM "claiming" snape like that. If I were to make a crazy guess, he's checking whether the real snape shows up contesting the claim, then say he posted some random shit cause he was drunk (cause that's what his posts look like ). And if the real snape doesn't show up, he will claim he's snape.

That'd be pretty ballsy, but effective scumplay. Let's see what BM has to say regarding this.


What's in your opinion the point of doing this as we can't know how many of each roles are in the game? If there is someone who claims snape, why can't BM be another one?

Vivax could you answer this?


I don't think there can be two self-aware millers. Don't see much point in discussing that atm, why does it concern you at this point? BM didn't even answer yet.


What concerns me about you on this is the following:
You state that there is no reason to discuss this atm, yet you are giving BM an out in the first place by discussing the matter and saying this kinda stuff:
he posted some random shit cause he was drunk (cause that's what his posts look like ).And if the real snape doesn't show up, he will claim he's snape.

Why are you so eager to give BM the "right" answers if you want him to expalin himself?

attacks vivax when i dont need an out due to the wording, hell, the LETTERING being an obvious joke......
trying to make an associative tell and chainlynch on d1.... scummy scummy scum

Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 01:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On April 22 2013 01:23 kushm4sta wrote:
WE knew that's what VE meant because we are town. Scum prob didn't know what he meant. Now you just explained it to them.

I think that ship sailed already.

this interaction with another scumspect of mine, kush, makes him look awful


im saying kush, rayn, and WoS are maf

how many are left? brb once i find if WoS chimed in on this



Later on, he drop this list where he no longer is so strongly against kush/rayn, but nevertheless...
+ Show Spoiler +

On April 28 2013 07:17 Bill Murray wrote:
Town regime:
Bill Murray
Ace
Palmar
BloodyCobbler
Sharrant

Probably town, not 100% in order:
Grush57
Mr. Cheesecake
TheRavensName
Artanis[Xp]
getmoript
ObviousOne
Grush57

Policy lynches:
Yamato77
Hopeless1der
Stutters695
ShiaoPi
GiygaS

Scum in here:
raynpelikoneet
Kushm4sta
Sylencia
VisceraEyes
WaveofShadow


I want to leave rayn for now. I also want to leave kush. I want to lynch VE, Sylencia, or WoS... preferably VE or WoS, as Sylencia is more of a gutread

His reads are so volatile, and they also have 3 flipped townies (and what I believe to be another 2) in the "scum-in-here" section. Not liking that at all. He could very well just be wrong as all hell (so could I about kush/WoS), but I find that list of his really sketchy.

Lastly, there's the issue of his activity, but who am I to talk, right?




Stutters
On the basis of primarily this exchange, I have stutters as town for the moment.
On April 30 2013 03:41 Stutters695 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 30 2013 03:07 ShiaoPi wrote:
On April 30 2013 02:23 Stutters695 wrote:
Well since the thread has died down, let's try this:

ShiaoPi: You have yet to adress any points against you ever, much less give a reason a single reason why we should lynch a claimed cop over you (except that he's wrong).

So I'll ask you:

What made you drop your suspicion on Sharrant (note: not why you voted Oats, why you never pushed Sharrant in D2)?

You say Gigyas should be lynched for being non-committal, no thread presence, and just going with the flow of the thread. That's awfully similar to your 3 reads throughout the game, none of which you have voted for.

Any explanations or are you just going to say more obvious stuff like "Kill stutters" to try and deflect from yourself again?


LOL

The points raised against me are mostly just inactivity and a fucking cop check which is just wrong.
Besides hammering someone is kind of committal dont you think so? My read on sharrant changed as d1 progressed. Unfortunately I was unable to be active, so all you see is a seemingly total turnaround.
Also I did adress points against me, so you are either dumb and unable of doing reading comprehension or just lying. Dunno why I answer to you anyway seeing that you are scum and should be dealt with fire.
bed time now


You hammered Oats when he was sitting at L-1 for fifteen minutes. Of fucking course he didn't have time to contribute more. I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt considering you hammered a townie WHO YOU NEVER HAD A SCUMREAD ON but if you're just going to dodge answering I'll await your flip.


Other than this, his filter is even shorter than mine and this was the most alignment indicative thing to me.




kushm4sta
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 01 2013 08:14 yamato77 wrote:
Question:

Has Kush suspected any of the mafia we have flipped this game?

If yes, he is mafia.

If no, we can ignore him.

I cba to look at his filter.

I checked, we can ignore him.
Proof
On April 30 2013 09:37 kushm4sta wrote:
I will not vote for shiaopi or cc ever. I think they are both town.


In all seriousness, I had kush as town from when he pulled this gem:
On April 22 2013 00:58 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2013 23:02 VisceraEyes wrote:
THANKS FOR MAKING ME HAVE TO READ THE DAMNED OP BH THAT WAS COOL OF YOU NOT

Sup guys I'm here and I'm very town. So whazzup?


also something i noticed...
i think this is borderline cheating for talking about the PM but I also think it points heavily to town.

and the resulting conclusions that he drew from it. He refused to acknowledge that his reasoning was not town-exclusive in a way that only kush can be oblivious. + Show Spoiler +
On April 22 2013 01:29 Oatsmaster wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 01:27 kushm4sta wrote:
On April 22 2013 01:25 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
On April 22 2013 01:23 kushm4sta wrote:
WE knew that's what VE meant because we are town. Scum prob didn't know what he meant. Now you just explained it to them.


Why wouldn't scum know what he meant? They had to do the exact same thing, the only difference is they had a QT in their PM. They still have to look up if they are framer,rber,godfather or whatever. Literally every person has to reference the op for their role, regardless of alignment.

Yes but it would be very difficult for scum to realize that TOWN had to look at the OP as well.
Scum would not say "oh shit I had to look at the OP" because they would have no idea if town ALSO had to look at the OP.

No, why would their role pm be different from town?

Also sample role pms are in the OP IIRC

Please dont let this become the flavor thing from that game.

Game in question was Acme Mini Mafia where kush thought he was sandroba and could solve the game with flavor claims
.
Also that thing yamato cited where kush busses all the time is something i believe, so thats another point for town-kush.
Hats will be eaten in the event I am wrong on this one.

getmoript
(Not Red)
"Modconfirmed" not scum. Possibly 3rd party, but I'm leaning town due to my read on Ace and the lack of NK's. I guess survivor is possible, but there's no reason to go after him, so leave him be imo.

ObviousOne
On April 29 2013 11:14 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Well if we lynch Syl:

Flips town ----> Shaio confirmed scum, OO confirmed town
Flips scum ---> OO confirmed scum, shaio confirmed town

And one of us gets a check in the end.


I fully believe this. I'm not reading OO's filter to discern his alignment at this point. If I'm still alive in the morning I'll probably give it a whirl to be on the safe side




TheRavensName
Most recent points against Palmar to me show well thought out reasoning as to why his mason role should be a pro-town entity and Palmar's actions are scummy.

On April 22 2013 23:38 TheRavensName wrote:
Rayn your righyt and I want to apologize, that was jarjar and rainbows who said that. I apparently need to pretend that game never happened because I,m still not sure I know lol. Please don't use this crucify me again all day 1 for it even if its more fitting this time.

I feel scum would have verified their accusation, to prevent this kind of backtracking from being necessary.

A decent amount of his thoughts on Sharrant and WoS were in line with rayn, but not in a buddying or forced way to me. Looks natural.
On April 29 2013 06:01 TheRavensName wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 29 2013 05:58 Sharrant wrote:
On April 25 2013 04:21 TheRavensName wrote:
Huh... and Cedric's flavortext lives up to its reputation.



That makes sense as to why this post stood out like a sore thumb to me.

I tried a few imes to breadcrumb. That one just looked the best. Truth be told, I think the host should have written his text different. Hes the only one that is by his name, not his character. Kinda soft confirms another cedric.

This really looks like a 2nd Cedric questioning the FLAVOR of the flip post. Massive towncred to TRN. gratz.




Ace - Serial Poisoner
On the basis of night-action analysis I believe ace is the serial poisoner. It lines up with there being 2 NK's the 2nd night and no further NK's since Ace has been roleblocked from N2 onwards it would seem.

Unless a townie was responsible for grush's death, I consider it a 3rd party shot and given that they are COMPULSIVE, Ace makes the most sense in this situation.




I'm tired and want to go to sleep. GiygaS, Artanis, Sharrant, Palmar and BC to follow tomorrow. I am debating whether to do yamato or not due to omgus bias.


Random Setup Notes:
Remaining players
2 Mafia
Probably 12 town
Probably 1 third party (with KP)
Worst Case Scenario's
Lynch = 11 town - 3 "scum"
Factional + 3P NK =9 - 3
Lynch = 8 - 3
Factional+3P = 6 - 3
Lynch = 5 - 3
NK's = 3 - 3

Theoretical 3 mislynches remain until the game is truly unwinnable for town. This assumes 3P starts firing his lazer. Due to 1NK N1, that almost guarantees there is no SK and suggests we have 4 mislynches minimum due to delayed SP hits.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 04:28 GMT
#4174
On May 02 2013 13:12 WaveofShadow wrote:
I just skimmed through your post and just from what I see here it doesn't look good.
You 'haven't gotten to' arguably the most important people on this list, that is, the only ones who are likely to be lynched today.

Who the fuck needs a townread on me and fucking OO?
We need reads on Palmar, BC, and (slightly less so) Ace but instead you give us reads that don't matter worth a dick right now where the game is at.

Your scumbro is gonna be pissed at you when you flip because you just let us know that we're aimed in the right direction.

i literally went in order of the signup list. Also ace is there already. Finally, if/when i flip town you can suck a dick. I told you I'd get to them tomorrow and I damn well will. Do you disagree with my townreads? If so, why? Process of elimination is a valid scumhunting method especially with a minimum of 4 mislynches available. Anyways I'm going to bed. Night.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 11:50 GMT
#4197
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 11:50 GMT
#4198
get hype guys
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 12:13 GMT
#4201
give him a fucking popcorn TRN, its not like hes not ransoming a baby here
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 12:26 GMT
#4212
If a town roleblocker ever flips, immediately lynch Ace. If he flips SP, I want TRN killed for this shit out of spite. Denying Artanis the opportunity to post his case for some bullshit reason, but still asks him to just post it. TRN took longer to tell him to fuck off instead of giving him a popcorn. No one said you had to like the case, but you already have some bullshit reasons to "ignore it". I'm coming back to you when I'm through with the rest of the filters.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 12:28 GMT
#4214
On May 02 2013 21:28 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2013 21:26 TheRavensName wrote:
On May 02 2013 21:26 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On May 02 2013 21:24 TheRavensName wrote:
On May 02 2013 21:22 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On May 02 2013 21:21 TheRavensName wrote:
On May 02 2013 21:19 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
TRN popcorn will not be accepted because he's a sour grape.

Whatever. Your giving me less insentive to take my vote off of palmar.

That's fine, I'm counting on the rest of town playing to their wincon, one player not doing so doesn't really bother me.

So what happens if you don't get your last popcorn? You going to just allow your case to go to waste?

I'm pretty sure I'll be getting it with this many players in play. If not, I'll post it postgame I guess!

If I was a vigi, I would shoot you for this comment.

And if I was a vigi I'd shoot you and take your popcorn.

he already ate it, that selfish sob
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 12:32 GMT
#4218
On May 02 2013 21:28 TheRavensName wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2013 21:26 Hopeless1der wrote:
If a town roleblocker ever flips, immediately lynch Ace. If he flips SP, I want TRN killed for this shit out of spite. Denying Artanis the opportunity to post his case for some bullshit reason, but still asks him to just post it. TRN took longer to tell him to fuck off instead of giving him a popcorn. No one said you had to like the case, but you already have some bullshit reasons to "ignore it". I'm coming back to you when I'm through with the rest of the filters.

WAit, I was pushing for the idea of him as 3rd party and only backed off when people said we don't have any real proof! Why the fuck lynch me if he flips SP? Especially when you yourself called me town, you know thats a mislynch.

Because it doubles our remaining mislynches so we can afford to off you out of spite
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 12:33 GMT
#4220
Like I still want to win the game. You're not helping by telling artanis to fuck off with his BC case. He just wanted a captive audience.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 12:35 GMT
#4221
On May 02 2013 21:33 TheRavensName wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2013 21:32 Hopeless1der wrote:
On May 02 2013 21:28 TheRavensName wrote:
On May 02 2013 21:26 Hopeless1der wrote:
If a town roleblocker ever flips, immediately lynch Ace. If he flips SP, I want TRN killed for this shit out of spite. Denying Artanis the opportunity to post his case for some bullshit reason, but still asks him to just post it. TRN took longer to tell him to fuck off instead of giving him a popcorn. No one said you had to like the case, but you already have some bullshit reasons to "ignore it". I'm coming back to you when I'm through with the rest of the filters.

WAit, I was pushing for the idea of him as 3rd party and only backed off when people said we don't have any real proof! Why the fuck lynch me if he flips SP? Especially when you yourself called me town, you know thats a mislynch.

Because it doubles our remaining mislynches so we can afford to off you out of spite

You know, perhaps threatening to lynch people for stupid reasons isn't a good idea when your at L-3.

Theoretically L-2 with WoS' vote-in-spirit
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 12:35 GMT
#4224
DAT POPCORN GET HYPE NOW ARTANIS??
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 12:53 GMT
#4229
On May 02 2013 21:51 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 02 2013 21:48 Ace wrote:
On May 02 2013 21:36 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Subject name: Bloodyc0bbler
Nickname: The Cobbler
Profile: Mafia
Future: Lynched by the mob of justice.

At the start of the game, BlazingHand wrote to Bloodyc0bbler:
You're a scummy sonuvabitch aintcha, your teammates are Tube, Clarity_nl, ShiaoPi and some other semi-afk dude lol enjoy



This annoys the cobbler, which can be seen in his first post in the game. A post which announces the tunnel he will put himself in for the rest of the game.
On April 22 2013 13:45 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 22 2013 12:57 yamato77 wrote:
On April 22 2013 12:56 Ace wrote:
so instead of looking at the people currently here, you're waiting for lurkers? awesome plan you got there.

I already said I think most of the people posting (Rayn, Sharrant, Giygas) seem town.

You, on the other hand, are worth looking at.


Mafia is a game about finding mafia not town + waiting on lurkers for more reads? How about you analyze whos already here.

Also still catching up but this is the single worst post ive seen to this point of reading

BC instantly calls Yamato likely scum and calls OO scum for suggesting that claiming miller is acceptable. So far, we've had only one person that claimed self-aware miller and I'm pretty sure he's town. It seems likely that BC wanted millers to stay hidden to give scum a chance for a mislynch in case they get checked. Town players that claim miller are excellent since it reduces from the pool of players that give detectives false information, and if scum has no intention of claiming miller, they certainly don't want town players to do so. It's also an easy way to look like you're contributing. The full exchange between OO and BC can be found in OO's case so I won't reiterate that.

BC, the player who had a strong scumread on Yamato never bothers to truly push him. Instead, he blabbers on about millers as if it'll get him anywhere. It won't, and he knows it won't, but he'd rather keep talking about that than actually having to push his scumread. Why doesn't he do so? It's fairly obvious. Once Yamato flips green, all eyes would be turned to him and his filter wouldn't survive the scrutiny. So he pushes Yamato weakly. Never asks people what they thought of him, just answering questions when people decide to look into the case. And the case is pretty damn awful.

On April 26 2013 05:34 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Ok lets move into the land of posting.

First off let me ask you all a question as you have been active this day. For all the "scum" reads I have garnered why is it only a single player has even pushed an analysis of any sort on me? This is coming from someone I pushed day 1, Yamato. Since then I have see others share the sentiment of BC must be scum. 0 reasons have followed aside from activity. My activity that I stated straight out that I was not going to be around for.

Now we have someone like Yamato claiming we should kill me before I return to avoid ruining town atmosphere meanwhile he has spent the day floundering over his reads, then telling people we should lynch into the ace/palmar/BC pool. Guess what? read his filter for this current day. Find me him pushing anyone on analysis. Show me him trying to consolidate the town on any central lynch. He suggests names then changes them. The only constant is me but he never just pushes me. He is still not actively pushing me. Why? If i am his #1 scum read this game he would be trying to push my death faster and surer than anything else he has done this game day. Instead? He just mentions my name. Read his filter. End of page 5 and on. Tell me where he gives an analysis post or solid read that is based on any substance. Tell me where he tries to prove my original statement of him being scum wrong. He has done absolutely nothing but attempt to blend into the crowd while calling names? Why? Because if I get lynched then he follows me to death as hes pushing for a death on a townie. He knows damn well that he will get shot / lynched on my flip thus is not pushing for my death.

He also mentions we should lynch into the me / ace / palmar group. He never does a solid method of analysis on either just blanket says we should lynch into this group to find scum. Why isn't he attempting to help? Because he knows there are misslynches in there and does not want the fallback on his own head. Why if he also believes ace could be scum why no analysis on ace? Why is the only post on palmar being red a WIFOM argument. Why does he have a vote on VE if he wants me dead of all people?

Simple. Yamato is scum.


Thankfully Yamato's scumbuddy Mr.Cheesecake also jumped out of the wood work. Cheesecake has a 5 page filter. Between calling himself Town, he finds time to quote/post lists on reads that don't count as real town contributions. What has he done on his own? Nothing. He has found the ability to follow Yamato's lead all through the last game day where he agreed with ace on Yamato being bad. Why would you sheep the guy you think is bad?
Why would you spend time attempting to confirm a player as town based on night shots on the grounds of "i don't think scum would defensively jailkeeper" n1. Why wouldn't they? Its the one night you can't get shot. Toss it on one of your goons or powerrole you don't intend on using to create a stupid wifom argument in which town goes "he must be legit"
Says he wants to lynch ShiaoPi yet spends more time in his filter mentioning me as scum than the guy he wants to lynch.

Given the massive level of non contributions while attempting to blend in he cannot be town.

Also, for anyone accusing me for being scum based on my lack of contribution. Please filter dive your beloved Ace and Palmar and tell me what either have done to convince you of being town. Both are "active" while not actively helping the town in any positive way. Since when would Ace base his reads/lynch of the reads of another player. Go read his game history. Ace does the shit ace wants to do and pushes it when town. He is not taking this town by the reins or even actively attempting to lead the lynches. Palmar is in the same boat.


Read this case, and read it thoroughly. It is full of shit. Yamato has created 3 cases at this point and pushed for them stronger than BC has on anyone. Consolidating on town is a shit argument because it's an instant majority game with no deadline so how the FUCK does that make anyone scum? It doesn't, it's just bullshit padding. Then there's a whole bunch of loaded questions he asks and answers himself with no content whatsoever. To top it all off, he adds a second scumspect that he never mentioned before in the same post and finishes the same post off with a defense of himself. he never wanted this case to be looked at. He never wanted yamato lynched. Would this be the case a cobbler makes to get someone lynched? Is this the fear of any scumteam that causes him to get shot N1 every time? No. It's awful, and he needs to die for it.

These are the first posts he made instantly after he posted his case.
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 26 2013 05:35 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2013 05:33 VisceraEyes wrote:
On April 26 2013 04:55 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
why would town jail BC?

I started to reply to this post and realized that I'm making the assumption that there has to be a scum jailer. There doesn't does there?


Why does town have to have a Jailer? Scum having two "rbers" isn't uncommon nor is town not having medics. Setup speculation serves no real basis on how to analyze if someone is town/scum.

On April 26 2013 05:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
EBWOP

Actually given that town could have jailkeepers or medics. not having jailkeepers makes sense given that town has no real need of rbers,

On April 26 2013 05:45 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2013 05:42 VisceraEyes wrote:
On April 26 2013 05:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
EBWOP

Actually given that town could have jailkeepers or medics. not having jailkeepers makes sense given that town has no real need of rbers,

Given the absence of actual RBers it does NOT make sense that scum have zero too. This is the basis of my assumption.

And I'm not basing wanting to lynch Palmar off the RB claim. I think he's scum based on what he's done in the game.


As would I. I am merely pointing it out based on the comment made about "why would town jail bc"

I would want to lynch Palmar for same reasons people would say "lynch bc for" What people don't realize Is i took a firm stance day 1 on a lynch and Palmar nor Ace did. They sheeped.

On April 26 2013 05:55 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Interesting point VE. I actually agree with it as well

No mention of Yamato or Mr. CC, he just instantly jumps back to town sentiment. He doesn't give a shit about actually getting Yamato lynched, he'd be fine with a Palmar lynch, or whoever town wants to lynch, as long as it isn't him.
On April 26 2013 06:00 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 26 2013 05:58 VisceraEyes wrote:
So is there a reason Yamato is a better lynch than Ace or Palmar to you?


Because I feel Yamato is 100% scum whereas the other two could be scum or third party. Of those two I would lynch Palmar first though

This is the last time he mentions Yamato for a long time other than in passing, the player he has a 100% scumread on. WHY DOES HE NOT CARE ABOUT GETTING HIS 100% SCUMREAD LYNCHED?!??!

Anyway, the thread goes on with suspicion being cast upon Clarity and Shiao, two people we later found out were scum. BC's initial response:
On April 26 2013 06:04 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 26 2013 06:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
BC what do you think of the candidates who are/were on the table on D2 besides yamato, particularly VE, ShiaoPi, Clarity?


Clarity has done nothing to change my read of him d1, VE is not mafia in my books and shiao is completely mia thus should be dealt with by vigi's in my books.

People who rarely contribute and spend more time lurking who have no real basis for a scum read should be dealt with by vigi's until they have said enough to warrant a lynch. Of that block you could argue clarity could be lynched, but he is not the scummiest player in the game thus has a higher chance of flipping town over say yamato/cheesecake/ace/palmar

A null read and they should be dealt with with a vigi. No one really cared about getting either lynched. Following thread sentiment, seems legit.

Then, he sees one of his buddies make a bad post. He knows people are suspecting Shiao already. Since he's inactive, he mind as well go for it and collect some towncred.
On April 27 2013 02:53 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 27 2013 02:35 ShiaoPi wrote:
Well, that took a lot of time to read.
Not so sure about whom to lynch now with tube getting modkilled (lol btw!). I also have very limited time during the entire weekend, which is obviously gimping me by quite a bit as I while only be able to drop by shortly during the evening/late night before I sleep.
I am currently torn between clarity and VE.
Going with VE for now because I think it is a good idea to sheep Palmar. Go figure.
##vote: VE
If there are no direct questions to me in the next couple of minutes I'll be off to bed until I can come back on tomorrow at about the same time as right now.


This is your first post I have seen where you look at VE as someone to lynch. Not only do you not provide a reason why you think either is scum you opt to choose who you did based on sheeping?

I am suddenly very fine with lynching you

Buut Shiao answers decently and BC notices that town doesn't want to lynch Shiao, so he lets it go.
On April 27 2013 03:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay that explains a lot. You know sometimes people realize they are arguing with a townie and let go.

Anyways i'm not interested in lynching ShiaoPi today.


On April 27 2013 03:23 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 27 2013 03:19 ShiaoPi wrote:
On April 27 2013 03:09 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 27 2013 03:05 ShiaoPi wrote:
On April 27 2013 02:53 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 27 2013 02:35 ShiaoPi wrote:
Well, that took a lot of time to read.
Not so sure about whom to lynch now with tube getting modkilled (lol btw!). I also have very limited time during the entire weekend, which is obviously gimping me by quite a bit as I while only be able to drop by shortly during the evening/late night before I sleep.
I am currently torn between clarity and VE.
Going with VE for now because I think it is a good idea to sheep Palmar. Go figure.
##vote: VE
If there are no direct questions to me in the next couple of minutes I'll be off to bed until I can come back on tomorrow at about the same time as right now.


This is your first post I have seen where you look at VE as someone to lynch. Not only do you not provide a reason why you think either is scum you opt to choose who you did based on sheeping?

I am suddenly very fine with lynching you

Its 2 am, I am fucking tired and tomorrow is another tightly packed day, this is the main reason for my shortness in statements and other things.
It is of course my first post saying that I think VE to be scummy, since my activity has been terrible anyway. As I am unable to do anything about my current schedule, shit like this happens. Take it or leave it as it is.

I think that the cases and points laid against clarity and VE throughout the day have merit to them, therefore I consider them to be scummy. As they are kind of both equally scummy to me I look on who are the voters on them and what are my reads of them and so on.

The votes on VE as the current time are Palmar and kush.
Palmar is a very high townread of mine and a really strong player in anyway
kush is a nullish read of mine at the moment
--->Strong preference to also vote for VE

Votes on Clarity are:
Sharrant, rayn, obviousone, Ace
Sharrant is probably town
rayn is more nullish but also in the townleaning camp
Their current interactions of being best pals for life is kind of irritating though as it makes the earlier exchanges between them esp in D1 look fabricated.
OO is just not readable to me right now. I have no clue about his alignment, I do know thought that I am fucking town, so his skill in making reads does not impress me.
Ace has the credentials to sway me onto the clarity vote, but I am much less sure of my read on him than on Palmar
---->much weaker preference to vote with them on clarity.

Call me Palmar fanboy if you want but ya


Why don't you discuss any of the other potential scum candidates, why didnt you make a solid post about why you think VE is scum or clarity is scum? If you have time to read, and know you are going to be inactive it seems the logical move as a townie would be to post why you are doing x to avoid being called out on it. Instead you don't do that. Instead you jump in, vote, and attempt to flee instantly.


I did not discuss them as incidentally my strongest reads are on VE and on Clarity right now.
I have a lingering suspicion on Gigays which is weakening to stupid townie currently and I am wary of Stutters, but that is more due to the fact that he replaced in and has not done much yet. Weak argument but he did replace DrH who is usually a very vocal person.
As you seem to disagree with the way I am playing, I just want to say that I am posting about why I a mdoing what, probably not to the satisfaction of most people in the thread when I glance eat the voting thread but that is just the way I do it now. Looks to you like jumping in dropping and vote and running off i guess, but truth is, it is late, I am tired, I do still want to play this game so I am allocating time I could use for sleep to this game in order to not only save towm from a potential mislynch but also to push what i believe to be scum.
You can read that as you want it, but at least to me it is definetyl not fleeing, heck I am here answering to you


That you are which is some points in your favour. You understand where i am coming from though? That I had to pressure you to get information that you should have presented in the first post?

I will let you get sleep but I do expect more from you than sheeping players because "they are good" especially when said players are not doing that much

Backing off weakly on his scumbuddy because it wasn't necessary to sacrifice him here just yet. It's interesting to note how he jumps on Shiao so strongly, yet hasn't commented on Yamato's posts at all in quite some time. His #1 scumread is forgotten. He hasn't even responded to any posts Mr. CC made either, which is another one of his suspects.
On April 27 2013 05:54 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 27 2013 05:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
On April 27 2013 05:43 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
VE I am willing to swap my vote but I want to wait a few more hours on Yamato to actually respond. Because well, if he responds insanely badly I will want him lynched instead / give us required night period to ensure he gets vigied.

I would attest that he's already responded insanely badly.


As would I, however its also selfish as I want to have the night period one I can actually talk if required. If we end it now, I can only ensure being around for 4-5 hours of it at most and thats pushing it alot.

Hold on hold on hold on VE I don't actually want Yamato lynched I just want to pressure him!

So eventually, Yamato responds to the case. BC's response:
On April 27 2013 07:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 27 2013 07:08 yamato77 wrote:
On April 27 2013 07:06 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 27 2013 07:04 VisceraEyes wrote:
Ace why are you focusing on the wagons? Why not outlying voters?


I recognize i am not ace. However I would hazard a guess its this. By focusing on the wagons and clearing them of the mafia on them you end up with a list of confirmed or semi confirmed players as town. IE it does two things at once.

BC, what do you say to my response?

Since you're obviously here, reading.


still mulling it over. I am happy I waited to let you respond rather than trying to lynch you while you were gone however.

Does this look like someone who was 100% convinced Yamato was scum? No. He never actually gets back to it either.
There's one point in his favour and that's that he calls both Clarity and Shiao likely mafia, but he knew they were likely to die. He didn't have enough towncred to prevent it, and he wouldn't be able to save them anyway so he just went with the flow, as BC has been doing the entire game. Following thread sentiment.

So the cobbler has been pretty inactive for a while from here, only making a few posts here and there that essentially say nothing. Thus, VE calls him out.
On April 28 2013 23:03 VisceraEyes wrote:
Problem I see with BC is that yamato's play is genuinely bad for yamato if he's town and I can see BC thinking yamato is scum based on what's in the thread. However I agree that BC will generally take a long-view of the game and produce more targets. What I find most interesting however was around the D2 lynch...when Ace and I were arguing between Shiao and Clarity, BC had nothing to add one way or the other...he was content to just sit, watch and eventually cast his vote.

I'm waiting to see what BC brings to the table D3 before making a judgement on him.

And pronto, BC shits out a few reads on lurkers that would surprise absolutely no one.
On April 29 2013 02:18 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
BC's List of people who should be shot/checked/lynched. This list is created based on many variables. My belief is all are scum/third party given current information pool.

Stutters. He replaced for DrH. DrH made 0 posts and since stutters replaced in he has made basically none as well. He has promised detailed posts that have not come and he defended clarity and attempted to push lynch towards shiao. Without Shiaos flip I cannot say if this was a 100% scum move. However given the flip of clarity + the activity level of stutters and his lack of real involvement while around makes me say scum.

Artanis[xp]. This guy is intriguing. He has since joining the game replacing drazak done a lot of defending VE, made a lot of excuses of "lazy and haven't read up on x players, or filtered my main scum reads" Aside from not being overly helpful in terms of pushing the lynch along or even voting at all. The conversations he has had in thread are very superficial and easily left unnoticed as if hes attempting to be appear active without being active.

hopeless1nder. He has done absolutely nothing this game. His biggest reads are "sharrant is scum" who if i recall properly was one of the first people to heavily push clarity, when his biggest reason for sharrant is scum is based on one specific read he has. He also ignored clarity almost completely as someone to talk about because of his read on sharrant. Given that clarity was also talked about by Ace, VE, and the like it should be at least something he mentions when he votes.

Yamato. I have stated many things about this guy. I am not the only person who has called him out for his performance. Anyone who finds this suspicious or odd of me should more be asking "why does bc still have this guy as a scum read" when the answer is very clear in his filter.

Sylencia. To many weird posts. I can't explain them in the least and they just have a feeling of "off"

On April 27 2013 10:05 Sylencia wrote:
Clarity hasn't been here for 72 hours now .. in which case I'd much rather go for the kill on Shiao today. I won't be around for much today (though I guess you could argue I haven't been around too much), since I'm going to be at a LAN tournament, but I'll try sneak a peek at the topic whenever I can.

##Vote ShiaoPi


This for one is very weird to me. I say this because the reasoning to push the lynch onto Shiao is just weird. We don't know if he will get modkilled so pushing the lynch off to someone else is imo scummy. I also view it as a defense move of clarity. This alone is not enough for me to say scum however when I looked through his filter and found

On April 25 2013 01:28 Sylencia wrote:
CC -
Kush Town
Voted Getmoript due to wishy washyness
Unvoted due to incident.
Leaned towards oats based on effort.
Wants to lynch ShiaoPi
Sharrent Town read
Note: Mentions being town billions of times

WaveOfShadow:
VE Town Read
Voted Getmoript due to answer dodging
Unvoted due to incident.
Becomes a bit suspicious of VE due to lack of posting.
Sharrant town read
Suspicious of ShiaoPi due to attack on Sharrant
Reinforced Sharrant town read

grush:
bandwagons yamato
suspects gigyas due to bandwagon.
a lot of off topic comments

Note: I'm suspicious of grush here for his hypocritical reasoning:

On April 24 2013 04:42 grush57 wrote:
Gigyas

He literally reposts what others say a page later and contributes jack shit to get on a bandwagon between 2 town players, yamato and oats. He also screams scummy through the power of starsenses.


Yet his bandwagon:

On April 23 2013 05:01 grush57 wrote:
I guess I didn't because I'm not sure yet of who to lynch and who would get lynched. I would glady do it though.


When asked about whether he would vote Yamato.

Tube:
???

Drazak:
Has posted, but has never returned since.

Giygas:
Suspected Oats due to attitude and lack of posts.
Hopeless not suspected as scum
Sharrant town read
Would've supported yamato lynch if hammertime.

Sylencia:
Semi-suspected TRN due to the rayn defense provided
Suspects Rayn due to inconsistent statements about miller lynch / scum suspicion of BM
Wagoned on Oats due to lack of town contribution from Oats.

VisceraEyes:
Early on uneasy about Palmar.
Voted getmoript for bad case against yamato (?)
Suspected yamato due to "Oh well you know my posting was INTENTIONALLY bad". types of posts
voted BM due to his response to BC (quote is below)

On April 23 2013 07:51 Bill Murray wrote:
first off, i was just scum with him, and i don't think he's scum this game
what makes the bolded so bad? i don't see it. that's actually when it started getting a more lilting tone, and felt like he was trying to be big-papa-bear, to me


Note: I don't see what is so bad about this post in general, apparently it comes off as antagonistic.

Switches to yamato a few hours later without ever mentioning BM again, despite already getting a response from him and being responded to with a request for an explanation.
Says he can get behind an Oats lynch.
Only now does he decide to actually read yamato's filter. (Vote was originally pure omgus)
switches to oats for original suspicion of oats (2 points above)

Note: Reading the filter and looking at some of the points in context such as the argument for BM has made me feel rather suspicious towards VE.


Now, I will continue going through everyone's filters for their suspicions and other points tomorrow if I am still alive (public holiday hooray), but from what I have seen as of so far, I would like opinions on VE and grush (am I missing something about grush gameplay here?)

Also, I fully know well that filter dive posts doesn't show anything about alignment, so no need to mention that too thx


This is a summary post. It is a very fucked up way to play and imo does not help at all in the slightest. It summarizes some peoples play at that point in the game. The thing that stands out most to me however is that he chose tube. Why would you add a player who has not posted at all as a player to summarize? Given the awkwardness of its structure / how it says nothing new at all I feel it + the previous post I quoted are pretty damning.

WaveofShadow. This guy has been discussed a bunch already. I feel he has to be dealt with because of his claim. The only way I am comfortable with him not dying is if he seriously steps up and plays solidly and gives me a reason to think of him as a miller and not confirmed scum.

Look at this part on Yamato. It's not telling people why they should lynch Yamato, it's telling people "I'm not scum because I have reasons for my suspicion on him!" In no way does this push Yamato in any way, it's just his justification for finding him scummy. So it turns out BC didn't find Yamato's response satisfactory, yet he never bothered to respond to it. Why not? Because he didn't want it in the limelight.

On April 29 2013 09:15 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 29 2013 09:14 Ace wrote:
BC ignore Palmar for now. I've got my sights on yamato and VE. where are yours?


Yamato and stutters. VE normally can't fool my senses this hard as scum. I can see him as 3p but not scum.

So now BC's main suspects are Yamato and Stutters. What did BC say about Stutters again?
Stutters. He replaced for DrH. DrH made 0 posts and since stutters replaced in he has made basically none as well. He has promised detailed posts that have not come and he defended clarity and attempted to push lynch towards shiao. Without Shiaos flip I cannot say if this was a 100% scum move. However given the flip of clarity + the activity level of stutters and his lack of real involvement while around makes me say scum.

He already said that he didn't know where Stutters stood until Shiao flipped. Earlier in the game, he indicated that he suspected both Shiao and Clarity, yet surprisingly Shiao disappeared from his to be shot list. BC has not forgotten about him clearly since he mentions that Shiao is still alive, yet he wants to kill Stutters for derailing a lynch from a person he thought was scum to a person he knows is scum. Other than that, the only reason he pushes Stutters is inactivity. Yet it's his second strongest suspect? Why? And where did Mr. CC go in all of this? Nowhere does BC explain that read evolving.

On April 30 2013 09:59 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
dts already know the checks of eachother. Makes more sense to make mafia wifom and check some of those checks who are still alive and confirm eachothers checks.

That way you can semi confirm eachothers sanities via eachothers checks. It also means its harder for mafia to frame successfully.

Also OO why would I be backed into a corner? I know I am town, I know Palmars check means
1) I am a miller and he is sane
2) I am town and was framed and he is sane
3) He is insane/paranoid
4) he is mafia.

Given that we don't know his sanity, also given that he was receiving a large amount of doubt on his alignment, given that I know I was rb'ed n1 and he claims he was yet we only have one claim of it n2 and that looks fishy as fuck I am more inclined to think hes mafia.

He promised to analyze me and instead pops out with a "im a cop with a red check". Given his experience it was a terrible play and thus again solidifies him as red in my mind.

CC's counter claim was odd given how fast it came out, as was VE's. I would guess one or both of these two are legit dts and the other could be a fake.

Aside from all this dt plotting nonsense I think its clear we have no vigi's and if we have a jack he's holding his abilities back for some reason.


We should still be looking at whos likely scum. Throughout all this nonsense I still have strong suspicions on stutters, artanis, hopeless and until Palmar does more than be a massive troll, hes on there as well.

Where did Yamato go? Why are Hopeless and me suddenly on the list? It looks like he has 6 players on a list and just randomly RNGs which one he mentions next. No justification, no reason why Yamato is missing and why myself or hopeless is suddenly on the list.

What's also interesting is his soft pushing of Palmar. He mentions Palmar a lot in his filter and argues with him a bit, but he never actually pushes for his lynch. It's the same in this post. "Until Palmar does more than be a massive troll, hes on there as well." This is not a push by any means, it just provides an easy scapegoat later. "Look, I did accuse him!"

On April 30 2013 22:27 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
OK so as I have been thinking recently.

We know there is one jailkeeper running around.
We know there are 3 dt claims(one now dead)
We know there is one mason still masoning, and one who is dead
We know we have 1 dead miller and 1 claimed miller(wos)
We know a mafia vig and a mafia framer are dead
We know a second rb happened n1. This means
a) palmar is lying
b) I am lying
c) An inactive town is a jailkeeper and has been mia for all nights since.

Given 2 millers, 1 framer. I find it extremely unlikely that we have two dts who have fucked up sanities. Insane is very easy to prove, as is insane. We know based on checks that obviousone is town, and palmar has a guilty check on him, I know I am town and he has a guilty check on me. Given that we have only been seeing 1 rb since n1 and joats can't rb as a power I am inclined to say Palmar is scum.

We know 100% that shiaopi is scum based on CC however I believe Palmar should be dealt with next at this time.

"Please don't kill my scumbuddy jailer yet, I'd like to roleblock another detective and lynch one before we do that."

On May 01 2013 05:19 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On May 01 2013 05:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
On May 01 2013 05:13 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 30 2013 22:40 TheRavensName wrote:
On April 30 2013 22:31 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 30 2013 22:30 TheRavensName wrote:
On April 30 2013 22:27 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
OK so as I have been thinking recently.

We know there is one jailkeeper running around.
We know there are 3 dt claims(one now dead)
We know there is one mason still masoning, and one who is dead
We know we have 1 dead miller and 1 claimed miller(wos)
We know a mafia vig and a mafia framer are dead
We know a second rb happened n1. This means
a) palmar is lying
b) I am lying
c) An inactive town is a jailkeeper and has been mia for all nights since.

Given 2 millers, 1 framer. I find it extremely unlikely that we have two dts who have fucked up sanities. Insane is very easy to prove, as is insane. We know based on checks that obviousone is town, and palmar has a guilty check on him, I know I am town and he has a guilty check on me. Given that we have only been seeing 1 rb since n1 and joats can't rb as a power I am inclined to say Palmar is scum.

We know 100% that shiaopi is scum based on CC however I believe Palmar should be dealt with next at this time.

Who was the second RB night 1? I only recall seeing Palmar.


Me

Ah I see... Well that works then. Truth be told i think it fits a bit with how hes acted. Even the QT, which is probably kinda eh evidence, would lend to this: He wouldn't want to push a case that isn't being discussed actively as it would make him stand out too much no matter the flip. If he is 3rd party, he could have overlapped a shot with the mafia or taken a hit and claimed Roleblocked to safely explain both. Kinda surprised you didn't mention this before today though like on day 3 when we only had 1 roleblock and people were saying at least one cop had to be fake.


I claimed this day 2 -_-


BC I'm rooting for you to win in the upcoming match! Ace looks way more townie though, but he tried to oppose my ShiaoPi lynch, and verily called him town for two days. I have faith that if you're townie you'll make me see it soon enough. In the meantime know that I'm pulling for you.


Why would I care about Ace in said argue match? He is clearly not mafia in my books. He could be 3p but forcing a lynch onto a scum from another scum when both were insanely inactive and useless doesn't scream like a scum move. That screams like ace liking his lynch choice more than anyone else.

I think I have made it insanely clear that Palmar is scum or 3p at this point. His actions don't make sense in any way from a town standpoint.

So just a while back Palmar was scum until he stopped trolling, and now he's scum or 3p for sure. BC knew Palmar wasn't going to change, he just wanted some time before he actually called him scum. Not that he actually pushes for anyone, mind you. He just continues to spend his time defending himself and talking setup/mechanics rather than actually pushing anyone. A trend he has had the entire game.

BC then goes into inactivity and just posts a bunch of oneliner replies to questions without any real content or purpose. There's no force behind anything. He's playing meek. Oh yeah, remember about Yamato being 100% scum?

On May 01 2013 09:23 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On May 01 2013 09:19 VisceraEyes wrote:
On May 01 2013 09:17 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On May 01 2013 09:12 VisceraEyes wrote:
On May 01 2013 09:10 VisceraEyes wrote:
BC: Palmar or Yamato - who gets the lynch tomorrow and why?



I believe I have summed up before in earlier posts about my suspicions of him no?

If you need a new summary

He has done basically nothing to help the town
He appears to only be doing what he does for shits and giggles
He claimed DT with one red check purely to get me lynched when he knows dts can have sanity issues
He has promised analysis and never delivered
I believe because of these things he is scum


On April 26 2013 06:00 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 26 2013 05:58 VisceraEyes wrote:
So is there a reason Yamato is a better lynch than Ace or Palmar to you?


Because I feel Yamato is 100% scum whereas the other two could be scum or third party. Of those two I would lynch Palmar first though

What has changed?


Yamato is trying in some varying degree so I feel I could be wrong now. Instead of 100% im more sitting on like 80% whereas Palmar's behaviour since just before and everything after his cop claim has just been insanely scumlike. I believe there is a strong possibility of both being scum, however in this case I feel Palmar's play has been far more scummy.

So he's only 80% sure of Yamato being scum now. Given that he named 4 names earlier and Yamato wasn't one of them anymore (me, Hopeless, Stutters and Palmar), that must mean he was more than 80% sure on the four of us. Strange given there are only 2 scum players left.

On May 01 2013 09:32 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Keep in mind VE, I still think Yamato is very likely to flip mafia, I just believe Palmar is going to flip mafia for sure.

HE'S SO CERTAIN YET HE'S NOT PUSHING ANYONE STRONGLY, HE'S JUST ANSWERING RANDOM QUESTIONS ABOUT PLAYERS

Then there's this.
On May 01 2013 09:35 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On May 01 2013 09:33 Ace wrote:
On May 01 2013 09:31 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On May 01 2013 00:36 yamato77 wrote:
The narrative I've managed to work out in my head feels rather conspiracy-theorist, so I'm not sure if I'm right or not. Wishy washy stances, yeah yeah, but it's something I've been thinking about since the syl flip.

So assuming Shiao is mafia, that makes the day 2 wagons BOTH mafia. People that felt there was little difference between them would be largely absolved, in my opinion. What would then be strange were the two people who argued over the two of them, VE and Ace.

As I said before, there is a clear scum motivation in saving Shiao and bussing Clarity, because Clarity was likely to be mod killed anyway and highly inactive. Ace proposes that this lost the scum team 2 KP, and it did, but it actually served to SAVE a scum member, since before Ace's push, Shiao was the one getting lynched. Some time in day 2, people began to realize just how inactive Clarity was, and it became apparent that he was more than likely to be mod killed. So the Clarity bus, assuming Shiao is mafia, is actually making the best out of a shit situation.

Ace also argues in his filter that the scum team would have pushed an alternative target, but people fail to realize that this person was me. Thread sentiment has been against me the entire game, and even the way Ace develops his suspicion of me on day 1 is worth looking at. And on day 2, there is no shortage of referring to me being a possible lynch candidate in Ace's filter.

What adds on to this for me is that his metric for determining the better lynch between Clarity/Shiao is somewhat suspect. Most of it no longer applies, because in knowing that Clarity was scum, and Shiao was scum, we realize that him not voting his scum buddy in the time he was there is not weird whatsoever. The VCA that "scummy people" from the Oats wagon were on the Shiao wagon is also complete bullshit, and I've been over that before.

Another thing is the choice of NK, CC. His check was the one on Shiao, and it was this check that Ace wanted to argue against, that CC was suspicious for his claim and not to be trusted. Later, he goes on to about face once he realizes people are believing CC and plays along with this whole thing, but he's still disruptive in the sense that he wanted cops to check each other, which CC was obviously against from a look at his filter. So with VE complying, and Palmar being a wildcard and under some suspicion, he NK's the cop everyone believes that isn't following his circle jerk plan.

Shiao flipping a scum largely invalidates the largest part of why people should believe Ace as town, which were his day 2 actions with the lynch. When you eliminate that, which is a large portion of his actual contribution this game, his filter devolves significantly, and you're left with a lot of arguing with people and insulting others, along with bullying people for their read on him.

So yeah, Ace could definitely be scum.


A mafia player could attempt to do this, however a post like this is also something I would expect out of a town player as well. Is it the best contribution? No, and do I agree with it? No. However I would say this is actually a "trying" post.


BC stop it. You know beyond a shadow of a doubt that was one of the dumbest posts in this thread. Come on rofl.


I personally find the dumbest posts in the thread are from townies lol. Mafia teams have people to go "don't say that you fucking retard"

I don't agree with the post but seriously its hard to see a mafia making it. However the like 4 - 5 pages of his filter before that are all "im mafia posts" -_-

OO already mentioned why this was noteworthy, but I'll post it again.

On April 24 2013 04:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On April 24 2013 04:29 Vivax wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 24 2013 04:26 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 04:01 yamato77 wrote:
So why didn't we lynch BC?

And why did Vivax apparently post an intentionally misleading votecount?

And why did people not listen to me and not hammer Oats?

And why did Clarity apparently not care that town was lynching someone he didn't want to lynch?

And why did no one decide to listen to the only person who gave a fuck about who we were lynching yesterday?

uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuugggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh


You don't lynch BC because he was right about who he pegged. You don't listen to you because you are scum. Clarity is likely not town thus he doesnt give to shits, and I have no clue why no one decided to listen to me.


Can I ask what your schedule is? It'd be nice to know when you're actually in the game. I guess people didn't lynch yamato cause, uh, you weren't there to provide better reasons or at least motivation to lynch him over Oats?


I am aroundish till 9ish tonight, gone from then till sometime mid thursday afternoon, gone friday morning, gone sat morning and likely all saturday if plans stay as they are, gone sunday morning possibly afternoon/evening.

I am busy. Nor should I have to be around to tell people how to make obvious choices. Yamato has done sweet fuck all. He trolled, spewed anti town shite, and only "contributed" when he was close to death. He calls oats scum then blindly comes out of no where and says he doesn't want to off him, says he wants to off ve for voting oats (which was thread sentiment) then attacks me blindly as well. He has done nothing productive. He has done basically nothing useful. The lynch on him vanished for no reason than oats was brought up as a lynch on shitty reasons.

Towns need to realize how to step back and think about situations.

Yamato and Palmar probably made the worst posts in the game according to BC, yet he just said the people who make the dumbest posts are town. That's pretty... interesting. This game, Palmar is pretty much playing lynchbait for the heck of it, and it's plain as day to see. However, he has a reputation as a vet. The two combined makes it easy for people to push him. Given most of the vets are still alive, it's easy for BC to push into him. A logical choice that, once again, follows town sentiment.

Tl;dr
1. BC has tunneled Yamato from his first post, yet never pushed him strongly.
2. BC's reads barely evolve and when they do, they're never/poorly explained.
3. BC treated the people that flipped scum very differently from the people that haven't, being far more willing to push them when town sentiment shifts.
4. BC's case on Yamato was godawful and looked more like trying to contribute than anything else. No conviction.
5. BC has followed town sentiment to the T.
6. BC spends more time answering random questions than actually pushing his candidates.
7. BC doesn't give a shit about who actually gets lynched, as long as he doesn't look suspicious.

The cobbler is scum. It is time for the cobbler to get cobbled to death.
##Unvote
##Vote Bloodyc0bbler


[image loading]

[image loading]

[image blocked]
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 13:35 GMT
#4237
GiygaS
On April 25 2013 15:59 GiygaS wrote:
My thoughts upon reading the thread:

- VE: is a complete null read for me except for kush's idea of a mafia not thinking to post what he did first. Leaning town for that reason. I'm not behind the current votes for VE.

- ShiaoPi:
This means nothing about his scumminess/innocence, but this may be why he's so inactive:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2013 15:15 ShiaoPi wrote:
screw my schedule :S
/unobs
/in


Anyway, he started off wonderfully by saying practically nothing about the 3 people he's asked about.
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 11:54 ShiaoPi wrote:
On April 22 2013 10:56 Sharrant wrote:
ShiaoPi, at your earliest possible convenience I would like you to tell me how you feel about Raynepelikoneet, TheRavensName, Hopeless1nder, and one person of your choosing.

I'll accept as low as one sentence on the first 3, but whoever you choose I'd like you to write something of decent size about.

Raynepelikoneet: Nothing to see here.
TheRavensName: Just some noobing around.
Hopeless1nder: Also nothing of note here.


Then accuses Sharrant, who seems to be target #1 for both main suspects at the moment (I'm not counting VE cause I think it's a stupid lynch). He proceeds to hammer Oats for "being silly", when it would have been sound to wait for the hammer, so we could at the very least get more info out of Oats before he got lynched.

And now he's sort of gone. From what we've seen so far, I'm gonna say he's scum.

- Clarity:
I'd like to point out this:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 11:27 Clarity_nl wrote:
And more.... Not even indicating any read, just asking for reads from another player.
More of this:
On April 22 2013 11:28 Sharrant wrote:
Oatsmaster, who are your top 2 lynch candidates today and why?

On April 22 2013 11:30 Sharrant wrote:
Also, same thing with Yamato, which two people would you lynch right now?


This was one of Clarity's point's on Sharrant. At the time, Yamato and Oats were the top two candidates for the lynch. This isn't just reaching so that the post looks larger, this is straight up wrong, and was something that Sharrant was actually doing properly.

The other thing about him was that he supposedly lied about when he was catching up with the thread and was too quick reading. I don't think this really makes him particularly scummy, and a town or mafia could do the exact same thing. Leaning Scummy for others' reasons as well as that top post, but not for his "record-setting reading prowess". Scummy, but not as much as ShiaoPi.

- Ace:
People are saying he's scum because he's not been playing very well, and it's outside of his meta or something, so I decided to look through his filter.

- Was one of or the first to point out the obvious thing that maybe, just maybe, Bill Murray wasn't actually claiming.
- Something I noticed on day 1 is he seemed to not really react to posts for a while unless he was directly spoken to/about, or if there was an opportunity for a meme.
- Voted Yamato with little reasoning. He doesn't actually give much reasoning for much unless asked on. Could be a playstyle thing like he says though.
- Likes the oats cases, but provides reasoning for it.
- Found a contradiction here:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 06:03 Ace wrote:
oh ok. Infinite days are possible. Ignore the part about wasting our time then, even though you still need a more convincing case than "he plays different from this one time I saw him". That's just utter bullshit and won't convince anyone. No effort at all.

Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 06:37 Ace wrote:
To all you people lurking the thread lets get some consensus going. Right now I've got my vote on yamato but Vivax's case on Oats looks like an even better lynch. These are our top two suspects at the moment and imo, our best 2. do not stall these fucking wagons unless you've got a really good case of your own. Else wise the discussion should be focused on these two for now. Arguments for/against either of them will be greatly appreciated.

He wants us to take our time, and then really pushes hard for an oats/yamato hammer from there.
- But other than day 1, he's been town in my eyes. More recently, he's been contributing valuable info and insight. For that reason, I've got a null read on him.

Going to bed now, will try and keep updated with my phone throughout the day tomorrow.

He's just so goddamn right it gives me chills. He waffles a bit between scum(a) and scum (b) when there was reasonable suspicion to be had in pursuing WoS. Instead we get
On April 27 2013 07:57 GiygaS wrote:
WoS: To be honest, I was sort of sheeping CC, and Rayne. Most of my reads are the same, and so I thought the case on WoS must have been solid. It's not. It's basically he's blending and not providing reads D1. Guess what, that's changed today, and I'm switching my read on him from mafia to town.

Promises a re-read, does it, changes his outlook. I see him giving thoughts freely in his filter despite lowish activity. I hope he finds more time for the game but I'd say hes town.




Artanis[Xp]
On April 24 2013 06:57 tube wrote:
Where's drazak?
Inactivity should be pushed.

Tube looking for an easy target.

On April 28 2013 06:06 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 28 2013 06:05 Blazinghand wrote:
On April 28 2013 05:44 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Nice. Was expecting this to be honest due to host leniency on the inactivity and the fact that one scum already got modkilled.


everyone gets one warning regardless of alignment

Ah, I missed the warning for Tube in the daypost. I thought he didn't get a warning, nevermind then.

Looked sincere.

His self-proclaimed apathy for replacing in and not catching up is a point for being Null. I dont see that as something to lie about or try to hide behind. Cutting that aspect of his game out and of course reading his epic case on BC, Artanis is strongly town to me by virtue of tube association.




Sharrant
Strongest points for townie
- Destroyed mafia vigilante
- Strong activity early on.

Strongest points for mafia
- He's disappeared from active discussion of late. I'm attributing this to cop claim stress.

I feel like hes wrong on a massive portion of his filter, but not in a scummy way because his reasoning is laid out in most cases.




Palmar vs BC
On May 02 2013 07:04 Hopeless1der wrote:
Reasons palmar is likely to flip red in my eyes:

- Eager to look active by declaring Vivax town for a really stupid reason. I've been through this before, as noted by why most people accused me of being scum in the first place.
- pointing out "modkillable" behavior but neglecting to follow through in any form:
(from VE's filter)
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 26 2013 05:52 VisceraEyes wrote:
Something else that really bothers me is that a couple of times Palmar has talked about players who should be modkilled or how HE modkills in his games (like that's pertinent to finding scum in the LEAST anyway)

Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 06:06 Palmar wrote:
On April 22 2013 05:33 getmoript wrote:
On April 22 2013 05:29 Blazinghand wrote:
Marvellosity (and only marvellosity) has been removed from the game for repeated refusal to follow the rules for out of game communication and being a dick to me.

Please keep all discussions of modkills until the post-game.

Getmoript has not been modkilled.


Ok. I'll tell you how it is given BH is being an enormous megalomaniac.

geript and I had a QT made for ourselves, which we have been using quite happily. BH decided that we should use the QT that he made, because he's a power-mad weirdo.

I said we're fine with the QT that geript and I made thank you, and BH is now swinging his dick around, saying we're forced to use a QT that he made, despite the rules saying nothing about this, and despite the rules only having this restriction, which we followed:

On March 22 2013 20:48 Blazinghand wrote:
Hydras:
If one of the players would like to hydra with someone else, that is acceptable. Please inform me. Your hydra can have any name, but the signature should be something like "Hydra of Blazinghand and Ange777 for TL Mafia LXI" so that people know what's up.


There were no such rules for out-of-game communication other than that that BlazingHand just edited in to the rules so that he'd be justified being a douchebag.

Anyway, glhf everyone!!

~marv



tbh this should result in a modkill.

It's super unfair to the mafia that he's allowed to reveal information about the nature of the hydra and how it interacts with the host that results in everyone just assuming they're town.

It's also super unfair to town if they're somehow mafia despite all this.

Show nested quote +
On April 25 2013 05:44 Palmar wrote:
On April 25 2013 05:35 Ace wrote:
Green font it and see if the mods make that info public.


well yeah. In my games you get modkilled for directly asking the host a question in the thread, although I guess I also run my games a bit differently. In fact, what I did, imply that I was going to ask the host a question would probably get me modkilled in my own game anyway.

So I wish I had just kept my mouth shut about it until BH clarified.

thanks BH, for explaining.


But when it comes to actual real modkillable offenses he's completely silent. Like tube's lack of posting for example. Why is Palmar ignoring tube, a player who has made literally one post in the game when Palmar has said the following?

Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 00:48 Palmar wrote:
also being inactive in this game is unusally scummy because BH sent a pm to everyone in the game 24 hours before the game started which required a response to be in the game.

So everyone here is fully aware when the game started and reminded of it very close to the start of the game. So being afk or saying nothing is almost inexcusable.



- case of the cba, even now in the face of the next point:
- Unverified cop claim, which is now thought to be "paranoid". Grats on trying to get BC lynched for no good reason.
- he's alive (so are Ace and BC, but Palmar looks worst of the vets)



Reasons for BC to be scum:
See Artanis' case.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 13:39 GMT
#4239
I didnt really do BC or Palmar properly. I need to step out for a while so I'll try to be back in a few hours. I'll also try to read through Yamato when I'm back.

In case I die, my tl;dr

Ace - Serial Poisoner
I'm confident at least 1 scum lies within BC, BM and Palmar. I'd probably lynch in that order right now.
If thats not game over, I'd consider looking into Sharrant, TRN and Yamato next.


##Vote: BloodyC0bbler


On May 02 2013 11:49 Ace wrote:
hopeless claim before hammer

I am but one of the simple wizard people, dear reader. I would not personally believe myself to be "Brave" and yet that is the title that was bestowed upon me by the great and all powerful Blazinghand.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 16:05 GMT
#4284
On May 03 2013 00:53 yamato77 wrote:
Then unless there's a second scum vigilante, Ace is SP.

yeah but if we have a jk he can wait
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 17:17 GMT
#4295
Where's palmars list of reads he promised?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 18:09 GMT
#4301
On May 03 2013 03:04 getmoript wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2013 03:04 geript wrote:
Ok, so why doesn't town vig claim so we can avoid lynching Ace. If no vig claim then lynch Ace. That works too I guess.

fucking failure at running on hydra

because hes not a threat while he can be continuously jailed
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 19:32 GMT
#4313
why the fuck is ace in that list?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 19:35 GMT
#4315
On May 03 2013 04:34 yamato77 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2013 04:32 Hopeless1der wrote:
why the fuck is ace in that list?

Should I care with which order I lynch anti-town elements in this game?

Yes considering Ace's KP is controlled atm
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 19:45 GMT
#4317
On May 03 2013 04:42 yamato77 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2013 04:35 Hopeless1der wrote:
On May 03 2013 04:34 yamato77 wrote:
On May 03 2013 04:32 Hopeless1der wrote:
why the fuck is ace in that list?

Should I care with which order I lynch anti-town elements in this game?

Yes considering Ace's KP is controlled atm

Only if you assume the JK plays along with our plan, and mafia doesn't already know who he is. If I can figure it out, I'm sure they aren't that stupid.

which means you lynch ace when the jailer dies, its not rocket science.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 19:47 GMT
#4318
Also, you cant rb factional KP so there is literally no better target than Ace based on the night actions we've witnessed. Aside from fucking with TRN (can you even block mason targets?) who else do you block? Bear in mind that if you try to "defend" the mafia NK, 3P hits the following night.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 19:53 GMT
#4320
Yeah except its not over and we have guaranteed kp reduction in not lynching Ace.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 20:47 GMT
#4342
I'm pretty sure you fuckers hammered me.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 20:48 GMT
#4345
oh well nvm then
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 20:53 GMT
#4351
On May 03 2013 05:03 Palmar wrote:
I didn't promise a case. I just said I wanted to get my thoughts out before I died.

I cba if you're actually not going to kill me. Gonna play some dota instead.

also it's scummy to think I'm scum at this point.

What the fuck is this i dont even..

More random shit for why Palmar is scum. From my reading of WoS' filter:
On April 27 2013 07:31 WaveofShadow wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2013 07:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:
My question remains. Why does ShiaoPi think Palmar is supertown and VE is scum when his reasons for VE being scum point at least as much, if not even more, to Palmar being scum.

Lazy town could very well answer that question, which is think the best overall countercase to Shiao's scumminess thus far, but it's not enough to convince me. Would be nice to hear more from Shiao himself or again, Clarity.


Furthermore, he wants us to
On May 03 2013 05:04 Palmar wrote:
also, assuming ace is 3p, can someone like explain to me why it's a bad idea to just lynch him so the JK is free to try to counter the mafia nightkill?

This is straight up wrong, to the point that I want to flip Palmar before anyone else now.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 20:55 GMT
#4354
##Unvote: BloodyC0bbler
##Vote: Palmar


Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 21:06 GMT
#4362
Why is Palmar being allowed to sit back and watch the town burn?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 21:10 GMT
#4371
Palmar->BC->Yamato-> (Ace)
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 21:16 GMT
#4375
I tried that argument, its not working
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 21:30 GMT
#4384
On May 03 2013 06:28 WaveofShadow wrote:
I've answered this before, but as Sharrant seems to advocate, 'patience and repetition.'
I find Hopeless scummier and want him dead today. I am not as sure of BC being a good lynch as I am of Hopeless.

well then you're bad at this game. grats.
P.S. I was the only person to believe your miller claim because I actually apply critical thinking to the context of things. The fact that you still think I'm scum is astounding.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 21:31 GMT
#4385
On May 03 2013 06:30 kushm4sta wrote:
yamatooo whyyyy the lynch is so close??
are you doubting hopeless scum?

kush don't kid yourself you never believed i was scum to begin with



Also,
##Unvote: Palmar
##Vote: BloodyC0bbler
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 21:34 GMT
#4387
On May 03 2013 06:32 kushm4sta wrote:
um i believed you were scum from the beginning of the game. then I forgot because I stopped paying attention for a little bit. Now I've remembered.

remember these words?
Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 01:32 kushm4sta wrote:
On April 22 2013 01:31 VisceraEyes wrote:
How about we stop trying to use the role PM to discern alignments KTHX

I already did though!
VE town
CC town
Hopeless scum

SO WISE

you didnt believe that then and you dont believe it now.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 21:36 GMT
#4390
On May 03 2013 06:35 kushm4sta wrote:
are you trying to use jedi mind tricks because they aren't working

thats because im a wizard, harry.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 21:42 GMT
#4394
On May 03 2013 06:41 WaveofShadow wrote:
Hopeless you want Palmar lynched today? How exactly do you plan on making that happen?

haha you're funny. Me get something done. Where's Ace with some primo meme's when I need him.

Lynch whoever the fuck, my votes parked on BC unless I get to hammer someone that isnt me
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 21:53 GMT
#4399
On May 03 2013 06:51 WaveofShadow wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2013 06:42 Palmar wrote:
On May 03 2013 06:22 WaveofShadow wrote:
On May 03 2013 06:21 Palmar wrote:
also, for anyone thinking BM is scum I have a pretty damn strong town read on him. I had to filter him and read back on past games in PYP mafia, and I ended up making a short case on him day since he was mafia.

Then when this game started I noticed a completely different BM playing, so I'm almost certain he is not scum.

Totally useful, thanks Palmar.


Do you sincerely think this information is not useful?

Don't be facetious; you know exactly what I meant. That information is completely irrelevant at a point in time where we're trying to figure out who to lynch for the dayn and BM hasn't been around in 60 hours. Probably gonna get modkilled too.


[image blocked]
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 22:02 GMT
#4401
Why is that information useless? You've decided to equate all my filter diving to meaningless drivel be caused I failed to call everyone scum. Learn how totthink about what Information is valuable instead of insisting on having clear cut scumreads all the time.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 22:42 GMT
#4403
I changed my mind, Palmar is right we should lynch ace
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 23:04 GMT
#4405

On May 03 2013 05:04 Palmar wrote:
also, assuming ace is 3p, can someone like explain to me why it's a bad idea to just lynch him so the JK is free to try to counter the mafia nightkill?


I was completely wrong in my initial reaction to this. We're going to have to lynch Ace at some point, right? Unless you think Mafia are going to be doing us any favors it is in our best interest to lynch Ace right the fuck now. Mafia KP is already as low as it will be until the end of the game. We also can't kill 2 mafia in one night, thereby removing mafia factional KP. Therefore it is most beneficial to town to remove the 3P ASAP and attempt to WIFOM the factional KP with our jailkeeper.

##Unvote: BloodyC0bbler
##Vote: Ace
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 23:05 GMT
#4407
On May 03 2013 08:02 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Lynching Ace is dumb as long as we can roleblock him. We can't roleblock scum KP, we can roleblock poisoner KP so we'd have no use for the JK power anyway once Ace is dead. He's no threat to us until then.
Lynch Hopeless or BC. I prefer BC because Hopeless is nice and BC doesn't give a shit. Calls me confirmed scum then fucks off after a short back and forth. Calls my case shit when his case on Yamato was far shittier. Never bothers to actually do anything other than defend himself and throw some mild accusations around with no conviction.
Pls lynch.

We can protect townies with the Jailer.

Lynch Ace:
Theoretically PERFECT game by both blocking the shot and lynching scum twice in a row

Don't Lynch Ace, Jail him instead
Guaranteed town deaths.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 02 2013 23:06 GMT
#4409
On May 03 2013 08:06 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Actually the JK could possibly protect town and get us extra days, hmm.

I thought the same as you at first, it clicked so when I posted "Palmar was right" (all along?).
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 03 2013 14:52 GMT
#4466
On May 03 2013 23:07 Sharrant wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 03 2013 22:36 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Guys. Seriously, there isn't a second scum vigi because I seriously doubt scum would have the balls to save their vigi for D5, and they've already had 3 strong power roles flip including a vigi. The setup would be pretty rediculously scum favoured if there was another scum vigi when town gets none.

Ace is confirmed 3rd party. Lynching him frees up our JK, which means he can protect townies rather than stop Ace from firing which means we get potentially more days and forces scum to guess who won't get protected so they can't shoot who they want to without risk.

Lynch Ace
I'm just going to afk now until Ace is lynched, unless someone actually brings up something I've missed which I highly doubt.


How can you be so bad at reading? How many times have I explained it now. If scum have a second vigi they fired it on night 2. It would look exactly like Ace was the serial poisoner. HOW MANY TIMES HAS THIS BEEN SAID? Honestly, it's so frustrating.

Lynching Ace right now gives the mafia an extra kill that we only have a chance to block, this isn't including things like a jail keeper may jail a doctor if we have one which means we potentially waste a lynch AND gain nothing for it.

I want to lynch Hopeless, and then if he flips red, you hang next. That should be all the mafia, then Ace can die.

If Hopeless isn't mafia, I'll look into everyone else again, but you're defending him by pushing the lynch off of him, giving mafia an extra night's worth of kills.

That's why I ninja voted Hopeless. If you're not mafia, Hopeless, I'm sorry. But Artanis is doing a good job of making you look like you are.

I can't blame you entirely because I believed it was better to hold off on Ace at first, but it is the most beneficial to town to kill him off ASAP. Get your shit together.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 03 2013 15:00 GMT
#4470
On May 03 2013 23:58 Stutters695 wrote:
Looking at it objectively. We're 5 lynches from LYLO and in those 5 lynches we must hit at least 1 scum (assuming ace is sp). If at any point the jk gets nk'd we must instantly lynch ace to keep LYLO timing on our side. Planning worst case it seems much better to get ace out of the way since he will tie up a lynch regardless but unless the jk makes 2 successful saves it doesn't affect our lynch count anyway. I'm surprised this push on ace happened without really mapping it out.

If you kill Ace now, the JK has the potential to protect townies 100% the rest of the game. Leaving Ace alive GUARANTEES town deaths (2nd doc/jk notwithstanding)
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 03 2013 18:23 GMT
#4539
Kinda want to lynch stutters for fucking that up. BH, me and strongandbig were "claimed-ish" blues in WLIIA (strongandbig fake-claimed).

but "BC's play was similar". Whatever....honestly I'd rather BC had said nothing and watched what stutters followed up with.

As to that supposed TRN case I'm supposed to make, I stand by my filter dump portion:
TheRavensName
Most recent points against Palmar to me show well thought out reasoning as to why his mason role should be a pro-town entity and Palmar's actions are scummy.

Show nested quote +
On April 22 2013 23:38 TheRavensName wrote:
Rayn your righyt and I want to apologize, that was jarjar and rainbows who said that. I apparently need to pretend that game never happened because I,m still not sure I know lol. Please don't use this crucify me again all day 1 for it even if its more fitting this time.

I feel scum would have verified their accusation, to prevent this kind of backtracking from being necessary.

A decent amount of his thoughts on Sharrant and WoS were in line with rayn, but not in a buddying or forced way to me. Looks natural.
Show nested quote +
On April 29 2013 06:01 TheRavensName wrote:
On April 29 2013 05:58 Sharrant wrote:
On April 25 2013 04:21 TheRavensName wrote:
Huh... and Cedric's flavortext lives up to its reputation.



That makes sense as to why this post stood out like a sore thumb to me.

I tried a few imes to breadcrumb. That one just looked the best. Truth be told, I think the host should have written his text different. Hes the only one that is by his name, not his character. Kinda soft confirms another cedric.

This really looks like a 2nd Cedric questioning the FLAVOR of the flip post. Massive towncred to TRN. gratz.


My reads are still thus:

I'm confident at least 1 scum lies within BC, BM and Palmar. I'd probably lynch in that order right now.
If thats not game over, I'd consider looking into Sharrant, TRN and Yamato next.

Still probably in that order.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 04 2013 00:19 GMT
#4605
On May 04 2013 09:12 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Is there anyone that still thinks Hopeless is town?

Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 04 2013 01:05 GMT
#4608
On May 04 2013 09:31 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 04 2013 09:19 Hopeless1der wrote:
On May 04 2013 09:12 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Is there anyone that still thinks Hopeless is town?


I'm guessing this is a scumclaim?

I'm town you jerkface.

On May 04 2013 09:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 04 2013 09:09 yamato77 wrote:
On May 03 2013 05:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On May 03 2013 04:20 yamato77 wrote:
Well, it's painfully obvious to me that we should just RNG between Ace/Hopeless/BC and insta-lynch them.




List Randomizer

There were 3 items in your list. Here they are in random order:

Hopeless
Cobbler
Ace
Timestamp: 2013-05-02 19:20:03 UTC




Random.org has spoken. We lynch Hopeless.


You are advocating me (i know I am town) and Ace who is either 3p or town, and hopeless who given the context of the last few pages could easily be town or mafia.

However Given I know you don't give two shits now about finding scum in any logical manner and have been trying to get Ace lynched first off this list (because he might be 3rd off a ton of wifom bullshit).

You go first. No town member should be advocating a potential 3rd party player when we have mafia still alive. Especially when said potential third party has been pushing mafia lynches a fair bit this game. The only one who would give two shits about mafia dying quickly is rita skeeter as she wins if the game ends on any sides victory.

Plain and simple you are mafia. I cannot believed I have waffled so much about this all game.

Read this post against and tell me just how much like bullshit it sounds.

Completely ridiculous.


How about you do what Palmar and I are doing? You know, trying to solve the game before we die. Cause he and I are both operating on the we get noosed. How about you do the same and work with us?

I did this before it was cool. Its fine though.

12-2 right now, assuming 2 mafia and no remaining 3rd party. At the very least I feel safe assuming 1KP per night

Upon day post:
11-2

Assuming fail-town / the purging, through successive nights we'll have
Lynch+NK =9-2
Lynch+NK =7-2
Lynch+NK =5-2
Lynch+NK =3-2

i.e. 4 mislynches until LYLO

Supposing Palmar/BC get their shit together and at least one of them is town, I have no problem taking up a cell in Azkaban.

Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 04 2013 12:50 GMT
#4614
so is the conclusion that mafia defensively jailed N2 and didnt claim?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 04 2013 16:38 GMT
#4620

I'm confident at least 1 scum lies within BC, BM and Palmar. I'd probably lynch in that order right now.
If thats not game over, I'd consider looking into Sharrant, TRN and Yamato next.


##Vote: BloddyC0bbler

For the record, do you honestly think there was a way out of Palmar's proposed 1-2 punch other than "well gosh that sounds swell"...

/afk
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 04 2013 16:39 GMT
#4621
Also Happy TL birthday Sharrant
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 04 2013 17:23 GMT
#4632
On May 05 2013 02:17 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Hopeless, is there anything you still want to say this cycle? If you are in fact town it'll be nice to have your updated reads. Anything new since your last read post?

I find giggles' lack of followup on his promised reads disconcerting. Palmar/BC dont seem to have covered him either...
On May 04 2013 08:03 GiygaS wrote:
Jesus, BC, Palmar and BM when they work together is scary good. I still think all of you are town for your pushes on Clarity on Day/Night 1. I agree with most of your guys' thoughts, and think that Hopeless should be tomorrow's lynch as well.

This is really sheepy and unsubstantial.


Aside from that my reads havent changed, and giggles is only a blip on my radar now. If I haven't convinced anyone I'm town, I'm not going to start now. I continue to stand by my lynch order as previously stated.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 05 2013 16:36 GMT
#4739
You'll note the stagnating day. Some might attribute that to it being the weekend. Others to general apathy. I'd partially attribute it to the fact that scum neither want to push my lynch nor suggest another.

What are you guys waiting for exactly? If you think im scum hurry up and lynch me already so you can actually start playing the game again. I'd guess at 5 people who essentially showed up strictly to vote me and fucked off. They can't all be scum, so this game is very trivial right now until you start looking into these questionable actions.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 06 2013 20:38 GMT
#4930
On May 07 2013 02:08 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2013 02:07 yamato77 wrote:
On May 07 2013 02:04 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On May 07 2013 02:00 yamato77 wrote:
On May 07 2013 01:57 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
On May 07 2013 01:55 yamato77 wrote:
Idk dude, it seems like your plan is designed to keep Palmar alive rather than actually figure out his true alignment.

He claims to have an information role.
I wish for him to live another day to acquire said information.
...this is scummy how?

Because the information it supposedly gains us is only useful if he's town, and it's not even necessarily that useful in the first place.

Yes, and there's no downside to letting him live for a day more to have a practically confirmed BC in case he IS town. When Palmar flips and he flips green BC is in a whole lotta shit. If we confirm he's insane and not paranoid and he flips cop then we might not actually end up killing BC, saving us a potential mislynch.
On May 07 2013 02:01 yamato77 wrote:
On May 07 2013 01:58 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Also if I'm scum with Palmar why the hell would I want you off the table when Hopeless flips town?

So you look good when everyone else decides to lynch me?

Fair point, but I won't let you get lynched.

I'll have to mull it over.

I guess I'm fine with killing off Hopeless today, but something feels off about the lynch. I don't like how everyone has now invented desire to lynch Hopeless.

It might just be that Hopeless has given up and given permission to the other scum to bus him. He did sound fairly defeatist earlier.

I'm more convinced at this point I'm a greater benefit to town dead than alive. There's too much bullshit reasoning right now. Once people realize they need to rethink their stance on a lot of things, I'd hope it clears up a lot of things. With Palmar/BC set to potentially resolve itself (pending JK assistance and NK information) the town is going to need to play an effectively town-favored vanilla game.
By my count its likely to be
11 town v 2 scum
or
10 town v 2 scum v 1 3rd Party
Once we mislynch (its practically inevitable at this point...) we'll be playing a normal mini.



@Yamato's read post, there's this excerpt:
BC is town because either you or him is confirmed town, because of what I've talked about his game, and right now I'm working under that assumption.

I'm hoping thats based on his supposed roleblocker read/breadcrumbs or something to that effect because otherwise I'd lynch Yamato for this read.


@Jailkeeper, I suggest claiming at the deadline for the daypost with your targets in the event that you are killed during this coming Night. I am of the opinion that the information is more valuable than your life at this point. Confirming one of BC/Palmar and shedding some light on how accurate yamato's reads are could potentially end the game. Also DO NOT block Palmar since he needs to use his check, duh.


P.S. my vote remains on BC. See Artanis' case and Palmar's comments on the night ping-pong discussions.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 06 2013 23:32 GMT
#4941
I'm a good little sheep

##Unvote: BloodyC0bbler
##Vote: yamato77


Baaah
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 07 2013 00:05 GMT
#4957
On May 07 2013 09:01 yamato77 wrote:
Regardless, we're lynching Palmar today.

I thought we were lynching me. Didn't I just claim scum?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 07 2013 00:16 GMT
#4964
So...when Palmar flips town, can we kill me (For obviously being scum, knowing Palmar will flip town and all...) THEN Yamato because he's scum?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 07 2013 00:55 GMT
#4966
Someone remind me why I'm supposed to have a townread on giggles, because yamato+giggles is looking mighty fine right about now.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 07 2013 00:59 GMT
#4968
uhh yes? typos and punctuation make that a difficult question for me, TRN.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 07 2013 01:07 GMT
#4970
Yes, you did Palmar. But thanks.
On April 30 2013 04:44 Palmar wrote:
giggles is really sticking, I'm a fan.

Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 07 2013 02:17 GMT
#4977
I trust the town to figure it out. Yamato just pelted a list of reads that Palmar is convinced is bullshit.

Instead of attempting to critically analyze that post, giggles reduced it to OMGUS from Palmar and also gives no second thoughts to his "#2" (to me) scum read (ie Yamato) nor to thread sentiment. He's still running on a fuck it, lynch Hopeless agenda. Scummy as shit. I seriously think giggles+yamato make sense.

The main post I made my town read on giygas from could very well have been scum blatantly flaunting knowledge that we aren't supposed to have as town. Assuming scum shot Ace N1 and it further fits that. Id need to confirm timing but that assumption may also support yamato's push that ace was 3P - they shot him and he didnt claim it ergo 3P.

I need to go to bed and won't be around until 15ish hours from now at the earliest. Feel free to lynch me (or yamato) so the town can get some wind back in its sails on where to go next.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 09 2013 12:00 GMT
#5333
On May 06 2013 11:24 GiygaS wrote:
Ugh, I'm not 100% sure of Yamato right now, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. My read right now is that say we lynch Hopeless today. If he flips scum, I've got a big town read on Yamato. If he flips town, I think Yamato should be the next lynch.

Kush is acting really strange about this read too, as he was obviously initially convinced it was mildly scummy (he was the one that initially pointed it out). Like here:

Show nested quote +
On May 01 2013 10:56 kushm4sta wrote:
yamato your one claim to towniness is pushing shiaopi d2. But the other wagon was clarity. So in reality you were just picking between 2 scum. scum literally had to bus.

Also that quote from earlier in which you explicitly soft defend 2 known scum. here it is again:

On April 26 2013 00:35 yamato77 wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
The reason I'm running through all this is that I'm not particularly happy with any of the lynches that most of town is talking about. VE of yesterday feels somewhat town. I feel like more time would only bury scum VE or give chance to solidify a town read on VE. There's absolutely no rush for his lynch to be finalized.

Shaio is easy to mislynch, as evidenced by the suspicion on him in day 2 of British Empire 1, also an instant lynch where he was lurkish, and eventually replaced. The worst part of his filter is the hammer sequence, but even that could be explained by overly eager town who got caught up in the game emotionally.

Clarity is always inactive, and him being fixated on Sharrant is not alignment indicative. His case is objectively something that scum like to do, but in the context of the game, I can see a town Clarity who had a late start feeling the need to get his thoughts about the game on the table, even if they weren't about the main lynch candidates. The fact that he basically has no other reads in the game is a point in his favor, but just like VE, we can afford to play a waiting game with him, seeing as we have unlimited time.

At the very least, we need real discussion about the alignments of Ace/BC/Palmar before we move forward with any lynch. Ace is the most town out of the three, and BC the least, in my eyes. I'd say a long day is in order, and town need to consolidate pressure upon just a few people so that we can determine their alignments more clearly.


that's why i want to lynch you now


Show nested quote +
On May 02 2013 05:42 kushm4sta wrote:
I want to lynch yamato because he soft defended shiaopi and clarity. too much of a coincidence imo. i already posted the quote 2 times.
plus there are a ton of other reasons other people have posted.

yamato...lurker doesn't make you scum. Town easily can lurk for a million different reasons and I was doing it myself for the middle part of this game.
Your case against hopeless..i do not find it convincing in the least.


Why has he suddenly pulled a 180 saying the quote is too scummy to be actual scum? It doesn't add up.

On May 07 2013 09:23 GiygaS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2013 09:07 kushm4sta wrote:
dudes can we just lynch hopeless? that is the lynch im most comfortable with I think

THIS.

Palmar's entire case on Yamato seems to be that he made some reaching town reads on that list, and that he's flippy floppy on kush.

Meanwhile, Yamato is completely set on the fact that one of BC and Palmar just HAS TO BE SCUM, IT JUST HAS TO.

I'm going with Hopeless, and I'm not going to switch my vote to either Yamato or Palmar until there is an actually convincing case against them, or if one (or both) make a scumslip.

##Vote Hopeless1der

Giggles setting up mislynches based strictly on association (Me/Yamato). I call this scum tactics. Lynch him (after me?)
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 09 2013 12:03 GMT
#5334
Palmar who's your top scumread this fine day?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 09 2013 13:40 GMT
#5339
On May 09 2013 22:36 TheRavensName wrote:
Quick question, after the modkill... how many mislynches do we get?

probably 8v2 right now.

Lynch=7v2
NK=6v2
Lynch=5v2
NK=4v2

**MYLO** (No-Lynch?)
NK=3v2
LYLO

I'm getting 2 Mislynches and a potential No-Lynch at MYLO if anyone wishes to confirm.
May we vote for a No-Lynch?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 09 2013 14:01 GMT
#5345
On May 09 2013 22:54 GiygaS wrote:
So because I wasn't sure about Yamato (following context this is when I saw the post that defended Clarity and ShiaoPi in the same post), I'm setting up mislynches? For that logic to even work, you'd have to be town, which is false. Yesterday, I wanted to see you flip. Today, I want to see you flip.


First:
+ Show Spoiler +
No U


Second:
+ Show Spoiler +
On May 09 2013 21:00 Hopeless1der wrote:
Giggles setting up mislynches based strictly on association (Me/Yamato). I call this scum tactics. Lynch him (after me?)


Anyways...##Vote: GiygaS
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 09 2013 16:52 GMT
#5351
Kush tell me why I AM scum?
@WoS my access is kind of limited to hotspots, I'm visiting my brother in the US. However I'd gladly try to have a chat.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 09 2013 16:58 GMT
#5353
On May 10 2013 01:54 kushm4sta wrote:
lol hopeless i figured out you were scum in the first few hours of the game remember?

thats not a fucking answer kush. It's also wrong. What further reasoning do you have?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 09 2013 17:03 GMT
#5355
On May 09 2013 23:52 WaveofShadow wrote:
Oh and Hopeless, the association reads that GiygaS is making are bad, though I don't necessarily see them as scummy.
What I DON'T like is his avoidance of the main issue of the day, being Palmar.
Show nested quote +
On May 07 2013 09:23 GiygaS wrote:
On May 07 2013 09:07 kushm4sta wrote:
dudes can we just lynch hopeless? that is the lynch im most comfortable with I think

THIS.

Palmar's entire case on Yamato seems to be that he made some reaching town reads on that list, and that he's flippy floppy on kush.

Meanwhile, Yamato is completely set on the fact that one of BC and Palmar just HAS TO BE SCUM, IT JUST HAS TO.

I'm going with Hopeless, and I'm not going to switch my vote to either Yamato or Palmar until there is an actually convincing case against them, or if one (or both) make a scumslip.

##Vote Hopeless1der

This looks a LOT like distancing, Gigs. What gives? Especially since there was a SHIT TON of info on yamato and Palmar; you just seem to wilfully ignore it.

My problem with the association read is that he says 1 of me and yamato essentially must be scum, but I 100% know hes wrong (since yamato flipped). If you think I'm town, or want to flip me first to confirm then by all means. But once my alignment is secured, giygas' actions look real scummy to me.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 09 2013 17:32 GMT
#5359
On May 10 2013 02:26 kushm4sta wrote:
I have seen hopeless scum in other games. He is very good at towning it up when he's about to get lynched.

What the fuck? I got lynched for not towning it up in acme, another game where you tried to game the setup (fake claiming/ VT names being inanimate objects) and as scum i explicitly told you that you were wrong to use that reasoning(we had fake claims). The same way your read on VE, while correct, was based on flawed logic.

@WoS
I need to check through his filter properly but hes just been wishywashy about lynching between me and yamato and then yesterday shows up to plop his terrible vote onto me so hes not as implicated on the mislynch of yamato. His filter says he was torn between me and yamato but his actions dont quite agree to me.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 09 2013 21:27 GMT
#5402
On May 10 2013 06:23 WaveofShadow wrote:
You're trying to 'resist' the analysis? What does that even mean? You don't want to being it to the thread for fear of derailing a lynch? You don't want to analyze me? If you did all sorts of work with Sharrant why not help the fucking town with it? I really don't understand your motivation here.

its like the fucking popcorn incident all over again....I'm at my laptop for probably an hour or so if anyone wants to chat. Reading through Giygas and general votecount things while I'm here.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 09 2013 21:30 GMT
#5403
WoS, my votes primarily come down to consolidating and denying my scumreads the satisfaction. More recently they've been about self-preservation to a large extent, scummy as that may seem its still playing to my (i.e. Anyone's) win-con. I'm sorry I neglected to give more thought out reasoning and transparency for my actions. If a post-hoc explanation would assist in anything, let me know what you'd like me to comment on.

Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 09 2013 21:43 GMT
#5410
I'll say this in defense of TRN:
ctrl+f: cedric
Read just those 3 posts that turn up and see how you feel, barring the rest of his filter. I got town from that exercise when I did it a couple days ago.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 09 2013 22:27 GMT
#5420
Something in the way GiygaS refers to his Ace reads (and feel free to consider this tunnelly/biased) as Anti-Town, whereas he has no qualms calling Shaio/Clarity scummy looks slippy to me.

When he puts his vote on Ace initially, it was for the switch from "anti" to "pro" town, which drew this exchange with rayn (read the spoilers for some context):
On April 26 2013 02:55 GiygaS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2013 02:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On April 26 2013 01:47 GiygaS wrote:
On April 26 2013 01:36 VisceraEyes wrote:
Re: lynching into Ace/BC/Palmar

Ehhhhhhhhhhh....I don't know if there's a case on BC somewhere that I'm missing, but is the fact that he's inactive right now a part of the case? And Ace is looking more town in this game than I've ever seen...but frankly that is a little disconcerting. :/

Ugh. I don't like the idea. I mean I'd lynch Palmar sure...but BC/Ace? Today? Seems silly. Scum will want them dead if they're town. In my opinion the fog should clear a little bit by tomorrow. I think tomorrow is a better time to make a lynch like that.

Your point on Ace could be disturbingly true. Anti town play that caused suspicion may have made him play more pro town today, which explains his behavior.

##Vote Ace

You are voting for Ace because he looks town? And you just said at the last page BC is red and Ace is null. Can you explain the logic?

Basically, I would say Ace is scum based purely off his day 1 play in my eyes, but his day 2 sort of redeemed him in my eyes. However, it seems to me that Ace could just be looking pro town purposefully because accusations started going on him. That's my logic.

On April 26 2013 03:16 GiygaS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 26 2013 02:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Why not let him be pro town and judge him if he gets scummy? Why not lynch someone who has been scummy the whole game in your eyes?

The place and even more the way you dropped your vote is really fishy. Why don't you want to lynch one of your red reads?

It's hard to explain from my phone. Day 1 Ace urged us to take our time, and then rushed the hammer and lynch on Oats. What I'm saying is that upon further reflection, Ace is a red read for me based on his day 1 play.

Not a contradiction per se, but scummy nonetheless in my opinion.



On April 26 2013 09:49 GiygaS wrote:
Palmar:
- Starts off the day my declaring to the world that Vivax is town because of that "strange heuristic". Could be that he already knew Vivax was town, or it could be that this was his actual read. I'm leaning on the latter.
- Goes on geript, who we now know is modconfirmed. At the time however, the case was pretty dang solid, and it seems like it was good scumhunting.

+ Show Spoiler +
On April 23 2013 00:31 Palmar wrote:
List of probably town:

Bill Murray
getmoript (QT thing)
Vivax
slot machine dude
hopeless

list of maybe town:

Ace
grush
cheesecake
kush
Sylencia
TheRavensName

list of who knows:

WaveofShadow
Tube
Drazak
Clarity_nl
Sharrant
Yamato77
ShiaoPi

list of bloodycobblers:

BloodyCobbler

list of somewhat scummy fuckers (based on absolutely nothing):

DoctorHelvetica
ObviousOne
Oatsmaster
giggles


The bolded here disturbs me a bit (or maybe it was just the name he gave me )

-
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 00:48 Palmar wrote:
also being inactive in this game is unusally scummy because BH sent a pm to everyone in the game 24 hours before the game started which required a response to be in the game.

So everyone here is fully aware when the game started and reminded of it very close to the start of the game. So being afk or saying nothing is almost inexcusable.

Said it before, I'll say it again. This is wrong, Blazinghand's pm was to ask to drop out, not to confirm. No influence on scum or town though.

- Jumped on VE 2 minutes after he omitted VE purposefully (from what I got from it he meant it as a null read)

Show nested quote +
On April 23 2013 10:16 Palmar wrote:
am I the hammer? Cause I fucking love hammering


##unvote
##vote Oatsmaster

Not as bad as Ace pushing for the hammer because he didn't stress to take our time, but he was the hammer(1), and still really didn't post an explanation for his suspicions on oats up until this point. He later jokingly ealaborated that he lynched oats cause oats accused him of being mafia. This is his way of shifting away from the fact that he had no explanation.(2)

- Now he's sort of tunneling on VE, whom I have a town read on.

- And of course the thing I already brought up (being that he called out inactives for modkills but not tube, who was the most inactive)

(1) Palmar wasn't the hammer
(2) This "joke" came up pretty goddamn early in the thread. All the justification Palmar ever had for his Oats vote was here:+ Show Spoiler +
On April 21 2013 20:00 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2013 19:42 Oatsmaster wrote:
On April 21 2013 19:36 Palmar wrote:
On April 21 2013 18:28 Vivax wrote:
Well I don't care that you say no, I'll treat everyone who posted before me as confirmed town for a while.


I think the absurdity and yet strange value of this heuristic makes Vivax very likely to be town. To the point that almost nothing would make me want to lynch him today.

Discuss.

oh god palmar rolled scum


There are two ways of looking at your post. First option is that you're town and legitimately think I'm scum. The second is you're scum and know I'm town and thus want to discredit me.

Since you didn't present any arguments to back up your conclusion, I am inclined to think you must be scum.

So until you present a believable motivation for your accusations...

##vote Oatsmaster



GiygaS twists the following post to serve his scumread while ignoring what I just quoted:
On April 24 2013 04:14 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2013 04:12 yamato77 wrote:
Vivax, don't fool yourself. Lynching town is never a good thing.


I beg to differ, I think it's hilarious that we killed Oats.

Hopefully other people will take notice what happens when people call me scum.

This analysis of Palmar from GiygaS is lackluster and neglects to tell us whether his read is town or scum until later:
On April 26 2013 09:56 GiygaS wrote:
Oh and my reading on Palmar is not town anymore, but scummy, but not as scummy as Ace or ShiaoPi


But wait, pop over to his filter and just skim a couple posts from that last one. He goes from Ace/Shiao to clarity and shortly thereafter has completely dropped Palmar. I'll concede I fucked this up already with Sharrant and his read on Rayn, but I still find the way his reads seem to conform to the thread sentiment to be scummy.

If he is scum, it looks horrible to back off of a scumread when that player flips scum.


By process of elimination my top 3 scumreads are GiygaS, Palmar and BC, so my reads are liable to be confirmation biased. I'm trying to spin the most convincing story that makes my target out to be scum and determine what seems most likely. I'm headed out now so I'll finish up my bias read when I'm back tonight.

Also I got diddly from vote-count analysis so far. I blazed through Day 1 and nothing jumped out at me, considering the lynch came down to two townies. I guess you could say kush is useless as usual but I really do think he's town so I disregarded that aspect of things.

Random BC speculation-like thoughts:
+ Show Spoiler +

Artanis' case on BC is sitting in the back of my mind. I can follow where the logic in the roleblocking "clears" him. However, I am almost 100% certain I've seen a scumteam withhold a block for towncred and also BC is a decent target for 3P to take out early to keep themselves safe, assuming scum shoot at Palmar/Ace first. This is N1 speculation, not considering Ace was 3P.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 09 2013 23:31 GMT
#5423
YEAH WHEN IM TOWN KUSH. I WORK BETTER UNDER PRESSURE. YOUR "EVIDENCE" IS WRONG THIS IS DEMINSTRABLY MY TOWN META BECAUSE I DONT (haven't had the opportunity to) TRYHARD AS SCUM.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 10 2013 12:46 GMT
#5455
...that's easily the scummiest thing you've done all game Palmar, and that's saying something. Activity, especially for me, is not alignment indicative. This is the lazy man's route but the whole time you're spouting off about how no one has a good reason to lynch you. Welll fuck it, you're voting to lynch a townie so that's reason enough.

##Unvote: GiygaS
##Vote: Palmar

Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 10 2013 14:57 GMT
#5471
Palmar, your reasoning for GiygaS seems to come down to "some other townie said so". Makes me sad bro. When I flip town calling giygas scum, what happens?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 10 2013 15:28 GMT
#5482
On May 11 2013 00:08 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2013 23:57 Hopeless1der wrote:
Palmar, your reasoning for GiygaS seems to come down to "some other townie said so". Makes me sad bro. When I flip town calling giygas scum, what happens?

This is a wifom bomb.
It doesn't make sense for town to say this, because town knows that being town doesn't make your reads right.

yeah so why does yamato's opinion on giggles make him town to Palmar? This argument goes both ways and is thoroughly inconclusive. By your logic we should be lynching Palmar, right kush?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 10 2013 18:54 GMT
#5499
Not really when they have me to hide behind. That and the triple cop caper...
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 10 2013 19:08 GMT
#5500
P.S. kill me or giggles please.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 10 2013 22:27 GMT
#5516
fuck it why not...
##Unvote: Palmar
##Vote: TheRavensName
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 11 2013 00:23 GMT
#5524
Does anyone else realize that I've been goddamn close to the chopping block for going on 4 days now? What hasnt been a survival vote for me?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 11 2013 00:50 GMT
#5526
As to why I'm "okay" with voting TRN, its the popcorn incident. Vivax did something in a previous game that was strictly against what you "should" be doing as town - attempting to hold open and transparent discourse. I can find reasonable motive for him doing the stuff that i initially called "town" as well. Scum mason wants to see if there are more town masons (after the initial flip) to contend with.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 11 2013 01:37 GMT
#5528
Kush is terrible but has yet to bus the shit out of his team (yamato has referred to this) and his retarded insistence that I'm scum because I disagreed with his REASONING for calling VE scum off the bat.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 11 2013 17:11 GMT
#5573
Kush: go away
Artanis: go for it. I'll vote with the RNG.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 11 2013 17:15 GMT
#5576
No I'm mad that you legitimately think you did though.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 11 2013 17:15 GMT
#5578
K RNG'd between me and BH it came up me so...
##unvote
##vote:Hopeless1der
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 11 2013 17:16 GMT
#5579
Giggles, BC, Palomar methinks
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
May 20 2013 20:07 GMT
#6009
Acro carried that game hard, all while being 3rd party and dealing with a resurrecting Toad.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 33m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 323
Nina 232
RuFF_SC2 162
Ketroc 43
StarCraft: Brood War
JulyZerg 1905
Icarus 8
Dota 2
monkeys_forever599
League of Legends
JimRising 588
Cuddl3bear6
Counter-Strike
summit1g10816
Fnx 1715
taco 705
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0911
Mew2King435
Westballz49
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor164
Other Games
WinterStarcraft463
ViBE233
Maynarde216
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1581
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 81
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki45
• Pr0nogo 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift6510
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
7h 33m
Replay Cast
1d 6h
WardiTV European League
1d 12h
PiGosaur Monday
1d 20h
WardiTV European League
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
BSL: ProLeague
5 days
SOOP
6 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
BSL: ProLeague
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Rose Open S1
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.