TL Mafia LXI - Page 157
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Sounds legit. ##Vote: Sylencia | ||
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + "Earlier on Sylencia says he is uneasy with voting for ShiaoPi because his scumread VE started the wagon. However he did not vote for VE earlier and never questioned him about anything. Is that how you treat your scumread? Also no mention why ShiaoPi is mafia. - Sylencia never tells why he thinks people he votes for are mafia. His votes on me/Oats were "because they are bad", and his vote on ShiaoPi is fishy. - Sylencia never questions his scumreads. He does nothing to figure out if i am scum on D1, he does nothing to figure out if Oats is scum on D1. Just votes based on "bad play". - Come D2, Sylencia doesn't seem to think i am scum any more. I question him about this, and he answers "you are still suspicious". But what does his next post say? That grush, ShiaoPi and VE are his suspects. How does that make sense? - Sylencia says this about ShiaoPi: - This is plain out lie. ShiaoPi has never called me or TRN mafia. If you don't believe me, look at his filter. Sylencia claims he has read ShiaoPi's filter and still lies about this. - Other than that Sylencia's filter is full of useless lists and self-defence. There is nothing that comes even close to scumhunting. Sylencia is mafia" | ||
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
it was definitely discussed, at least momentarily. i mention having meta reads on maf on you and sylencia, VE+ Show Spoiler + On April 28 2013 08:48 Bill Murray wrote: rayn you're being illogical over "townie counter wagons" and such i've been in a game as scum top 3 wagons were all scum it happens On April 28 2013 08:57 Bill Murray wrote: "Sharrant's Clarity case" a lot of that was taken from my pressuring, and my case, honestly I pushed it before Sharrant Noone was interested in who was a better lynch over you, ace... and ve?... no. i KNEW who was a better lynch, and not because I have a rolelist Ace and I have had discussion of ___ role and ___ role for mafia, and which are better to lynch, but that was on d1 relating to yamato and oats. I am null on ShiaoPi, largely, but would okay lynching him. I am not really keen on lynching someone I don't have a read on................... So I definitely cared more than you I cared because I take full credit for Clarity being lynched, and if you don't agree with that, you don't know what you're talking about, Rayn. Your Sylencia read is probably right, but self-preservation is largely null. He is right about Yamato/Oats being the 2 prevalent counterwagons d1. D2 I tried to get wagons on people other than Clarity, so that hurts my "credit" for "sticking with it"... but it wasn't "sharrants case" it was "sharrants defense, and countercase" Sharrant had to DEFEND himself because it was CLARITY'S CASE. I pressured Clarity over his weak, fabricated case, weaseling him into lying the way town-VE tries to do... haven't seen VE doing that. VE + Sylencia for me are 1) meta on VE as VE, and 2) meta on sylencia for mafish behavior. I don't know how he plays, though, so for me it is largely gut. I don't believe you're right about the voting, or lying. Those are rookie mistakes anyone can make... I could make them as town. They are, to reiterate, largely null. OK now he's saying he wouldn't like WoS shot, and is soft-defending him. Humorous, considering. the end of rayn's wall has me unwavering again. I'm still leaning scum on him... I'm going to finish this wall up, but after that, I will probably be largely ignoring him he's appealing to sense of authority lumping himself in with Ace, and casting doubt on VE This makes me want to lynch VE less than Rayn, although I want to lynch them both eventually I would rather go after WoS right now for that miller claim... especially with no counterclaim... TRN... I have brought this up TWICE, now... why did you parrot me? | ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 29 2013 15:11 VisceraEyes wrote: Like OO soft defends Syl all effing game long until he's suddenly the same alignment as him? THEN all of a sudden he knew all along that Syl was scum right? Sounds legit. ##Vote: Sylencia Come on, VE really wtf | ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
LMFAO Hey VE I re-read my filter and my town read on me is pretty strong. | ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Man it's been a hard day's claimin! I'm gonna hit the ol' sack and see what tomorrow brings! | ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On April 29 2013 15:18 VisceraEyes wrote: *yawn* Man it's been a hard day's claimin! I'm gonna hit the ol' sack and see what tomorrow brings! You do not start shit about town OO and walk away. | ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On April 29 2013 15:20 VisceraEyes wrote: OO what do you want man I've got a check saying you're the same alignment as him, I see you soft-defending him earlier in the game, suddenly he's got a red check and everyone and his mother want to lynch Syl. It's like...whatever dude. Are you worried that Syl will flip scum or something? I didn't vote for you you know I voted for Syl. I'm lynching scummy players, not checks. Checks are icing on the cake. Checks are what guides you towards looking at filters when you're completely lost. Checks are not the BE-ALL-END-ALL of ANYTHING in a semi-closed setup and please stop pretending that they are somehow just that. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On April 29 2013 15:24 VisceraEyes wrote: Really? Cause gosh I remember you saying something about wanting to lynch Palmar and me today. Why aren't you lynching either of us OO? You know, since you're lynching scummy players and NOT checks. Lynching you guys could be fun too. Palmar likes to lynch people for fun, I could get him on board with lynching you EZPZ and like you said, half the town thinks you're scum. I'm NOT because I WANT to believe your claim but you are saying stupid shit like you suddenly changed your read on me. Like maybe you just went the easy route before and said I was town because YOU KNOW IM TOWN and now you're changing your mind to fit the reality of your checks. | ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
![]() | ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On April 29 2013 15:26 VisceraEyes wrote: Maybe. Lynch me and find out. ![]() GOOD NIGHT SIR | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
| ||