EPTLynch ObviousOne.
Boardwalk Empire Mafia: Pick Your Power - Page 146
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vivax
22291 Posts
Lynch ObviousOne. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
He has a green check. I had a pretty strong town read on him even before the town check. I would bet my left nut that he's town. Stop it. | ||
|
Vivax
22291 Posts
| ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
Meh, I still just can't think of Mocsta as scum in this game. I just played with scum Mocsta in Hydra, and he doesn't really "feel" the same at all. A slim possibility of scum, but I think he's town. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On April 12 2013 03:05 Vivax wrote: (1) I WAS SCUM IN THAT GAME WITH MOCSTA. I KNOW WHAT HE WAS DOING THERE, I WAS HYPERAWARE OF WHAT HE WAS DOING THERE.Mocsta is not scum he doesn't do abrasive shit as scum, go read Personality 2, he was nice and reasonable, and he didn't try to jump into your face with what he had to say. Lynch ObviousOne. (2) Mocsta absolutely can be abrasive as scum. In the same vein as your comment, go read Newbie 37. He was not nice and reasonable, he DID jump into your face, and he did a great job of executing the "destroy the thread with spam/harrassment" scum plan. Yes, a player will have tendencies as scum and as town. But anyone who mentions says "mocsta not scum because personality 2" is being lazy/close-minded/wrong. I have pointed you towards a specific game that you can find to see that you are wrong if you believe mocsta always plays scum like he did in personality 2. Furthermore, you are arguing with someone WHO WAS SCUM WITH MOCSTA IN PERSONALITY 2. As that game wore on, we had a very particular strategy, and we did not need to spam the thread or be abrasive, because TOWN was taking care of that. Heck. I was scum that game and only looked townie because I kept telling townies to quit crapping in the thread. That's how bad it was. Scum did not NEED to kill the thread that game. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On April 12 2013 03:10 austinmcc wrote: (1) I WAS SCUM IN THAT GAME WITH MOCSTA. I KNOW WHAT HE WAS DOING THERE, I WAS HYPERAWARE OF WHAT HE WAS DOING THERE. (2) Mocsta absolutely can be abrasive as scum. In the same vein as your comment, go read Newbie 37. He was not nice and reasonable, he DID jump into your face, and he did a great job of executing the "destroy the thread with spam/harrassment" scum plan. Yes, a player will have tendencies as scum and as town. But anyone who mentions says "mocsta not scum because personality 2" is being lazy/close-minded/wrong. I have pointed you towards a specific game that you can find to see that you are wrong if you believe mocsta always plays scum like he did in personality 2. Furthermore, you are arguing with someone WHO WAS SCUM WITH MOCSTA IN PERSONALITY 2. As that game wore on, we had a very particular strategy, and we did not need to spam the thread or be abrasive, because TOWN was taking care of that. Heck. I was scum that game and only looked townie because I kept telling townies to quit crapping in the thread. That's how bad it was. Scum did not NEED to kill the thread that game. Dude. I played scum in Ego. WAY DIFFERENT to LIX. So yeah not accurate. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On April 12 2013 03:07 Oatsmaster wrote: Austin, I tend to think that recent scum games, are close to what a player would do when he rolls scum, rather than past scum games a while ago. Newbie 37 started on February 11 TL time. It less than 2 months old. It is not particular far away, and was within about ~3 weeks of Personality 2. | ||
|
Vivax
22291 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On April 12 2013 03:12 austinmcc wrote: Newbie 37 started on February 11 TL time. It less than 2 months old. It is not particular far away, and was within about ~3 weeks of Personality 2. In number of games its a ton. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
On April 12 2013 03:08 Vivax wrote: There's also the chance scum has a goldman sachs and austin is scum so don't take anything for granted for the moment, this setup allows crazy ideas. Wait, how would the politician somehow make Keirathi's dt check invalid? | ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 12 2013 02:39 Keirathi wrote: What the actual fuck? How can BM be scum if he picked JV? Which you also supposedly picked, but got VT? If he flips scum, you 100% die tomorrow for lying. How the fuck do I know what he picked? I do have a theory that would implicate one or the other, but that would require them both cooperating with the role-claim plan that's not happening. | ||
|
Vivax
22291 Posts
A way of saying that there can be a lot of chaos caused by scum during this day. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
If you played differently in Ego than another scum game of yours, that supports the idea that there is no single way that a player plays scum --> i.e. scumMocsta is not necessarily passive mocsta. Also, what is this number of games thing? As best I can tell, mocsta played...one game in between those two at most? It's okay to look at game x but not a game that's two games behind x? It's okay to look at someone's MOST recent scumgame, but not their second most recent? | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
On April 12 2013 03:17 Vivax wrote: It wasn't anything concrete, I was throwing in the thought that everything is possible around that nuke and it's not guaranteed that austin will be dead after this day. A way of saying that there can be a lot of chaos caused by scum during this day. More accurately, you are causing confusion in the thread for no reason. M_Z didn't nuke day 1, his first nuke isn't silent, etc. You and geript are consistently throwing as much confusion as you can into this thread. PLEASE STOP. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
What makes you doubt your Mocsta read? | ||
|
Vivax
22291 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On April 12 2013 03:17 austinmcc wrote: What do you mean by this, and by your comment about Ego or whatever? If you played differently in Ego than another scum game of yours, that supports the idea that there is no single way that a player plays scum --> i.e. scumMocsta is not necessarily passive mocsta. Also, what is this number of games thing? As best I can tell, mocsta played...one game in between those two at most? It's okay to look at game x but not a game that's two games behind x? It's okay to look at someone's MOST recent scumgame, but not their second most recent? I mean that when you play more games, your view on the game changes and your playstyle changes, same as your meta. So games that are more than 5 games behind this one is not VERY ACCURATE in determining meta in my opinion, especially with the game I JUST played. My mindset was totally different between LIX and Ego, and I assume Mocsta's one is different between Newbie and Personality. Also newbie games play differently because you feel differently about the players in the game. | ||
|
Vivax
22291 Posts
On April 12 2013 03:19 Sn0_Man wrote: More accurately, you are causing confusion in the thread for no reason. M_Z didn't nuke day 1, his first nuke isn't silent, etc. You and geript are consistently throwing as much confusion as you can into this thread. PLEASE STOP. ##Nuke: Player. You must nuke 12 hours or more before day ends. Nukes land at the end of the day. Feel free to launch your first nuke without any warning. Interesting you think I'm scum without reading my posts or you would know this. | ||
|
Vivax
22291 Posts
| ||
| ||
