| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 26 2013 20:35 Palmar wrote: rayn I have a reason to lean very slightly on town on you. Please consider lynching Grackaroni instead of this lynch. Yes i will consider it. What do you think about marv atm? | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9856 Posts
On March 26 2013 15:08 Keirathi wrote: Anyways, I'm much more interested in Grack right now. I wasn't particularly awed by Palmar's vote/case and Hapa's input, but his interactions afterward have been much worse IMO. He doesn't call out the bullshit vote. He panics, and questions it to figure out what he did wrong. I don't know any townie who reacts to a random vote on themselves by saying "OH GOD WHAT DID I DO?" Some get mad at the 'bad' play, some ignore it completely, and some vote the person back. But, even more than that: He's looking for a way out. He doesn't volunteer information, he wants to know what information Palmar wants, so that he can give the "right" answer, rather than a "real" answer. And finally: The bolded points feel like more "oh crap, I re-read my posts and realize I made some mistakes. Time for damage control". Like, he was already looking back at his posts to see how they LOOKED. His first reaction was to apologize for how they were perceived. THEN he explains himself better. It betrays his mindset of caring about his appearance. I don't know what you're talking about Palmar... you did get a couple sheep. This case is weak from Keirathi. Palmar's I could at least understand and actually kind of agree with. Betrays the mindset of caring about his appearance? What kind of logic is that? Of course I care about my appearance, I would prefer to not be the first one lynched. That doesn't point to something I would only do if I was scum. and there's not much to me not omgusing Palmar, he seems to be putting in the effort to scumhunt so I don't think he is scum. It irritates me when OO attacks me when he obviously hasn't read the thread and just saw Palmar attacking me and filtered me to throw some shit. @Palmar: any comment on Marv? You guys know each other pretty well. He hasn't taken any sort of stance as well and has shown complete apathy towards scumhunting so far, despite being here more often than others. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9856 Posts
On March 26 2013 13:52 Nisani201 wrote: Acrofales seemed to be making a lot of sense at the beginning of the game and now he's looking really bad. He said this: The joking stage of the game is over and he's still trying to drag it on into seriousness. And looking back at his filter, he said a lot of things about how people should be interpreting OO's words without putting in his own opinion. And in general there isn't much real content in his filter. I think he's scum. ##vote acrofales I have noticed that Acro seemed to be too focused on interpreting OO but this case is scummy and seems forced. Acro has done plenty of other things and has commented on other things besides OO but the only thing you're going to mention is that he is focused on OO? | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9856 Posts
On March 26 2013 20:59 Palmar wrote: I'm not ready to comment on marv's play yet. Well your mostly just commenting on me... hypocrite! | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On March 26 2013 21:01 Grackaroni wrote: Well your mostly just commenting on me... hypocrite! you're* Also how is that hypocritical? It's discriminative, but not hypocritical. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9856 Posts
On March 26 2013 21:04 Palmar wrote: you're* Also how is that hypocritical? It's discriminative, but not hypocritical. Yeah I saw that but I didn't want to triple post  You accuse me of not taking a stance in the thread BUT you only make one stance in the thread AND it's ON the person who hasn't taken a stance in the thread! Without me you've got no stance! but enough of this because it is pointless. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18371 Posts
I don't quite know what Grack has done to deserve all this attention. I understand Palmar's initial point, which I don't really agree with is all that scummy, but at least I understand what he was saying. However, since then I have had no problem with Grack at all and Keirathi's case is outright bad and feels like Keir is simply making a case to get a wagon rolling. I don't like that at all. Palmar, you should drop Grack and start lynching Nisani, whose sole contribution is one big fat lie. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18371 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18371 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18371 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
I don't like the Grack case as much as i do like the OO one. Both fall into the same category of being non-commital but on top of that OO gives people some catches. If someone bases a case on me influenced by OO's post he can't be held accountable for it but he actually was the one who gave the thought out in the first place. I don't like wishy-washyness but even more i dislike wishy-washyness that leaves an open door for stupid townies to push a mislynch which you in fact caused in the first place. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On March 26 2013 21:07 Grackaroni wrote: Yeah I saw that but I didn't want to triple post You accuse me of not taking a stance in the thread BUT you only make one stance in the thread AND it's ON the person who hasn't taken a stance in the thread! Without me you've got no stance! but enough of this because it is pointless. Actually I also took a stance towards smurf's case on DI. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On March 26 2013 21:10 Acrofales wrote: I'm awake! I don't quite know what Grack has done to deserve all this attention. I understand Palmar's initial point, which I don't really agree with is all that scummy, but at least I understand what he was saying. However, since then I have had no problem with Grack at all and Keirathi's case is outright bad and feels like Keir is simply making a case to get a wagon rolling. I don't like that at all. Palmar, you should drop Grack and start lynching Nisani, whose sole contribution is one big fat lie. No. | ||
|
Grackaroni
United States9856 Posts
On March 26 2013 21:22 Palmar wrote: Actually I also took a stance towards smurf's case on DI. Well then I took a stance towards Sinani's case on OO. I've got to go to class right now. And I don't want to hear any "where's Grack to counter. . . " | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
He's not interested in figuring out my alignment, he's just interested in making me look like scum. Which is what scum do. Cool thing about it is, since he won't get me lynched cause I'm so awesome (and also he won't try cause then my mislynch would be all on him and he scared), he has set up to have an easy "scumread" for the rest of the game, so he'll easily look like he's doing something for the ages to come! Note how 1) his case is shit, and the scum kind of shit 2) he's not doing anything about it 3) he's not doing anything else Hapa already answered the case for me, which is rad. Thanks for helping a brother out. Not sure why you're so certain you can read me, given you read me 100% wrong in our last 2 games, but heeeey. In other news, marv still scum (not sure why people think i'm trolling, this is srs read) So is Keirathi Oats stop being bad. ##Vote Smurfdude | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 26 2013 21:17 Acrofales wrote: Oats, you don't seem your normal talkative self. What's up? Whats up is I woke up at 12.30. Missed like 10 pages. Caught up. Guess what NO ONE IS TALKING. Palmar, you being a prick by giving 1 word/line responses to everyone isnt exactly the way to get people to sheep you. About SnB On March 26 2013 09:38 strongandbig wrote: I am so down with this aww fuck calling it right now prp/ryan scum team this is stupid. dont be stupid. Anyway ##vote: prplhz - doesn't sound like normal town prplhz - he's proposing things to try and be helpful - doesn't follow his own advice - suspicious interactions with other players yeah i'm totes down with this. I assume the top part is bullshit fluff. The parts about Prp seem to be way generalized and basically showing Prp in a bad light. Its a really lazy initial vote. And basically he follows it up with that prp shouldve followed his own advice and not spammed. Its day 1, content needs to be created and SnB is using that as an excuse to vote for prp. Dumb or scum? Im leaning scum. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On March 26 2013 21:26 Grackaroni wrote: Well then I took a stance towards Sinani's case on OO. I've got to go to class right now. And I don't want to hear any "where's Grack to counter. . . " The fact you feel the need to pre-emptively counter a dumb argument I'd never use anyway just underlines how nervous I perceive you to be towards any push in your direction Lynch this guy. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Clem vs Lambo
Scarlett vs Cure
CranKy Ducklings
IPSL
Dragon vs Hawk
RSL Revival
Classic vs Trap
herO vs SHIN
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
