EPTPersonality Mafia 2 - Page 34
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On March 11 2013 11:12 austinmcc wrote: snb, three things what are those BHs in the Foolishness pic holding? their hands are blazing | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
why is cDg the one you fear? What about this fiasco makes you like yamato he made a townie disappear. | ||
|
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
On March 11 2013 11:18 HiroPro wrote: man what does this even mean. you thought kurumi was suspicious also right? so why does kurumi flipping a bastard town role make you more suspicious of bugs? i didnt think kurumi was suspicious, i thought he was terrible and its not a bastard role except for its abilities. kurumi was straight up lying about changing alignment. but i could tell kurumi was lying and that it was stupid to kill him. bugs should have been able to tell that too. If kurumi had flipped traitor or mole, i would have thought, maybe a real scummer would have been told that a traitor exists and thus not want kurumi dead after he fakeclaimed traitor. but since he flipped townie, that qualm is removed. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Every one of Corazon's posts are atrocious. His "joke" about balancing the game, his stance on yamato and Oats, his dumb anger. I might vote him for now and see how it goes. ##Vote: cDgCorazon | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On March 11 2013 11:34 cDgCorazon wrote: LOL When in the world did I say I would move to oats "if it fails?" Read my fucking filter and stop putting words in my mouth... Mocsta, your argument is ridiculously stupid and you're wasting everyone's time with this shit. Heres your filter dive (1) + Show Spoiler [yamato tunnel] + On March 10 2013 13:36 cDgCorazon wrote: Here's what I do not want to see from anyone in this town(in no particular order): Lurking BS Confusing Posts Being Scum Lying Decrypted Messages Being Scum Disagreeing with me Being Scum. So why do you immediately attack yamato? Surely it must be for something you put in your first list, right? On March 10 2013 13:40 cDgCorazon wrote: Don't post stupid shit about grammar. Who is scum Yamato? Your meta tends to be that everyone should have the scum team down 100% five minutes in the game. Have you found the scumteam yet? You're pursuing yamato for an absolutely stupid reason... Grammar & a stupid meta-hypothesis. its a 25 player game, and about a handful had posted; why the fuck would This is just stupid, meaningless aggression that goes no where. Then, there is your "question" to him: rhetorical at best, and derogatory at worst. Exactly the type of outcome town seeks ... NOT Lets keep chugging along please. You then continue discourse solely with Yamato even though he is politely saying I am not entering a war of words with you; and start talking about Duel mafia (instead of the actual game). You build lots of suspicion on yamato, and then, retreat. why... because maybe its a "personality influencing him" + Show Spoiler + On March 10 2013 14:02 cDgCorazon wrote: The position I'm talking about is when you basically accused me of having no scum reads 3 hours into Duel Mafia and basically told me that I needed to have 100% scum reads 3 hours into the game or I am scum. I know a general feeling of how you play. You're aggressive as town. You don't give a fuck if you die or not, as long as your top scumread dies with you: The fact that you have decided to back way down from posts like this and play more passive is a bit suspicious. However, I'm going to assume the personality of whoever you are is influencing your play right now. I'll take a look later to see what kind of Yamato (or whoever you are) is going to come into town. Then you rescind to a meta argument to support the yam claim.. which is interesting.. because you dont apply a meta read to oats (with SnB case) YET you just played Duel mafia with yamato and oats On March 10 2013 15:36 cDgCorazon wrote: Yamato's already playing way too far away from his town meta for me to be comfortable. More meaningless insults that go no where. On March 10 2013 16:19 cDgCorazon wrote: Yamato if you were playing to anyone's town meta you would not be playing this badly. You're just trying to stir up BS and you are calling people out for stuff that you have not done either (which basically means you called someone out for something). You aren't scumhunting, you're just throwing shit around. There's no need to do that. We find scum and lynch them. The fact that you are murking the water up means that you are not trying to scumhunt, which would make you not town. Why you so scummy? Again, more living in the past of Duel Mafia as reasoning for his Yamato tunneling. On March 10 2013 16:41 cDgCorazon wrote: No, it's the fact that you are not playing as abrasive as your usual town meta is. So Yamato, let me get this straight: You called me out in Duel Mafia for not having scum reads AND You're calling me out now for having a scumread. Please bow down to your King and tell me what I am missing. Absolute stupid vote rational. On March 11 2013 05:59 cDgCorazon wrote: Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro... ##Vote: Yamato Gonna start scumhunting? So not only has this tunneling of Yamato been founded upon nothing except living in the past, and grammar. He now votes the guy, because he wasn't around when Corazon thinks he should be around.... ============= (2) + Show Spoiler [SnB] + CorazonWhen in the world did I say I would move to oats "if it fails?" Here: Implicitly On March 11 2013 06:20 cDgCorazon wrote: I think Strongandbig's argument is very good. It's very convincing, but we are still a long time away from the deadline. Other than that, I've just seen a lot of nonsense and posts that I cannot understand. I was the first one to start scum hunting, don't accuse me of not doing that... Also, it's a bit frustrating to try and scumhunt and then have 5 people complain that no one has scumhunted... (1) Says he has been scum hunting? I already proved his reasoning for targeting yamato were stupid and meaningless? (2) Clearly says the SnB case is convincing... why mention the deadline comment? Because it would lose traction. This is implicitly stating he would support it, if it came about later in the cycle. Yet he has the audacity to tell me, he never said anything of the sort? On March 11 2013 06:57 cDgCorazon wrote: I think he makes good points. If you're going to make me repeat what he is saying and then try to hammer me for it, it's not going to happen. I'm not pushing Oats because I am pushing my own read (Yamato). Just because SnB's case is good doesn't give us an excuse to sit around for 24+ hours and do nothing. I've already said why Yamato is scummy and now I'm voting for him. It's pretty simple. And this is where he is setting himself up to move onto Oats whenever Yam loses traction. it reads pretty clear to me. tl;dr Corazon says he been scum hunting.. but the effort has been fruitless and lacking of town conviction. He hasnt obtained any real information from his target; nor prodded yamato for meaningful discourse. He then follows up with a vote, cos they guy might have been asleep or having a drink with mates - i.e. wasn't around for an hour. All meek attempts to scum hunt, and indicative of scum taking the easy road. Then with the SnB case, clearly says he likes it..but its a "townie" thing to push your own case instead so will do that. LOl Doesnt even give reasoning to why the case is good (when others clearly do not agree with it as valid on Oats) Again, setting himself up for an easy switch, if yam loses traction. Again, scummy play. ##Vote: Corazon | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
the former is scum, the latter a butt what it is you see to make you want to hang cDg? Atrocious does not make a scum from a nut. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
Its been over a full day and sloosh, foolishness and ver have all been absent posting. One of these three should be lynched unless they come out with some epic post to prove why they shouldn't die. Also yamato is claiming to be someone who shot a confirmed town. This is not in any way a town aligned move regardless of kurumi's play. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:04 BloodyC0bbler wrote: we are not lynching bugs today unless we have a day dt. Why? Because you don't lynch decaf chicken on day 1. Its been over a full day and sloosh, foolishness and ver have all been absent posting. One of these three should be lynched unless they come out with some epic post to prove why they shouldn't die. Also yamato is claiming to be someone who shot a confirmed town. This is not in any way a town aligned move regardless of kurumi's play. what I want clarified (which is really important) why kurumi still died after his shooter checked him as town is yamato scum or a clown? I'm waiting for him to respond before I decide. I thought Fool got a pass why are you being an ass? wasn't he day 2 readable on meta alone while Ver and Sloosh are day one, you intoned which thought is not crass? | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:07 Promethelax wrote: what I want clarified (which is really important) why kurumi still died after his shooter checked him as town is yamato scum or a clown? I'm waiting for him to respond before I decide. I thought Fool got a pass why are you being an ass? wasn't he day 2 readable on meta alone while Ver and Sloosh are day one, you intoned which thought is not crass? Level in which people have virtually ignored all 3. Why am I the only one looking at 3 top players with any level of seriousness while everyone is derping around looking at anyone aside from those 3 and yamato? Top tier players like them should have at least one post in thread by now apologizing for lack of activity with an explanation for themselves. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 11 2013 10:52 austinmcc wrote: Hello everyone! I think you should vote austinmcc for Mayor. Or any other elected office. But mainly mayor. As mayor, I'll aim to keep a healthy thread environment. We have a lot of heavily-themed roles it seems, and a couple posting restrictions or flavor-lovers. Limericks and rats are nice, but there are a lot of other things that get lost when there is too much creativity and not enough scumhunting. So please be judicious with your silly posts. But the real benefit to electing me mayor is that I will lynch scum. For now, that means lynching slOosh or crossfire. I like those better than oats, although I agree that oats doesn't look very green here. But iirc I'm not particularly good at putting oats's actions together with his alignment. slOosh is a good townie, and generally active. scumslOosh is inactive. slOosh this game is... But the stronger lynch today is crossfire. I like the idea that some scum will attempt to hide within personalities, allowing them to play the game from a less-than-town angle and pass it off as part of the game. crossfire has done just that. He has talked his nonsense, and I enjoyed reading his posts. But the posts contain little/nothing. bugs's post had some logic in them. Others are roleplaying within the context of scumhunting. crossfire is just posting nonsense. At best he called hiro out for voting for "non-alignment reasons," but he hasn't called out any other bad votes and he didn't go anywhere with hiro. Call out his vote, blink away. Austin here wants to lynch 'lynchbait' basically, Sloosh has posted nothing, crossfire has also posted nothing. But here Austin is saying that posting nothing is scummy. On March 11 2013 11:12 austinmcc wrote: snb, three things what are those BHs in the Foolishness pic holding? wbg's posts may ramble, but they rambled while making townie points (at times). Read his post about how rats work. It's not the most insightful thing ever, but it gave me a strong townie vibe on him, because he was still playing mafia while filling the thread with nonsense (unlike crossfire). oats does look bad. I like the point on reads more than the point on not following his own advice, especially within a game where everyone is playing as someone else. For starts, you look at the iamperfection/mocsta pushes from oats, but you miss this:Oats still pushing iamp, before you post, in response to iamp finding hiro scummy based on hiro's wanting claims. Specifically, iamp made a case, and oats immediately jumps all over iamp. I dislike that, because he's not actually seeking discussion on those questions, he starts off with the all caps LYNCH IAMP, which makes it feel like the questions don't matter. He just wants to lynch iamp, for...making a case and scumhunting. There's also his posts on ver. Check these out:Ver's entrance is "unimpressive" and he has no posts after. Reads like Oats finds this scummy But now acro finds Ver scummy for the same post, and Oats thinks it's a horrible reason for a vote. Acro responds, and Oats downplays Ver's post. Ver has a whopping one post. And yet Oats still manages to have 3 different thoughts about it. Weird interaction, and weirdly inconsistent. Austin says I want to lynch Iamp for making a case. So he assumes scum never make a case which is blatantly wrong. He also focuses on the 'lynch Iamp', instead of the actual questions in order to make it seem like my post is useless. The best part is about my opinion on Ver. Ver's entrance is "unimpressive" and he has no posts after. Is this scummy? Its just a factual representation of what Ver has done, There are no opinions in this line other than 'unimpressive' which I dont feel is me saying that Ver is scummy. Then he tries and says that I contradict myself. But now acro finds Ver scummy for the same post, and Oats thinks it's a horrible reason for a vote. Is this wrong? According to Austin, this makes me scum even though I am right because it somehow is different from the question I asked Mocsta. Or he was kidding, and roleplaying. Its one fucking post. Is he really the scummiest person so far? Again, this is a different thought according to Austin. Is it? No, it isnt. Keep in mind Im asking all these questions about Ver in order to discern Acro's and Mocsta's alignment, nothing else. So ##Unvote ##Vote: Austinmcc | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
##Vote: wherebugsgo ##Vote: yamato ##Vote: Crossfire Each has prioritized roleplaying over scumhunting in various ways, which is one of my own personal metrics this game in determining who to look at the closest. Incidentally I've made no secret of this fact. wherebugsgo seems to be almost hardclaiming Chezinu...which is fine. Except the only person he's paid any attention to is Kurumi, who is now flipped as town. Hilariously as wherebugsgo. Something tells me the closer to lynch he gets, the less like Chezinu he will start to sound and the more like wherebugsgo he will start to sound. But then again, perhaps not. yamato reacted to pressure in a very telling way at the beginning of the game: capitulation. As town yamato is fearless, and almost impassible. Yet when his methods were called into question at the very beginning of the game, rather than immediately take issue with his accuser as I'd expect a townie yamato looking for scum to do, he capitulated and called out someone else. Like "Well fine, here I did what you said." And further, rather than take my aggression for what it is - trying to gauge his alignment - he immediately goes on to ask others what they think of me. Which should indicate that he's suspicious of me. But ask yourself if you think he's really suspicious of anyone. Crossfire is another who is playing this really passive, defensive style of mafia which I find more prevalent in scum. I haven't looked at his filter closely, but what I remember seems to be roleplaying heavy and defensive. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:04 Promethelax wrote: I say mr Moc needs a vote over stutt the former is scum, the latter a butt what it is you see to make you want to hang cDg? Atrocious does not make a scum from a nut. Your the one pushing for Bugs based on nothing but unreadable posts. "Translation: Nothing but air Dare I say, he might be easy to rhyme with, hence your asphyxiation towards him. I just proved to you, you were already bullshitting about reasoning. Yet, you call me scum. Where did I say this? When i showed you, bugs has NOT posted since kurumi was killed. Yet one of your reasons for him being scum, is that he changed his post structure when kurumi died to "..." It is YOU who is not reading. If you want to scum hunt on bugs, start finding some real evidence; and stop wasting your time on me. I know my role pm and I know my alignment. I am scum hunting, and cDgCorazon is my #1. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:10 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Level in which people have virtually ignored all 3. Why am I the only one looking at 3 top players with any level of seriousness while everyone is derping around looking at anyone aside from those 3 and yamato? Top tier players like them should have at least one post in thread by now apologizing for lack of activity with an explanation for themselves. same is true if they're scum, dear | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:11 BloodyC0bbler wrote: This just in, Oats softclaimed scum. This just in, BC is being an idiot. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
Not really. They let their team defend them typically or wait til people stop talking about them when scum. | ||
| ||
