EPTPersonality Mafia 2 - Page 35
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
no you. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:16 marvellosity wrote: you think both ver and foolish are mafia then, BC? Its day 1. Given the fact both have been insanely absent and offered absolutely nothing the likelyhood given my past with them suggests at least 1 if not both are red. Would it be a surprise if they were? Look at the lineup of players. Virtually everyone is experienced or held in high regards. We are all basically on equal footing skill wise. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:11 Mocsta wrote: Your the one pushing for Bugs based on nothing but unreadable posts. "Translation: Nothing but air Dare I say, he might be easy to rhyme with, hence your asphyxiation towards him. I just proved to you, you were already bullshitting about reasoning. Yet, you call me scum. Where did I say this? When i showed you, bugs has NOT posted since kurumi was killed. Yet one of your reasons for him being scum, is that he changed his post structure when kurumi died to "..." It is YOU who is not reading. If you want to scum hunt on bugs, start finding some real evidence; and stop wasting your time on me. I know my role pm and I know my alignment. I am scum hunting, and cDgCorazon is my #1. Moc if you think you are scumhunting, you better look it up in the dictionary. You're piggybacking off of Vivax and Marv's arguments and you're only calling Prome's posts unreadable because he is basically saying you are playing bad. You REALLY think Yamato is scummier than me? Just think about it... | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:11 Mocsta wrote: Your the one pushing for Bugs based on nothing but unreadable posts. "Translation: Nothing but air Dare I say, he might be easy to rhyme with, hence your asphyxiation towards him. I just proved to you, you were already bullshitting about reasoning. Yet, you call me scum. Where did I say this? When i showed you, bugs has NOT posted since kurumi was killed. Yet one of your reasons for him being scum, is that he changed his post structure when kurumi died to "..." It is YOU who is not reading. If you want to scum hunt on bugs, start finding some real evidence; and stop wasting your time on me. I know my role pm and I know my alignment. I am scum hunting, and cDgCorazon is my #1. maybe the structure of my posts is hard for you but by "..." I meant Bugs said nothing, and nothing which he would later rue my cases make sense, Bugs is scum and so is Moc perhaps you need to empty your head of this crock. You shall now sit there and stew. marv, baby, please say it why is bugs not a target? what do you think of mr moc and his stink I say both bugs and Moc are shit. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
why do you think mocsta is mafia? | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:17 marvellosity wrote: So we wait on Foolish, and Ver advertised before the game he'd have no time before Monday. I don't know where BC is going with any of this. limited availability does not mean 0 availability. He should have been able to make more than one post this cycle in some form of a contribution. If you are so hesitant to off ver this early explain sloosh for me. He has his /in post only and is known for lurking hard and doing F all as scum. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:20 BloodyC0bbler wrote: limited availability does not mean 0 availability. He should have been able to make more than one post this cycle in some form of a contribution. If you are so hesitant to off ver this early explain sloosh for me. He has his /in post only and is known for lurking hard and doing F all as scum. he's not known for not posting at all as mafia. ever. next? | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:18 cDgCorazon wrote: Excuse me?Moc if you think you are scumhunting, you better look it up in the dictionary. You're piggybacking off of Vivax and Marv's arguments and you're only calling Prome's posts unreadable because he is basically saying you are playing bad. You REALLY think Yamato is scummier than me? Just think about it... Piggy back off what? Are we even reading the same game? All Vivax done is say we shouldnt lurk. Marv is questioning BC motives. Whats that got to do with what I am pushing? Keeping build those thin arguments Cora. & No, I dont think yam is scummier than you... Case on Corazon Read that, its my case on you. I can forgive you for missing it.. because the thread is shitting up. That should answer your question: Yeah, you are way scummier to me than yam. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On March 10 2013 22:50 Mocsta wrote: It wasn't rhetorical. Its pretty clear. Ver makes one post, and you asking what people think of it. Thats stupid. Now what I know is, Ver wrote some fuckn great analysis guides on this forum. I never played with him before, but know of him by reputation. Hes a scum killer. You come in, and show A LOT of interest from one post.... Wheres the town motive in that? So yeah, its a real question Oats. On March 11 2013 11:09 Mocsta wrote: In short: I dont like how Corazon kept his options open on vote targets. The play was pointless.. if you +1, follow with a vote on the case Saying +1 & adding "but my top scum read is something else" doesnt make sense. Its not even clear what cora likes about the case. Marv knows oats well. I know oats well: & so far he is playing his town self (i.e. points lots of fingers and asks dumb questions). Consider cora just played with oats in duel, where oats was doing the exact same things as town. Yet this game cora thinks oats = scum ?!?!? INTERESTING, no? ---- Bugs, I read his posts; but they are unreadable. If I supported his vote, it would be as a policy lynch. How do you ascertain him as town/scum based on his posts so far? he flip flops on oats using you as an out he has this idea that it is good being a sheep that it doesn't make him a creep. He isn't trying to give himself clout. On March 11 2013 11:26 Mocsta wrote: Honestly, I am struggling to keep up with all the happenings in this thread. Its not a unified conversation.. i.e. there are like 5 or 6 conversations occurring in parallel & I don't like it. Has any consideration been given that Bugs is being forced to act a certain way by role PM? I know in Personality 1 Role PMs, some said you HAD to target specific people regardless of alignment. As for your dichotomy, I dont see how you can derive this conclusion from just the role PMs or post structure change after target shot. Kurumi died here: Bugs last post was 1hr30min BEFORE kurumi died. My case on bugs is strong though it words it is not long but Mocs says its a policy doesn't see Bugs' idolatry Moc is misunderstanding a good case. What a shlong. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:18 Promethelax wrote: maybe the structure of my posts is hard for you but by "..." I meant Bugs said nothing, and nothing which he would later rue Maybe you dont realise.. but bugs last or second last post says "rat..." It was pretty easy to misinterpret what you wrote.. and hence, why all this rhyming is bullshit as I have already been saying. Didn't realise it was scummy to keep up with the thread and struggle to figure out what you rhymists are saying... Sounds to me, your writing what ever agenda is easiest to rhyme with... P.S. the "..." means extended pause for accentuation, not nothing. | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On March 11 2013 07:07 Vivax wrote: I don't think I said I wanted to hammer you it's just strange that you comment on someone's case as being very good without reacting to it by either voting for the guy in the case or putting it into relation with your own case. I don't understand why you are so afraid of me I just asked you something that made me curious  Why aren't you trying to persuade me about the yamato lynch then? You too Kurumi I only asked you to write in a way that is understandable I don't get why you react like that (also you failed to roleplay didn't I break the Chezinu role or something like that ?  )Marv: + Show Spoiler + On March 11 2013 07:08 marvellosity wrote: so, if you're intent on being lynched, why don't you tell us what your role is? hi s&b. we're not lynching Oats today and to be honest I only barely skimmed your case. $10 says that what you said is probably valid, but it doesn't make Oats mafia. By far the most interesting result of the case is that Corazon agrees with it, despite having played with Oats before (more than once I think?). Corazon, why don't you tell me in your own words why you think Oats is mafia, why don't you tell me how Oats' play is different this game than in Hiro's game. thanks bish. Mocsta: + Show Spoiler + On March 11 2013 12:02 Mocsta wrote: Heres your filter dive (1) + Show Spoiler [yamato tunnel] + On March 10 2013 13:36 cDgCorazon wrote: Here's what I do not want to see from anyone in this town(in no particular order): Lurking BS Confusing Posts Being Scum Lying Decrypted Messages Being Scum Disagreeing with me Being Scum. So why do you immediately attack yamato? Surely it must be for something you put in your first list, right? On March 10 2013 13:40 cDgCorazon wrote: Don't post stupid shit about grammar. Who is scum Yamato? Your meta tends to be that everyone should have the scum team down 100% five minutes in the game. Have you found the scumteam yet? You're pursuing yamato for an absolutely stupid reason... Grammar & a stupid meta-hypothesis. its a 25 player game, and about a handful had posted; why the fuck would This is just stupid, meaningless aggression that goes no where. Then, there is your "question" to him: rhetorical at best, and derogatory at worst. Exactly the type of outcome town seeks ... NOT Lets keep chugging along please. You then continue discourse solely with Yamato even though he is politely saying I am not entering a war of words with you; and start talking about Duel mafia (instead of the actual game). You build lots of suspicion on yamato, and then, retreat. why... because maybe its a "personality influencing him" + Show Spoiler + On March 10 2013 14:02 cDgCorazon wrote: The position I'm talking about is when you basically accused me of having no scum reads 3 hours into Duel Mafia and basically told me that I needed to have 100% scum reads 3 hours into the game or I am scum. I know a general feeling of how you play. You're aggressive as town. You don't give a fuck if you die or not, as long as your top scumread dies with you: The fact that you have decided to back way down from posts like this and play more passive is a bit suspicious. However, I'm going to assume the personality of whoever you are is influencing your play right now. I'll take a look later to see what kind of Yamato (or whoever you are) is going to come into town. Then you rescind to a meta argument to support the yam claim.. which is interesting.. because you dont apply a meta read to oats (with SnB case) YET you just played Duel mafia with yamato and oats On March 10 2013 15:36 cDgCorazon wrote: Yamato's already playing way too far away from his town meta for me to be comfortable. More meaningless insults that go no where. On March 10 2013 16:19 cDgCorazon wrote: Yamato if you were playing to anyone's town meta you would not be playing this badly. You're just trying to stir up BS and you are calling people out for stuff that you have not done either (which basically means you called someone out for something). You aren't scumhunting, you're just throwing shit around. There's no need to do that. We find scum and lynch them. The fact that you are murking the water up means that you are not trying to scumhunt, which would make you not town. Why you so scummy? Again, more living in the past of Duel Mafia as reasoning for his Yamato tunneling. On March 10 2013 16:41 cDgCorazon wrote: No, it's the fact that you are not playing as abrasive as your usual town meta is. So Yamato, let me get this straight: You called me out in Duel Mafia for not having scum reads AND You're calling me out now for having a scumread. Please bow down to your King and tell me what I am missing. Absolute stupid vote rational. On March 11 2013 05:59 cDgCorazon wrote: Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro... ##Vote: Yamato Gonna start scumhunting? So not only has this tunneling of Yamato been founded upon nothing except living in the past, and grammar. He now votes the guy, because he wasn't around when Corazon thinks he should be around.... ============= (2) + Show Spoiler [SnB] + CorazonWhen in the world did I say I would move to oats "if it fails?" Here: Implicitly On March 11 2013 06:20 cDgCorazon wrote: I think Strongandbig's argument is very good. It's very convincing, but we are still a long time away from the deadline. Other than that, I've just seen a lot of nonsense and posts that I cannot understand. I was the first one to start scum hunting, don't accuse me of not doing that... Also, it's a bit frustrating to try and scumhunt and then have 5 people complain that no one has scumhunted... (1) Says he has been scum hunting? I already proved his reasoning for targeting yamato were stupid and meaningless? (2) Clearly says the SnB case is convincing... why mention the deadline comment? Because it would lose traction. This is implicitly stating he would support it, if it came about later in the cycle. Yet he has the audacity to tell me, he never said anything of the sort? On March 11 2013 06:57 cDgCorazon wrote: I think he makes good points. If you're going to make me repeat what he is saying and then try to hammer me for it, it's not going to happen. I'm not pushing Oats because I am pushing my own read (Yamato). Just because SnB's case is good doesn't give us an excuse to sit around for 24+ hours and do nothing. I've already said why Yamato is scummy and now I'm voting for him. It's pretty simple. And this is where he is setting himself up to move onto Oats whenever Yam loses traction. it reads pretty clear to me. tl;dr Corazon says he been scum hunting.. but the effort has been fruitless and lacking of town conviction. He hasnt obtained any real information from his target; nor prodded yamato for meaningful discourse. He then follows up with a vote, cos they guy might have been asleep or having a drink with mates - i.e. wasn't around for an hour. All meek attempts to scum hunt, and indicative of scum taking the easy road. Then with the SnB case, clearly says he likes it..but its a "townie" thing to push your own case instead so will do that. LOl Doesnt even give reasoning to why the case is good (when others clearly do not agree with it as valid on Oats) Again, setting himself up for an easy switch, if yam loses traction. Again, scummy play. ##Vote: Corazon These posts look very similar...are you sure you aren't piggybacking off of them? Kicking someone when they're down is not a very town thing to do, especially when you just rehash the arguments that knocked them down in the first place. Not looking good for you Moc. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:30 Mocsta wrote: Maybe you dont realise.. but bugs last or second last post says "rat..." It was pretty easy to misinterpret what you wrote.. and hence, why all this rhyming is bullshit as I have already been saying. Didn't realise it was scummy to keep up with the thread and struggle to figure out what you rhymists are saying... Sounds to me, your writing what ever agenda is easiest to rhyme with... P.S. the "..." means extended pause for accentuation, not nothing. marv, let me present exhibit d why Mocsta is scummy he herein calls me a greenie but also calls me scum, what a weanie so I say: moc is scum q.e.d. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:27 Promethelax wrote: he flip flops on oats using you as an out he has this idea that it is good being a sheep that it doesn't make him a creep. He isn't trying to give himself clout. You just filter dive, and post what suits your agenda... or actually read things in context? Why would I have a read on oats from the start? Course reads can flip flop prome. You know Day1 early reads are meaningless and subject to change. Your point is simply... stupid. My case on bugs is strong though it words it is not long but Mocs says its a policy doesn't see Bugs' idolatry Moc is misunderstanding a good case. What a shlong. The summary of your reasoning on me is: I dont like your bugs case.. so I must be bugs scum supporter. Thats weak ass reasoning. I still havent seen an actually case on Bugs, showing why what he is doing is scummy. All I have seen is some saying, writing "unreadable" is a tactic some have done as scum in the past. So yeah, its a fuckn policy lynch. I call it like I see it. When you can write a lame limerick, clearly detailing mafia motive in Bugs "white noise" filter, I will reconsider calling it a scum lynch. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On March 11 2013 12:31 cDgCorazon wrote: Vivax: + Show Spoiler + On March 11 2013 07:07 Vivax wrote: I don't think I said I wanted to hammer you it's just strange that you comment on someone's case as being very good without reacting to it by either voting for the guy in the case or putting it into relation with your own case. I don't understand why you are so afraid of me I just asked you something that made me curious Why aren't you trying to persuade me about the yamato lynch then? You too Kurumi I only asked you to write in a way that is understandable I don't get why you react like that (also you failed to roleplay didn't I break the Chezinu role or something like that ? )Marv: + Show Spoiler + On March 11 2013 07:08 marvellosity wrote: so, if you're intent on being lynched, why don't you tell us what your role is? hi s&b. we're not lynching Oats today and to be honest I only barely skimmed your case. $10 says that what you said is probably valid, but it doesn't make Oats mafia. By far the most interesting result of the case is that Corazon agrees with it, despite having played with Oats before (more than once I think?). Corazon, why don't you tell me in your own words why you think Oats is mafia, why don't you tell me how Oats' play is different this game than in Hiro's game. thanks bish. Mocsta: + Show Spoiler + On March 11 2013 12:02 Mocsta wrote: Heres your filter dive (1) + Show Spoiler [yamato tunnel] + On March 10 2013 13:36 cDgCorazon wrote: Here's what I do not want to see from anyone in this town(in no particular order): Lurking BS Confusing Posts Being Scum Lying Decrypted Messages Being Scum Disagreeing with me Being Scum. So why do you immediately attack yamato? Surely it must be for something you put in your first list, right? On March 10 2013 13:40 cDgCorazon wrote: Don't post stupid shit about grammar. Who is scum Yamato? Your meta tends to be that everyone should have the scum team down 100% five minutes in the game. Have you found the scumteam yet? You're pursuing yamato for an absolutely stupid reason... Grammar & a stupid meta-hypothesis. its a 25 player game, and about a handful had posted; why the fuck would This is just stupid, meaningless aggression that goes no where. Then, there is your "question" to him: rhetorical at best, and derogatory at worst. Exactly the type of outcome town seeks ... NOT Lets keep chugging along please. You then continue discourse solely with Yamato even though he is politely saying I am not entering a war of words with you; and start talking about Duel mafia (instead of the actual game). You build lots of suspicion on yamato, and then, retreat. why... because maybe its a "personality influencing him" + Show Spoiler + On March 10 2013 14:02 cDgCorazon wrote: The position I'm talking about is when you basically accused me of having no scum reads 3 hours into Duel Mafia and basically told me that I needed to have 100% scum reads 3 hours into the game or I am scum. I know a general feeling of how you play. You're aggressive as town. You don't give a fuck if you die or not, as long as your top scumread dies with you: The fact that you have decided to back way down from posts like this and play more passive is a bit suspicious. However, I'm going to assume the personality of whoever you are is influencing your play right now. I'll take a look later to see what kind of Yamato (or whoever you are) is going to come into town. Then you rescind to a meta argument to support the yam claim.. which is interesting.. because you dont apply a meta read to oats (with SnB case) YET you just played Duel mafia with yamato and oats On March 10 2013 15:36 cDgCorazon wrote: Yamato's already playing way too far away from his town meta for me to be comfortable. More meaningless insults that go no where. On March 10 2013 16:19 cDgCorazon wrote: Yamato if you were playing to anyone's town meta you would not be playing this badly. You're just trying to stir up BS and you are calling people out for stuff that you have not done either (which basically means you called someone out for something). You aren't scumhunting, you're just throwing shit around. There's no need to do that. We find scum and lynch them. The fact that you are murking the water up means that you are not trying to scumhunt, which would make you not town. Why you so scummy? Again, more living in the past of Duel Mafia as reasoning for his Yamato tunneling. On March 10 2013 16:41 cDgCorazon wrote: No, it's the fact that you are not playing as abrasive as your usual town meta is. So Yamato, let me get this straight: You called me out in Duel Mafia for not having scum reads AND You're calling me out now for having a scumread. Please bow down to your King and tell me what I am missing. Absolute stupid vote rational. On March 11 2013 05:59 cDgCorazon wrote: Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro... ##Vote: Yamato Gonna start scumhunting? So not only has this tunneling of Yamato been founded upon nothing except living in the past, and grammar. He now votes the guy, because he wasn't around when Corazon thinks he should be around.... ============= (2) + Show Spoiler [SnB] + CorazonWhen in the world did I say I would move to oats "if it fails?" Here: Implicitly On March 11 2013 06:20 cDgCorazon wrote: I think Strongandbig's argument is very good. It's very convincing, but we are still a long time away from the deadline. Other than that, I've just seen a lot of nonsense and posts that I cannot understand. I was the first one to start scum hunting, don't accuse me of not doing that... Also, it's a bit frustrating to try and scumhunt and then have 5 people complain that no one has scumhunted... (1) Says he has been scum hunting? I already proved his reasoning for targeting yamato were stupid and meaningless? (2) Clearly says the SnB case is convincing... why mention the deadline comment? Because it would lose traction. This is implicitly stating he would support it, if it came about later in the cycle. Yet he has the audacity to tell me, he never said anything of the sort? On March 11 2013 06:57 cDgCorazon wrote: I think he makes good points. If you're going to make me repeat what he is saying and then try to hammer me for it, it's not going to happen. I'm not pushing Oats because I am pushing my own read (Yamato). Just because SnB's case is good doesn't give us an excuse to sit around for 24+ hours and do nothing. I've already said why Yamato is scummy and now I'm voting for him. It's pretty simple. And this is where he is setting himself up to move onto Oats whenever Yam loses traction. it reads pretty clear to me. tl;dr Corazon says he been scum hunting.. but the effort has been fruitless and lacking of town conviction. He hasnt obtained any real information from his target; nor prodded yamato for meaningful discourse. He then follows up with a vote, cos they guy might have been asleep or having a drink with mates - i.e. wasn't around for an hour. All meek attempts to scum hunt, and indicative of scum taking the easy road. Then with the SnB case, clearly says he likes it..but its a "townie" thing to push your own case instead so will do that. LOl Doesnt even give reasoning to why the case is good (when others clearly do not agree with it as valid on Oats) Again, setting himself up for an easy switch, if yam loses traction. Again, scummy play. ##Vote: Corazon These posts look very similar...are you sure you aren't piggybacking off of them? Kicking someone when they're down is not a very town thing to do, especially when you just rehash the arguments that knocked them down in the first place. Not looking good for you Moc. Right... Corazon lets make this clear. The posts you quoted, are general comments in the thread. Did they call you scum? The answer is no. Did they vote you? The answer is no. Did I call you scum and vote you? The answer is yes. I dont see any piggy backing + I was asleep when those posts were made regardless. Using your logic, the only people who can be town: are the ones who are first to raise an issue Thats dumb. And you know it. | ||
| ||
