EPTI have only skimmed the thread since the last time I posted, and all I got out of it was the death miller thingy, so yeah.
Personality Mafia 2 - Page 182
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
yamato77
11589 Posts
I have only skimmed the thread since the last time I posted, and all I got out of it was the death miller thingy, so yeah. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
You screaming at stupid people. A lot of people WIFOMing themselves over the Death Miller. Vivax posting obvious bullshit. I don't really have the time to sift through all that just to find out my predictions are all 10000000% correct just based off skimming the important posts. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
You seemed to agree with it, there. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Blind yourself to the bits where he supports you. Blind yourself to the parts where his reads line up with yours A LOT of the time. Is town iamp....this unfocused? Some may be roleplaying, but actually read his filter critically. Especially during D2 when the thread didn't need any help being a mess. He's got a couple reads, and he talks about those when they come up, sometimes, but he just never ever goes out of his way to START anything. He never goes out of his way to comment on anything that isn't being commented on, and he's got NOTHING as far as...half or so of the thread is concerned. It's all so short and terse that I can't get much from it, besides some associative stuff once we have more flips. But...is this iamp? On March 14 2013 10:37 iamperfection wrote: Thinks you're town. You parity checked those two as different. You telegraphed that, so decent chance there was a frame, but he wants to lynch both. No comment ever on whether he thinks there's a cover ability or something, he just doesn't update his read AT ALL from both scum during N1 --> opposite parity check from someone that seems to be a major town read.i feel strongest about ver as well as fool still i dont think cross is mafia that lynch deadline stuff still makes me think he is town Yamato not playing is extremely concerning but i feel stronger about ver and fool | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
iamp is pretty consistent in wanting to lynch people, and vets especially actually, who aren't doing anything. iamperfection is the type of player who puts player on pedestals, and when they don't perform to their expectations, he wants to kill them. Themed is an easy example, from quite early on he wanted to lynch me because I wasn't doing anything. His interest in Ver and Fool, yes both of them, seems entirely consistent with his philosophy as town. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
of logical posting there has not been a birth there is yelling and screaming it is not redeeming though some things cause some mirth. I hope we'll vig foolish he can be slapped with a fish at him I'll still point his kill will be joint I guess that karma's a bitch This magic marker was used and we were confused but I thought cora was red and that is stuck in my head all I know is some role was abused Now I'll send in my action wait for scum's reaction when fool becomes useless no longer a threat he is getting smacked down, son. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9644 Posts
Don't don't know what your talking about austin | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On March 16 2013 04:37 austinmcc wrote: marv, take a look at iamp's filter for a second. Blind yourself to the bits where he supports you. Blind yourself to the parts where his reads line up with yours A LOT of the time. Is town iamp....this unfocused? Some may be roleplaying, but actually read his filter critically. Especially during D2 when the thread didn't need any help being a mess. He's got a couple reads, and he talks about those when they come up, sometimes, but he just never ever goes out of his way to START anything. He never goes out of his way to comment on anything that isn't being commented on, and he's got NOTHING as far as...half or so of the thread is concerned. It's all so short and terse that I can't get much from it, besides some associative stuff once we have more flips. But...is this iamp?Thinks you're town. You parity checked those two as different. You telegraphed that, so decent chance there was a frame, but he wants to lynch both. No comment ever on whether he thinks there's a cover ability or something, he just doesn't update his read AT ALL from both scum during N1 --> opposite parity check from someone that seems to be a major town read. you wanted to ask me something? What was it little thing? I have not much time so reply to my rhyme before to work myself I must bring. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
iamp N1 has both Foolishness and Ver in his scum list marv D2 comes back with a parity check on those two as different iamp strongly believes marv to be town iamp continues to push both Foolishness AND Ver. He does not explain why he does not trust the check. That's fine, in and of itself. There were a lot of comments in the thread about how the check was telegraphed, and so there could be a frame or a rb. But we know marv wasn't roleblocked (PARANOIA PARANOIA: IF HE'S TOWN (WHICH HE PROBABLY IS)). And if the checks came back different, that means a frame doesn't explain both being scum. If both were TOWN, you could frame one, have the parity check come back different, and lynch them BOTH. Get rid of 1 of 2 big scary players that you would not want to face as scum. But if both were SCUM, you can't frame them to make the parity check come back different. You'd need a cover ability, or a framer that specifically can do both, which MIGHT be the case. Or a gf, which MIGHT be the case. iamp just jumps into wanting to lynch BOTH players though. Despite the parity check, despite a roleblock not occurring, despite a regular frame + the check indicating that both are actually TOWN. So he's relying on one of them being a gf or one of them being covered, but nobody is really discussing those powers and he doesn't see fit to mention. He just carries his night scum reads over to day, without taking into account a parity check that a big town read got back. Scum. Dude scum. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9644 Posts
On March 16 2013 04:46 austinmcc wrote: In case that quotes bit was unclear, here's what I'm getting at. iamp N1 has both Foolishness and Ver in his scum list marv D2 comes back with a parity check on those two as different iamp strongly believes marv to be town iamp continues to push both Foolishness AND Ver. He does not explain why he does not trust the check. That's fine, in and of itself. There were a lot of comments in the thread about how the check was telegraphed, and so there could be a frame or a rb. But we know marv wasn't roleblocked (PARANOIA PARANOIA: IF HE'S TOWN (WHICH HE PROBABLY IS)). And if the checks came back different, that means a frame doesn't explain both being scum. If both were TOWN, you could frame one, have the parity check come back different, and lynch them BOTH. Get rid of 1 of 2 big scary players that you would not want to face as scum. But if both were SCUM, you can't frame them to make the parity check come back different. You'd need a cover ability, or a framer that specifically can do both, which MIGHT be the case. Or a gf, which MIGHT be the case. iamp just jumps into wanting to lynch BOTH players though. Despite the parity check, despite a roleblock not occurring, despite a regular frame + the check indicating that both are actually TOWN. So he's relying on one of them being a gf or one of them being covered, but nobody is really discussing those powers and he doesn't see fit to mention. He just carries his night scum reads over to day, without taking into account a parity check that a big town read got back. Scum. Dude scum. Your an idiot | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On March 16 2013 04:46 austinmcc wrote: In case that quotes bit was unclear, here's what I'm getting at. iamp N1 has both Foolishness and Ver in his scum list marv D2 comes back with a parity check on those two as different iamp strongly believes marv to be town iamp continues to push both Foolishness AND Ver. He does not explain why he does not trust the check. That's fine, in and of itself. There were a lot of comments in the thread about how the check was telegraphed, and so there could be a frame or a rb. But we know marv wasn't roleblocked (PARANOIA PARANOIA: IF HE'S TOWN (WHICH HE PROBABLY IS)). And if the checks came back different, that means a frame doesn't explain both being scum. If both were TOWN, you could frame one, have the parity check come back different, and lynch them BOTH. Get rid of 1 of 2 big scary players that you would not want to face as scum. But if both were SCUM, you can't frame them to make the parity check come back different. You'd need a cover ability, or a framer that specifically can do both, which MIGHT be the case. Or a gf, which MIGHT be the case. iamp just jumps into wanting to lynch BOTH players though. Despite the parity check, despite a roleblock not occurring, despite a regular frame + the check indicating that both are actually TOWN. So he's relying on one of them being a gf or one of them being covered, but nobody is really discussing those powers and he doesn't see fit to mention. He just carries his night scum reads over to day, without taking into account a parity check that a big town read got back. Scum. Dude scum. most framers point both ways they make checks a haze red to green, green to red both can be said don't discount this thought today. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 16 2013 04:46 Promethelax wrote: Yeah, but earlier. I read you over a couple times and felt a little better, was worried about the drop in activity, and was hoping to get you more involved so I could reassure myself further. you wanted to ask me something? What was it little thing? I have not much time so reply to my rhyme before to work myself I must bring. Like...supersoft, during yesterday, went from you being super super townie to moving you down his list. You were noticeably absent. Even if the rhymes are sometimes painful, you seem to be forced to condense your thoughts down and give short thoughts/directions. It works well, and we could use more of it. What do you think about this iamp bit? | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9644 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 16 2013 04:49 iamperfection wrote: Why would you put any stock in the check Austin at all? I put some stock in the check because it happened. How much stock I put in it is a factor of my read on marv, pure speculation that scum has a framer that can cover/gf/something else we don't know about, and ... assumptions about vet balance. I care less about how much I trust the check than the fact that you just discard it without any mention. Like, whether you trust it, maybe trust it, dont' trust it at all, I can't tell WHAT you thought, only that you kept pushing both of them as scum without seeming to factor in the check. I dunno if you didn't notice, didn't care to comment, or knew the check was bogus. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On March 16 2013 04:49 austinmcc wrote: Yeah, but earlier. I read you over a couple times and felt a little better, was worried about the drop in activity, and was hoping to get you more involved so I could reassure myself further. Like...supersoft, during yesterday, went from you being super super townie to moving you down his list. You were noticeably absent. Even if the rhymes are sometimes painful, you seem to be forced to condense your thoughts down and give short thoughts/directions. It works well, and we could use more of it. What do you think about this iamp bit? I've been busy my man and I liked your plan of the thread getting less shitty so I posted less ditties my free time is out of my hands Iamp is not impressive to me but the top of my list is not he his posts are dry air but I just don't care there are people involved much more scummy. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
his posts are dry air feels true. It's one of the few things that makes me go "hmmmm" in iamp's filter, the other stuff is often just so cursory. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9644 Posts
On March 14 2013 23:13 iamperfection wrote: for someone who shot their own scum buddy you put a lot of stock in associations. marvs dt check is useless because he had to announce it why rb when he cant put any stock in it since its a closed setup. .... | ||
| ||
