|
Hey guys, sorry I've pretty much been a lurking piece of shit so far since mid day 1. Sorry, things to do, people to see, roomates to argue with.
I'm looking at the red lynch atm... MLuneth is looking like a prime candidate for todays lynch imo.
Opening Post
On March 07 2013 12:24 MLuneth wrote:Flavour was certainly pretty sweet  I know it's my first game so I'm still learning but I don't think we should just lynch Krafla without reason, even if it would be fantastically ironic. Your post Omni seems pretty reasonable and a good basis to work on ^_^
Completely buddies Omni, and acts all "pro town" by not wanting to lynch Krafla (which, was obviously a troll vote).
MLuneth joke votes me, but someone calls him out on it, and get's really paranoid.
On March 07 2013 12:55 MLuneth wrote:
Last post was a joke, if that wasn't clear
Why would town need to verify their obvious joke post was a joke? Nervous scum.
A weak distancing attempt
Basically coinflip votes Arctic Daishi, which seems oddly enough like an attempt to disassociate the two should one of them flip. There is no reasoning behind it.
On March 07 2013 17:34 MLuneth wrote:
EBWOP Forgot to add TheRavensName to above list of people that have done little
Coin said
##Vote: Arctic Daishi
This scummy vote
On March 08 2013 16:29 MLuneth wrote:
##Vote: nobodywonder
This vote is basically the result suspiciously targeting lurkers but more importantly the lack of an acceptable coherent defence.
Rainbow, it strikes me as odd that while you have accused/pressured people to find out their position on certain matters but your position is not clear. In what circumstances would you lynch a lurker?
Blatantly sheeps the NW vote, and keeps it there the entire game. And for what reason? Suspiciously targeting lurkers... OH WAIT, hypocrisy! Wasn't that exactly what MLuneth was doing? In addition, ML is picking on someone that hasn't defended themselves explicitly. Scum want to hit the easiest target, and someone who provided an "acceptable coherent defence" is just that.
Look at this vote again. Notice how he asks ME a question. Why me? Why not, you know, the guy you are voting for and want to lynch? Town mentality = zero. The vote is a blatant sheep with little-to-no reason and is used as a catalyst (somehow) to ask me a question. The vote is more about me than it is about NW.
Lynch this guy.
On March 09 2013 07:48 MLuneth wrote:
My vote in NW stays the same because there has still been no coherent defence to tell me why NW is not scum.
I agree that other players are looking very suspicious too but I'm more confident that NW is scum than they are
^ There's that "no defence" statement again. ML hasn't attempted (even badly) to scumhunt at all to find a better candidate than NW.
@MLuneth
Respond to this. Do things. Stop playing the noob card all game and perform.
|
@Taco
Explain this bullshittery
On March 09 2013 08:30 MeatlessTaco wrote:
No one will care about my reads right now. I'll post all my thoughts beginning of day 2 so there is plenty of time to discuss lynching me. The only 2 actives I could vote for aren't under suspicion, so it is between Chew and Arctic.
##Unvote
##Vote: Arctic Daishi
"I can't push a mislynch on some active guy, so I'll vote a lurker guy"
|
@NW yeah still going to pull the case together after work. I still believe letting off the gas can be as effective as stomping the pedal.
@Rainbow I'll take another look at Lune. I know I preferred OE lynch over Lune , but both are on my highly suspicious list.
|
OE shouldn't be on the ballot for lynch today.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not convinced OE is scum at all actually. I have a null on him right now and until Geript can prove to me otherwise, I won't be voting him.
Luneth is a much stronger vote and I've been leaning towards him since last night after Daishi was hammered.
Glad to have you back, Rainbows, and strong delurk. The only thing that bothers me is with such a strong case, where's your vote?
Vote: MLuneth
Maybe this will get him to come back and start answering some questions. I don't even know what to say about Matriarch.
|
EBWOP: whoops.
##Vote: MLuneth
|
On March 10 2013 14:28 WaveofShadow wrote:
I'm not convinced OE is scum at all actually. I have a null on him right now and until Geript can prove to me otherwise, I won't be voting him.
Luneth is a much stronger vote and I've been leaning towards him since last night after Daishi was hammered.
Glad to have you back, Rainbows, and strong delurk. The only thing that bothers me is with such a strong case, where's your vote?
Vote: MLuneth
Maybe this will get him to come back and start answering some questions. I don't even know what to say about Matriarch.
Right here
##Vote: MLuneth
|
I'm glad you've come back to give your thoughts Rainbows. And strong reads indeed. Luneth needs to stop expecting others to do work for him.
##Vote: MLuneth
|
In an interest to not just sheep Rainbows and add to discussion, Rainbows is your secondary read on Taco perchance based on this at all?
On March 08 2013 14:20 MLuneth wrote:
Yeah, was going to get to that in my post.
Considering changing vote to one of several people
When will Arctic Daishi be replaced if he doesn't respond?
On March 08 2013 14:14 MeatlessTaco wrote:
FYI.. Arctic has 2 posts total on TL.net. He'll probably be replaced.
The fact that the both of them asked when he was going to be replaced is curious, and might add up to a scumteam 'plan' to pretend they thought he was going to be replaced when they knew very well he'd show up to make them look good. (Not realizing we'd lynch him, obv)
|
On March 10 2013 14:45 WaveofShadow wrote:In an interest to not just sheep Rainbows and add to discussion, Rainbows is your secondary read on Taco perchance based on this at all? Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 14:20 MLuneth wrote:
Yeah, was going to get to that in my post.
Considering changing vote to one of several people
When will Arctic Daishi be replaced if he doesn't respond? Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 14:14 MeatlessTaco wrote:
FYI.. Arctic has 2 posts total on TL.net. He'll probably be replaced. The fact that the both of them asked when he was going to be replaced is curious, and might add up to a scumteam 'plan' to pretend they thought he was going to be replaced when they knew very well he'd show up to make them look good. (Not realizing we'd lynch him, obv)
Taco yes, cus that's shady as fuck.
ML not so much. Asking a question to host is pretty null, even if it's about a scum guy being replaced. What I find most suspect about that quote is the "considering changing my vote to one of several people' lol
|
Honestly, I don't find either of those in any way damning. As far as I'm concerned, it's standard operating procedure to ignore lurkers who are set to be modkilled/replaced.
|
Whoa, this MLuneth bandwagon is moving awfully quickly. I don't see most of Rainbows' case as pointing scum any more than it points to a legitimate town newbie. Is everyone else really just buying Krafla's story at face value?
And Rainbows... could you please explain exactly why we should not be voting for OE?
|
good to see you come back with such a strong case rainbows. I agree with you that Luneth looks like a pretty good choice for mafia, leaving us with 1(?) remaining. I still believe the last one is Taco. If there is a 4th I'd be surprised as I've only had 3 scum in all of my newbie games.
Anyway I looked back and people are for the most case correct as my case on Taco was very unpolished as I was asked to just look closer at him when I found that almost everything he had done was scummy.
I will again touch on the topic of his obsession with getting other players to vote while not doing anything himself. After placing his joke vote on NW he goes after several other players to try and force them to place their votes.
On March 07 2013 15:49 MeatlessTaco wrote:
Matriarch / Krafla:
If I held a gun to you head noose around your neck and made you pick someone to lynch instead of yourself, who would it be?
On March 07 2013 17:05 MeatlessTaco wrote:Show nested quote +On March 07 2013 17:01 Krafla wrote:On March 07 2013 15:49 MeatlessTaco wrote:
Matriarch / Krafla:
If I held a gun to you head noose around your neck and made you pick someone to lynch instead of yourself, who would it be?
Point taken, I guess I'd have to pick someone randomly, so probably someone that hasn't posted yet, Arctic Daishi?! Why are you afraid to take a position? Are you going to vote for Arctic Daishi or just write his name with a question mark?
On March 07 2013 17:13 MeatlessTaco wrote:Show nested quote +On March 07 2013 17:08 Krafla wrote:On March 07 2013 17:05 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 07 2013 17:01 Krafla wrote:On March 07 2013 15:49 MeatlessTaco wrote:
Matriarch / Krafla:
If I held a gun to you head noose around your neck and made you pick someone to lynch instead of yourself, who would it be?
Point taken, I guess I'd have to pick someone randomly, so probably someone that hasn't posted yet, Arctic Daishi?! Why are you afraid to take a position? Are you going to vote for Arctic Daishi or just write his name with a question mark? Nope, I'm not going to vote yet, I want to make an educated decision of who to vote for instead of flinging dirt and seeing what sticks Take a stand. Are you going to side with me trying to lynch someone acting suspicious or side with nobodywonder trying to lynch a lurker who can't defend themselves? This is TL Mafia which is serious stuff. You aren't allowed to be Switzerland.
This is all very early on in the game where it isn't realistic to have a very strong scum read on anyone let alone be convinced of people you want to lynch. Ultimately nothing he has done helps town, nor does it push a town agenda. It seems more likely that he is trying to spread confusion by having many people vote on multiple targets making it much easier for mafia to get votes down without much issue.
The main point is, at Town, there is no reason to try to get other people to do all of the work for you. This seems like an easy way for scum to pretend to be trying to get conversation started but instead results in no real information being found. Perfect for scum.
On March 08 2013 08:58 MeatlessTaco wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 08:53 nobodywonder wrote:
...I'd still say if I can't find concrete proof of scum, then I would just get rid of the scummiest lurker...
Isn't that kind of a high bar for day 1?
This struck me as odd immediately, the whole point of Town is to scum hunt and try to FIND proof of scum. Why would this be a high bar when it is the only goal we should all be working towards? Granted Taco hasn't attempted scum hunting once at this point. He's been telling people to vote for who ever they feel like and create a mess. [bold]This is NOT Townie Behavior![/bold] The only people who don't want any evidence of scum during D1 are the mafia. This post reeks scum.
On March 08 2013 08:59 MeatlessTaco wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 08:53 nobodywonder wrote:
disregarding lurkers, i'd say the most suspicious active is Krafla
Are you going to vote for Krafla or keep it on BDuddy?
Another useless post questioning NW about his votes. He's been avoiding doing any real work the entire time. Again, not a townie mentality. Ultimately why does it matter if NW changes his vote between the lurkers anyway? This question is absurd and serves no purpose. It wouldn't bring town any relevant information.
Then we have something which I believe is extremely scummy, we have the following two posts
On March 08 2013 10:35 MeatlessTaco wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 03:08 ChewOnStu wrote:
Im finding nobodywonder scummy too for complaining about lurkers not contributing yet he's barely contributed anything himself.
##vote: nobodywonder
... Why are you bandwagoning on NW while your only contribution is couple of trite posts about your lurker policy?
On March 08 2013 14:06 MeatlessTaco wrote:
You are right. His behavior is unacceptable so far. You got anything to add Chew?
##Vote: ChewOnStu
He sheeps Rainbows vote, and does exactly what he was just chastising Chew for.
This post screams scum, AGAIN he does not work on his own, jumps onto another vote and then asks Chew if he has anything to add to his own lynch mob. Chew is hard core lurking all game... this vote is extremely scummy.
On March 08 2013 14:14 MeatlessTaco wrote:
FYI.. Arctic has 2 posts total on TL.net. He'll probably be replaced.
On March 08 2013 14:17 MeatlessTaco wrote:
EBWOP: Artic Daishi has to be a null read. If you haven't voted yet, vote for someone else. He'll be replaced soon.
Misdirection on Arctic. Telling us all to just forget about him and move on, you shouldn't even think of putting your vote on him. I don't think I have to explain how scummy this is.
On March 08 2013 14:56 MeatlessTaco wrote:
No vote: OmniEulogy, Krafla, TheRavensName, Arctic Daishi, bduddy, Matriarch, Frorgon, WaveofShadows
You all need to make a stand. Are you going to let marines kills our broodlings one by one? Vote and make a case.
More attempts at trying to get people to vote, while he himself has not made a single case or tried to scum hunt once so far this game. Pretending to be active while in all reality not accomplishing a single thing. He has made absolutely no effort to find anything that could help town at this point. Extremely scummy.
On March 09 2013 07:05 MeatlessTaco wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2013 04:49 OmniEulogy wrote:I'm also quite worried about Taco. His actions so far are a mixture of scum/town so I can't get a good read on him. We have his opening joke vote, which alone I have no problem with On March 07 2013 14:47 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 07 2013 14:06 WaveofShadow wrote:My GOD this thread is exciting.  On March 07 2013 14:17 nobodywonder wrote:
woo! ~ exciting game Nobody's only post is sheeping the experienced guy adding no new content of his own? Now you can lurk and say "I would have contributed if the game were more exciting?" That seems pretty anti-town to me. ##Vote: nobodywonder Now it's more exciting. However we do end up sticking on NW through pressure of other people so he never actually has to vote. He uses this as an excuse to pressure others to place votes on people when he himself never actually made a serious vote. Keep in mind how early in the game these posts are. On March 07 2013 15:49 MeatlessTaco wrote:
Matriarch / Krafla:
If I held a gun to you head noose around your neck and made you pick someone to lynch instead of yourself, who would it be?
On March 07 2013 17:05 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 07 2013 17:01 Krafla wrote:On March 07 2013 15:49 MeatlessTaco wrote:
Matriarch / Krafla:
If I held a gun to you head noose around your neck and made you pick someone to lynch instead of yourself, who would it be?
Point taken, I guess I'd have to pick someone randomly, so probably someone that hasn't posted yet, Arctic Daishi?! Why are you afraid to take a position? Are you going to vote for Arctic Daishi or just write his name with a question mark? I feel that Krafla here was trying to apply pressure the Arctic who had yet said anything at all but Taco tries to pressure him to vote for somebody who hasn't said a single word so far? that's sketchy so early on in the game. Makes it seem like he doesn't care who is voting for who. On March 07 2013 17:13 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 07 2013 17:08 Krafla wrote:On March 07 2013 17:05 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 07 2013 17:01 Krafla wrote:On March 07 2013 15:49 MeatlessTaco wrote:
Matriarch / Krafla:
If I held a gun to you head noose around your neck and made you pick someone to lynch instead of yourself, who would it be?
Point taken, I guess I'd have to pick someone randomly, so probably someone that hasn't posted yet, Arctic Daishi?! Why are you afraid to take a position? Are you going to vote for Arctic Daishi or just write his name with a question mark? Nope, I'm not going to vote yet, I want to make an educated decision of who to vote for instead of flinging dirt and seeing what sticks Take a stand. Are you going to side with me trying to lynch someone acting suspicious or side with nobodywonder trying to lynch a lurker who can't defend themselves? This is TL Mafia which is serious stuff. You aren't allowed to be Switzerland. Again goes after Krafla early on, Why is Taco so obsessed with getting people to vote? The game isn't even through the first 24 hours. Town doesn't need to throw votes out so quickly, they need to think about their actions as Krafla is doing. This raises more questions about how much Taco actually cares who gets lynched. And then we have these back-to-back posts. Holy Shit Hypocrisy. On March 08 2013 10:35 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 08 2013 03:08 ChewOnStu wrote:
Im finding nobodywonder scummy too for complaining about lurkers not contributing yet he's barely contributed anything himself.
##vote: nobodywonder
... Why are you bandwagoning on NW while your only contribution is couple of trite posts about your lurker policy? On March 08 2013 14:06 MeatlessTaco wrote:
You are right. His behavior is unacceptable so far. You got anything to add Chew?
##Vote: ChewOnStu His FIRST real vote is a complete sheep with nothing to add about why Chew is scum. Does he really care who gets lynched? This doesn't take away from the good points he's made and some of his questions have been really good... but the inconsistency is there. I've been re-reading the thread, only on page 25, trying to hurry up and then double check Frogron's and Chew's filters. I think the NW lynch has served its purpose. My defense quickly: My first read was picking someone was was scummy with very little information. I've been consistent in the opinion that without an instant lynch, vote for people, don't make long-winded threads saying "I don't like A, but B is bad, but maybe C". The thread had very little content. I wanted people to make a stand. Someone already caught on to this and I asked me if I really thought NW was my best scum read. I responded with how I had planned on attacking Raven, but it didn't play out like I wanted. The second I thought someone would be a better lynch than NW I switched my vote. I might switch from Chew to Frogron in a few minutes or I might not, I gotta read the last few pages and then take a look at their filters and my notes. TLDR: a bunch of lurkers saying "A or B or C might be bad, I dunno" isn't helpful.
He comes back after lurking for awhile with his defense of what I had found in my first look through his filter. He talks about why he voted for NW shortly and I guess he forgot that his vote on NW was a joke. And he never did make a case for why NW was scummy.
A bunch of talk about how lurkers are bad and how LURKERS going in circles isn't helpful... Lurkers are Lurkers because we have no clue WHAT they think... If the lurkers are giving us their opinions... as TOWN isn't that what we want? His mind set doesn't follow a townies at all. MAFIA don't want lurkers to talk. TOWN wants them to be active. This is a MASSIVE scum tell.
On March 09 2013 08:27 MeatlessTaco wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2013 08:20 nobodywonder wrote:Right now Taco and Arctic are both looking really bad. I have already said things about Arctic and I feel that he really should respond. I doubt he is simply afk. As for Taco. For generating content, it's not really content if it's rather directionless. So give us some reads, don't just try to act all innocent and excuse yourself from scumhunting when you yourself pointed the finger first. On March 09 2013 07:05 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 09 2013 04:49 OmniEulogy wrote:I'm also quite worried about Taco. His actions so far are a mixture of scum/town so I can't get a good read on him. We have his opening joke vote, which alone I have no problem with On March 07 2013 14:47 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 07 2013 14:06 WaveofShadow wrote:My GOD this thread is exciting. On March 07 2013 14:17 nobodywonder wrote:
woo! ~ exciting game Nobody's only post is sheeping the experienced guy adding no new content of his own? Now you can lurk and say "I would have contributed if the game were more exciting?" That seems pretty anti-town to me. ##Vote: nobodywonder Now it's more exciting. However we do end up sticking on NW through pressure of other people so he never actually has to vote. He uses this as an excuse to pressure others to place votes on people when he himself never actually made a serious vote. Keep in mind how early in the game these posts are. On March 07 2013 15:49 MeatlessTaco wrote:
Matriarch / Krafla:
If I held a gun to you head noose around your neck and made you pick someone to lynch instead of yourself, who would it be?
On March 07 2013 17:05 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 07 2013 17:01 Krafla wrote:On March 07 2013 15:49 MeatlessTaco wrote:
Matriarch / Krafla:
If I held a gun to you head noose around your neck and made you pick someone to lynch instead of yourself, who would it be?
Point taken, I guess I'd have to pick someone randomly, so probably someone that hasn't posted yet, Arctic Daishi?! Why are you afraid to take a position? Are you going to vote for Arctic Daishi or just write his name with a question mark? I feel that Krafla here was trying to apply pressure the Arctic who had yet said anything at all but Taco tries to pressure him to vote for somebody who hasn't said a single word so far? that's sketchy so early on in the game. Makes it seem like he doesn't care who is voting for who. On March 07 2013 17:13 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 07 2013 17:08 Krafla wrote:On March 07 2013 17:05 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 07 2013 17:01 Krafla wrote:On March 07 2013 15:49 MeatlessTaco wrote:
Matriarch / Krafla:
If I held a gun to you head noose around your neck and made you pick someone to lynch instead of yourself, who would it be?
Point taken, I guess I'd have to pick someone randomly, so probably someone that hasn't posted yet, Arctic Daishi?! Why are you afraid to take a position? Are you going to vote for Arctic Daishi or just write his name with a question mark? Nope, I'm not going to vote yet, I want to make an educated decision of who to vote for instead of flinging dirt and seeing what sticks Take a stand. Are you going to side with me trying to lynch someone acting suspicious or side with nobodywonder trying to lynch a lurker who can't defend themselves? This is TL Mafia which is serious stuff. You aren't allowed to be Switzerland. Again goes after Krafla early on, Why is Taco so obsessed with getting people to vote? The game isn't even through the first 24 hours. Town doesn't need to throw votes out so quickly, they need to think about their actions as Krafla is doing. This raises more questions about how much Taco actually cares who gets lynched. And then we have these back-to-back posts. Holy Shit Hypocrisy. On March 08 2013 10:35 MeatlessTaco wrote:On March 08 2013 03:08 ChewOnStu wrote:
Im finding nobodywonder scummy too for complaining about lurkers not contributing yet he's barely contributed anything himself.
##vote: nobodywonder
... Why are you bandwagoning on NW while your only contribution is couple of trite posts about your lurker policy? On March 08 2013 14:06 MeatlessTaco wrote:
You are right. His behavior is unacceptable so far. You got anything to add Chew?
##Vote: ChewOnStu His FIRST real vote is a complete sheep with nothing to add about why Chew is scum. Does he really care who gets lynched? This doesn't take away from the good points he's made and some of his questions have been really good... but the inconsistency is there. I've been re-reading the thread, only on page 25, trying to hurry up and then double check Frogron's and Chew's filters. I think the NW lynch has served its purpose. My defense quickly: My first read was picking someone was was scummy with very little information. I've been consistent in the opinion that without an instant lynch, vote for people, don't make long-winded threads saying "I don't like A, but B is bad, but maybe C". The thread had very little content. I wanted people to make a stand. Someone already caught on to this and I asked me if I really thought NW was my best scum read. I responded with how I had planned on attacking Raven, but it didn't play out like I wanted. The second I thought someone would be a better lynch than NW I switched my vote. I might switch from Chew to Frogron in a few minutes or I might not, I gotta read the last few pages and then take a look at their filters and my notes. TLDR: a bunch of lurkers saying "A or B or C might be bad, I dunno" isn't helpful. I want your stand, You say that NW has served its purpose. Show me that what purpose that was? ##Vote: MeatlessTaco Right now I only have two or three people with no information on. What if everyone had just complained how boring the thread was for two days? Where would we be right now?
This is from the guy who said he doesn't want lurkers to share their thoughts, and wanted us all to just place votes on who ever with little to no reasoning. Has STILL not contributed to scum hunting and has STILL not done anything that I could see as pro-town. A lot of null-reads and extremely scummy posting.
On March 09 2013 08:30 MeatlessTaco wrote:
No one will care about my reads right now. I'll post all my thoughts beginning of day 2 so there is plenty of time to discuss lynching me. The only 2 actives I could vote for aren't under suspicion, so it is between Chew and Arctic.
##Unvote
##Vote: Arctic Daishi
This was already covered by Rainbows but his vote on Arctic just looks like a massive bus to me. He knows Arctic is about to flip scum, He knows he looks terrible, so he thinks he might be able to give himself a little bit of credit by joining the scum lynch on Arctic.
Overall he looks incredibly scummy and has done nothing during D1/N1 to try to help town catch scum. This is inexcusable and Mafia Behavior. Cause confusion, and try to slow down the spread of information.
##Vote: MeatlessTaco
|
On March 10 2013 14:48 Rainbows wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 14:45 WaveofShadow wrote:In an interest to not just sheep Rainbows and add to discussion, Rainbows is your secondary read on Taco perchance based on this at all? On March 08 2013 14:20 MLuneth wrote:
Yeah, was going to get to that in my post.
Considering changing vote to one of several people
When will Arctic Daishi be replaced if he doesn't respond? On March 08 2013 14:14 MeatlessTaco wrote:
FYI.. Arctic has 2 posts total on TL.net. He'll probably be replaced. The fact that the both of them asked when he was going to be replaced is curious, and might add up to a scumteam 'plan' to pretend they thought he was going to be replaced when they knew very well he'd show up to make them look good. (Not realizing we'd lynch him, obv) Taco yes, cus that's shady as fuck. ML not so much. Asking a question to host is pretty null, even if it's about a scum guy being replaced. What I find most suspect about that quote is the "considering changing my vote to one of several people' lol
I think both Luneth and Taco have shown some pretty large signs that they don't really care who gets lynched. The amount of effort behind where their votes land is between minimal and non-existent.
|
On March 10 2013 15:16 bduddy wrote:
Whoa, this MLuneth bandwagon is moving awfully quickly. I don't see most of Rainbows' case as pointing scum any more than it points to a legitimate town newbie. Is everyone else really just buying Krafla's story at face value?
And Rainbows... could you please explain exactly why we should not be voting for OE?
My vote stays where it is.
Rainbows' case is decent enough considering we don't have more to go on until Luneth comes back. I don't like all of these random questions from you though bduddy. Can you explain why we shouldn't be believing Krafla?
As far as voting OE, hopefully his continued strong (though very tunnel-y) attempts at scumhunting are enough to convince people that there are scummier candidates out there. There are a couple of very good points in his most recent case and the longer Taco goes without helping himself out the scummier he looks. In my opinion OE's continued effort and Geript's decided lack of such actually makes Geript look kinda scummy. Still awaiting that promised case.
|
Not voting Omni because he's one of the towniest looking dudes in the thread. Worstclynch right now.
|
Also we should consider the kraf claim as truth until see more confirmed blues.
|
On March 10 2013 15:31 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On March 10 2013 15:16 bduddy wrote:
Whoa, this MLuneth bandwagon is moving awfully quickly. I don't see most of Rainbows' case as pointing scum any more than it points to a legitimate town newbie. Is everyone else really just buying Krafla's story at face value?
And Rainbows... could you please explain exactly why we should not be voting for OE? My vote stays where it is. Rainbows' case is decent enough considering we don't have more to go on until Luneth comes back. I don't like all of these random questions from you though bduddy. Can you explain why we shouldn't be believing Krafla? As far as voting OE, hopefully his continued strong (though very tunnel-y) attempts at scumhunting are enough to convince people that there are scummier candidates out there. There are a couple of very good points in his most recent case and the longer Taco goes without helping himself out the scummier he looks. In my opinion OE's continued effort and Geript's decided lack of such actually makes Geript look kinda scummy. Still awaiting that promised case.
I KNOW! I said I didn't want to tunnel but Rainbow made a case on Luneth before I was able to. I was gonna do it tomorrow when I woke up while waiting for Geript to get his ass in gear but I really hate just having a single lynch mob. I've already said Luneth was my #2 scum pick. But for the sake of not sounding like a broken record I was gonna vote him... but... Rainbows made a better case than I would have anyway so back to the Wagon of Justice on Taco lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
