Fruity Mafia

On February 07 2013 02:57 kushm4sta wrote:
Can I in yet?
if so /in i wont be modkilled

On March 04 2010 15:36 flamewheel wrote:

If you are not semi-permanently banned, you must sit out a number of games equal to your Banned Game Count. You may sit out any game which is hosted on this forum unless the host of that game says otherwise (which usually happens in games which are over very quickly). Not playing in a game is not the same as sitting it out.

To sit out a game, you must do these two things during the signups of that game (assuming you are not currently sitting out a different game and the game in which you were banned has finished):
1. PM the host of the game you are sitting out saying you are sitting out that game.
2. Post here that you are sitting out that game.
If you cannot point me to a post or PM clearly stating "I am sitting out XYZ Mafia," you are not sitting out that game.

I will note that you are sitting out that game once it starts. At the end of that game, your Banned Game Count will be reduced by 1 and you will be removed if if is 0. You cannot sit out two games which run concurrently. Your name will be added to the "People taken off the list" category so I can keep track of you in case you are banned again in the future. You cannot play in other games which follow the Ban List until the last game in which you are sitting out has finished.

On February 14 2013 08:46 WeWinMafia wrote:
Oh if that's how we lynch I'd like to toss in a

##vote Vivax

but sady it's not how we lynch
##unvote

On February 15 2013 07:01 WeWinMafia wrote:

The people I mentioned should have no problem sharing some of their thoughts. I don't know if that's true for the 3 you just mentioned.

On February 15 2013 14:06 Coagulation wrote:
that would make sense if you hadnt of made it a point to notify the thread you know who he is.

On February 16 2013 01:24 marvellosity wrote:


I chose mario because it's a mini, unlike LVIII. I also disagree that he was particularly 'insistent'. Actually it's natural for either a town or a mafia player would want to know if i was making a case on him.

On February 16 2013 01:34 marvellosity wrote:


This:



is quite different to this:

On January 03 2013 07:14 Hopeless1der wrote:
really kush? he calls you a troll so you ninja omgus lazer?

On February 16 2013 01:38 marvellosity wrote:


right, both those quotes are disbelief, wtf moments. Here he is specifically calling it "scummy as shit", in LVIII he quite clearly did not.

On February 16 2013 01:49 marvellosity wrote:


The overall feel is as I described in my case. He's looser and more carefree as town, and more constructed as mafia.

On February 16 2013 02:12 marvellosity wrote:


ya. i mean, i'm not all guns blazing that he's mafia, but i think there's a pretty good chance of it. what you said here reminds me of austin's argument to me on Day 1 of LIX when I wanted to lynch prplhz - "i always find him scummy, he always seems to be a lynch target". Of course, but these guys roll mafia as well ^^

Talk to me about yamato, then. What about his questions did you find unnatural?

On February 16 2013 04:27 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
I'm not comfortable lynching yamato. This bandwagon seems to go way too easily with not enough reasoning.

On February 16 2013 06:20 marvellosity wrote:
i still don't get why people don't give a shit that Vivax isn't here pushing stuff, when normally he screams like a maniac as town.

i don't get it at all.

On February 16 2013 06:42 marvellosity wrote:
##Unvote
##Vote Vivax

join me guys. we can do this. and i'm right.

On February 17 2013 08:27 Vivax wrote:


Hiro, why so mad?

On February 17 2013 09:40 HiroPro wrote:
wait I just realized something. Coag thinks marv is definite town. he accuses me of being butthurt mafia who wasted a roleblock on toad when I saw him claim vig. why in the hell would I roleblock toad if I was scum and marv was town?


Am I dumb or did coag just claim scum?

On February 17 2013 10:31 Vivax wrote:
Wtf are you guys even talking about, Toad didn't announce his shot until resolution period began. So far only Zess claimed to have seen the crumb.

On February 17 2013 10:34 marvellosity wrote:


Toad only claimed the shot in the resolution period right?

So theoretically you roleblocked Toad just because, then you found out Toad was 'shooting' me, and then you go 'argh fuck oh noes you bastard!' or something.

On February 17 2013 10:42 marvellosity wrote:
right, but you don't have to know the mechanics when host announces it in the middle of the thread

On February 18 2013 06:56 Vivax wrote:
Then why did you say he should be looked into after the lynch nontheless?

On February 18 2013 07:00 Vivax wrote:
Matt would make sense since he hasn't been modkilled for not voting. I can't imagine Bugs being the guy to be forgiving unless it was really bad for mafia. He asked us to type "I will not be modkilled" as well.

I'd like you to specify your own reasons for thinking he's scum though.

On February 19 2013 01:17 marvellosity wrote:


you know i'm not though

##Unvote
##Vote: Hopeless1der

going for 2/2

On February 19 2013 01:18 Vivax wrote:
Why matt over hopeless Hiro?

On February 19 2013 01:19 marvellosity wrote:


I mean today, no need to be bitchy. I still voted for yamato remember

On February 20 2013 18:13 Artanis[Xp] wrote:

Well, I think that part specifically is because no one dares to attack syllo/sandro as they have a reputation of figuring out each other's alignment easily. Scum knew they had to paint both Syllo and Sandro as scum if they wanted to get them lynched, which would've been a very hard thing to do.