|
11589 Posts
On February 12 2013 13:50 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2013 13:37 yamato77 wrote:On February 12 2013 13:36 jaybrundage wrote:
Yamato why am i not scum Because scum jay wouldn't openly sheep Palmar. Scum jay barely even had reads to begin with, not even sheep reads. If Palmar has bad reads why wouldn't i sheep them as scum. @Oats I fail to see what you are trying to do.
Scum jay wouldn't admit to sheeping, because it draws attention to the fact that he's not making independent analysis. Town jay doesn't care, and often gets lynched for saying scummy things like that.
Why are you arguing with me about this? Mocsta's dumb argument that I "give up" my scum reads is blatantly false. Plenty of people opposed my opinion on JX, on Prplhz, on YOU, on Palmar, etc., yet I persisted. Because I'm town, and confident in my reads, wrong or not.
|
Jay, do you think Prp is scum?
|
On February 12 2013 13:53 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2013 13:50 jaybrundage wrote:On February 12 2013 13:37 yamato77 wrote:On February 12 2013 13:36 jaybrundage wrote:
Yamato why am i not scum Because scum jay wouldn't openly sheep Palmar. Scum jay barely even had reads to begin with, not even sheep reads. If Palmar has bad reads why wouldn't i sheep them as scum. @Oats I fail to see what you are trying to do. Scum jay wouldn't admit to sheeping, because it draws attention to the fact that he's not making independent analysis. Town jay doesn't care, and often gets lynched for saying scummy things like that. Why are you arguing with me about this? Mocsta's dumb argument that I "give up" my scum reads is blatantly false. Plenty of people opposed my opinion on JX, on Prplhz, on YOU, on Palmar, etc., yet I persisted. Because I'm town, and confident in my reads, wrong or not.
I am not sure what your talking about; I dont recall building a case on you as the points were already highlighted by others.
What I have requested is you address the points; you refuse to. each and every time.
That summary post of yours, is not how to make a defense (if your serious about being town) if you are the vote leader (which either you are, or pretty fuckn close)
|
On February 12 2013 13:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
Jay, do you think Prp is scum?
On February 12 2013 13:36 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2013 13:30 Oatsmaster wrote:
##Unvote
Jay. you have got to chill.
Oats please expound what jay has to do with you unvoting yamato?
|
Meh, rereading I dont think yamato is scum now.
Therefore, everyone arguing here is town and should stop being stupid, me included
|
11589 Posts
On February 12 2013 13:57 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2013 13:53 yamato77 wrote:On February 12 2013 13:50 jaybrundage wrote:On February 12 2013 13:37 yamato77 wrote:On February 12 2013 13:36 jaybrundage wrote:
Yamato why am i not scum Because scum jay wouldn't openly sheep Palmar. Scum jay barely even had reads to begin with, not even sheep reads. If Palmar has bad reads why wouldn't i sheep them as scum. @Oats I fail to see what you are trying to do. Scum jay wouldn't admit to sheeping, because it draws attention to the fact that he's not making independent analysis. Town jay doesn't care, and often gets lynched for saying scummy things like that. Why are you arguing with me about this? Mocsta's dumb argument that I "give up" my scum reads is blatantly false. Plenty of people opposed my opinion on JX, on Prplhz, on YOU, on Palmar, etc., yet I persisted. Because I'm town, and confident in my reads, wrong or not. I am not sure what your talking about; I dont recall building a case on you as the points were already highlighted by others. What I have requested is you address the points; you refuse to. each and every time. That summary post of yours, is not how to make a defense (if your serious about being town) if you are the vote leader (which either you are, or pretty fuckn close)
I did address them. If you can't read that post and understand how the arguments I outlined there are false, you have comprehension problems, and I can't help that.
Go away.
|
On February 12 2013 13:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
Jay, do you think Prp is scum?
Possibly
|
11589 Posts
Furthermore, I just addressed another point against me in that post you quoted there.
FUNNY HOW THAT WORKS
|
So vote prp maybe Jay?
Or are you deadset on VE being scum that you cant vote for anyone else?
|
Vote Count
Snarfs: Mr.Cheesecake, Yamato77, VisceraEyes
Yamato77: JayBrundage, Phagga, Mocsta, Oatsmaster
VisceraEyes: Snarfs, SlOosh
Mr.Cheesecake: Prplhz,
Prplhz: VisceraEyes, Oatsmaster
Have not voted: Djodref,
Oats did you vote CC today?
|
um not that I can remember. LOL unofficial votecounter
|
11589 Posts
Oats why don't you want to kill Snarfs with me?
|
On February 12 2013 14:08 Oatsmaster wrote:
um not that I can remember. LOL unofficial votecounter
Yea its how i contribute with out contributing cause im scum /sarcasm
|
11589 Posts
Jay, that goes for you, too.
You say you don't want to lynch Snarfs. why?
|
@Yamato cause hes an easy mislynch scum have been pushing all game. VE is very likely scum.
|
I rather lynch Prp first TBH,
not that I think that Snarfs is town.
|
11589 Posts
So, Snarfs is not a good lynch because you're making association cases again?
I need better than that.
What about his play suggests town to you at all? He's tunneled VE all game and done shit else.
If the problem is that you view VE as mafia, I can address the points Sloosh raises against him some time tomorrow, but I want you to filter Snarfs and think about his alignment first.
|
Im taking a breather and rerwading the
this is just getting stupid
i think we need yo start producing cases
|
On February 12 2013 14:17 yamato77 wrote:
So, Snarfs is not a good lynch because you're making association cases again?
I need better than that.
What about his play suggests town to you at all? He's tunneled VE all game and done shit else.
If the problem is that you view VE as mafia, I can address the points Sloosh raises against him some time tomorrow, but I want you to filter Snarfs and think about his alignment first.
I already said with snarfs.
I think he made his case on ve too early instead of establishing innocence and that was why he cops grief.
|
11589 Posts
On February 12 2013 14:28 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2013 14:17 yamato77 wrote:
So, Snarfs is not a good lynch because you're making association cases again?
I need better than that.
What about his play suggests town to you at all? He's tunneled VE all game and done shit else.
If the problem is that you view VE as mafia, I can address the points Sloosh raises against him some time tomorrow, but I want you to filter Snarfs and think about his alignment first. I already said with snarfs. I think he made his case on ve too early instead of establishing innocence and that was why he cops grief.
I think his case on VE was just an excuse to do nothing else that day.
I think his play day 2 shows a complete lack of interest in town's affairs, because it didn't matter to him who died since they were all town.
I think even his play today shows how little he cares about interacting with town and actually hunting scum, because he just comes in, plops down some reads and then AFKs.
He SHOULD get flak for this kind of play, because it's scummy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
