|
On February 06 2013 22:22 Mocsta wrote:
Djo. I explained why I don't support the RNG lynch.
For funzies I ran a RNzg and it identified you as the random lynch for day 1.
Will u support me with this campaign?
Of course not ! What was the purpose of this post ?
And did your read on Oats change or not since the beginning of the game?
|
On February 06 2013 21:53 Oatsmaster wrote:
Hey,
Respond about Djo's random lynch idea and VE's LYNCH ALL LURKERS policy. Is it normal for VE?
It's an idea, sometimes it works out sometimes it doesn't. He specifically states that he just wants to generate discussion so maybe he was fed up with your bantering too, I don't know but lets see how Djodref proceeds from here. No idea if it is normal for VisceraEyes but threatening lurkers early day1 is always viable. Doesn't really mean much.
On February 06 2013 22:02 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2013 21:50 prplhz wrote:
I'm on page 15 and scrolling down and seeing who is discussing I just want to say something really quick.
Oatsmaster, Mocsta: Stop focusing on each other. Just by your activity neither of you are up for lynch right now so stop focusing on each other. Whatever useful you could be doing by arguing with each other you've done it by now so quit it and stop messing the thread up. It is bloating the thread and for hardly any reason. Take a deep breath and a step back and focus on something else, if you want better reads on each other then just reread your discussion, I'm sure there's something you missed.
Alright going to read page 15 now.
But seriously, quit it and do something else. @ prplhzCould you expand on your activity argument ? Are you implying that you are going to lynch a lurker today ? Why wouldn't you lynch Oats especially ?
No, I'm implying that if we were to discuss who to lynch right now it would be silly to consider the two most active people unless we have a pretty decent case and we don't. I'm not going to lynch Oatsmaster right now because he has a great deal of activity and it's going to be harder for him to keep up appearances as scum later on like that. I also think he has showed a good amount of interest in this game, by fervor as well as insight, so townie points for him.
Where are you going with this random lynch thing?
|
What is the purpose.
RNG is stupid policy lynch. Anyone can use it as an excuse to push their agenda without penalty.
I think u already realised that though and the question was rhetorical.
As for oats. I didn't have a read on him since the beginning. My leaning town was based on him willing to butt heads and not retract. I don't think scum would do this at the start of the game it draws too much attention.
Considering he kept going after VE called us into line. Kept going after I gave an olive branch. And kept going after I said I had had enough.. I am not as certain on town anymore. He is walking a fine line towards flaming, which is now making me revert to null.
I'm still not supporting him for RNG though
|
Mocsta, I dont think you understand how to play this game.
You dont stop pressuring/attacking people when they tell you to stop, you stop pressuring them when it makes no sense and has no content anymore. I dont think I reached that limit yet.
|
Several ppl have identified our actions as pointless banter.
I even asked us to move on because its obvious we are just two clashing personalities.you vhose to threw this back in my face.
For me. You are basically a vivax. I.e or going on my auto ignore list.
|
So first you call me town, then you call me null and now you are calling me town again? Flipflopping all over the place.
|
When did I call u town after saying null.
Quote it otherwise learn to read and stop shitting up the thread. As I said you are approaching flaming now and THAT is scum motivated behaviour.
|
For me. You are basically a vivax. I.e or going on my auto ignore list.
Ignore means town read/certain scum read
If I am a null read, you wanna learn about my alignment, so you can have your own opinion on it.
If I am a slight town/slight scum you want to CONFIRM your read.
|
On February 06 2013 22:43 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2013 21:53 Oatsmaster wrote:
Hey,
Respond about Djo's random lynch idea and VE's LYNCH ALL LURKERS policy. Is it normal for VE?
It's an idea, sometimes it works out sometimes it doesn't. He specifically states that he just wants to generate discussion so maybe he was fed up with your bantering too, I don't know but lets see how Djodref proceeds from here. No idea if it is normal for VisceraEyes but threatening lurkers early day1 is always viable. Doesn't really mean much. Show nested quote +On February 06 2013 22:02 Djodref wrote:On February 06 2013 21:50 prplhz wrote:
I'm on page 15 and scrolling down and seeing who is discussing I just want to say something really quick.
Oatsmaster, Mocsta: Stop focusing on each other. Just by your activity neither of you are up for lynch right now so stop focusing on each other. Whatever useful you could be doing by arguing with each other you've done it by now so quit it and stop messing the thread up. It is bloating the thread and for hardly any reason. Take a deep breath and a step back and focus on something else, if you want better reads on each other then just reread your discussion, I'm sure there's something you missed.
Alright going to read page 15 now.
But seriously, quit it and do something else. @ prplhzCould you expand on your activity argument ? Are you implying that you are going to lynch a lurker today ? Why wouldn't you lynch Oats especially ? No, I'm implying that if we were to discuss who to lynch right now it would be silly to consider the two most active people unless we have a pretty decent case and we don't. I'm not going to lynch Oatsmaster right now because he has a great deal of activity and it's going to be harder for him to keep up appearances as scum later on like that. I also think he has showed a good amount of interest in this game, by fervor as well as insight, so townie points for him. Where are you going with this random lynch thing? ;
First of all, I'm going to get a read on Oats from everybody. He's a fairly active player, and I think there is enough in his filter to have a read on him.
Then, I hope that some people are going to join me for this random lynch, and I expect them to give some reasoning for joining me on this. I see if they match my own reasons or not to vote Oats (which I'll keep for myself for the moment) and try to start my investigations from there.
|
Djo, what is up with you and all your crazy 'plays'.
Cant you play like everyone else? :D
Every game, you have to speculate on something, if not setup speculation, then random lynching. LOL
|
Wow. Your first post showing signs of intelligence.
That is a fair deduction but isn't what was in my head.
You are null for me.
As for why I don't want to interact with you. Its simple. Your shitting up the thread and whoever in this game is scum have no reason to join the thread.
Several have pointed this out and you keep choosing to ignore their advice.
So it remains I'm ignoring you and your posts.
|
lol
You're, not Your.
whoever in this game is scum have no reason to join the thread
This is EXACTLY what you said in XXXV.
|
|
|
On February 06 2013 23:12 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2013 22:43 prplhz wrote:On February 06 2013 21:53 Oatsmaster wrote:
Hey,
Respond about Djo's random lynch idea and VE's LYNCH ALL LURKERS policy. Is it normal for VE?
It's an idea, sometimes it works out sometimes it doesn't. He specifically states that he just wants to generate discussion so maybe he was fed up with your bantering too, I don't know but lets see how Djodref proceeds from here. No idea if it is normal for VisceraEyes but threatening lurkers early day1 is always viable. Doesn't really mean much. On February 06 2013 22:02 Djodref wrote:On February 06 2013 21:50 prplhz wrote:
I'm on page 15 and scrolling down and seeing who is discussing I just want to say something really quick.
Oatsmaster, Mocsta: Stop focusing on each other. Just by your activity neither of you are up for lynch right now so stop focusing on each other. Whatever useful you could be doing by arguing with each other you've done it by now so quit it and stop messing the thread up. It is bloating the thread and for hardly any reason. Take a deep breath and a step back and focus on something else, if you want better reads on each other then just reread your discussion, I'm sure there's something you missed.
Alright going to read page 15 now.
But seriously, quit it and do something else. @ prplhzCould you expand on your activity argument ? Are you implying that you are going to lynch a lurker today ? Why wouldn't you lynch Oats especially ? No, I'm implying that if we were to discuss who to lynch right now it would be silly to consider the two most active people unless we have a pretty decent case and we don't. I'm not going to lynch Oatsmaster right now because he has a great deal of activity and it's going to be harder for him to keep up appearances as scum later on like that. I also think he has showed a good amount of interest in this game, by fervor as well as insight, so townie points for him. Where are you going with this random lynch thing? ; First of all, I'm going to get a read on Oats from everybody. He's a fairly active player, and I think there is enough in his filter to have a read on him. Then, I hope that some people are going to join me for this random lynch, and I expect them to give some reasoning for joining me on this. I see if they match my own reasons or not to vote Oats (which I'll keep for myself for the moment) and try to start my investigations from there.
Djo. You say u have your own reasons for voting oats, yet initiated oats as a candidate by way of RNG.
WTF
Either u wanted him lynched before u suggested RNG
Or
U doing it due to RNG
U can't have it both ways, which is it
|
Go on Palmer,
Explain how his play here although its different from LIX, is still scummy.
|
On February 06 2013 23:24 Palmar wrote:
##Vote prplhz
he scum
Hi Palomar.
Can u please expand on why?
I recognise both alignmnets can break up fights. But I thought the way prplhz went about it was fairly constructive. I.e. I didn't get a scum vibe from it.
|
Btw I have a super day 2 plan to counter the mafia, just you wait.
|
On February 06 2013 23:25 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2013 23:12 Djodref wrote:On February 06 2013 22:43 prplhz wrote:On February 06 2013 21:53 Oatsmaster wrote:
Hey,
Respond about Djo's random lynch idea and VE's LYNCH ALL LURKERS policy. Is it normal for VE?
It's an idea, sometimes it works out sometimes it doesn't. He specifically states that he just wants to generate discussion so maybe he was fed up with your bantering too, I don't know but lets see how Djodref proceeds from here. No idea if it is normal for VisceraEyes but threatening lurkers early day1 is always viable. Doesn't really mean much. On February 06 2013 22:02 Djodref wrote:On February 06 2013 21:50 prplhz wrote:
I'm on page 15 and scrolling down and seeing who is discussing I just want to say something really quick.
Oatsmaster, Mocsta: Stop focusing on each other. Just by your activity neither of you are up for lynch right now so stop focusing on each other. Whatever useful you could be doing by arguing with each other you've done it by now so quit it and stop messing the thread up. It is bloating the thread and for hardly any reason. Take a deep breath and a step back and focus on something else, if you want better reads on each other then just reread your discussion, I'm sure there's something you missed.
Alright going to read page 15 now.
But seriously, quit it and do something else. @ prplhzCould you expand on your activity argument ? Are you implying that you are going to lynch a lurker today ? Why wouldn't you lynch Oats especially ? No, I'm implying that if we were to discuss who to lynch right now it would be silly to consider the two most active people unless we have a pretty decent case and we don't. I'm not going to lynch Oatsmaster right now because he has a great deal of activity and it's going to be harder for him to keep up appearances as scum later on like that. I also think he has showed a good amount of interest in this game, by fervor as well as insight, so townie points for him. Where are you going with this random lynch thing? ; First of all, I'm going to get a read on Oats from everybody. He's a fairly active player, and I think there is enough in his filter to have a read on him. Then, I hope that some people are going to join me for this random lynch, and I expect them to give some reasoning for joining me on this. I see if they match my own reasons or not to vote Oats (which I'll keep for myself for the moment) and try to start my investigations from there. Djo. You say u have your own reasons for voting oats, yet initiated oats as a candidate by way of RNG. WTF Either u wanted him lynched before u suggested RNG Or U doing it due to RNG U can't have it both ways, which is it
The random lynch initiation is purely due to RNG, but I have found reasons to lynch him.
I'd like to see if people want to join me or not, knowing that it is a random lynch at the beginning.
@ Palmar
What do you think of lynching Oats today ?
Also why do you think prplhz is scum ? Marv (FiveTouch) had shown that scum prplhz was usually entering the thread in a different way in LIX.
|
I don't think I'm going to have a lot of patience with your bullshit Palmar.
|
Djo: I'm not gonna lynch a random target. I don't know what to do with Oats currently, he is either scum trying to shit up the thread to disrupt town, or stubborn, but I'm sure not just gonnay vote for him because you claim he came up on your RNG.
Also, prplhz not scum, and Palmar better gets some more content in here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
