|
On January 29 2013 11:03 FiveTouch wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2013 11:02 Vivax wrote: You posted a post where there were three options for yesterday's lynch during N2.
How the hell is annul supposed to be sure who's going to get lynched? because it was fucking obvious? All 3 of me/bugs/toad said BKE and Chezinu, the only differences were in #3. Did anyone genuinely end night 2 thinking we weren't lynching those 2?!
Ok I will bite twice. And hopefully I wont say stuff I should not.
As you clearly imply, I 'suspect' everyone + Show Spoiler +whamongst the pool of Townies.o has better idea of how this game is normally played than I do, thought they were obvious due to N2 discussions. Trouble is as I am, without knowledge based on experience, hence I have to work it all out from scratch.
As I remember the timing of things, I have general principle, I didn't like running the D2 Annul wagon so hard so early because then the productive discussion stalls if it becomes fait accompli.
That the double D3 Lynch seemed to be getting as stitched up as it was N2, also seemed implausibly odd. It was especially odd to be doing it before the scum had committed to their actions. Many things in this LIX game seem odd. That one seemed very implausibly odd. Deciding to Lynch Chez of the information that I had, was hard. (I think the (last night) mocsta logs add new twists (Chezs Logic was odd...), I think they make it easier to lynch but ) + Show Spoiler +I do keep seeing information that is to me WTF is that!!, but it must not be that way to multiple others who don't speak up so....  Deb is not a mason... ? So perhaps some people who had more info than me found it even easier to know who would be lynched D3 on N2. Remember the Annul wagon took off then went bleh. Even the hard(overacted?) calling of the offensive JK on BKE as a target seemed odd, as it allowed the possibility of scum holding the shot. I always wondered if it was actually a WIFOM ploy to get scum to hold a shot.... or... but then we really lynched BKE off that. IIRC that was another day Vivax held a check all day and thus I turned up some time before Lynch just in case there was some mad last minute play that was meant to go down. IIRC I totally dismissed the actual announced N2 check until later in the day.
So the answer to your question is ... "Did anyone genuinely end night 2 thinking we weren't lynching those 2?!" maybe... What was the probability of it? I thought it was quite low... At that time (N2), I also knew I had asked Sandroba what I thought was a good question but it was not worth answering so I also knew the accuracy of estimate of the probability was utter crap. That (N2/D2) time I was right we were certainly Lynching them both and very low probability of doing anything else.
(If the N2 D3's are wrong, sorry I tried)
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 29 2013 12:35 Vivax wrote: Seriously marv stop acting like a dick, you always seem to take for granted that everyone should see you as town, you also did as scum in Hero.
you're seriously telling me to stop acting like a dick? this has to get a mafia award.
If you don't see me as town by now, I may as well quit mafia.
|
Vivax, what is scummy abut 5touch?
|
11589 Posts
On January 29 2013 12:33 FiveTouch wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2013 12:32 yamato77 wrote:On January 29 2013 12:30 FiveTouch wrote:On January 29 2013 12:28 yamato77 wrote: It was a foregone conclusion, there was nothing aside from Vivax's check that would have swayed the votes, especially after Bugs died, cementing the reads in people's minds.
Annul was stupid for putting his bomb on Chez, and I said when he claimed that it looked like a play for survival, and now Chez flips red which makes it look worse.
This is nothing new, you've just been ignoring it. I'd much rather lynch Austin now, after this though because you don't seem to want to take responsibility for this lynch, which makes me uneasy. I'm not talking to you anymore. You're stupidly shovelling suspicion at me despite my play the entire game, despite how when we were masoned i repeatedly prevented you fucking up the whole thread with Vivax. I'm literally not interested in what you have to say any more if this is the attitude you're taking. I just don't understand why you opposed me saying Annul's claim was fake before and then now you're the one questioning it. Seems convenient. use your brain. for once in your whole mafia fucking life, please use your fucking brain. I beg you.
Did you or didn't you do exactly as I said?
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 29 2013 12:39 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2013 12:33 FiveTouch wrote:On January 29 2013 12:32 yamato77 wrote:On January 29 2013 12:30 FiveTouch wrote:On January 29 2013 12:28 yamato77 wrote: It was a foregone conclusion, there was nothing aside from Vivax's check that would have swayed the votes, especially after Bugs died, cementing the reads in people's minds.
Annul was stupid for putting his bomb on Chez, and I said when he claimed that it looked like a play for survival, and now Chez flips red which makes it look worse.
This is nothing new, you've just been ignoring it. I'd much rather lynch Austin now, after this though because you don't seem to want to take responsibility for this lynch, which makes me uneasy. I'm not talking to you anymore. You're stupidly shovelling suspicion at me despite my play the entire game, despite how when we were masoned i repeatedly prevented you fucking up the whole thread with Vivax. I'm literally not interested in what you have to say any more if this is the attitude you're taking. I just don't understand why you opposed me saying Annul's claim was fake before and then now you're the one questioning it. Seems convenient. use your brain. for once in your whole mafia fucking life, please use your fucking brain. I beg you. Did you or didn't you do exactly as I said?
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU
|
Jesus. I said lynch him at LYLO. I'm going with "he's town" atm, everything else is utopic.
Let's just discuss. Why not austin?
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
I've told you why not austin. Many times. Repeatedly. I don't see why I'm being asked to repeat myself. I'm losing the will to live.
|
11589 Posts
|
I am not in favour of lynching Austin today CAUSE HE CLAIMED BLUE with absolutly no provocation. Also, he split the vote between Gonzaw and himself. Also balance reasons
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
We have some serious discussing to do after this game, yamato.
|
On January 29 2013 12:43 yamato77 wrote: Okay, Marv. Fine.
Bye.
Answer my question.
|
Oats, who would you be lynching instead of him?
|
11589 Posts
On January 29 2013 12:44 FiveTouch wrote: We have some serious discussing to do after this game, yamato. I agree.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On January 29 2013 12:47 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2013 12:44 FiveTouch wrote: We have some serious discussing to do after this game, yamato. I agree.
Some guy plays the most pro-town game you can possibly imagine in almost 20 pages of filter.
He has suspicion of a guy at a slightly different time than you.
FUCK ME HE MUST BE MAFIA OMG FUCK ME FUCK ME
|
Come on. It's clear who yamato wants to lynch today, and it's not you. Let's just talk about something else.
|
You're simply fucked for being such a good scum player marv, no one will ever trust you.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On January 29 2013 10:49 FiveTouch wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2013 10:47 Vivax wrote: So, who are we lynching today? Who did Toad jail?Why is he so quiet lately?
I am swimming in an ocean of I don't know what the fuck. well, for a start, we'll see how annul answers me. Because at the moment it seems like this. annul asks me/bugs/toad who we're going to lynch day 3. We all say BKE/Chez. annul puts his bomb (?) on Chezinu. Why? We're lynching him! From a mafia perspective? mafia know BKE is town. So if they manage to keep Chez alive for an extra day, they get an extra KP. I literally don't understand putting the bomb on Chezinu in that situation. 5Touch: I literally don't understand putting the bomb on Chezinu in that situation.
Neither do I but I don't understand mad hatter play. My best understanding is Mad Hatters like Vigs mean one more town directed kill. They can thus be used to eliminate various unreadables. It evens up control over who survives to end game. Chezinu AFAIK is a classic target for a MH, but not if think hes about to get Lynched.
|
On January 29 2013 12:46 Vivax wrote: Oats, who would you be lynching instead of him?
Oatsy pls. You don't win this game by defending your townreads.
|
Marv you said you gave reasons to not lynch austin. It's not true. + Show Spoiler +On January 29 2013 03:12 FiveTouch wrote:Going through austin's filter at work because I'm naughty. I found this: Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 08:08 austinmcc wrote: Vivax,
Given that you seem to want toad with bodyguards, and toad wants toad with bodyguards, but does not want Chez with bodyguards, why keep your vote on Chez?
Hi probable townie, given you want another townie with bodyguards (toad), why don't you move your vote off mafia and on to this townie?
This the last thing of weight you wrote about him. Doesn't look like it's to say he's town. Then you completely ignored the fact that gonzaw and austin supported each other, saying literally that they didn't do that.
|
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
|
|
|
|