TL Mafia LIX - Page 177

On January 29 2013 12:11 yamato77 wrote:
I don't know why you're pushing annul in one post and then not in the next.

What the fuck are you doing, marv?

On January 29 2013 12:16 yamato77 wrote:
Marv are you trying to tell us you're mafia with this "mafia wouldn't pass the chance to be elected up" stuff?

Because looking at what happened, unless I think Toad is mafia (I don't), then you're the only other option.

On January 29 2013 12:19 Oatsmaster wrote:
yamato, are you saying that 5touch is Marv? Or are you just angry at EVERYBODY?

Who do you want to lynch today

On January 29 2013 12:19 Oatsmaster wrote:
yamato, are you saying that 5touch is Marv? Or are you just angry at EVERYBODY?

Who do you want to lynch today

On January 29 2013 12:16 FiveTouch wrote:


I might actually start weeping.

I'm pushing him because I don't understand what he did.

But the argument Vivax put in the thread is a good reason annul could be town, and I'm not gonna bullshit about it.

On January 29 2013 12:24 yamato77 wrote:

Well the important thing isn't what I think, because obviously I've been saying he might be mafia all game, it's what you think, because you're mayor and de facto leader of town since most of town votes with you anyway.

But you know this and aren't taking any strong stances about ANYONE in the last cycle or so. Why?

On January 29 2013 12:24 Vivax wrote:
Okay. Let's all cool the fuck down.

I'm in support of an austin lynch cause of the stated.

Marv gets lynched at LYLO (which comes before with him as scum mayor) to avoid another Hero MM.
DID YOU HEAR ME GRUSH????

Marv, don't take this personally, but you're dangerous as shit to have around at LYLO, no matter who you lynched. Consider this an argument that doesn't want your reply. It's policy.

On January 29 2013 12:28 yamato77 wrote:
It was a foregone conclusion, there was nothing aside from Vivax's check that would have swayed the votes, especially after Bugs died, cementing the reads in people's minds.

Annul was stupid for putting his bomb on Chez, and I said when he claimed that it looked like a play for survival, and now Chez flips red which makes it look worse.

This is nothing new, you've just been ignoring it. I'd much rather lynch Austin now, after this though because you don't seem to want to take responsibility for this lynch, which makes me uneasy.

On January 29 2013 12:26 FiveTouch wrote:


Because I don't know who's mafia, it's quite simple.

The reason I keep asking Vivax, and anyone who will listen, about what they thought about the day 3 lynch, is because;

it seems absolutely apparent to me who was getting lynched on day 3, so the fact that annul had his bomb on chezinu should at the least be a cause for concern. But if a bunch of other townies for some reason didn't think it was a forgeone conclusion, then something I find obvious clearly isn't obvious to everyone else. Which changes how I view things.

On January 29 2013 12:30 FiveTouch wrote:


I'm not talking to you anymore. You're stupidly shovelling suspicion at me despite my play the entire game, despite how when we were masoned i repeatedly prevented you fucking up the whole thread with Vivax.

I'm literally not interested in what you have to say any more if this is the attitude you're taking.

On January 29 2013 12:30 Stutters695 wrote:

I asked him that question a while ago. I would have to check his filter and remember what he said though. I had that same concern. Especially with BKE flipping town.

On January 29 2013 12:32 yamato77 wrote:

I just don't understand why you opposed me saying Annul's claim was fake before and then now you're the one questioning it.

Seems convenient.