EPTWitchcraft Mini Mafia - Page 38
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On December 17 2012 05:28 Hapahauli wrote: Are you an idiot? Those votes were within the first 3 hours of the game. This has nothing to do with the timing, this has to do with your claim (which is a lie)... YOU said that you called out lurkers with votes so that they'd post... Q: Were they against lurkers? A: No You've never voted against a lurker and your entire I'm innocent because story has just fallen to shreds through your own ignorance of past actions you've committed. Fact: You've jumped from band wagon to band wagon Fact: You lied about a story that would justify the band wagon hopping. Fact: You've directly accused anyone who's ever accused you just because "they have yet to justify why they're not guilty" You're tracking on very thin ice here, you've been pointing fingers all game, I've kept my eye fixed on the game and I've come to one conclusion at every turn. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
Like, I didn't even see a real case against Mordi, and I like his views on mrZ. Policy lynch, anyone ? | ||
|
JieXian
Malaysia4677 Posts
On December 17 2012 04:45 DarthPunk wrote: The bolded part is incredibly scummy. Hedges bets, says he is a good lynch regardless of alignment. But is not policy lynching. ? He's been consistent in being against MrZ the whole game | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
[QUOTE]On December 17 2012 04:29 Morbidius wrote: [QUOTE]On December 17 2012 04:16 MrZentor wrote: Kush, I'd rather lynch scum than a lurker. We should kill Morbidius.[/QUOTE] Hmm i made some light accusations against you and now you're full on calling me scum? That's quite the overeaction,which certainly doesn't help your case. I already had in mind the fact that you're either very noob town or noobish mafia. Either way a flip is worth more than you. [b]##unvote ##vote MrZentor[/b[]/QUOTE] Justifying lynching a "noob town." I don't think these things are 100% allignment indicative, but it's certainly scummy and the best chance we have for a red flip IMO. | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
Just scanned Morbidius's filter. I wouldn't mind lynching him. There was the pre-emptive defensiveness that MrZ brought up earlier, as well as this: On December 17 2012 04:29 Morbidius wrote: Hmm i made some light accusations against you and now you're full on calling me scum? That's quite the overeaction,which certainly doesn't help your case. I already had in mind the fact that you're either very noob town or noobish mafia. Either way a flip is worth more than you. ##unvote ##vote MrZentor Justifying lynching a "noob town." I don't think these things are 100% allignment indicative, but it's certainly scummy and the best chance we have for a red flip IMO. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On December 17 2012 05:32 drazak wrote: Just got back to reading the thread. WTF. You edited your post?! Please read the rules. No editing of posts allowed. I didn't intend to, if it happened, I apologize. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
On December 17 2012 05:35 JieXian wrote: ? He's been consistent in being against MrZ the whole game Consistency is not a townie trait. But here I like the fact that he is after mrZ  | ||
|
JieXian
Malaysia4677 Posts
[QUOTE]On December 17 2012 05:28 MrZentor wrote: The List of Reasons Eywa isn't scum. (Although it should be pretty apparent to anybody that reads through his filter) 1. It's unlikely that mafia would flat out insult somebody; they want to be on everybody's good side, so that they don't get lynched [QUOTE]On December 17 2012 03:17 Eywa- wrote: [QUOTE]On December 17 2012 03:15 MrZentor wrote: I'm thinking.[/QUOTE] If you weren't so busy thinking about how awesome of a player you are, maybe you'd have an answer :-/.[/QUOTE] 2. ACOLYTE IS VANILLA TOWN. That's right; he didn't scum slip. 3. He is a lot of good posts that I agree with. [QUOTE]On December 17 2012 03:07 Eywa- wrote: [QUOTE]On December 17 2012 03:02 threesr wrote: haven't been reading this game too close but i want to lynch jiexian [/QUOTE] Are you for real... like, if this is the extent of your contribution, you shouldn't be playing. Clearly players are responsible for reading the thread.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]On December 17 2012 03:56 Eywa- wrote: [QUOTE]On December 17 2012 03:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: [QUOTE]On December 17 2012 03:49 JieXian wrote: [QUOTE]On December 17 2012 01:22 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Hey guys, shenanigans here being sorted out. I'm down for a Thrawn lynch, he's a sheeping scummy dude right meow. Thrawn is an Opportunist + Show Spoiler + On December 15 2012 11:11 thrawn2112 wrote: ok ##Vote Djodref what kind of information are you looking for? Sheep on Djodref vote, hardcore. No explanation, just does it. Also, the question he asks is self-explanatory. On December 15 2012 12:13 thrawn2112 wrote: I didn't th9nk hapa's case was super good but dp's reaction to it seems insane Slightly discredits Hapa's case, and takes the opportunity to acknowledge that DP looks scummy after an OMGUS vote (duh). He then unvotes to keep his options open. When Hapa makes his more fortified case, he suddenly believes it's some god-given scumhunting then votes for DP. Wait, What's this? On December 15 2012 12:17 thrawn2112 wrote: dp I don't think it's fair to accuse djo based on setup speculation meta because of 2 reasons 1. start of the game and everyone is lurking 2. this game doesn't have standard mechanics Didn't Thrawn VOTE for Djo based on this exact thing? He was being obsessed with blue roles / witchhunter and Thrawn sheeped the vote, supposedly because of this. Now he thinks it's not fair to accuse him? On December 16 2012 10:17 thrawn2112 wrote: oh sniped on the random lurker vote lol, sounds fun ##unvote ##Vote: Mr Cheesecake pie is better and all you mo-fos need to start posting Sheeps onto lurker vote opportunity. Underlined = scummiest shit ever townies like cheesecake over pie. On December 16 2012 11:38 thrawn2112 wrote: ok here's what I probably mean about kush... you mention his terrible ideas... yes the things he's said he'll do this game have been crazy, but that's his meta right? this game however, it seems like they are intentionally dumb. scum kush says crazier things than town kush. he said he's not going to lynch me no matter what... is that a joke? an actual plan? the problem is I couldn't really tell.... it's so different from town oriented thinking I don't know what to make of it. the only reason I have to suspect that town kush could possibly have said that is because he's lynched me over and over for the same reasons and I keep flipping town. PROBABLY mean? What? How do you probably mean something...? Town mean things genuinely, scum try to emulate they are meaning something. The rest of this post is garbage--he comes to no read on Kush at all, just flip-flops between the possibility of town kush not wanting to lynch him and the alternative scum motivation. Above all, Thrawn doesn't seem to care who is lynched: On December 15 2012 11:52 thrawn2112 wrote: this conversation between the few of us is getting very tiresome i'll lynch lurkers LURKERS i will happily lynch you Okay so he wants to lynch a lurker. By all means, a viable strategy considering the circumstance. But he also wants to lynch Djo, JX, DP... I'm confused. I don't see strong scum reads from him other than on JX due to obvious scumslips. He is sheeping a ton and doesn't seem too caring of who he wants to get lynched. Just look at this flip-floppiness between lurker lynching and lynching his top scumread. On December 16 2012 20:05 thrawn2112 wrote: I suggest all town people be around during the lynch if (when?) we decide to lynch a rando lurker Maybe we could lynch a lurker! That sounds like a good idea! On December 16 2012 20:41 thrawn2112 wrote: i still really really like it But I still really really like a JX lynch! On December 16 2012 20:42 thrawn2112 wrote: but who knows, perhaps some lurker will die instead But maybe we could lynch a lurker! I'm all for that! Why is Thrawn so indecisive? On December 16 2012 14:04 thrawn2112 wrote: no this is a lie the red parts are what I just now added to the 2nd post that would make the 1st post true. I bolded "but above all" because that implies you still hold your suspicions about hapa/dp. J scum-slipped hard, he lied about the scumslip, he's a lurker... and he's scum He states JX is scum. THEN WHY IS HE KEEPING HIS OPTIONS OPEN LIKE THIS? Town Thrawn would want to push this JX lynch into the ground, not be ready to jump off the wagon at the last minute to lynch a lurker. Thrawn's general posting in context of the thread seems very opportunistic. The way he jumps on JX's vote post of Mr.Z is just that, scum trying to find easy things to tackle people on. I have no clue, if town, why he's willing to lynch a lurker right now if he's set on JX being scum. ##Vote: Thrawn[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]On December 17 2012 02:51 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: [QUOTE]On December 17 2012 02:50 kushm4sta wrote: we really need a vote count... We only have 3 hours left... people should not be discussing anything but the lynch. Who are teh viable lynches at this point? Is anyone adverse to lynching a lurker?[/QUOTE] Yes we need a vote count. I want to lynch Thrawn but I don't think anyone is biting atm... Who'd you have in mind for lurkers?[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]On December 17 2012 02:52 JieXian wrote: read my filter please, I'm still waiting for his reply[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]On December 17 2012 02:57 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: JX, that post wasn't even directed towards / had anything to do with you.[/QUOTE] So you posted your long wall of text case against thrawn for shits and giggles? I get it [/QUOTE] Jx, you're really paranoid. If I could lynch thrawn I would. But apparently everyone wants you dead, and I can see why.[/QUOTE] That's pretty much how it seems this game is going to go "We want you dead" even though he in no way seems to be guilty. I hope someone sees reason before the vote is final.[/QUOTE] [/QUOTE] Cracked me up while I was cracking my head looking for answers | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
On December 17 2012 05:34 Djodref wrote: I don't think Mordi is a good lynch at this point. I think a policy lynch on theesr is the best we can do right now... Like, I didn't even see a real case against Mordi, and I like his views on mrZ. Policy lynch, anyone ? What?? There are least four. Why do you want to kill a town lurker so bad? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
Morbidius (7) - Drazak, MrZentor, DP, kush, MrCheesecake, DoYouHas, threesr threesr (1) - Djodref MrZentor (1) - Morbidius Hapahauli (1) - Eywa- MrCheesecake (1) - JieXian Not Voting (2) - Hapahauli, thrawn2112 Currently Morbidius is set to be lynched! The deadline is in ~35 minutes at Sunday, Dec 16 9:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) aka 21:00 GMT (+00:00). Please make sure to vote and to cast your secret witchcraft votes by then. Anyone who has not voted by the end of the day will be subject to moderator action. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
Why is everybody ignoring my proposition to lynch theesr on a policy lynch ? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
JieXian
Malaysia4677 Posts
it was about the acoltye = townie not a scumslip thing morbid is a bad idea I'm down for a mrcc lynch On December 17 2012 03:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Jx, you're really paranoid. If I could lynch thrawn I would. But apparently everyone wants you dead, and I can see why. WHY ARENT YOU LYNCHING THRAWN NOW THEN? | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On December 17 2012 05:34 Eywa- wrote: This has nothing to do with the timing, this has to do with your claim (which is a lie)... YOU said that you called out lurkers with votes so that they'd post... Q: Were they against lurkers? A: No Oh this is getting rediculous. 1) Everyone's a lurker in the beginning of the game. I pressured anyone who was around 'cause thats all I can do. How the hell do you pressure someone who hasn't posted yet in the first 3 hours? So I pressured DP and Djo. They are now my strongest townreads. You've never voted against a lurker and your entire I'm innocent because story has just fallen to shreds through your own ignorance of past actions you've committed. This is a straight-up lie. I've voted kush (when he was a lurker, and the reason he's not is because of MY tunneling of him). I've voted JieXian (when he was lurky, and he still kinda is), I've pressured Draz, and I've voted for your lurky-ass. You're failing to account for the state of the game when I placed my votes. Fact: You've jumped from band wagon to band wagon Fact: You lied about a story that would justify the band wagon hopping. Fact: You've directly accused anyone who's ever accused you just because "they have yet to justify why they're not guilty" "Fact" 1) I haven't "jumped" on any bandwagon. In fact I've been a bandwagon starter. I tunnel people until they convince me they're town or scum. "Fact" 2) It's not a lie, you're just screaming it is "Fact" 3) Yes, what's your point? That's how scumhunting works. You're tracking on very thin ice here, you've been pointing fingers all game, I've kept my eye fixed on the game and I've come to one conclusion at every turn. Well I'll probably be dead after N1, it's not going to last too long. | ||
| ||
