| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On November 23 2012 10:09 Oatsmaster wrote: EWBOP: My post was directed at hopeless/clarity/marv. Not chronicler :D given i said i had done my speculating for the day and it was all of 3 lines long, you may go and screw yourself, sir. | ||
|
TheChronicler
Macedonia260 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On November 23 2012 10:12 Oatsmaster wrote: Speculating what hidden modifiers scum has in comparison to town is pointless CAUSE we dont actually know anything about those modifiers. Yes it makes sense that out of a 4 man team, 1 scum would fail the mission but that was already brought up last cycle. We should focus on scum hunting and leaving the party members out of the discussion is better as it narrows down the pool in which to find scum. Yes I am biased because I am in the party. excellent, except now the conversation about it is twice as long because you're ranting about it. well done there. | ||
|
TheChronicler
Macedonia260 Posts
On November 23 2012 10:09 Oatsmaster wrote: EWBOP: My post was directed at hopeless/clarity/marv. Not chronicler :D Lol, I was like wtf? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18425 Posts
On November 23 2012 09:16 Toadesstern wrote: How is that a soft defense? I basicly said that I would not have picked Deinosaur, as in I didn't consider him to be a clear townie at all. I said I want Sandroba and Marv lynch. What part of that post is defending someone? How could you NOT have a town read on this guy? I'm boggled. He's like a transparent BillMurray. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On November 23 2012 10:13 Acrofales wrote: How could you NOT have a town read on this guy? I'm boggled. He's like a transparent BillMurray. must... resist... obvious answer.... | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On November 23 2012 10:08 TheChronicler wrote: I'm talking about you trying to get votes on marv when sand is trending. I wouldn't even mind if you had done it with some reasoning. wat I think I made it fairly clear that I want to lynch Sandroba today with that post. If anything I'm softdefending Marv by saying I'd rather lynch Sandro today lol. but that'd be incredibly far fatched. I'd say I made it fairly clear that I'd like to lynch the both of them if we had a double lynch available. | ||
|
Dienosore
Brunei Darussalam622 Posts
 b-b-b-but i was only gone for like 6 hours | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On November 23 2012 10:12 Oatsmaster wrote: Speculating what hidden modifiers scum has in comparison to town is pointless CAUSE we dont actually know anything about those modifiers. Yes it makes sense that out of a 4 man team, 1 scum would fail the mission but that was already brought up last cycle. We should focus on scum hunting and leaving the party members out of the discussion is better as it narrows down the pool in which to find scum. Yes I am biased because I am in the party. I'll be nicer than marv, partly because I'm not done speculating yet. Did you lose hp? | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On November 23 2012 10:13 Acrofales wrote: How could you NOT have a town read on this guy? I'm boggled. He's like a transparent BillMurray. The BillMurray who's playing like and idiot from time to times (I'm trying to be nice), keeps on blackmailing people as a mad hatter so that noone lynches him and actually succeeds in doing so because people think there's no way he'd be that stupid as mafia so they think he's just really a stupid Drazerk-like townie. I have never ever figured out BillMurray in my life in a game of mafia with confidence and I played some games with him. Does that answer your question? Yes I'd agree the comparison you did isn't complete bullshit, hence my astonishment because I'd neither label any of those 2 transparent. Never ever. | ||
|
TheChronicler
Macedonia260 Posts
On November 23 2012 10:14 Toadesstern wrote: wat I think I made it fairly clear that I want to lynch Sandroba today with that post. If anything I'm softdefending Marv by saying I'd rather lynch Sandro today lol. but that'd be incredibly far fatched. I'd say I made it fairly clear that I'd like to lynch the both of them if we had a double lynch available. No. To me it looks like you're trying to have a back door for yourself in case a marv push were to appear. You could point to that post and go, "See!" People will decide for themselves, but for ME it's sketchy as hell. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18425 Posts
So, given that, I think I will follow SnB's advice and just ignore him. Which leaves Sandro. I am not sure I like the bandwagon that is already forming on him, but I can't ignore the fact that he is acting like his scum self, and not his town self. I will also be looking into the other competition for the party leadership more closely. Particularly Hapa: I was null on him, but the whole lastminute campaigning really made me wary. Will read his filter more closely tomorrow. | ||
|
Dienosore
Brunei Darussalam622 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On November 23 2012 10:19 TheChronicler wrote: No. To me it looks like you're trying to have a back door for yourself in case a marv push were to appear. You could point to that post and go, "See!" People will decide for themselves, but for ME it's sketchy as hell. In that case I could also go to the countless amount of posts I did yesterday telling people that Marv is probably the least person I'd ever vote because I consider him to be mafia and that I consider one of Sandro&Syllo to be mafia, thinking Syllo is town. But yeah I want them both dead. If a Marv lynch is going to appear I'll vote for that as well, I just think a Sandroba lynch is the better move right now. A softdefense would be telling people "Sandro is totally mafia but I'd rather lynch Marv". That's why I said I could understand it the otherway around but the way you said it just makes no sense. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Your question to me was interesting. I may look into it at a later date | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On November 23 2012 10:30 Oatsmaster wrote: Clarity, no I did not take damage. Your question to me was interesting. I may look into it at a later date Someone suggested to use the same party every time we have to send a party, and I was wondering if it was viable. Quite interested in why you think I asked. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On November 23 2012 10:32 Clarity_nl wrote: Someone suggested to use the same party every time we have to send a party, and I was wondering if it was viable. Quite interested in why you think I asked. the fact that the party did not take damage (if they all didn't) isn't necessarily an indicator that they cannot take damage | ||
| ||
|
|
GSL
OSC
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
IntoTheTV X SOOP
CranKy Ducklings
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
