EPTChrono Trigger Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On November 22 2012 00:20 kushm4sta wrote: Holy fuck this thread is so long and 99% of it is about who are we voting leader, which I really don't care about. Not much thought put into this decision but ##vote sandroba Good town, easy to distinguish town from scum. You usually have a million page filter when you are town, I've a hard time believing you find the size taunting. What do you care about then and what are you going to about it? Why do you say sandroba's town play is easy to distinguish from his mafia play, my impression from looney lynching was that you had no idea whether he was town or mafia on day 1 (he got shot n1)? | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Today I think it's a good idea not to reveal, at least if I'm the leader, who the party is going to be until the action resolving period, because that minimizes potential of mafia roles somehow messing with the success of the party (doesn't eliminate it though) and prevents them from sniping party members in case it's an all town party. The main advantage in revealing who is coming is to provide more information regarding the alignment of the party leader, but I do not think that is necessary if I get elected. I have never been lynched as town and will never likely be; it should soon be extremely clear whether I'm town or not, it already is in fact. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On November 22 2012 16:23 Keirathi wrote: What do you think about my point that party leader candidates expressing who they plan to choose as their party giving mafia extra influence as to who they want to vote to elect in the event that one of the candidates has a scum member in their proposed parties while the others might not? This is absolutely true, although we don't know whether 1 mafia is enough for an event to fail. Balance wise I think it makes sense for that to be case, unless the party consists of townies with a high hidden factor numbers. I'm not going to reveal who I am going to pick. I may do that after the day post if that is necessary; that is to say, if the event fails. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On November 22 2012 16:12 Adam4167 wrote: Syllo, what are your thoughts on Kitaman. I am trying to grasp if he is taking this game seriously when he delivers a list of 'reads' with as lousy reasoning as he did. I've seen him play well as both scum and town, and this doesn't look similar to either. I don't currently find him particularly suspicious. Some elements of his posts point towards him being interested in figuring things out and nothing stands out as clearly mafia motivated. When he puts in effort his mafia play is good, however. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On November 22 2012 16:58 risk.nuke wrote: What? What benefit would it be not to explain the reasoning for why you picked them? If the mission is a success and everyone considers me town anyway I don't think that's necessary and I would then rather be lazy. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On November 22 2012 17:13 risk.nuke wrote: I'm not a fan of your lazy-when-I-feel-like-it strategy. It still feels like you should have your reads on why you picked your team already. It shouldn't be that much of an effort to scribble them down. What do you think of leader-candidates outside you and sandroba? (feel free to ignore kitaman) Acro seems like the only other serious candidate and I do not like his play so far. The most recent post of his that I found off was the one where he suggested for Frog should attempt to run a campaign without claiming and he based this on, in my view, laughable suggestion that frog was a playable character in the first mission of the game. It seemed like a complete fluff post rather than a serious well-thought of suggestion. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
I'll be back in maybe 6 hours | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Sandro: you said that you don't mind me being the leader. Does that mean you are open to throwing your support behind me and withdrawing your nomination? | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Whomever is elected i will support in their choice of team 100%, we as a town gain more (information and, I believe a better chance of mission success) by giving that power to one person. This doesn't feel like town mindset, which is that of suspicion. It makes no sense at all to suggest that whomever is elected you will support the choice of team 100%. How do you gain more information by giving that power to one person? If that person is mafia, what information do you gain from his choices? Better chance of mission success regardless of whom is elected? This might also be nitpicky depending on how he plays usually, but first he has this to say about Hapa He is a great town player and a kinda crappy scum player, seems like the right guy to have along for the ride. I just don't have that town feel from Hapa. (as Hapa knows I never have a town feel from him). First Promethelax asserts that hapa is a great town player and crappy scum player and thus prom wanted to have him on his team. In the second quote he says that he never has a town read on Hapa. This feels like the kind of contradiction that indicates a mindset other than town. If you aren't comfortable reading Hapa, why would you want him on your team? In general I find people who immediately suggested teams based on nothing at all. His reasoning for not wanting to vote for me or sandro are also curious as I think I saw him only explaining why he chose not to vote for sandro, but didn't provide any reason for not voting for me. | ||
| ||
