• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:25
CEST 10:25
KST 17:25
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed17Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Who will win EWC 2025? The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion Soulkey Muta Micro Map? [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 643 users

Chrono Trigger Mafia - Page 11

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 Next All
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 01 2012 15:35 GMT
#5459
Sniped...
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 01 2012 17:14 GMT
#5470
Hopeless,

+ Show Spoiler +
On December 02 2012 01:35 Hopeless1der wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2012 20:26 goodkarma wrote:
On December 01 2012 12:18 Hopeless1der wrote:
Because of the amount of effort Acro has put into the game and my belief that he has the towns best interest at heart, I am not going to 100% claim my actions in order to protect his HP information. I do not believe the information I'm withholding is valuable enough to town to justify giving scum/other 3rd parties that info.

I gain vig hits equal to 2x the damage I deal to myself and untargetability as my secondary ability.
N1 - 63 HP
N2 - Target CJ for 126 damage
N3 - # HP (withheld to prevent knowledge of Acro's HP)
N4 - Target Toad
N5 - I'll debate whether its worth claiming.

Things to note:
My target on CJ seems to have been delayed. In addition, it directly contradicts gk's claim. There is an extra 75 damage that went missing on CJ Night 3. However, my hit should have gone through Night 2, and I don't know why it didn't.

I was unable to deal the amount of damage to myself that I wanted to last night. I still have a shot, its just less than I was expecting. The amount I fell short makes no sense from a percentage standpoint. It was not a round number.

No heals to report.


I don't want to use tech attacks for this event. I want to try taking that sword and I want Robo to attack first.

##Slash: A
##Flea: E


So explain to me how your attack got "delayed?" Because from what I see in your claim, your damage should have gone through night 2. My shot went off on night 3...

Are you dense or scum, and keep in mind I already think you're scum? What part of I don't know what happened did you not understand? I wouldn't withhold that information because the situation is confusing enough as it is. As far as I can tell, I'm the only player that has the option to deal abnormal amounts of damage (i.e. not increments of 5). The simplest solution is that my hit was delayed and yours was half of what you say it was.

This brings me to another point:
Show nested quote +
On November 29 2012 13:04 goodkarma wrote:
Might as well roleclaim now:

My name is Fiona. I have a vigilante-type role.

Night 3, I was responsible for 150 points of damage on CaveJohnson.

So here's what I propose:
1) You see if anyone comes forward to counterclaim the damage.
2) If someone does one of us is scum. Lynch accordingly.
3) If not, I am incredibly tired of having to deal with ignorant people... I'm going to role claim now, so that later as confirmed town I'm entitled to draw giant pictures of dinosaurs, and run around failing parties like I've been lobotomized.


See you guys later after I've calmed down.

CJ claimed more damage than you claimed to have dealt. Why was that not accounted for in your proposal? What did you think happened to the 51 damage? Why am I automatically scum, by your reasoning?



@Acro
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2012 20:34 Acrofales wrote:
So your first ability is to do a percentage of a target player's HP damage to yourself, if I understand correctly? Current HP or max HP? Also what percentage? If you ever feel the necessity to claim N3, I want to be able to verify that.

My ability does not use percentages to determine any damage dealt.

What's supposed to happen is:

I pick a number between 0 and [an upper limit].
Damage is dealt TO MYSELF equal to the number I selected.
I then gain a vig hit for 2x the damage dealt and I cannot be targeted the following night.

The percentages part of my post was because I suspect foul play. The number I selected last night, the one to deal damage to myself, was reduced by an amount that makes no sense. It isn't a clean percentage of the total, it isnt a round number, it was just strange and I don't know if anyone has the ability to modify my own.
Alternatively, the math behind my max HP says I can fully charge one more hit before I'm down to 1 hp. I'm going to get at least one more cycle in because I'm untargetable again tonight.


I suspect that only myself and draz targeted Toad, no one else has claimed to do so. I think the mafia has a block 50% damage that was used on Toad. From there, you should be able to extrapolate roughly how much my hit was for, barring CJ's HP fluctuations and Toad lying through his teeth.



I never said you were scum. If you were to look, I have you listed as a town read. I just couldn't follow how you concluded your ability was delayed, and I still don't. No one to date has claimed any kind of ability that would postpone damage as you've described.


Consider that the fifty-one points of damage I didn't inflict could have come from another source that's not reporting, and your damage night 2 could have been somehow nullified. This would involve three people's abilities.

This is actually a simpler possibility than your proposal of a type of ability that no one's claimed to have postponed your damage, and saying I dealt a different amount of damage than what I said I did (this scenario would actually involve four people: me, you, and someone with a damage mitigation ability on CJ, and someone with this damage-postponement ability which imho is pretty far-fetched...)...


Finally, one last possibility: CaveJohnson is lying.

Take your pick, but imho your scenario is the least plausible of the three listed here.
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 01 2012 21:32 GMT
#5518
On December 02 2012 06:25 kitaman27 wrote:
No need to get emotional

It seems to me that S&B's role is more useful as an investigative role, rather than a heal 50 hp role. Based on the two flips we've seen so far, the bad guys in the game match up with the mafia team roles. What we can do is select the player we're most likely to lynch the next cycle, force them to name claim, and have S&B verify that the character name.


Did it occur to you that if strong is scum, then his "confirmations" mean nothing? If the person's town, he'll say it "checks out," and if scum fake claims he'll do exactly the same...
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 01 2012 21:51 GMT
#5520
On December 02 2012 06:44 kitaman27 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2012 06:32 goodkarma wrote:
On December 02 2012 06:25 kitaman27 wrote:
No need to get emotional

It seems to me that S&B's role is more useful as an investigative role, rather than a heal 50 hp role. Based on the two flips we've seen so far, the bad guys in the game match up with the mafia team roles. What we can do is select the player we're most likely to lynch the next cycle, force them to name claim, and have S&B verify that the character name.


Did it occur to you that if strong is scum, then his "confirmations" mean nothing? If the person's town, he'll say it "checks out," and if scum fake claims he'll do exactly the same...


If he confirms a scum fake claim, then he's linked himself to another scum player and we have a 2 for 1 deal. You value the 50 hp heal over the investigative check?


Never said that. Just saying we can't trust what he says from his investigative checks.

Nvm though. I see what you're saying now. If we're going to lynch a person he checks regardless of what he says his check turned back, then we can possibly catch him in a lie and get "2 for 1"... Got it. I approve.
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 02 2012 01:43 GMT
#5573
The presented arguement for path and Magus both make sense.


##Ozzie B
##Magus A
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 02 2012 02:03 GMT
#5575
Doing a little research, Magus hits like a truck a little while after the preparing a spell message, so healing everyone up makes sense.

As for pathing, taking the route without pits makes sense. Although, I suppose you could argue if a particular route had a pit containing a treasure chest that could be nice...

The reason people are sheeping is because his proposed actions are sensible...
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 02 2012 02:15 GMT
#5578
And as far as SnB being scum, I would propose this.:

We come to a consensus on our top 2 lynch picks before next cycle. I strongly suspect at this time that SnB would be among them (at least, he is for me, with phagga being the other...). We have SnB investigate one of them, and, if we are in a situation where we've decided he is the other top lynch choice, we will know the alignment of the second choice if SnB is somehow mislynched and flips town.

As for my 2 lynch choices (as I just said), they would be: phagga, SnB



Tbh, at this point, I'm skeptical that SnB's abilities are real, but we might as well make the best use of them if for whatever reason he's actually telling the truth.
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 03 2012 00:16 GMT
#5782
I took 75 damage.
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 03 2012 08:50 GMT
#5928
On December 03 2012 17:18 phagga wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 03 2012 17:00 risk.nuke wrote:
##Vote strongandbig

Hapas first ability sound like bogus. The second sound like scum.


That post sounds like scum. you have posted almost nothing in the last 72 hours, and all you do is trying to judge a player on is claimed abilities. Hapa has posted a lot in the last few hours, why don't you comment on that?


Incredibly hypocritical to be saying this, considering pretty much the exact same thing could be said of you. You haven't posted anything of substance for quite a while (like ~2 days...). What do you think of Hapa? You've spent a good deal of effort defending yourself against his case, but I don't see much about what you actually think of him...
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 03 2012 09:02 GMT
#5929
So here's the strong situation: a "confirmed town" player (syllo) establishes that strong visited Djo, who is not the target strong said he was going to visit (phagga), and also Djo happens to die that night... That's two strikes against strong just there, and a compelling case that he's scum just based off night actions.:

##Vote: strongandbig


As for my current scum reads:
Nothing has really changed on my reads since my all-encompassing list post. The only exception to that is Adam, who I now have a slight town read on. Said post is spoilered below for reference. A few additional case points on why strong is scum are also listed there.:


+ Show Spoiler +
On November 30 2012 20:34 goodkarma wrote:
Listed below is a more detailed list post. Included are all my reads, including my top scum suspects.:

Clarity, Oatsmaster, Dienosore, Keirathi, Syllogism: “Confirmed town…”
TheChronicler: believable claim, a sincerity that leads me to believe he's town...
Toad – Scum, obviously.

Z-Boson – Lurky, about to be replaced. From what I’ve seen of his game, he plays much more wishy-washy as scum and tries moreso to “blend in” than give definitive reads. Then again, this was in (I think?) his first newbie game (NMM XXIV). Whatever the case, I know that his play has evolved significantly since then, and that if he was scum his play would be possibly craftier. But I do like his closing list post. I would lean towards a (slight) town read on him at this present point in the game. We will know more after his replacement (hopefully) does a better job of being active. + Show Spoiler +
(And as a side note, I’m a little sad I couldn’t play a full game with Z-Bo… Playing with him in NMM XXIV was a blast )


Kitaman – For being a strong town player, he doesn’t seem to be dedicating much effort into playing this game. Honestly, does anyone NOT think he’s 3rd party yet? His most recent post about Acro though does raise my eyebrows quite high though… Why does he take such a sudden interest in Acro??? Is it because he has to get him lynched as a 3rd party objective? Heavy speculation I know, but the thought crossed my mind… I mean it’s not as though Kita’s done much of anything all game to help us… Just as he’s pushing for Acro to full claim, I’d propose that it’s important for him to full claim, for the same reasons he listed for Acro.

CaveJohnson – Ridiculously anti-town, lies constantly about his abilities, but hard to read because of the consistency with which he does it… That pretty much sums up his play… That he claimed to damage Toad with some super-powerful OP ability doesn’t mean he’s town… I’d say if Acro were to claim his HP, maybe there could be some means of determining if his claim were even plausible after Toad’s flip. But really even that is speculative, as Acro isn’t someone who we know we can trust presently… As it stands, there’s really not much we can do with him. He’s not a strong lynch prospect, but I’m still not against him being a decent vigi prospect. Even then, though, I don’t feel he’s the best priority right now. This is different than my stance before. Details below:

While making this list post, I’ve thought of it this way: I am of the belief that CaveJohnson would be just as likely to be playing this way as scum or town. So how I look at it it’s a (assuming 5-member scumteam) 5/25 (20%) chance he’s scum from the outset. It could be the case but it’s inherently unlikely… As such, there are better vigi targets.

Hapa – I honestly don’t know what to make of this healing situation. Firstly, I don’t see how town or scum would be likely to damage Hapa. Secondly, I don’t see what Hapa would have to gain by lying about either being damaged or healed… And this I believe to be the major point: even if he were scum, why would he have any reason whatsoever to lie about being damaged or healed? Pity points, I guess??? I see zero motive for doing so, and as such I believe Hapa’s damage and (lack of) healing claims. The circumstances for them may be unclear, but in the absence of motive there’s really no reason I can see to not believe Hapa.

Regarding Hapa’s play in general: It’s undeniably “off” from the town Hapa I remember that tunnel drills scum to death. But then again, I see clearly pro-town qualities to his play. He is providing scum reads and doing + Show Spoiler +
(at least imo)
decent scumhunting. I was disappointed to see how little people considered his case on phagga, as I believe it does a decent job showing how phagga should be a top scum suspect, and a person who should be further investigated. It helps too that he “sticks his neck out” on persons such as myself, who definitely is on several people’s vigi-kill/lynch wish list right now… This is something scum don’t typically do.

I’m not 100% familiar with his scum play but from what I’ve seen from a couple of games where he’s played scum (Mario mini, liquid city), he takes on a more informal tone in his posts and is a bit more trolly. He has a more serious tone this game, and while I would not consider this alone a reason to call him town, it is something else worth considering. I would love to see a game where he played scum well, as I find it hard to believe he got a “well-respected scum game” from these two games… All in all, I have a town read on him.

Iamperfection – Players such as him are incredibly hard for me to read… In fact the only thing I can really say from what I’ve tried to gather from his meta is that he is super-spammy as town (in Mario mini) and a less spammy as scum (NMM XIX, GSL mini don’t remember the number). As it stands, I’m trying to sift through a sea of one-liners to find posts of substance. I clearly recall in the early game, he had a really ridiculous “You know I’m town, right?” remark that Acro hammered him for. While I really didn’t feel it was productive, given how he plays I couldn’t call that alignment indicative. As it stands, he does seem to be showing what I consider to be genuine interest in the game (with intermittent non-sequitor remarks…), asking relevant questions to try to peg scum. I would like to see more “case” posting from him, but I’m not holding my breath… Leaning town.

Prox – There’s a certain zeal with which he pushed his cases when we first played together as town in NMM XXII. Not saying that our play hasn’t evolved since then, but I do find it incredibly hard to believe that, however bad, as scum he could be bothered to write up a 43-page case against someone (me). I guess it could be he really really hates me … But I’d assume it’s more plausible that he’s passionate about finding scum this game. And that’s not the kind of passion you typically find from scum. I’ve taken a chance to look at his scum game in NMM XIX, and it’s also notable that he is far lurkier that game. 18 pages’ activity, however, in his filter presently this game, and there’s definitely some substantial scumhunting in there. I’d say that’s at least some indication that he cares. Add to that that he has a plausible roleclaim that I’m inclined to believe. I have a town read on him.

Hopeless – At this point I’m having a bit of writer’s block mulling through everything… But I can say this: Hopeless tends to play a far lurkier game as scum. Also the effort he puts into defending himself and the transparency with which he’s explained his scummy actions (such as lack of scumhunting) I find to be town characteristics. I have a slight town read on him. Although if he is to convince others he isn’t scum, it would be a good idea for him to pick up on the scumhunting…

risk.nuke – This seems to be a favorite topic of a few people here for a potential lynch. He definitely hasn’t been very useful for town, and his scumhunting is rather lacking, but I’m not convinced that makes him scum. A large part of my town read on him is his roleclaim in mason QT. He was incredibly indignant about how reserved I was with communicating with him, and as he came to understand it was uncertain his claim implied he was town I felt he was genuine in how he came across.

Another reason I believe risk is that I have never seen a setup where masons are scum aligned. And honestly, from a logistical standpoint it would make little sense as it’s a power that really wouldn’t help scum much at all. And from this perspective, I find it unlikely that he is lying. I am rather thankful that he was given the mason role, as I will admit that from his filter it would be very easy to mislynch him.

And lastly, I am unsure as to the full line of reasoning for why he chose me the first cycle. I will, however, say that I find it believable that as town you would bring in the person you vote for party leader, as that’s clearly one of your town reads. He definitely could have used his role differently (as a way to try to confirm and vigi kill scum reads), but he didn’t. Traditionally, a mason wouldn’t have a vigi kill power, and I could understand how he would not think to use his role in what is (arguably) the stronger way of confirming and killing scum… I have a town read on risk.

Djo – I really should have given his scum game more credit. I didn’t realize until looking at Mario Mini that he had a formidable scum game. However, I still have a town read on him. He had been eager every step of the way to get himself established as town. Even now, when it would be suicidal as scum to be elected to a party, he’s excited for the opportunity. I simply don’t see scum doing that, as being the weak link that fails the party at this point in the game means certain detection and death.

Adam – I really don’t like the way he’s played this game. And the only scum game I could find he lurked until he got modkilled, which really doesn’t tell me much of anything… He shows an active interest in the game, asking reasonable questions, but his only “case” seems to be on Z-Boson who he seems bent on tunneling. I remember a person or two commenting on how it was inaccurate he was spending most his time tunneling Z-Boson as it was only something like two posts. But looking at his sparse filter, they are the two-three posts of the most substance. He made one or two comments about Sandroba for his lynch, but beyond that, all he’s given us is Z-Boson is a prime scum candidate and no one else really is… Tunneling is something both scum and town do. However, Z-Boson is an easy target that has had lurker issues similar to Adam. Imho, it’s a bit scummy to only focus on Z-Boson, even after he’s said he’s getting replaced… All that being said, I have a null read on Adam. Outside of Z-Boson, he has generally acted pro-town and nothing else appears to be scummy.

Acro – Has generally acted pro-town, and has claimed 3rd party. Kita, however, has brought up the good point that we have no idea of Acro’s win condition or if he can be trusted. Unlike Kita, the most peculiar thing I’ve found about Acro is how actively invested he seems to be as 3rd party. This doesn’t make sense to me, unless if he wins with town. And if he really is 3rd party, he should have a different win condition of some kind… It doesn’t quite add up for me. He genuinely seems to be trying, and I can’t quite figure out why. He needs to roleclaim if town is to trust that he is an asset and not a liability going further into this game. I also have not ruled out the possibility that the reason he is so proactive after claiming 3rd party is that he actually is scum. Nothing that I can presently find tips me towards distrusting he’s third party, but it’s in the back of my mind…

My Scum Reads:
Sorry that this section isn’t longer and more detailed. I may elaborate more at a later point in time if people demand a “definitive case.” What makes them top suspects is that almost everyone else’s alignment I have deduced as discussed above. Combined with the scummy behavior they exhibit, I believe they have a very strong chance of flipping red.

1) phagga – I like Hapa’s case on him. Phagga has indeed been “playing it safe, and has not been aggressive with pursuing his reads. It’s the kind of laziness and indifference I’d expect of scum. His defense to Hapa’s case was short and sweet and unconvincing too imho. I’m not going to go into much more detail right now other than to say this: Hapa’s case has merit. Maybe you guys should actually take some time to pay attention to it… Perhaps he hasn’t been “red checked” like Toad, and he hasn’t outright said he’s scum, but his play is consistent with what I’d expect from scum. By process of elimination, he is a top scum suspect that needs to be further investigated for next lynch.

2) strongandbig – I jumped the gun on this case before. I looked into his filter and I noticed that he had a pronounced difference in his post count between this game and his town meta. Then I saw that he had excuses for his absences, and that he was genuinely busy. He has definitely “blended in,” taking no stances I would consider brave or new. And while he has excuses, he still has been pretty lurky, and this does match his scum meta. Also, two things I consider possible scumslips:

“phagga is probably town, but I'm not confident enough to agree with putting him on a party yet.”
This remark has been referenced before, but this is something I don’t see a townie motivation for saying. There’s a pronounced difference between “probably town” and “maybe town.” You vote in your strong town reads, so this doesn’t quite add up to me… It’s at the very least an odd statement if phagga were to be lynched and flip town, but I would argue it would be a damning statement if phagga were to be lynched and flip scum.

Another thing that was odd to me was that he was pissed about the 100 points of damage he took. How could you be mad about this when it’s pretty clear that you’re a decent lurker shot? Not clearly scum motivated by any means, but still it felt a little odd to me since only scum needs to worry about surviving as long as possible.

3) VE – Has pretty much only lurked until recently. Has recently pushed a case on me. Scolds Prox for making a case on why I was scummy rather than about my motivations then does the same with his own. He has done absolutely nothing to demonstrate that he is town, and further, pointing out scummy actions rather than scum motivated ones on town players is a commonplace play for scum. I have ruled out almost everyone else from this list as either town or third party. That only leaves lurkers for this third spot… VE fits the bill of a scummy lurker, and should be considered for lynch after phagga and strong. Some might say something like, “But he’s only been active a short time give him time…” And I’m not opposed to that. He will have some time to attempt to prove he’s town as phagga and strong are first on the chopping block. By far my weakest scum read, but a scum read nonetheless.

3, alternate 1) CaveJohnson as I described before is a very hard one to read since he is so consistently anti-town. However, he belongs on this list as he very well could be scum for reasons already described.

3, alternate 2) Adam could be scum. He’s a null read lurker for me atm...
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 03 2012 17:04 GMT
#6032
Did it occur to everyone that we already killed the Master of War (Spekkio)???

As such, I don't get what we're hoping to achieve at the End of Time.

Further: GreyMist has shown over and over again this game that just about anything can be thrown at us at his whim. Feel free to hope for one result (such as new magic abilities), but FULLY EXPECT you'll get another...

The ONLY THING related to times that we know about right now is that some characters have a bonus in certain times.



With the very very likely scum flip this cycle, I don't see anything too worrisome about matching up a time period with characters who have admitted having a bonus in that time + Show Spoiler +
(or even who just happen to be from that time period)
. I mean, unless this game is wildly different from a normal game setup there's going to only be 2 (maybe three) scum left. We've eliminated half their team. And we already know their KP isn't that amazing given how much trouble they've had killing even a single townie each cycle... So I'm not terribly worried if we pre-plan accordingly a party even if some of them become higher priority targets. I highly doubt that scum will be able to fully negate the additional ability advantage we will gain from such a play.


Looking at the spreadsheet, and the already claimed abilities, the time period that will most likely benefit us most is the Middle Ages (600AD). As such:

##Epoch: Middle Ages (600AD)



goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 04 2012 15:40 GMT
#6166
So just briefly:

On December 03 2012 20:33 phagga wrote:
@risk.nuke I also still would like to know what you think of hapa.

Regarding SnB: Having two damaging abilities, him visiting Djo who is in the party is damning in any case. However, I am also confident in my scum read on Goodkarma, so I am happy to lynch either of them. For now, my vote stays on GK.


Your vote post is pretty funny. Because it basically says, "I'd rather lynch my favorite scum read over a sure scum." The scum motivation here is apparent: trying to set up a counterwagon to prevent the snb lynch.


As for this quote:

On December 01 2012 07:33 phagga wrote:
Spoilering Goodkarmas quotes to not shit up the thread too much.
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 01 2012 01:34 goodkarma wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2012 01:09 phagga wrote:
On December 01 2012 00:49 goodkarma wrote:
On December 01 2012 00:19 phagga wrote:
On November 30 2012 09:21 Hapahauli wrote:
GK saw Sandro as town. If GK were scum, he would at least know that Sandro is not scum. GK wants to have sandro in his team. I don't like the reasoning of GK, I think its contradicting. I therefore make the hypothesis that if GK is scum, he takes Sandro (whom he knows not to be scum) on his team to look more townie. That's the whole story. I did not say anywhere in that post that I think that Sandro is town.

Hell, i even write one paragraph earlier: " If GK thinks Sandro is so townie that you includes him in your team" (it should actually say "you" instead of "GK", but whatever).


What about GK's previous analysis was "contradictory?" He wanted someone he thought was town on his team - that's pretty straightfoward to me.


Ok, let's do this right so we can hopefully close that topic. I want to put this into relation of the dialog I already had with GK at that point and how I felt about GK then. Context matters, after all.

So let's start with what Goodkarma wrote here:

On November 21 2012 13:06 goodkarma wrote:
Who I would nominate (if not myself):

As of right now, my support for a party leader (besides myself) would be sandroba.

Sandroba seems to be adopting a solid strategy at present. I wholeheartedly agree with going with the most townie individuals, even if they are inexperienced. We don't know how the minigames are going to work yet, but we do know with 100% certainty that scum will count against their success. In a game where we don't lynch, all we can do is establish who is actually town. It is absolutely ridiculous to nominate people who have both strong scum and town games and are hard to read day one (thinking of Marv).

I also completely agree with the suggestion that's been brought up that parties be suggested by those who are hoping to be nominated up-front. This is especially important if we are to nominate a townie who isn't as experienced.


Goodkarma for President:

As your leader, I will do my best to further the policy of choosing the most obvious townies as detailed above. Along those lines, I would elect to choose both sandroba and promethelax for my party. The third is still tentative, as the game has only been going for a short time.


So, in this very post he says that he would support Sandro because he adopts a solid strategy. Then he proposes himself as party leader and says he would take Sandroba on his team. I found this strange, which is why I asked him:

On November 21 2012 15:59 phagga wrote:
You would vote Sandroba because you think his strategy is solid. His strategy involves taking less known townies on the team and no additional vets, to make it harder for scum to decide who to snipe. Your Strategy however would be to take at least one vet and a well known, albeit newer town player to your team. Why?


His answer

On November 21 2012 17:07 goodkarma wrote:
I agree with Sandroba insofar as that lesser known players that are obvious townies should be strongly considered. However, at the end of the day, going with your three strongest town reads is going to be optimal for selecting a party. Unfortunately I, like several other players here, have somewhat of a bias at times towards prioritizing players that we have played with before. It could also be said that less experienced players are more likely to post like crap and not distinguish themselves as town than "vets" (look at deino). So there might be some unintentional bias towards vets (which is something I would try to avoid to the best of my ability). To be clear I will definitely be reassessing my read on Prox (as well as Sandroba) before making a finalized Vice Presidential Candidate trifecta.

I don't feel it's absolutely necessary that all three chosen members are townie looking newbies. I feel that the chosen members should be closest to 100% confirmed town, and that newbies should not be left out of consideration. Maybe there is a small difference between myself and Sandroba in this area. That's good for my election campaign I suppose...


So, he explains he has a slightly different plan than Sandro. Fair enough. Still, I wondered, why would anyone who has a town read on Sandro would vote Goodkarma instead of Sandroba, when Sandroba was running for party leader himself? After all, he is the vet, the well known scumhunter who was drawing votes with his name alone. Why would GK expect to be voted instead of Sandroba when his team contained Sandroba as well?

I also have a short discussion with GK about town/scumhunting here. After that I write the following:

On November 22 2012 07:04 phagga wrote:
- Goodkarma: I will have to go through his filter again (not in the next 10 hours though), but my gut currently says that he is talking too much about the importance of townhunting. I have him in my mind as "looks like he is contributing but is not really helping town". Do not want him on the party.


I do not call him scum. I voice my suspicion of him. Some later, Goodkarma posts this:

On November 22 2012 15:10 goodkarma wrote:
3) Sandroba: However much I feel he's playing lazy (he is), I keep coming back to his filter. I do currently believe that he is town. Everything he has done to date has been to provide clarity and insight into reads others have had and the general mechanics of this specific game. He could do this as scum, but I am inclined to believe he could have been a little less helpful and gotten away with it as scum as well. I look forward to seeing his proposed party as this will provide the information I need to help solidify my understanding of his thought process and determine if he truly belongs on this platform. But as it currently stands, I believe him to be town, and am including him on my platform.


And again, I wonder, why should anyone vote GK instead of Sandroba if GK is gonna take Sand on his team anyway. Their plans differ only slightly, and most people would probably trust a town sand more to make accurate reads than a town GK.

I was then writing a longer post about who I wanted as party leader and why. Somewhere in there was this part about Goodkarma and that I did not understand why he was voting Sandroba. Then I realised that it might be better to ask GK beforehand, show that I don't trust him and then post the longer post. Additionally, I wanted to show him where I came from with my suspiciouns and added that "What do you say about this:" part. However, it was meant to draw a reaction, i did not have a scum read on him at that point, I just wanted to see how he responded. So I posted this:

On November 22 2012 18:52 phagga wrote:
@Goodkarma

If you trust Sandro so much, why do you not vote him? If GK thinks Sandro is so townie that you includes him in your team, why should I vote you instead of Sandro?

What do you say to the following: You are scum, you include a town sandro to make his team more townie, hoping to catch more votes like that.


Also, after copying the short paragraph in a new post, I started changing the sentences from third person to second person (as I was going to ask GK directly instead of talking about him in 3rd person). I made an error in the second sentence of the first paragraph (it should be "if you think Sandro..."). The reason is that I was doing this in a hurry, I was at work. I had already typed this long post that I wanted to put online, so I hurried to get this short post about GK out. Perhaps that is a reason why I did not word it clear enough, which is possibly why you seem to interpret it as "phagga says GK is scum and Sandro is town", while in reality it was supposed to be a hypothetical question that
- should provoke a reaction of GK
- should show GK what my fear about his candidature was

Then, 3 minutes later, I posted the aforementioned big post, where I discussed who I wanted to vote and why.

So, I admit, contradiction is the wrong word. His candidature did not make any sense to me with Sandroba in his team. Also, I know I am not the only one who felt that way, look at this post from prom for example, or risks post here.



So you consider rehashing old arguements I've already addressed activity? You do know Hapa has a case against you, and you are continuing to behave as scum in the way highlighted in that case, right? + Show Spoiler +
(Not coming up with any new arguement of any kind. Attacking "safe" players who already have cases against them...)
eh, I was answering a question hapa asked me. Since when is that a bad thing? Are you actually reading what I post?

(posting from phone)


Does it matter who it was in reply to? It's rehashing arguments all the same...

Here's a thought: Besides me (and obviously Toad), who do you think has the highest chance of being scum and why?


Dude, seriously. you ask If I am aware that Hapa made a case against me as answer to my post who is an answer to Hapas case against me. Your post is nonsensical. Also, since when is defending myself scummy?

+ Show Spoiler +
On December 01 2012 02:05 goodkarma wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2012 01:37 iamperfection wrote:
he said hopeless gk


I almost missed it. He linked to a very old case on Hopeless about a page ago... Let's take a look at it:

Show nested quote +
On November 29 2012 01:32 phagga wrote:
On November 28 2012 22:23 strongandbig wrote:
Now, phagga I have a couple of questions for you:
1. As far as I can tell, you changed your mind on your scumread on goodkarma because of the timing of his vote on Sandroba. Could you update that read for us? Given that Sandroba never really responded to Syllo's case or made a real effort to not get himself lynched, I'm hesitant to draw any conclusions from who voted for him when. It's definitely possible that his teammates knew he wasn't going to try very hard, and started bussing him very early. So if you ignore gk's vote on sandro, do you still think he's town or do you want to lynch him again.
2. You said you object to hopeless being in the party. do you think he's scum? What do you think of my stuff on his behavior since the check on him and acro?
3. What is kitaman's alignment and why do you think that?

-snip-

2. I remember going over Hopeless' filter a few days ago and setting him null on my list. Then Hope came up with this strange theorie about what if Toad flips town, followed by TC saying that Acro and Hope are of opposite alignement. Then he wanted to be part of the party to show that he is town, which was a red flag for me. Since then he is marked as scum.

Regarding your post, I like the point about his sentence that he will not bring any last minute shenanigans. I mean, this is what everyone expects, why does he feel he has to announce this? seems like he is missing a townie mindest.

The "Bring it, bitches" is interesting because he first takes a defensive stance in his answers to TCs case, but then tries to look aggressive with that last sentence. It does not seem authentic, but I don't think it's alignement indicative.

-snip-




This only adds to the evidence this guy is scum. It is super-lazy to use this as your case. What's more, it was a case he didn't have any conviction with describing. I'm not at all convinced from his case he thinks hopeless is scum.:

Let's start with the bolded part.: The opposite alignment issue was already explained. And wanting to be in a party at this point in the game would be suicide for scum. So that only leaves a strange remark about Toad being town...


Second paragraph: "Regarding your post, I like the point about his sentence that he will not bring any last minute shenanigans. I mean, this is what everyone expects, why does he feel he has to announce this? seems like he is missing a townie mindest.":

How is a "no shenanigans" announcement indicative of only a scum mentality? He needs to elaborate on this point...


Third Paragraph: "The "Bring it, bitches" is interesting because he first takes a defensive stance in his answers to TCs case, but then tries to look aggressive with that last sentence. It does not seem authentic, but I don't think it's alignement indicative. "

So here, he's saying that what hopeless says isn't genuine, but isn't necessarily scum motivated. In other words, he tells us nothing.


So what I get from this post that amounts to any kind of opinion at all is: 1) Hopeless said Toad could be town once, 2) Announcing no shennanigans means Hopeless is scum...

Does everyone see how wishy-washy and weak this case is? This is exactly how a scum trying to blend in posts. It is blatantly obvious from stunts like this that phagga is scum.


The post was two days ago. That's once cycle. That's not "very old".

The post was not a case. It was an answer to snb who asked me about my opinion on Hopeless in regard to his case. My comments were related to his case. I have written more about what I think of hopeless here and in the discussion with him here. That is for example the reason why the "bring it bitches" thing is in there: I read it differently than snb, so I wanted to comment on it since he ASKED for my comments.

And only because the opposite alignement stuff is explained I am no longer allowed to talk about it? I am not allowed to describe how I felt about it back when it came up? Even if he would have specifically asked to comment on it?

Seriously, you are grasping at straws here. You have not even correctly read my post, let alone my filter, you did not put the post into context to try to understand what's going on.

you are just trying desperately to discredit me at all cost. You don't care about the truth, you put meanings into my sentences that were not there, you ignore time stamps, exagerate, and try anything to make me look bad.



So your post on hopeless was not a case...? And every time I bring up your disinterest in coming up with your own opinion on why someone is scum, it seems your favorite thing to do is to bring up one or two old quotes that don't point to a very coherant case... So how about this: if hopeless is your next strongest scumread: Put all your arguments on why you think Hopeless is scum in one spot, in one case post. Hopeless has been active enough that there's clearly more to go on than comments which are several cycles old. You briefly mention you still find him suspicious here: here. To be clear, I expect to see some followup from you, not a series of half-baked ideas.

Because tunneling me with old arguments is a splendid way of pretending to be active and interested while contributing nothing. If you want to prove that you're town, the first step is to take some initiative and actually show you can do your own scumhunting, without recycling and rehashing others' arguments.
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 04 2012 16:15 GMT
#6172
On December 05 2012 00:55 phagga wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 05 2012 00:40 goodkarma wrote:
So just briefly:

On December 03 2012 20:33 phagga wrote:
@risk.nuke I also still would like to know what you think of hapa.

Regarding SnB: Having two damaging abilities, him visiting Djo who is in the party is damning in any case. However, I am also confident in my scum read on Goodkarma, so I am happy to lynch either of them. For now, my vote stays on GK.


Your vote post is pretty funny. Because it basically says, "I'd rather lynch my favorite scum read over a sure scum." The scum motivation here is apparent: trying to set up a counterwagon to prevent the snb lynch.


If I would have switched my vote you would have accused me of bussing. If I would have wanted to set up a counterwagon I would have actually pushed you, which I did not.

Show nested quote +
On December 05 2012 00:40 goodkarma wrote:
As for this quote:

On December 01 2012 07:33 phagga wrote:
Spoilering Goodkarmas quotes to not shit up the thread too much.
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 01 2012 01:34 goodkarma wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2012 01:09 phagga wrote:
On December 01 2012 00:49 goodkarma wrote:
On December 01 2012 00:19 phagga wrote:
On November 30 2012 09:21 Hapahauli wrote:
GK saw Sandro as town. If GK were scum, he would at least know that Sandro is not scum. GK wants to have sandro in his team. I don't like the reasoning of GK, I think its contradicting. I therefore make the hypothesis that if GK is scum, he takes Sandro (whom he knows not to be scum) on his team to look more townie. That's the whole story. I did not say anywhere in that post that I think that Sandro is town.

Hell, i even write one paragraph earlier: " If GK thinks Sandro is so townie that you includes him in your team" (it should actually say "you" instead of "GK", but whatever).


What about GK's previous analysis was "contradictory?" He wanted someone he thought was town on his team - that's pretty straightfoward to me.


Ok, let's do this right so we can hopefully close that topic. I want to put this into relation of the dialog I already had with GK at that point and how I felt about GK then. Context matters, after all.

So let's start with what Goodkarma wrote here:

On November 21 2012 13:06 goodkarma wrote:
Who I would nominate (if not myself):

As of right now, my support for a party leader (besides myself) would be sandroba.

Sandroba seems to be adopting a solid strategy at present. I wholeheartedly agree with going with the most townie individuals, even if they are inexperienced. We don't know how the minigames are going to work yet, but we do know with 100% certainty that scum will count against their success. In a game where we don't lynch, all we can do is establish who is actually town. It is absolutely ridiculous to nominate people who have both strong scum and town games and are hard to read day one (thinking of Marv).

I also completely agree with the suggestion that's been brought up that parties be suggested by those who are hoping to be nominated up-front. This is especially important if we are to nominate a townie who isn't as experienced.


Goodkarma for President:

As your leader, I will do my best to further the policy of choosing the most obvious townies as detailed above. Along those lines, I would elect to choose both sandroba and promethelax for my party. The third is still tentative, as the game has only been going for a short time.


So, in this very post he says that he would support Sandro because he adopts a solid strategy. Then he proposes himself as party leader and says he would take Sandroba on his team. I found this strange, which is why I asked him:

On November 21 2012 15:59 phagga wrote:
You would vote Sandroba because you think his strategy is solid. His strategy involves taking less known townies on the team and no additional vets, to make it harder for scum to decide who to snipe. Your Strategy however would be to take at least one vet and a well known, albeit newer town player to your team. Why?


His answer

On November 21 2012 17:07 goodkarma wrote:
I agree with Sandroba insofar as that lesser known players that are obvious townies should be strongly considered. However, at the end of the day, going with your three strongest town reads is going to be optimal for selecting a party. Unfortunately I, like several other players here, have somewhat of a bias at times towards prioritizing players that we have played with before. It could also be said that less experienced players are more likely to post like crap and not distinguish themselves as town than "vets" (look at deino). So there might be some unintentional bias towards vets (which is something I would try to avoid to the best of my ability). To be clear I will definitely be reassessing my read on Prox (as well as Sandroba) before making a finalized Vice Presidential Candidate trifecta.

I don't feel it's absolutely necessary that all three chosen members are townie looking newbies. I feel that the chosen members should be closest to 100% confirmed town, and that newbies should not be left out of consideration. Maybe there is a small difference between myself and Sandroba in this area. That's good for my election campaign I suppose...


So, he explains he has a slightly different plan than Sandro. Fair enough. Still, I wondered, why would anyone who has a town read on Sandro would vote Goodkarma instead of Sandroba, when Sandroba was running for party leader himself? After all, he is the vet, the well known scumhunter who was drawing votes with his name alone. Why would GK expect to be voted instead of Sandroba when his team contained Sandroba as well?

I also have a short discussion with GK about town/scumhunting here. After that I write the following:

On November 22 2012 07:04 phagga wrote:
- Goodkarma: I will have to go through his filter again (not in the next 10 hours though), but my gut currently says that he is talking too much about the importance of townhunting. I have him in my mind as "looks like he is contributing but is not really helping town". Do not want him on the party.


I do not call him scum. I voice my suspicion of him. Some later, Goodkarma posts this:

On November 22 2012 15:10 goodkarma wrote:
3) Sandroba: However much I feel he's playing lazy (he is), I keep coming back to his filter. I do currently believe that he is town. Everything he has done to date has been to provide clarity and insight into reads others have had and the general mechanics of this specific game. He could do this as scum, but I am inclined to believe he could have been a little less helpful and gotten away with it as scum as well. I look forward to seeing his proposed party as this will provide the information I need to help solidify my understanding of his thought process and determine if he truly belongs on this platform. But as it currently stands, I believe him to be town, and am including him on my platform.


And again, I wonder, why should anyone vote GK instead of Sandroba if GK is gonna take Sand on his team anyway. Their plans differ only slightly, and most people would probably trust a town sand more to make accurate reads than a town GK.

I was then writing a longer post about who I wanted as party leader and why. Somewhere in there was this part about Goodkarma and that I did not understand why he was voting Sandroba. Then I realised that it might be better to ask GK beforehand, show that I don't trust him and then post the longer post. Additionally, I wanted to show him where I came from with my suspiciouns and added that "What do you say about this:" part. However, it was meant to draw a reaction, i did not have a scum read on him at that point, I just wanted to see how he responded. So I posted this:

On November 22 2012 18:52 phagga wrote:
@Goodkarma

If you trust Sandro so much, why do you not vote him? If GK thinks Sandro is so townie that you includes him in your team, why should I vote you instead of Sandro?

What do you say to the following: You are scum, you include a town sandro to make his team more townie, hoping to catch more votes like that.


Also, after copying the short paragraph in a new post, I started changing the sentences from third person to second person (as I was going to ask GK directly instead of talking about him in 3rd person). I made an error in the second sentence of the first paragraph (it should be "if you think Sandro..."). The reason is that I was doing this in a hurry, I was at work. I had already typed this long post that I wanted to put online, so I hurried to get this short post about GK out. Perhaps that is a reason why I did not word it clear enough, which is possibly why you seem to interpret it as "phagga says GK is scum and Sandro is town", while in reality it was supposed to be a hypothetical question that
- should provoke a reaction of GK
- should show GK what my fear about his candidature was

Then, 3 minutes later, I posted the aforementioned big post, where I discussed who I wanted to vote and why.

So, I admit, contradiction is the wrong word. His candidature did not make any sense to me with Sandroba in his team. Also, I know I am not the only one who felt that way, look at this post from prom for example, or risks post here.



So you consider rehashing old arguements I've already addressed activity? You do know Hapa has a case against you, and you are continuing to behave as scum in the way highlighted in that case, right? + Show Spoiler +
(Not coming up with any new arguement of any kind. Attacking "safe" players who already have cases against them...)
eh, I was answering a question hapa asked me. Since when is that a bad thing? Are you actually reading what I post?

(posting from phone)


Does it matter who it was in reply to? It's rehashing arguments all the same...

Here's a thought: Besides me (and obviously Toad), who do you think has the highest chance of being scum and why?


Dude, seriously. you ask If I am aware that Hapa made a case against me as answer to my post who is an answer to Hapas case against me. Your post is nonsensical. Also, since when is defending myself scummy?

+ Show Spoiler +
On December 01 2012 02:05 goodkarma wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 01 2012 01:37 iamperfection wrote:
he said hopeless gk


I almost missed it. He linked to a very old case on Hopeless about a page ago... Let's take a look at it:

Show nested quote +
On November 29 2012 01:32 phagga wrote:
On November 28 2012 22:23 strongandbig wrote:
Now, phagga I have a couple of questions for you:
1. As far as I can tell, you changed your mind on your scumread on goodkarma because of the timing of his vote on Sandroba. Could you update that read for us? Given that Sandroba never really responded to Syllo's case or made a real effort to not get himself lynched, I'm hesitant to draw any conclusions from who voted for him when. It's definitely possible that his teammates knew he wasn't going to try very hard, and started bussing him very early. So if you ignore gk's vote on sandro, do you still think he's town or do you want to lynch him again.
2. You said you object to hopeless being in the party. do you think he's scum? What do you think of my stuff on his behavior since the check on him and acro?
3. What is kitaman's alignment and why do you think that?

-snip-

2. I remember going over Hopeless' filter a few days ago and setting him null on my list. Then Hope came up with this strange theorie about what if Toad flips town, followed by TC saying that Acro and Hope are of opposite alignement. Then he wanted to be part of the party to show that he is town, which was a red flag for me. Since then he is marked as scum.

Regarding your post, I like the point about his sentence that he will not bring any last minute shenanigans. I mean, this is what everyone expects, why does he feel he has to announce this? seems like he is missing a townie mindest.

The "Bring it, bitches" is interesting because he first takes a defensive stance in his answers to TCs case, but then tries to look aggressive with that last sentence. It does not seem authentic, but I don't think it's alignement indicative.

-snip-




This only adds to the evidence this guy is scum. It is super-lazy to use this as your case. What's more, it was a case he didn't have any conviction with describing. I'm not at all convinced from his case he thinks hopeless is scum.:

Let's start with the bolded part.: The opposite alignment issue was already explained. And wanting to be in a party at this point in the game would be suicide for scum. So that only leaves a strange remark about Toad being town...


Second paragraph: "Regarding your post, I like the point about his sentence that he will not bring any last minute shenanigans. I mean, this is what everyone expects, why does he feel he has to announce this? seems like he is missing a townie mindest.":

How is a "no shenanigans" announcement indicative of only a scum mentality? He needs to elaborate on this point...


Third Paragraph: "The "Bring it, bitches" is interesting because he first takes a defensive stance in his answers to TCs case, but then tries to look aggressive with that last sentence. It does not seem authentic, but I don't think it's alignement indicative. "

So here, he's saying that what hopeless says isn't genuine, but isn't necessarily scum motivated. In other words, he tells us nothing.


So what I get from this post that amounts to any kind of opinion at all is: 1) Hopeless said Toad could be town once, 2) Announcing no shennanigans means Hopeless is scum...

Does everyone see how wishy-washy and weak this case is? This is exactly how a scum trying to blend in posts. It is blatantly obvious from stunts like this that phagga is scum.


The post was two days ago. That's once cycle. That's not "very old".

The post was not a case. It was an answer to snb who asked me about my opinion on Hopeless in regard to his case. My comments were related to his case. I have written more about what I think of hopeless here and in the discussion with him here. That is for example the reason why the "bring it bitches" thing is in there: I read it differently than snb, so I wanted to comment on it since he ASKED for my comments.

And only because the opposite alignement stuff is explained I am no longer allowed to talk about it? I am not allowed to describe how I felt about it back when it came up? Even if he would have specifically asked to comment on it?

Seriously, you are grasping at straws here. You have not even correctly read my post, let alone my filter, you did not put the post into context to try to understand what's going on.

you are just trying desperately to discredit me at all cost. You don't care about the truth, you put meanings into my sentences that were not there, you ignore time stamps, exagerate, and try anything to make me look bad.



So your post on hopeless was not a case...? And every time I bring up your disinterest in coming up with your own opinion on why someone is scum, it seems your favorite thing to do is to bring up one or two old quotes that don't point to a very coherant case... So how about this: if hopeless is your next strongest scumread: Put all your arguments on why you think Hopeless is scum in one spot, in one case post. Hopeless has been active enough that there's clearly more to go on than comments which are several cycles old. You briefly mention you still find him suspicious here: here. To be clear, I expect to see some followup from you, not a series of half-baked ideas.

Because tunneling me with old arguments is a splendid way of pretending to be active and interested while contributing nothing. If you want to prove that you're town, the first step is to take some initiative and actually show you can do your own scumhunting, without recycling and rehashing others' arguments.


I don't take requests from you. I don't care what you think of me. You are scum, you need to die.



Your first point about not actively pushing for a counterwagon has some validity to it. However, as town you should always be lynching sure scum over not sure scum. And in this context,that you didn't switch your vote is a bit odd. Especially considering that you seem more worried about how you'd look scummy "bussing" a sure scum, than about lynching a sure scum (which isn't something you'd need to worry about at all as town).


Your second point ("I won't elaborate on my scum read") is completely unjustified. There are other people who would like to see actual scumhunting from you. Especially Hapa, who you currently have a town read on... This isn't just a reasonable request. It's a request for you to actually do what you're supposed to be doing if you're actually town. And if you're scum, just keep this up...
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 04 2012 16:20 GMT
#6173
On December 05 2012 01:10 phagga wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 05 2012 00:40 goodkarma wrote:
So just briefly:

On December 03 2012 20:33 phagga wrote:
@risk.nuke I also still would like to know what you think of hapa.

Regarding SnB: Having two damaging abilities, him visiting Djo who is in the party is damning in any case. However, I am also confident in my scum read on Goodkarma, so I am happy to lynch either of them. For now, my vote stays on GK.


Your vote post is pretty funny. Because it basically says, "I'd rather lynch my favorite scum read over a sure scum." The scum motivation here is apparent: trying to set up a counterwagon to prevent the snb lynch.


Btw, from where do you know that SnB is sure scum? All I know is that his behaviour was extremely anti-town, hence the lynch. But town does not know his alignement yet.


SnB was caught in a lie when syllo found he targeted Djo, he made a very implausible story about being bussed, and then posted this:

On December 04 2012 20:11 strongandbig wrote:
##lynch cavejohnson
##epoch 1999
Lets get this shit over with yo
Both of these things are gonna happen eventually might as well do them now



So yeah, strongandbig is scum. Perhaps a better question is: how can you in any way think at this point strong could be town?
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 05 2012 01:12 GMT
#6319
This flip provides an abundance of information.

Kita can be nearly "confirmed" as not scum by simply asking around and confirming that no one else was playing the guessing game the days he claimed to be + Show Spoiler +
(I mean maybe they opted not to use their ability multiple nights so he could do this but I find that incredibly unlikely and suboptimal...)
.

Cave claimed to take headbutt one night. I'm actually not inclined to buy into this as "confirmation" he isn't scum. Headbutt has the unique ability of hardly doing any damage at all. The other of strong's abilities can only be used when a role name is known, making strong effectively in a position of uselessness if he doesn't have a role to go off of. I could completely picture Cave fake claiming headbutt, or even actually taking 1HP headbutt damage + Show Spoiler +
(on a night where scum didn't have a role name to target)
, as scum to get town cred. It would cost scumteam almost nothing to do...

If VE's afk lurk modkill is any indication, scum is disheartened and have given up on this game. Looking for the last one (assuming 5 scum setup) may be as easy as seeing who else has stopped caring. In this context, I can understand how some have decided risk is a good lynch candidate for today. However, I still have reservations. Did it occur to anyone else how absolutely crazy it would be for a mason-type role to be scum-affiliated? I have yet to see this in a game... That aside, I've already discussed how I feel about a risk lynch. I'm still against it.


I will be reassessing my reads either tonight or tomorrow morning and making my case for who I feel we should lynch.
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 05 2012 01:24 GMT
#6323
On December 05 2012 10:14 Hapahauli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 05 2012 10:12 goodkarma wrote:
This flip provides an abundance of information.

Kita can be nearly "confirmed" as not scum by simply asking around and confirming that no one else was playing the guessing game the days he claimed to be + Show Spoiler +
(I mean maybe they opted not to use their ability multiple nights so he could do this but I find that incredibly unlikely and suboptimal...)
.

Cave claimed to take headbutt one night. I'm actually not inclined to buy into this as "confirmation" he isn't scum. Headbutt has the unique ability of hardly doing any damage at all. The other of strong's abilities can only be used when a role name is known, making strong effectively in a position of uselessness if he doesn't have a role to go off of. I could completely picture Cave fake claiming headbutt, or even actually taking 1HP headbutt damage + Show Spoiler +
(on a night where scum didn't have a role name to target)
, as scum to get town cred. It would cost scumteam almost nothing to do...

If VE's afk lurk modkill is any indication, scum is disheartened and have given up on this game. Looking for the last one (assuming 5 scum setup) may be as easy as seeing who else has stopped caring. In this context, I can understand how some have decided risk is a good lynch candidate for today. However, I still have reservations. Did it occur to anyone else how absolutely crazy it would be for a mason-type role to be scum-affiliated? I have yet to see this in a game... That aside, I've already discussed how I feel about a risk lynch. I'm still against it.


I will be reassessing my reads either tonight or tomorrow morning and making my case for who I feel we should lynch.


Can you post the logs from the QT (especially those regarding risk). Also, Mad Men Mafia had some sort of mafia-mason from what I remember.



It's good to know that there is some precedent for such a thing as scum masons... Yeah, QT is pretty worthless imho now so I see no problem with posting most of it minus perhaps the most recent stuff (related to my future night actions). Don't get too excited though, as I expect it's going to take me a few minutes to find a semi-palatteable way of copy-pasting it...
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 05 2012 01:26 GMT
#6326
Another question worth asking is: If risk is really scum, why would he use his abilities to mason more townies when he could be smashing them in the face with his damaging ability? This doesn't make sense to me...
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 05 2012 01:29 GMT
#6328
On December 05 2012 10:24 iamperfection wrote:
Is there any reason not to post the whole log of the mason circle?


The later part is not that useful or important for discussion, it's decently long, and I'm decently lazy...
goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 05 2012 01:36 GMT
#6332
90

goodkarma

11-28-2012

04:38 PM ET (US)

Okay, just going to go with CaveJohnson then...

Would be curious to understand Syllo's motive for exposing circle too...




89

risk7nuke

11-28-2012

04:08 PM ET (US)

I got an idea, since you don't want to play this game. Post your rolepm and get modkilled.




88

risk7nuke

11-28-2012

04:02 PM ET (US)

thanks syllogism, for outing the qt for absolutely no reason.




87

syllogism

11-28-2012

03:34 PM ET (US)

Don't you care who he is inviting, goodkarma?




86

syllogism

11-28-2012

03:24 PM ET (US)

Risk are you inviting someone tonight?




85

goodkarma

11-28-2012

02:53 PM ET (US)

I've got stuff to do now, but to quickly address your questions:

I am a minor character by the name of Fiona. I have forest critters that gather around my target (up to three stacks) and attack on my command...

If they were to be bussed, I wouldn't know what to expect the outcome to be. I was thinking at the time that it meant 150 damage to my target, and just assumed the damage would be transferred. But now that I think about it, it could be that the damage could not be done to anyone other than CJ.

Also:
If you doubt I'm town, tell me who to shoot, and in three turns you'll have confirmation (two if we're talking about suboptimal dps...). That's really the only thing I can do for you here, other than asking you to go through my filter and compare it to my other games...




84

syllogism

11-28-2012

02:38 PM ET (US)

And goodkarma can you also claim your flavor, thanks




83

syllogism

11-28-2012

02:37 PM ET (US)

Goodkarma why did you think it was possible that CJ and Chronicle were bussed and you were responsible if your ability is to add stacks and the stacks don't activate until you want them to?




82

risk7nuke

11-28-2012

01:41 PM ET (US)

Hit CJ if you want to play lurkerbane. I'd probably hit VE though if I were you.




81

goodkarma

11-28-2012

12:06 PM ET (US)



150 damage every three turns may not be OP, but I wouldn't call it useless. If you have a better alternative in mind, I'm listening. But at this point, I still feel CaveJohnson is a good target.




80

risk7nuke

11-28-2012

11:59 AM ET (US)

If you don't mind.




79

syllogism

11-28-2012

11:40 AM ET (US)

Also risk if you figured out that goodkarma is town, if there is ever a time when town is unsure as to whom to take on a mission, I assume you are going to be pushing for him.




78

syllogism

11-28-2012

11:39 AM ET (US)

I don't really care, it seems like a rather useless ability as it takes way to long to do anything. We are never taking Cavejohnson on a mission though so it doesn't matter to me what happens to him. Him flipping might be slightly informative.




77

goodkarma

11-28-2012

11:35 AM ET (US)

What do both of you think of targetting CaveJohnson again? For optimal DPS, I will be committing 3 turns to my target so if you can provide an opinion yet today that would be great.




76

goodkarma

11-28-2012

11:32 AM ET (US)

@Syllo:

The ability I've claimed is the only ability I have.




75

risk7nuke

11-28-2012

11:25 AM ET (US)

I figured out goodkarma was town.




74

syllogism

11-28-2012

11:21 AM ET (US)

There isn't much to do until we actually get to flip some people or party selection gets more difficult.

The reason I'm asking because it appears to me that the primary purpose of this tent is to convince people that you are town, rather than to figure out the alignments of the people you invite.




73

risk7nuke

11-28-2012

11:01 AM ET (US)

Why did I invite you. That makes two of us wondering that. I guess I believed it might be able to get you interested in the game again. Clearly it didn't.




72

syllogism

11-28-2012

10:05 AM ET (US)

Actually I don't think any answer you give can be alignment indicative. I just find don't find the content very useful, despite initially thinking otherwise. Claims are nice to have though.




71

syllogism

11-28-2012

09:56 AM ET (US)

Risk why did you invite me? What is in this quicktopic that you would think I would find useful?

Goodkarma have you revealed everything about your role?




70

goodkarma

11-27-2012

08:26 PM ET (US)

Wow I'm such an idiot lol...

I'll be back tomorrow to clean up my mess.




69

goodkarma

11-27-2012

07:16 PM ET (US)

Guess that's not the best shortlist given 25 players in the game... But anyway that's my current thoughts. I would put this in thread, but I know it will distract from the Strong case I'm going to write up soon.




68

goodkarma

11-27-2012

07:13 PM ET (US)

Upon review, still a ways away from "solving" this game. With the lack of lynches it's incredibly hard for me to cement my reads.

My "shortlist" btw:

1) Iamp - I have a good "gut feel" about this guy I guess you could say. But he still has yet to contribute anything meaningful, which earns him a spot here. Would be willing to give him more time to see if his roleclaim checks out.
2) VE - Shoot him dead. I actually think he might be more likely to be town than scum given his enthusiasm for playing scum. But if an elimination-based approach for finding scum is to work, he has to go. He has not posted enough to make a meaningful read...
3) phagga - Need to reread his filter at some point (but not something I'm focusing on today). He has been pro-town in his contributions, but I can't help but feel he is also "playing it safe" and doing what he can to fly under the radar...
4) Adam - lurker who might need to be shot too.
5) Kita - I'm inclined to believe Marv's read of 3rd party
6) Cave - This guy won't be figured out without getting vigi killed. Shoot first, ask questions later...
7) Z-boson - From my experience with him, he likes to play pretty safe as scum, whereas as town he is rather reckless to the point of being pretty easy to mislynch. He definitely is making his own reads and contributing to thread, but all his reads I would call "safe" ones in that he is targeting almost exclusively lurkers... Null read atm, even after looking into filter.
8) Prox - Tbh I don't know what to do with him. Syllo's input is definitely appreciated, but I don't see him as a strong scum read (closer to null...).
9) Strong - I have a strong scum read based both off meta and on filter. Will discuss soon in thread
10) Toad - Scum




67

goodkarma

11-27-2012

06:15 PM ET (US)

Okay, so strongandbig is strong scum read. Moving on through filters...




66

goodkarma

11-27-2012

03:14 PM ET (US)

Put a little more thought into it today, and I feel I'm pretty close to "solving the game." I have reduced the list of players to a shortlist of likely scum whose filters I'm going to look at when I get back.

All in all, I'm feeling pretty good about this game. I'll put together some stuff when I get back. It should help to focus the sheep .




65

risk7nuke

11-27-2012

01:30 PM ET (US)

It wasn't particularly to karma but more general information to everyone I would invite, I felt it was good to avoid a why are we here phase. As for the crystal ball I haven't played CT and never gave it any thought, assume it's just flavor.




64

syllogism

11-27-2012

01:19 PM ET (US)

Nevermind about the bonus, I see your previous claim regarding it




63

syllogism

11-27-2012

01:06 PM ET (US)

I'm a bit confused as to why Gato's mason tent has a crystal ball. Why did you immediately claim your role name to goodkarma?

What was your 1000 AD bonus




62

risk7nuke

11-27-2012

11:35 AM ET (US)

Oh btw if I shoot I'm automatically rearming the next cycle.




61

risk7nuke

11-27-2012

11:00 AM ET (US)

I can but I thought it was better to use my ability to mason townies then to shoot scum or lurkers when our objective wasn't to kill them anyway.




60

syllogism

11-27-2012

10:49 AM ET (US)

I don't understand, shouldn't you then be inviting players who you want to shoot? Can you still invite one more?




59

risk7nuke

11-27-2012

10:43 AM ET (US)

I invited Goodkaram because I had a townread on him. The mainreason I picked him over others were the way his posts were logical and constructed so I deemed we'd be able to have good discussion in this qt. It never really got to that due to mutual distrust and time difference.

There is more to my role, I wasn't intending to claim this but I don't think it matter holding it back now. I am a conditioned vigilante. I am a fighting robot. Instead of inviting someone to my tent I can attack one player in my tent for 200 damage.

Also, Syllo get your head of your arse please. Whether you like it or not you're a leader to this town now. Act like one instead of a little girl bitch.




58

syllogism

11-27-2012

06:39 AM ET (US)

Ok I read through all this and it's quite informative, but I wish some of this discussion had occurred in the thread.

Risk is there more to your role than what you have revealed in here?




57

goodkarma

11-27-2012

04:56 AM ET (US)

@Syllo:

Okay. I understand where you're coming from, but it is worth noting I have mislynched Prox before (NMM XXII) and back then he also looked quite scummy... I agree he definitely could be scum, but I'm not convinced he definitely is.

I asked nicely for him to fully roleclaim. If he does, and you still believe he's scum, I will have no problem doing my vigi damage thing to him accordingly.


However, I still think that the most probable scum in the Acro/Chronicler/Hopeless debacle might be a better target...




56

goodkarma

11-27-2012

03:07 AM ET (US)

For what it's worth Syllo I will be looking into Prox's filter closely and followup on my findings tomorrow.

If I come to a scum read, I will focus all my damage on him...

I can understand your frustration, but ragequitting isn't going to help us at all...




55

goodkarma

11-27-2012

01:32 AM ET (US)

That's actually a very good question lol.

Hi there btw syllo




54

syllogism

11-27-2012

01:22 AM ET (US)

Risk why did you invite goodkarma on n1?




53

goodkarma

11-27-2012

12:25 AM ET (US)

Nvm the way Chronicler described how he obtained his damage it couldn't have been me...




52

goodkarma

11-26-2012

07:34 PM ET (US)

Chronicler took 150 points damage...

If somehow CaveJohnson and him were bussed FML.




51

goodkarma

11-26-2012

09:40 AM ET (US)

I find it a little worrying that such an allegedly good player would be so incredibly lazy.

Prox is a null read for me, and will stay so until I take a long look into his filter. As for Acro, I could certainly be wrong, but based off everything I've seen of him I'm still of the belief that he's town.

And then of course, there's you who is definitely town <3


I can understand him thinking of the scum suspects he has as a part of a larger thought process, but putting it on paper without coming to an actual conclusion (via... actually looking at filters) I find very disturbing. It's a good way of looking active while contributing nothing, and would be something I would expect of scum. However, I still place enough faith in the party mechanics (and day one's outcome) to believe that he is town... I have absolutely no idea why he is being so lazy though. And his most recent behavior is only weakening my strong town read I originally had on him...




50

risk7nuke

11-26-2012

09:17 AM ET (US)

What do you think of Syllos recent post?




49

risk7nuke

11-26-2012

04:31 AM ET (US)

Yeah, I hate when everything is lined out. I tend to slack of and be to lazy to do any hunting.




48

risk7nuke

11-26-2012

04:29 AM ET (US)

I'm not really familliar with all of the lurkers but VE is a person I definitely want to shoot in his face. Adam aswell for being king of the useless but VE. Look consider this. He was really hyped about getting into this game but when actually accomplished in he's done very little. I could understand if he had problem following it since we were 2000 posts in when he joined, However he said he had been paying attention to the game. Normally I think People who replaces in have a unique advantage (IF they followed the thread closely prior to replacing in). This post http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessag...urrentpage=110#2186 that Viscera did is what I would expect from a townie replacing in and it proves that Viscera were following the game. But what have he done after that post. Nothing.




47

goodkarma

11-26-2012

02:33 AM ET (US)

EBWOP: I mean I suppose Oats's party might fail and we won't get the lynch but I highly doubt it.




46

goodkarma

11-26-2012

02:24 AM ET (US)

It's just a little boring out in thread right now for me... We KNOW that we're lynching Toad next cycle, and we KNOW that Oats is going to be elected leader this cycle. So that leaves everyone flailing around speculating about the setup and other meaningless shit...

I do feel the case on hopeless, though, has some merit.

And that scum very well could be playing a heavily passive game. I definitely gave them too much credit early game as this type of play is clearly sub-optimal in this setup... But going through the list of people most of the ones that are actually active I have as town right now either based off game mechanics or via my own reads of them: Oats, Dieno, Marv, Acro, Keir, Hapa (the one exception), syllo (okay, a second exception)... What we're left with are lurkers and semi-lurkers. Kind of wish town had more KP as: iamp, hopeless, Adam, Viscera, CaveJohnson... are all people I wouldn't mind seeing shot right now. There's no easy way of reading them given how little they've contributed, but as I'm confirming more town by process of elimination it's looking more and more likely that at least some of them are scum.




45

goodkarma

11-26-2012

02:13 AM ET (US)

Again, there are more powerful roles out there than mine.

Role-check and healing roles are the roles I would prioritize RBing if I were scum.

While they might have trouble killing people, the converse is equally (if not even more true) as town. In short, I'm not all that worried about getting RBed

But that's probably enough discussion of this. I'm going to let off asking for a single target, as what Acro has said does have some merit...




44

risk7nuke

11-26-2012

01:57 AM ET (US)

Yeah everyone likely have ability's but everyone can probably not attack. I got sort of happy I have a vigilante in the masoncircle.
I'm more worried about roleblocks then they shooting you because if my theory is correct scum doesn't have enough kp to straight of kill people.




43

goodkarma

11-26-2012

01:51 AM ET (US)

I'm pretty confident at this point that all of town is blue.

I mean, look at how many role claims we've already had in thread...

I'm not worried about drawing scum eyes on me. I haven't done the best job of establishing I'm town, so honestly if they choose to shoot me over a syllo or oats or dieno, I would be quite happy.


42

risk7nuke

11-26-2012

01:48 AM ET (US)

You shouldn't talk about coordinating vig shots. If mafia is bluehunting it will draw eyes onto you.




41

goodkarma

11-26-2012

01:35 AM ET (US)

I'm a 600 AD character, and it doesn't look like I get any bonuses either.

At this point, it looks like I'm committed to either 100 or 150 points on CJ at day's end tomorrow. From everything I've read in his filter, I see no compelling reason not to do the full 150 pts of damage.




40

risk7nuke

11-25-2012

04:23 PM ET (US)

Clocking out for today, I never read up on CJ, I spent so much time on mafia today I just felt like taking some time off. I will try to get around to it tomorrow first thing when I get home. Btw who are you and was any timeperiod mentioned in your rolepm that indicate that you'd be stronger in missions at that time. My pm says I hangs out in the millennium fair in 1000 AD but it really doesn't sound like I get any bonuses.

also, sorry I got a bit frustrated. I was feeling mighty nervous about you and I didn't consider you feeling as paranoid as I was. It seems obvious in hindsight.




39

goodkarma

11-25-2012

03:08 PM ET (US)

Just learned that apparently once I reach max charges they auto discharge... That makes my role slightly better, at least.




38

goodkarma

11-25-2012

02:38 PM ET (US)

Thinking about it a bit more, even if CJ has been a little more helpful lately, he clearly lied about his role and has said several scummy things such as "my intention is to survive to endgame..." and "Syllo has taken himself to be out of the running and we should respect that." on day one. In addition of course, to the anti-town let's kill newbie players mentality he had day one (although this particular point may not be alignment indicative). At the very least he is profoundly anti-town town. But I still feel there's a decent chance he's scum even if he's played better today.

I only can put three stacks on the guy before unloading anyway, so one more this cycle, and unload next cycle for 150 damage. I'm hoping that kills him, but based off the two flips and my own role PM I'm a bit pessimistic .




37

goodkarma

11-25-2012

01:36 PM ET (US)

Okay.




36

risk7nuke

11-25-2012

01:14 PM ET (US)

I think I'll try to invite syllogism this cycle.




35

risk7nuke

11-25-2012

01:09 PM ET (US)

Okey, I believe you. Your actions fits for a dayvig profile plus mafia would not likely target CJ.
I guess we'll just have to be carefull with who we bring in but as you say there are alot of people looking very town.

Not sure what to advice you do with CJ, I've not really payed him much attention. I'll read up on him.




34

goodkarma

11-25-2012

01:01 PM ET (US)

If you're bringing in someone like Keirathi anyways, he is all but confirmed town in my book so claiming here won't hurt anything.




33

goodkarma

11-25-2012

01:01 PM ET (US)

Just did...

Honestly I don't care it's a bit lame anyway, and it's that fastest way of having you believe that I'm town.

My current target is CaveJohnson since day one, and I'm currently debating if I want to add another stack on him or unload for 100 points of damage. He is actually contributing (at least more so than he usually does) and not proactively trolling, which leads me to wonder if he actually could be town.




32

goodkarma

11-25-2012

12:59 PM ET (US)

I have a unique vigi-type role, but instead of directly damaging someone each turn I can choose to either:

-->Put up a stack of potential damage
-->Unload the stacks I have and actually damage the person

e.g.: turn 1 I would put up a stack (let's say 50 potential), turn 2 I would add another stack (bringing it to 100), turn 3 I would actually unload 2 stacks of damage on the target (said target takes 100 points of damage).

I am locked onto the person I choose and cannot change targets until I unload my stacks after I initially target him...




31

risk7nuke

11-25-2012

12:57 PM ET (US)

If you describe your role and ability's it could be a risk if I invite other people here.




30

goodkarma

11-25-2012

12:53 PM ET (US)

I can share my thoughts and reads with you, but perhaps the best way to convince you would be to describe my role and abilities.




29

goodkarma

11-25-2012

12:52 PM ET (US)

True dat.

One of the reasons I have not "warmed up to you" is that I myself am a little suspicious of the circumstances. It would be a little far-fetched, but not impossible that your ability and role are correct but you are scum-aligned, given the nature of this game. Gato is someone you beat up as an enemy in chrono trigger, so I could visualize him taking a scum alignment... Add to that that outside of knowing that you are a mason looking into your filter I would lean more towards a null read.

The indignation with which you describe being a mason though leaves me to believe that you are indeed town aligned. And, it was a bit far-fetched to think otherwise, but I still prefer to be cautious...




28

risk7nuke

11-25-2012

12:44 PM ET (US)

I wouldn't take you on a party because I don't know if you're mafia or not, it's not the same. And the more time pass you're giving me more and more reason to doubt your alignment. If you don't want to out of the blue nominate me I can understand that because that could raise eyebrows. But you're doing nothing to slowly warm up to me in the thread either.

And if you're scum you can only spy on this chat as long as you're alive.




27

goodkarma

11-25-2012

12:34 PM ET (US)

Hopefully that last portion I just posted explains that.

With as many power roles as there are presently in this game, why would you think, as scum, I would feel motivated to roleblock you? People have claimed role-check abilities, damaging vigi-type abilities, HEALING abilities... With abilities that powerful, why would they bother to roleblock you???


Especially considering that if I were really scum, I would be able to spy on everything that goes on in this chat. Why on earth would I ruin that?


26

goodkarma

11-25-2012

12:30 PM ET (US)

Finally, add to that that if I were to out of the blue nominate you as a party member, many people would be confused / suspicious. It would be semi-apparent that my choice was motivated by something else (such as a shared QT).

And for what it's worth, I would fully expect that you wouldn't choose me for a party at this point either...
Because to be perfectly honest, you shouldn't. There are far better choices right now.




25

risk7nuke

11-25-2012

12:28 PM ET (US)

That's fucking irrelevant. You KNOW I'm a mason. I find it's pretty fucking suspicious that I invite you here and the next cycle I'm roleblocked.




24

goodkarma

11-25-2012

12:27 PM ET (US)

Also, the choice of several party members is based more off game mechanics than off of actual reads (such as TheChronicler claim, party members from first day being clear choices, etc...).




23

goodkarma

11-25-2012

12:24 PM ET (US)

You have not been one of the more active members this game, and sadly not being super active means less respect.

It also means you've given less time to discussing your scum reads, etc. There are others in game right now who have worked much harder to establish themselves as town.

But if it makes you feel any better, I'm kind of in the same spot right now. I really haven't worked as hard as I should have been coming up with cases and participating in scumhunting in general. That gets noticed, and I can understand why others are not considering me for a party spot right now.




22

risk7nuke

11-25-2012

12:11 PM ET (US)

Why am I not in your list of people you're okey sending.




21

risk7nuke

11-25-2012

08:49 AM ET (US)

I might switch oats too keirathi since oats is also outed (name)




20

risk7nuke

11-25-2012

08:48 AM ET (US)

I don't like the the current teams at all. I see no reason why oats and dienosore should be sent instead of syllogism. Dienosore especially risky since it looks like this magus guy is killing the shit out of him. (not familliar with ct lore, but it's what I read in the thread)




19

goodkarma

11-24-2012

08:25 PM ET (US)

Okay.

I posted that because I'd rather not waste time on party selection, and spend more time scumhunting.

Syllo has proven himself to have sound judgement thus far, and is all but confirmed town. Therefore, just leaving it to him so we can determine who is scum seems like a sound idea to me at this point in the game.




18

risk7nuke

11-24-2012

08:09 PM ET (US)

Okey Grey says it did. Looks like it's just you and me for another cycle.




17

risk7nuke

11-24-2012

08:03 PM ET (US)

I'm not sure if my roleblock prevented me from inviting Keirathi. awaiting modconfirmation.




16

risk7nuke

11-24-2012

06:42 PM ET (US)

Hmm nevermind then, I might not be here in an hour. Anyway I've invited Keirathi.




15

goodkarma

11-24-2012

06:35 PM ET (US)

Yup.




14

risk7nuke

11-24-2012

06:10 PM ET (US)

Are you here?




13

goodkarma

11-24-2012

01:47 PM ET (US)

I agree. Even though his town meta may be a bit off in looney, he seems to share reads, and actually... care. I believe he's still the best lynch choice, especially with syllo backing his lynch.

As for kita, I believe there's a very good chance he will flip scum too. I like Marv's case against him. Everything Kita's done to date has been safe. Even presently, focusing on hopeless who imho is an easy target.

TheChronicler is the only candidate whose lynch I feel would be a mistake. I'm okay with either Sand or Kita being lynched today.




12

risk7nuke

11-24-2012

01:28 PM ET (US)

Sorry I've been away for most of the day, I'll curse myself if Sandroba flips town, I think djo said he had done this as town before but I've never seen it and I checked looney, it didn't feel like this. He felt more irritated.




11

goodkarma

11-24-2012

01:05 AM ET (US)

Barring some new revelation, I'm sticking to pushing a Sandroba lynch today.


10

goodkarma

11-23-2012

04:05 PM ET (US)

Adam is your average lurker that may or may not be scum. Definitely a good vigi target, but maybe not the best lynching target for today.




9

risk7nuke

11-23-2012

12:42 PM ET (US)

What do you think of Adam4167
He's done almost nothing. Adam was quick to vote syllogism and quick to vote sandroba but other then that he feels completely inactive, his posts doesn't feel like they are going anywhere and he doesn't follow them up.




8

risk7nuke

11-23-2012

12:24 PM ET (US)

I quite agree on marv, he's not been playing his usual self but this isn't a usual game and during the first cycle it revolved far less around scumhunting then a normal game. Furthermore the only real reason he's been under suspicion is because of his reputation. He's one of the more active players in the game.

As for sandroba, if he's not going to come back or if he comes back with something halfassed I'm going to assume he's just miserable and he rolled scum.
But well lets see what happens.




7

goodkarma

11-23-2012

11:52 AM ET (US)

I would not be surprised if Sandroba flipped scum, but looking at what he's actually said to date he has not acted scummy. The scummiest thing about him is his complete nonpresence since early game. I'm inclined to give him the chance to redeem himself.




6

goodkarma

11-23-2012

11:47 AM ET (US)

I am against lynching marv right now. I am nowhere near having a clear read on him, but am actually leaning toward a town one atm.

As for who to lynch presently, I am honestly not sure. I don't like how the majority of votes are on trolls / lurkers. I am going to need to seriously go through everyone's filters again to see if anyone stands out.




5

risk7nuke

11-23-2012

10:21 AM ET (US)

Have any thoughts on the lynch?
What do you think of marv?




4

risk7nuke

11-23-2012

05:43 AM ET (US)

Yeah it's fine, I just woke up now. I'm really wondering where sandroba have gone. I'm normally very wary of people who disappears when they are under pressure. I've had too much bad experience with mafia avoiding lynches that way.




3

goodkarma

11-23-2012

05:01 AM ET (US)

How's it going? Long Thanksgiving, and now it's pretty late . I'm headed to bed talk to you tomorrow.




2

risk7nuke

11-22-2012

06:30 PM ET (US)

Hi, I am Gato and this is my masontent. I can invite one person each night up to a maximum of 4 people.




1

GreY

11-19-2012

11:49 AM ET (US)


Its the inside of a Tent! Its strangely dark and there appears to be a Crystal ball on a table.

goodkarma
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States1067 Posts
December 05 2012 01:40 GMT
#6335
That's up to the "circle exposure" scandal... Might post more later, but tbh that should include pretty much all meaningful conversation that transpired in QT...
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 35m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 245
trigger 34
StarCraft: Brood War
BeSt 266
Soma 261
Barracks 177
Backho 169
Dewaltoss 136
Larva 136
sorry 49
ajuk12(nOOB) 30
Sharp 16
Britney 0
Dota 2
ODPixel695
XcaliburYe591
League of Legends
JimRising 664
Super Smash Bros
Westballz39
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor192
Other Games
summit1g5547
Fuzer 159
SortOf91
Trikslyr25
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2737
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH323
• practicex 30
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2181
League of Legends
• Stunt1212
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
1h 35m
Epic.LAN
3h 35m
CSO Contender
8h 35m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 1h
Online Event
1d 7h
Esports World Cup
3 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.