Newbie Mini Mafia XXXI - Page 28

On November 27 2012 07:17 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:


?????????? How do you "Obviously know" people are town ??????????????

On November 27 2012 07:25 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
##unvote
##Vote: Kickstart

Not sure if scumtrapped, or didn't read yamato's post before commenting.

On November 27 2012 07:47 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Hm, pretty confused right now. Thought a scum yamato would be all over that scumtrap claim on Kick. Instead he does the town thing and actually questions if it's a scumtrap. Idk if Kick jumped on it because he just wanted more evidence for a mislynch or genuinely misread it. The fallacy of the evening, children.

##Unvote

Might just have to go with Munk. Not a clue right now. People be sheeping onto my Yamato case hardcore. Trying to sniff out what's going on here... it's a smelly smell that smells.... smelly.

On November 27 2012 08:19 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
This sucks. The only reason I'm doubting my read on Yamato is because I feel like I did this exact thing to Djo. I'll feel so guilty if he flips green. And I have to leave soon so I can't see this play out =\

My vote is between munk, yamato, and Oats (because he is so flip floppy and barely/refuses to back up anything he has)

On November 27 2012 08:40 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Okay I have to leave... I doubt I'll return before lynch time.

I'm trying to come up with scenarios that will play well in my head if either guy flips town. I think the lesser of the two evils is Munk at this point, simply due to passiveness and ultra mega sheepy attitude. People rolling their face over Yamato because of my few posts doesn't sit well with me...

Crap, I hope this ain't a mistake.

##Vote: Munk-E

The Cheese will take his leave. Best of luck guys.

On November 27 2012 06:28 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
I see no reason I should take my vote off of him.

On November 27 2012 22:50 JacobStrangelove wrote:
Why are we ignoring kickstart! But yeah to the post above looked into cheese however received only jumbled notes in return so I am glad you sorted it from your perspective.

On November 27 2012 21:55 Kickstart wrote:
Well I didn't switch because I had a scumread on Oats and Yamato. The objective of the game is to lynch the scum, not to get rid of lurkers. I already expressed that it was a shame that Munk-E had been lurking but lynching a lurker is a coin-flip, one I didn't really want to be a part of. And since my top scumread was not going to get any other votes behind it, I put my vote behind who I felt was more likely scum instead of putting my vote on a coin flip.

On November 27 2012 23:08 JacobStrangelove wrote:
Humor me and link to those posts.

On November 27 2012 00:09 Kickstart wrote:
Ah I get to wake up to a case on me and many questions to answer, have to say I wasn't anticipating that. I am catching crap for "defending cheese". First off I am suspicious of everyone and no one at this point is confirmed town, but if me pointing out that the cases against him are absolute SHIT, then you can claim I am defending him, but saying that a case is founded on bad logic or that I don't agree with the case is hardly scummy.



There are all the posts where I "defend" cheese, and all they say is meta cases in a noobie game where the person has only played one game each as town and scum is not worth anything to me. If you disagree then whatever, but me saying this is hardly scum, it is me trying to be a logical town. I am not going to just let shit cases fly on people when I don't think the cases hold any weight.

With that being said, I will explain why Aquas case on me is also shit. So he decides to start out by going after my first post as useless, content-less, and just a space filler. Well I take offence to that, especially given the posts of the majority of people in this thread. I think my post:

Is much better than almost anyone's first post, and it has substance. I quickly say what needs to be said about policy because focusing on it too much is horrid as town, and I point out some shit play coming out from oatsmaster.

Then I get accused of "lurking" because I didn't post for four hours. I am not sure if this is a serious accusation or him grasping at straws to try and make a case. But frankly it is ridiculous, it is the start of the game, I posted a perfectly good introduction post that asked questions of people, and I was waiting for the answer. How you could possibly accuse ME of lurking in this thread is beyond me given the activity that I have had compared to others. But I will write it off as an attempt to bolster your "case" on me.

Then the rest of your "case" is just me going after Oatsmaster in an opportunistic way. For one, I am the FIRST person who was telling him to step up his posts in the beginning and I called him out for giving a half-assed vote without ANY explanation. AND HE IS STILL FUCKING DO IT, LOOK AT HIS RECENT POST:

Really? I pointed out the fact that saying "well there isn't much to go off of" and then saying you feel he is scum is really, really, silly - but Oats just continues to tunnel Cheese. I have just pointed out that Oats is playing horrible and that I am suspicious of it. And my case on Oats is not meaningless as you would like to paint it to be, look at his posting - completely confusing and doesn't drive any discussion at all; he is then asked to please give some real reasons and sound logic for his votes and he refuses while just continuing to post nothing of substance. And it also seems to me that a shitty wagon on Cheese has formed that he is all too keen to sit on.
Now again I must say I don't know if Cheese is town or not, but the case against him is crap and not convincing to me at all. Could he still be scum? Yes, but I won't be voting on crap cases, and other than a few horrible cases on him there is nothing; as is the case with this "case" on me.