EPTFor the reasons stated in the my earlier post
Newbie Mini Mafia XXX - Page 42
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
For the reasons stated in the my earlier post | ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
On November 05 2012 08:23 debears wrote: @Alsn Could you look over Sylver's filter? I see a few worrisome things 1) In an active game, he has been fairly inactive - only 2 pages in the filter. In other words, he isn't invested in the game/the lynch discussion 2) He still hasn't addressed my response to his case 3) His reasoning for voting me was bad 4) His latest troll post 5) He's not here before lynch 6) His reasons for suspicion are pretty ambiguous against me/Djo when there has been plenty said of us 7) He defends Clarity by throwing out random suspicions on Djo/me/dau0d 8) He reposts pretty much the same thing an hour later What do you think Alsn? 1) Null tell/speculation. I wouldn't say he was particularly active in XXIX either before he was shot. 2) I guess he hasn't? I'd like it if he clarified it too, but what does it say really? 3) This I'll give you that he did, but not that it's necessarily a scum tell. It might have felt to him like he had to produce "something" so that people wouldn't suspect him. I'm not sure if I can brand this a scum tell though. If he really believed that you were scum but just couldn't find a good reason for why he thought so it also fits. 4) That post is definitely not helpful at this point. 5) I don't like it either. 6) Actually, that point I actually feel you're wrong. I'd say that statement is pretty clearly an attempt at pointing out why he thinks you are suspicious(him thinking you are hiding behind Djod). I see similarities in my rationale for thinking one of Dandel/Cheese was scum and the other was town last game. 7) I'm not sure what to think of this, is he not allowed to defend clarity and at the same time be suspicious of other people? If he was defending a supposed scum buddy I could see it, but sylver has been suspicious of those names before Clarity was under attack hasn't he? Correct me if I'm wrong. 8) An elaborate EBWOP? I honestly have no clue what to think about that "double" post unless he explains it. All in all, I think the best point is his weak case against you. But on the other hand, I don't see the scum motivations for in essence sheeping onto me and Clarity in order to get you lynched if you are indeed town. Especially if his scum buddy was Clarity? I guess it depends on who his scum buddy is in that scenario, what he was trying to accomplish by pushing you, but I see it as a little bit too "public" for having clear scum motivations. At least at first glance. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Is there ANYONE other than sylver here that thinks debears might be scum? Seriously doubting right about now... | ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
Considering the flavor claim. I would like to point out a few things 1) If Cheese is scum, the other scum probably went in on the flavor claim also, since both would know it 2) If Cheese is town, I doubt there were any scum in the claims that just happened | ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
On November 05 2012 08:47 Clarity_nl wrote: Not at this time, no. I'm leaning pretty hard town on debears. If nothing else, I think he's been more open about what his actual opinions are this game(last game at this point he had basically only accused Inig and then went missing only to come back and complain about us lynching someone else)I am completely lost now after what just happened. Is there ANYONE other than sylver here that thinks debears might be scum? Seriously doubting right about now... | ||
|
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On November 05 2012 08:51 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Wait, how would people know about the VT role PM besides the VTs.... I think to give the mafia safeclaims | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On November 05 2012 08:32 Clarity_nl wrote: I can do that too. I don't wanna pay for no porn man. I don't think that saying that proves anything, can't make an assumption based on the host's behavior. Cheese why did you claim VT? Why would you think that doesn't prove anything. I didn't know everyone got the VT role pm? This sounds like you knew that everyone did | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On November 05 2012 08:56 debears wrote: Why would you think that doesn't prove anything. I didn't know everyone got the VT role pm? This sounds like you knew that everyone did I didn't want to assume things. I didn't know that either but I had considered it much earlier. I noticed the OP is different from my PM role. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On November 05 2012 08:58 Clarity_nl wrote: I didn't want to assume things. I didn't know that either but I had considered it much earlier. I noticed the OP is different from my PM role. Hold on there. I could understand that maybe you thought the mafia had a name safe claim. But the whole role pm? | ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On November 05 2012 08:59 Alsn wrote: Wait, if I'm to understand marv correctly, were some players not aware that the VT role was "regular fapper"? Or what? I didn't know that everyone knew the flavor and whole pm | ||
| ||
