GSL Mini Mafia III - Page 33

On October 23 2012 10:53 Keirathi wrote:

I used the same argument as town in Aperture 2, and I Can't Believe It's Not Themed too, as town. So...how is that relevant? You're making an argument about my "meta" without any fucking clue what my meta actually is. Or hell, what meta even is in general. It's a pattern of things repeated across multiple games. That I even have to explain this to you is so mindboggling that I can't comprehend it, since I've used it to correctly read you and tell you about it in like 4 different games, granted I was wrong in another game.

I actually don't know what you're talking about with Ottoxlol. I named my scumteam in the obs thread on night 1, then checked out because the game was boring and dead.

You're right. Dropping a hammer, in and of itself, is completely a completely null tell. Did I ever say I was voting him for hammering v7? No. I'm going to vote him for the REASONS he hammered v7.

On October 23 2012 10:59 marvellosity wrote:
when have you ever known me to apologise?

On October 23 2012 11:01 Keirathi wrote:

When have you ever been so wrong before (assuming you are town. which i'm not totally convinced of, ofc)? Certainly not in any game that I've played with you. I've literally never seen you make such a weak case, so if you believe that strongly in it, I'll expect that apology after I flip town.

On October 23 2012 11:05 marvellosity wrote:


I think austin actually takes great delight in his post that he's used across multiple games about my wrong reads.

I do find it interesting though that you characterise any case against you, by anyone really, as weak, lazy, *insert word here*.

If you can show me you're town, I'll reconsider my read. Hell, I even gave Palmar in Rock Band a chance. This hammer shit is NOT it.

On October 23 2012 11:05 marvellosity wrote:


I think austin actually takes great delight in his post that he's used across multiple games about my wrong reads.

I do find it interesting though that you characterise any case against you, by anyone really, as weak, lazy, *insert word here*.

If you can show me you're town, I'll reconsider my read. Hell, I even gave Palmar in Rock Band a chance. This hammer shit is NOT it.

On October 23 2012 10:51 marvellosity wrote:
DP dear, don't be so predictable. The reasoning behind it.

On October 23 2012 10:56 marvellosity wrote:
Also, if you speak to me like that again DP, I'll slap you in the face.

<3

On October 23 2012 10:01 austinmcc wrote:

Ya. I get what you're grok-ing at, but I don't think it makes any sense.

If both the vote AND hammer were suboptimal or optimal, then I could think Z-BosoN was scum or scum mastermind. If there's a mix, then I find it more likely the townie response is real, and not the result of scum mastermind Z-BosoN, or else I would expect different play concerning the vote/hammer.

On October 23 2012 13:08 Keirathi wrote:

So, I've been thinking about this a lot. While I agree with your premise, I just don't agree that the hammer was suboptimal play IF Z-Bo is scum and was worried about dying. Its hard to say whether he was actually worried about dying or not, but I do think he was the second most likely possibility of being lynched, at least with the given information, behind v7.

So, yea, I think he did the optimal scum thing in both cases: 1) giving himself another day and hopefully letting people talk themselves out of his lynch, and 2) attempting to discredit the person who attacked his hammer reasoning.


Anyways, I still don't think a town ZB magically creates a top 2 scum read on v7 out of nowhere like that. The timing was just too convenient. I was pretty convinced even before his reasoning for hammering, and that was just the icing on the cake.

On October 20 2012 09:11 drazak wrote:
Yeah, there is a reason this game was invite after the last disa-gsl, game. Of course it starts while my laptop is put of commission haha. Phpnes and multiple computers for the win.

On October 20 2012 09:27 drazak wrote:
Of course Hapa, plenty of free time as far as I know, should be posting a bunch. Also a little less afraid to post for various reasons.

On October 23 2012 13:08 Keirathi wrote:

So, I've been thinking about this a lot. While I agree with your premise, I just don't agree that the hammer was suboptimal play IF Z-Bo is scum and was worried about dying. Its hard to say whether he was actually worried about dying or not, but I do think he was the second most likely possibility of being lynched, at least with the given information, behind v7.

So, yea, I think he did the optimal scum thing in both cases: 1) giving himself another day and hopefully letting people talk themselves out of his lynch, and 2) attempting to discredit the person who attacked his hammer reasoning.


Anyways, I still don't think a town ZB magically creates a top 2 scum read on v7 out of nowhere like that. The timing was just too convenient. I was pretty convinced even before his reasoning for hammering, and that was just the icing on the cake.

On October 23 2012 05:43 drazak wrote:
About which?