|
On October 13 2012 09:48 kushm4sta wrote:Why is ET voting for ON when he himself pointed out: Show nested quote +If you have a scumread, it's better to lynch them over someone who has a high chance of being replaced or modkilled. It's the difference between a coin flip and an educated guess.
You keep on requoting this without context. This is what happened.
1. HiroPro stated that his top scumread is djodref. He had no votes on him.
2. I write that statement; specifically calling out why would he not vote his scum read if he is not freely available?
3. I vote for ON because I don't want 1der to die because I think he is townie. My top scumread is not available for the lynch.
I am unable to vote for my scumread. I am unable to push him because of my own earlier mistake and because of the lynch mechanics. However you were able to push me, your top scumread, and you did nothing. You have also written 0 posts about why you think I'm scummy, yet you continuously seek to jab at me and aggravate me.
Either out and state why you think I am scummy, or lay off. All you are doing is trying to start a shit show, and I'm not interested in that.
|
On October 13 2012 05:14 EchelonTee wrote:
If you have a scumread, it's better to lynch them over someone who has a high chance of being replaced or modkilled. It's the difference between a coin flip and an educated guess.
ET remember when you wrote this?
If you have a scum read on sandroba, why would you not care which is lynched??
|
ON moves on then not then again.
Now I am pretty sure at least one town is in the finals. Let's hope there are not two of them and we find the scummy one
|
On October 13 2012 11:19 EchelonTee wrote:
However you were able to push me, your top scumread, and you did nothing.
I gave you 3 votes. Austin said he would outvote. I backed off (i figured you would lose to sandroba next round anyway so no reason to get into a voting war with austin)
You have also written 0 posts about why you think I'm scummy, yet you continuously seek to jab at me and aggravate me.
false.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=372945¤tpage=15#295
|
This is the last time I am going to talk about this, because it's clear you're not going to make a case and are just trying to make me angry.
1. I voted ON because I didn't want 1der to die. This is the original reason why I posted that statement.
2. I stated IDGAF between ON and sandroba because I think both are likely enough to be scum.
2b. The reason why I stated IDGAF is because I have no votes now, so I have no direct influence. By vote bombing, it means that I am giving up my ability to choose between ON and sandroba, and I am ok with that.
3. As I stated before and you ignored, I have a scumread on sandroba, but he's someone who will be very obvious come N1/D2/N2, and lynching a strong vet is no the best if you aren't very sure. Therefore I rate his lynch equally between ON in terms of viability, hence "IDGAF"
I would appreciate it if you didn't ignore my posts.
|
In that post you said I didn't scumhunt. I responded to you that I did scumhunt.
In my post, I said you put 0 posts on me. You respond to me that you did.
You see a pattern? We're arguing about nothing. Just stop.
|
ET if you had votes who would you use them on
|
there are 49 votes remaining in the finals
|
Sandroba, and a bullet into OriginalName. I would want a double lynch.
|
edit : there are 48 votes remaining in the finals
|
On October 13 2012 11:30 EchelonTee wrote:
Sandroba, and a bullet into OriginalName. I would want a double lynch.
thats bs you can only pick one
|
On October 13 2012 11:27 EchelonTee wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2012 11:24 kushm4sta wrote:On October 13 2012 11:19 EchelonTee wrote:
However you were able to push me, your top scumread, and you did nothing.
I gave you 3 votes. Austin said he would outvote. I backed off (i figured you would lose to sandroba next round anyway so no reason to get into a voting war with austin)
You have also written 0 posts about why you think I'm scummy, yet you continuously seek to jab at me and aggravate me.
false. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=372945¤tpage=15#295 In that post you said I didn't scumhunt. I responded to you that I did scumhunt. In my post, I said you put 0 posts on me. You respond to me that you did. You see a pattern? We're arguing about nothing. Just stop.
What is the pattern? That you are wrong?
You said I put 0 posts on you. I linked you one. 1>0
That you responded to it does not cancel out its existence.
What is so scummy about ON? Just his 2 ninja votes at the end of r1? Or his afking?
Hypothetically if he does not post at all d1, rules state that he will be modkilled or replaced. What is wrong with letting that happen?
|
Clarification: a bullet into OriginalName means a vigilante shot, because it's better to lynch controversial people and shoot lurkers. This is not an assumption that vigilantes exist in this game.
Barring a miracle change in ON's play, he has to die. He will yield extremely little information so wasting the lynch on him today is definitely not the best move, now that I think about it more. But he has to die. A super lurker at endgame is an almost un-winnable proposition for scum.
|
On October 13 2012 11:30 EchelonTee wrote:
Sandroba, and a bullet into OriginalName. I would want a double lynch.
even though you dont like them both it would not really make sense.
|
On October 13 2012 11:33 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2012 11:27 EchelonTee wrote:On October 13 2012 11:24 kushm4sta wrote:On October 13 2012 11:19 EchelonTee wrote:
However you were able to push me, your top scumread, and you did nothing.
I gave you 3 votes. Austin said he would outvote. I backed off (i figured you would lose to sandroba next round anyway so no reason to get into a voting war with austin)
You have also written 0 posts about why you think I'm scummy, yet you continuously seek to jab at me and aggravate me.
false. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=372945¤tpage=15#295 In that post you said I didn't scumhunt. I responded to you that I did scumhunt. In my post, I said you put 0 posts on me. You respond to me that you did. You see a pattern? We're arguing about nothing. Just stop. What is the pattern? That you are wrong? You said I put 0 posts on you. I linked you one. 1>0 That you responded to it does not cancel out its existence. What is so scummy about ON? Just his 2 ninja votes at the end of r1? Or his afking? Hypothetically if he does not post at all d1, rules state that he will be modkilled or replaced. What is wrong with letting that happen?
I said you put 0 posts on me, but you did, 1>0
You said I didn't scum hunt, but I showed 4 examples of me doing so, 4>0
We both are saying incorrect things about each other, that is going nowhere. We should be talking about the lynch.
|
On October 13 2012 11:31 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2012 11:30 EchelonTee wrote:
Sandroba, and a bullet into OriginalName. I would want a double lynch. thats bs you can only pick one
To make it 100% clear.
SANDROBA
That's why I wrote his name first. A bullet into ON by defintion means N1 or beyond, aka not now.
|
sorry to nitpick further but is that choice out of everyone in the entire game, assuming normal lynch mechanics?
|
On October 13 2012 11:12 EchelonTee wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2012 11:11 thrawn2112 wrote:On October 13 2012 11:08 EchelonTee wrote:On October 13 2012 11:05 thrawn2112 wrote:echelon why would you opt for last minute sneaky maneuvers to keep hopeless safe instead of discussing it in the thread? On October 13 2012 11:00 EchelonTee wrote:
Vote bombing ON, fuck it. I don't want 1der to die and idgaf between ON and sandroba, both should die at this point. so what do you give a fuck about? who is your top scumread? You misinterpret me; I'm not saying IDGAF as in I don't think either of them are worthy of the lynch. I'm saying I consider them both bad enough to lynch and don't care who dies today. who is your top scumread da0ud. We're killing sandroba. I'm 99% sure 1der is a townie.
I mean, I posted this. I realize the thread is moving fast but am I really being that unclear?
|
On October 13 2012 11:38 thrawn2112 wrote:
sorry to nitpick further but is that choice out of everyone in the entire game, assuming normal lynch mechanics?
No it is not that choice out of anyone in the entire game. That choice would be da0ud, which I said in thread.
I don't want to be a bitch, but seriously. Read my posts before you question me over and over and over.
|
ah ok. dou0ud seems a weird choice for a top scumread though
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
