|
On October 13 2012 09:13 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2012 08:27 prplhz wrote:sandroba has a legitimate excuse for getting drunk but saying that nothing has happened in the last 6 pages is just lazy. he looks like he does in liar game (and i thought he was town  along with his team mates echelontee and palmar). kush read liar game or just sandroba's filter ( notsolong) and tell me what you think 1.He seems more casual/carefree in that scum game. 2.This game the tone of his posts are stern and the posts themselves are relatively long and focused. If you compare both filters they read quite differently. I do think it's interesting that ET said one of his town tells this game was discussing set up, but he did that also quite a bit in that scum game.
1. I disagree. In context of that game, sandroba was widely (and correctly) considered scum D1. Any carefree-ness you see is him on D2-4 just completely not giving a crap because he was completely and utterly doomed.
What is similar in the two games is in Liar Game, sandroba got extremely busy and fell off the face of the planet (I was on his team), and he made very little effort to try and defend himself. AKA, his effort dropped off preciptiously from D1. You can say that it's because he is busy, but heuristically this looks very similar to me.
2. His C9++ is important to look at, if you're going to look at filters. That is an average town sandroba game; he is aggresive, speaks plainly, and most importantly discusses topics with people that he trusts. He seems completely disinterested in discussing things with anyone which is weird considering how he usually does things. He likes to take control and build power blocs, which he hasn't even tried to do since the first 12 hours of the game.
|
Vote bombing ON, fuck it. I don't want 1der to die and idgaf between ON and sandroba, both should die at this point.
|
I wanted ON over Hopeless because of ON inactivity and actually ON has posted a lot of good things and but effort in his defense. There is more content to be expected from him to help us get a better read on him in the future.
I do want Sand > Djo which is the case right now. From what i said earlier I dont think either that Djo and Hopeless can both be mafia, hence at least we are saving one valuable town with constructive agrumentation.
|
echelon why would you opt for last minute sneaky maneuvers to keep hopeless safe instead of discussing it in the thread?
On October 13 2012 11:00 EchelonTee wrote:
Vote bombing ON, fuck it. I don't want 1der to die and idgaf between ON and sandroba, both should die at this point.
so what do you give a fuck about? who is your top scumread?
|
|
|
On October 13 2012 04:35 EchelonTee wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2012 04:28 Hopeless1der wrote:
Basically hoping to lure scum out either latching onto my case with poor justification, just sheeping or trying to defend me for towncred, knowing I'd flip town. Quite frankly I think it failed pretty hard, so yeah...I won't be trying stunts like this again.
I'm currently going through filters for proper scumreads. K. I'll put 2 onto ON. It would be a policy lynch, sad to say, but lurking in a mini is extremely bad for town. Can't stand for it.
On October 13 2012 07:09 EchelonTee wrote:
Prplhz, would you care to weight in on the ON vs 1der matter? I don't want to vote dump but I will if I have to.
Me showing that I supported 1der over ON, and was willing to vote dump if I had to.
|
On October 13 2012 05:14 EchelonTee wrote:
If you have a scumread, it's better to lynch them over someone who has a high chance of being replaced or modkilled. It's the difference between a coin flip and an educated guess.
what about this quote?
|
On October 13 2012 11:00 EchelonTee wrote:
Vote bombing ON, fuck it. I don't want 1der to die and idgaf between ON and sandroba, both should die at this point.
Wahouuu I didn't see the 6 votes on Hopeless from kush and at the last second you actually vote on ON. Only looked at the update. Happy with how it went then !
|
On October 13 2012 11:05 thrawn2112 wrote:echelon why would you opt for last minute sneaky maneuvers to keep hopeless safe instead of discussing it in the thread? Show nested quote +On October 13 2012 11:00 EchelonTee wrote:
Vote bombing ON, fuck it. I don't want 1der to die and idgaf between ON and sandroba, both should die at this point. so what do you give a fuck about? who is your top scumread?
You misinterpret me; I'm not saying IDGAF as in I don't think either of them are worthy of the lynch. I'm saying I consider them both bad enough to lynch and don't care who dies today.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Round Four
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/SydsE.jpg)
24 hours remain
|
On October 13 2012 11:08 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2012 05:14 EchelonTee wrote:
If you have a scumread, it's better to lynch them over someone who has a high chance of being replaced or modkilled. It's the difference between a coin flip and an educated guess. what about this quote?
What if he has a town read on Hope, then his last second vote makes perfect sense
|
On October 13 2012 11:08 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2012 05:14 EchelonTee wrote:
If you have a scumread, it's better to lynch them over someone who has a high chance of being replaced or modkilled. It's the difference between a coin flip and an educated guess. what about this quote?
I have a scumread on sandroba. But since lynching vets with a meta like his is not the best, it makes put his lynch on par with ON in worthiness.
|
On October 13 2012 11:08 EchelonTee wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2012 11:05 thrawn2112 wrote:echelon why would you opt for last minute sneaky maneuvers to keep hopeless safe instead of discussing it in the thread? On October 13 2012 11:00 EchelonTee wrote:
Vote bombing ON, fuck it. I don't want 1der to die and idgaf between ON and sandroba, both should die at this point. so what do you give a fuck about? who is your top scumread? You misinterpret me; I'm not saying IDGAF as in I don't think either of them are worthy of the lynch. I'm saying I consider them both bad enough to lynch and don't care who dies today.
who is your top scumread
|
haha look at vote thread you got owned et
|
On October 13 2012 11:11 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2012 11:08 EchelonTee wrote:On October 13 2012 11:05 thrawn2112 wrote:echelon why would you opt for last minute sneaky maneuvers to keep hopeless safe instead of discussing it in the thread? On October 13 2012 11:00 EchelonTee wrote:
Vote bombing ON, fuck it. I don't want 1der to die and idgaf between ON and sandroba, both should die at this point. so what do you give a fuck about? who is your top scumread? You misinterpret me; I'm not saying IDGAF as in I don't think either of them are worthy of the lynch. I'm saying I consider them both bad enough to lynch and don't care who dies today. who is your top scumread
da0ud.
We're killing sandroba. I'm 99% sure 1der is a townie.
|
On October 13 2012 11:11 kushm4sta wrote:
haha look at vote thread you got owned et
Oh boy
|
|
|
On October 13 2012 11:12 EchelonTee wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2012 11:11 thrawn2112 wrote:On October 13 2012 11:08 EchelonTee wrote:On October 13 2012 11:05 thrawn2112 wrote:echelon why would you opt for last minute sneaky maneuvers to keep hopeless safe instead of discussing it in the thread? On October 13 2012 11:00 EchelonTee wrote:
Vote bombing ON, fuck it. I don't want 1der to die and idgaf between ON and sandroba, both should die at this point. so what do you give a fuck about? who is your top scumread? You misinterpret me; I'm not saying IDGAF as in I don't think either of them are worthy of the lynch. I'm saying I consider them both bad enough to lynch and don't care who dies today. who is your top scumread da0ud. We're killing sandroba. I'm 99% sure 1der is a townie.
I have this feeling as well. I will need to be sure though. With 9 votes, I should be able to make a difference.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Sorry, literacy was never my strong point. ET's votes do count and ON and sandroba advance to the final around
On January 10 2012 04:28 Qatol wrote:
Actions/votes will be accepted up to and including the posted time, but not after.
|
I see as well that Sand voted 7 times against ON to make him move on, when himself was already doomed over Djo.
Hence ON and Sand cannot both be scums. It is actually a good result to have Sand vs Hopeless
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
