EPTLooney Lynching Mini Mafia - Page 24
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 13 2012 08:27 prplhz wrote: sandroba has a legitimate excuse for getting drunk but saying that nothing has happened in the last 6 pages is just lazy. he looks like he does in liar game (and i thought he was town  along with his team mates echelontee and palmar).kush read liar game or just sandroba's filter (notsolong) and tell me what you think He seems more casual/carefree in that scum game. This game the tone of his posts are stern and the posts themselves are relatively long and focused. If you compare both filters they read quite differently. I do think it's interesting that ET said one of his town tells this game was discussing set up, but he did that also quite a bit in that scum game. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Mementoss v. HiroPro Kush v. da0ud me v. prplhz | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On October 13 2012 09:15 austinmcc wrote: If these were brackets today and you had to vote in them: (1) Who would you vote for in each matchup? (2) Why? (3) Would you use mass votes to ensure they pass on? Mementoss v. HiroPro Kush v. da0ud me v. prplhz I would probably neglect to vote on mmt vs Hiro, I'm reading null on them both. Since you say I have to vote, I guess MMT? I'd vote Kush over da0ud. Kush's filter is more spammy, I have a more clear town read on da0ud from his OP and reactions to people thinking he was being disruptive because of it. I would not mass vote as I'm currently reading kush as town as well. Kush's high activity makes me think it would be better for town if he were to advance because it would lead to better discussion. I would definitely vote prplhz over you. Going through your filter, I didn't really find anything that rubbed me the wrong way. Your posts are usually open. Only the last couple hours have you been reserved and I think you're saving some walls for us. I hope I'm right. Prplhz's recent activity has not been strong to me, and his lack of effort strikes me as scummy. He says he has specific reads on people but they aren't explained, or they're actually false (mistaking me and hiro). He also asks a lot of questions but I feel he's not very focused on them, just picking away for information without providing any himself. I would use a sizable number of votes if necessary. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
sandroba x1 easy decisions this round | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Why the fuck are so many people voting for ON??? | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On October 13 2012 09:39 thrawn2112 wrote: austin was there a point to that other than asking for reads? Perhaps we'll never know.... Anyways, my time filters has given me a scumish read of prplhz and a wtf read of ET. Prplhz for pretty much what I outlined for austin in my last post. On ET, he made his townread of sandroba clear, and now that sandroba isn't living up to expectations, he's not really doing anything about it. He also made a big stink about associative tells saying if sandroba flips scum he should be held accountable. That goes the other way too I think. He's been around, focused mainly on my bracket. I think its bad form that his filter directly implicates him but he hasn't had much presence on sandroba's bracket. I don't get why he's mostly ignoring it. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
If you have a scumread, it's better to lynch them over someone who has a high chance of being replaced or modkilled. It's the difference between a coin flip and an educated guess. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
I haven't come to a conclusion about his "scum plan" story yet. But honestly I'm wanting to save my votes for the next round so unless I end up more decisive on that MU than I am right now I probably won't use any votes on it | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Purely hypothetically, non-inflammatorally, etc, ON is probably going to get replaced or modkilled. Why would you policy lynch that??? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
et has 2 votes on ON sandroba has 7!!! votes on ON @thrawn ah ok i see you changed your vote. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
I don't want to waste my votes on what would only be a policy lynch, and I'm more interested in pushing sandroba than I am hopeless so I'm not wanting to use votes on the ON vs 1der MU | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On October 13 2012 09:39 thrawn2112 wrote: austin was there a point to that other than asking for reads? Yeah. A couple (1) ON on D1 and D2 got ALL the votes in his matchups. Nobody voted me. Nobody voted HiroPro. It's one part of the bracket where we've got very little information, and I'm worried that there's been NO pushback against him. It even worries me that nobody's really saying that, if he's scum and he's uncommunicative so they're cutting him loose, at least scum should be saying "Hey guys, nobody is voting against him, maybe he's not scum?" Or...that's what I'm thinking. Based on that, I want to push Hopeless1der just on principle, to see what happens and because it feels unlikely ON is scum if you look PURELY at the voting on D1 and D2. But when I look through his filter...I don't get a scumread off of it. I'm not working with much, but the constant asking about who will be around at deadline feels like an actual concern, rather than an act. Hopeless asks mementoss for mementoss's read on Hopeless's D1 unvotes, mildly townie (Calling attention to it, having someone scrutinize you voluntarily). The unvote in part to not throw away votes I'm mildly townie on as well. So...I actually don't really like that matchup at all. I'll send ON through because I'm more worried about him based on votes and speculation rather than what he's done. Hopeless1der's whole look scummy to catch scum thing is ... null to me, but some of his other stuff is mildly townie to me. I don't want to just leave it at that and not interact with the matchup though, so I figure I'll ask Hopeless1der about some people he hasn't mentioned too much. See how quick and thoroughly he answers, see who he picks and why. It's a variety of answers and reasons - no vote, vote kush even though I think he's town because x, vote prplhz because I think he's scum. I like that. (2) We're too complacent with the matchups. This is a 96 hour day, but...we're not playing this right if we talk ONLY about the matchups. We ought to all be scumhunting EVERYWHERE. There's a chance there are no scum in the final 4, no scum on one side of the bracket, etc. I realized that we're not making good use of our 96 hour D1 if we focus only on the people who can still be lynched. The more we discuss and the more we scrutinize everyone D1, the better our future reads will be. It's like...I don't want this to be GSL Open 2, waiting and waiting and waiting. So, specifically, I chose some matchups of people that have been safe since the first 24 hours. Don't neglect to look em over just because we can't lynch them D1. Mementoss, me, HiroPro, we all sort of got by easily and so I wanted to see what he thought about that set of people. | ||
| ||
