|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
sudden cuz I wake up and check the threqd again…?
@iamp
limiyrd time caused mr to rmphasize it. cant write full cases
|
On October 14 2012 11:05 ShiaoPi wrote:
sudden cuz I wake up and check the threqd again…?
@iamp
limiyrd time caused mr to rmphasize it. cant write full cases
what?
|
On October 14 2012 11:00 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 10:59 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:58 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:56 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 iamperfection wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 Keirathi wrote:
I'll put my vote on whoever I damn well please, thanks.
I already said the people I would be eilling to vote for. I have 2 hours to make up my mind on if I want to change. can you explain why you think a no lynch was a good idea. I already did. VE made me paranoid that scum had an ability that they could use to change the flip today. If we no-lynched, there wouldn't be a flip to change. But, I said that without reading the op again to see if it was even possible to vote no-lynch. The only role in the game that could feasibly change a lynch flip was likely the coroner. Given that it is extremely unlikely scum had more then 1 of that role, I think we should be able to trust lynches at this point. Coroner hasn't flipped though? that was ve's check
I don't give a fuck what VE's "check" was. Because Kush flipped town. We KNOW that something is wrong. There are too many unexplainable things, and no way to verify any of them.
My gut tells me that Kush was town. He flipped town. So, from my perspective, either one of two things happened: 1) Kush was framed or 2) VE is lying.
|
"limited time cause me to emphasize it"
|
On October 14 2012 11:04 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 11:01 Kreb wrote:On October 14 2012 10:57 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:50 Kreb wrote:Shiao, Coag and Sloosh appearing within 8minutes after a few Shiao votes go down. If I am to move to a secondary target, thats the kind of stuff thats gonna decide where my vote go. Both Matt and Shiao are similarly scummy because of their inactivity to me, but the sudden resistance appearing for Shiao after several hours of very surprisingly low activity despite the very unfavourable situation for town with votes everywhere. Thats might definitely tip me over. Couple that with: On October 14 2012 04:31 Mattchew wrote:
also, if someone links me to a newbie game (VE you did this too WTF) for a meta read you have got to be kidding. I would say anyone under like 7 - 10 games should never be lynched on meta because there is so much room to improve and change styles Which is likely directed at me. And since I know Im town, a scum should have little reason to do this. Heavily leaning towards a Shiao vote here if I am to switch. How is it sudden resistance? To my understanding Shiao was not really ever on the docket until what? an hour or two ago, tops of 3? Meanwhile you have a player like mattchew who has been on near universally everyones scumlist at some point through this game. Why is a player who has been so apathetic and unhelpful, who isn't even playing in the interests of the town getting a free pass repeatedly? The entire shiao wagon looks like its designed to keep mattchew alive another day which I have no clue as to why. Its sudden because..... it happened right after the votes went down? Though its definitely a possibility its a designed wagon. Given how close it is to lynch deadline, when else would it happen? If people waited till just before deadline it would look insanely weird. Given the Shiaopi lynch is a very late choice in the day, it should be getting all resistance to it early.
Theres been surprisingly little activity last hours. That tells me mafia was fine with the situation at hand.
|
when phone posting goes wrong
|
On October 14 2012 11:07 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 11:00 iamperfection wrote:On October 14 2012 10:59 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:58 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:56 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 iamperfection wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 Keirathi wrote:
I'll put my vote on whoever I damn well please, thanks.
I already said the people I would be eilling to vote for. I have 2 hours to make up my mind on if I want to change. can you explain why you think a no lynch was a good idea. I already did. VE made me paranoid that scum had an ability that they could use to change the flip today. If we no-lynched, there wouldn't be a flip to change. But, I said that without reading the op again to see if it was even possible to vote no-lynch. The only role in the game that could feasibly change a lynch flip was likely the coroner. Given that it is extremely unlikely scum had more then 1 of that role, I think we should be able to trust lynches at this point. Coroner hasn't flipped though? that was ve's check I don't give a fuck what VE's "check" was. Because Kush flipped town. We KNOW that something is wrong. There are too many unexplainable things, and no way to verify any of them. My gut tells me that Kush was town. He flipped town. So, from my perspective, either one of two things happened: 1) Kush was framed or 2) VE is lying.
V/e looks pretty townie to me. Doesnt seem likely that kush was townie based on his play. Thats what it looks like from my perspective anyway.
|
On October 14 2012 11:00 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 10:59 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:58 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:56 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 iamperfection wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 Keirathi wrote:
I'll put my vote on whoever I damn well please, thanks.
I already said the people I would be eilling to vote for. I have 2 hours to make up my mind on if I want to change. can you explain why you think a no lynch was a good idea. I already did. VE made me paranoid that scum had an ability that they could use to change the flip today. If we no-lynched, there wouldn't be a flip to change. But, I said that without reading the op again to see if it was even possible to vote no-lynch. The only role in the game that could feasibly change a lynch flip was likely the coroner. Given that it is extremely unlikely scum had more then 1 of that role, I think we should be able to trust lynches at this point. Coroner hasn't flipped though? If you believe VE at all (you seem to via you believe mafia has an ability that fucks with flips) then kush would have been said role and self used.
The only reason anyone has ever thought that coroner could change a flip was because VE FUCKING SUGGESTED IT.
In my experience, people only speculate about roles that they should have no fucking clue about when they actually have some information about said role.
|
This lynch guys. This lynch. ShiaoPi.
|
On October 14 2012 11:09 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 11:00 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:59 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:58 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:56 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 iamperfection wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 Keirathi wrote:
I'll put my vote on whoever I damn well please, thanks.
I already said the people I would be eilling to vote for. I have 2 hours to make up my mind on if I want to change. can you explain why you think a no lynch was a good idea. I already did. VE made me paranoid that scum had an ability that they could use to change the flip today. If we no-lynched, there wouldn't be a flip to change. But, I said that without reading the op again to see if it was even possible to vote no-lynch. The only role in the game that could feasibly change a lynch flip was likely the coroner. Given that it is extremely unlikely scum had more then 1 of that role, I think we should be able to trust lynches at this point. Coroner hasn't flipped though? If you believe VE at all (you seem to via you believe mafia has an ability that fucks with flips) then kush would have been said role and self used. The only reason anyone has ever thought that coroner could change a flip was because VE FUCKING SUGGESTED IT. In my experience, people only speculate about roles that they should have no fucking clue about when they actually have some information about said role.
Coroner is in the game... it has to do something.
|
On October 14 2012 11:07 Kreb wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 11:04 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 11:01 Kreb wrote:On October 14 2012 10:57 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:50 Kreb wrote:Shiao, Coag and Sloosh appearing within 8minutes after a few Shiao votes go down. If I am to move to a secondary target, thats the kind of stuff thats gonna decide where my vote go. Both Matt and Shiao are similarly scummy because of their inactivity to me, but the sudden resistance appearing for Shiao after several hours of very surprisingly low activity despite the very unfavourable situation for town with votes everywhere. Thats might definitely tip me over. Couple that with: On October 14 2012 04:31 Mattchew wrote:
also, if someone links me to a newbie game (VE you did this too WTF) for a meta read you have got to be kidding. I would say anyone under like 7 - 10 games should never be lynched on meta because there is so much room to improve and change styles Which is likely directed at me. And since I know Im town, a scum should have little reason to do this. Heavily leaning towards a Shiao vote here if I am to switch. How is it sudden resistance? To my understanding Shiao was not really ever on the docket until what? an hour or two ago, tops of 3? Meanwhile you have a player like mattchew who has been on near universally everyones scumlist at some point through this game. Why is a player who has been so apathetic and unhelpful, who isn't even playing in the interests of the town getting a free pass repeatedly? The entire shiao wagon looks like its designed to keep mattchew alive another day which I have no clue as to why. Its sudden because..... it happened right after the votes went down? Though its definitely a possibility its a designed wagon. Given how close it is to lynch deadline, when else would it happen? If people waited till just before deadline it would look insanely weird. Given the Shiaopi lynch is a very late choice in the day, it should be getting all resistance to it early. Theres been surprisingly little activity last hours. That tells me mafia was fine with the situation at hand.
Or people weren't around to talk. Any way you look at it you can find reasons to dislike mattchew, and dislike shiaopi. The obvious difference to me which seperates the two is one has actively said he doesn't care, promised to do things that he doesn't follow through on and attempts to be active while never being around to leave his mark on the thread. These are all scum characteristics and everytime he is mentioned as a possible lynch case it suddenly gets pushed aside for other reasons, or people just stop discussing it and move to different things.
Look at the last game where BM, and Grush were left alive in a lylo situation and how by not being around 1 townie lost the game. I honestly can say I don't ever want to see a repeat of that.
|
Kei I do.
I HAVE A FUCKING MOD REPORT THAT SAYS MAFIA CORONER.
Thats the information I have that you're suggesting.
|
On October 14 2012 11:09 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 11:00 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:59 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:58 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:56 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 iamperfection wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 Keirathi wrote:
I'll put my vote on whoever I damn well please, thanks.
I already said the people I would be eilling to vote for. I have 2 hours to make up my mind on if I want to change. can you explain why you think a no lynch was a good idea. I already did. VE made me paranoid that scum had an ability that they could use to change the flip today. If we no-lynched, there wouldn't be a flip to change. But, I said that without reading the op again to see if it was even possible to vote no-lynch. The only role in the game that could feasibly change a lynch flip was likely the coroner. Given that it is extremely unlikely scum had more then 1 of that role, I think we should be able to trust lynches at this point. Coroner hasn't flipped though? If you believe VE at all (you seem to via you believe mafia has an ability that fucks with flips) then kush would have been said role and self used. The only reason anyone has ever thought that coroner could change a flip was because VE FUCKING SUGGESTED IT. In my experience, people only speculate about roles that they should have no fucking clue about when they actually have some information about said role.
You are right. VE did suggest it. However your options are, hes lying, or hes right that mafia somehow fucked with the flip. Given that the name coroner is likely something to do with dead bodies (as each role has thus far has been somehow related to its name) its not unreasonable thing to leap to. Could he be wrong? yes, but its the most obvious explanation if you think hes telling the truth.
|
On October 14 2012 11:09 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 11:00 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:59 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:58 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:56 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 iamperfection wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 Keirathi wrote:
I'll put my vote on whoever I damn well please, thanks.
I already said the people I would be eilling to vote for. I have 2 hours to make up my mind on if I want to change. can you explain why you think a no lynch was a good idea. I already did. VE made me paranoid that scum had an ability that they could use to change the flip today. If we no-lynched, there wouldn't be a flip to change. But, I said that without reading the op again to see if it was even possible to vote no-lynch. The only role in the game that could feasibly change a lynch flip was likely the coroner. Given that it is extremely unlikely scum had more then 1 of that role, I think we should be able to trust lynches at this point. Coroner hasn't flipped though? If you believe VE at all (you seem to via you believe mafia has an ability that fucks with flips) then kush would have been said role and self used. The only reason anyone has ever thought that coroner could change a flip was because VE FUCKING SUGGESTED IT. In my experience, people only speculate about roles that they should have no fucking clue about when they actually have some information about said role.
I came to that conclusion on my own before ve mentioned it. well at least thought of it.
|
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
damn it.
I was saying that with limited time and methods(aka phone) i had to overemphasize the slip to make you consider.lynching him. since I cannot.post large cases now
|
This is an unbelievably convoluted and elabrate lie you're putting your chips on Kei. I'm not lying.
|
On October 14 2012 11:12 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 11:07 Kreb wrote:On October 14 2012 11:04 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 11:01 Kreb wrote:On October 14 2012 10:57 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:50 Kreb wrote:Shiao, Coag and Sloosh appearing within 8minutes after a few Shiao votes go down. If I am to move to a secondary target, thats the kind of stuff thats gonna decide where my vote go. Both Matt and Shiao are similarly scummy because of their inactivity to me, but the sudden resistance appearing for Shiao after several hours of very surprisingly low activity despite the very unfavourable situation for town with votes everywhere. Thats might definitely tip me over. Couple that with: On October 14 2012 04:31 Mattchew wrote:
also, if someone links me to a newbie game (VE you did this too WTF) for a meta read you have got to be kidding. I would say anyone under like 7 - 10 games should never be lynched on meta because there is so much room to improve and change styles Which is likely directed at me. And since I know Im town, a scum should have little reason to do this. Heavily leaning towards a Shiao vote here if I am to switch. How is it sudden resistance? To my understanding Shiao was not really ever on the docket until what? an hour or two ago, tops of 3? Meanwhile you have a player like mattchew who has been on near universally everyones scumlist at some point through this game. Why is a player who has been so apathetic and unhelpful, who isn't even playing in the interests of the town getting a free pass repeatedly? The entire shiao wagon looks like its designed to keep mattchew alive another day which I have no clue as to why. Its sudden because..... it happened right after the votes went down? Though its definitely a possibility its a designed wagon. Given how close it is to lynch deadline, when else would it happen? If people waited till just before deadline it would look insanely weird. Given the Shiaopi lynch is a very late choice in the day, it should be getting all resistance to it early. Theres been surprisingly little activity last hours. That tells me mafia was fine with the situation at hand. Or people weren't around to talk. Any way you look at it you can find reasons to dislike mattchew, and dislike shiaopi. The obvious difference to me which seperates the two is one has actively said he doesn't care, promised to do things that he doesn't follow through on and attempts to be active while never being around to leave his mark on the thread. These are all scum characteristics and everytime he is mentioned as a possible lynch case it suddenly gets pushed aside for other reasons, or people just stop discussing it and move to different things. Look at the last game where BM, and Grush were left alive in a lylo situation and how by not being around 1 townie lost the game. I honestly can say I don't ever want to see a repeat of that.
Most of what you say about Matt can be said about both BM and Grush last game too, and they were both town. People seemed to think BM was some kind of vet player but he was awful in my opinion. I have no problem putting Matt in the same category.
However, you arguing strongly for this one means something too because I very much trust you to be town. And as someone pointed out, I dont like voting for the same target as VE does. Im not gonna switch to either of Matt/Shiao yet, but at least the recent discussion is giving me new info on it.
|
I'm flattered you think so highly of my scum play though.
|
On October 14 2012 11:07 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 11:00 iamperfection wrote:On October 14 2012 10:59 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:58 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:56 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 iamperfection wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 Keirathi wrote:
I'll put my vote on whoever I damn well please, thanks.
I already said the people I would be eilling to vote for. I have 2 hours to make up my mind on if I want to change. can you explain why you think a no lynch was a good idea. I already did. VE made me paranoid that scum had an ability that they could use to change the flip today. If we no-lynched, there wouldn't be a flip to change. But, I said that without reading the op again to see if it was even possible to vote no-lynch. The only role in the game that could feasibly change a lynch flip was likely the coroner. Given that it is extremely unlikely scum had more then 1 of that role, I think we should be able to trust lynches at this point. Coroner hasn't flipped though? that was ve's check I don't give a fuck what VE's "check" was. Because Kush flipped town. We KNOW that something is wrong. There are too many unexplainable things, and no way to verify any of them. My gut tells me that Kush was town. He flipped town. So, from my perspective, either one of two things happened: 1) Kush was framed or 2) VE is lying.
On October 14 2012 11:09 Keirathi wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 11:00 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:59 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:58 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:56 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 iamperfection wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 Keirathi wrote:
I'll put my vote on whoever I damn well please, thanks.
I already said the people I would be eilling to vote for. I have 2 hours to make up my mind on if I want to change. can you explain why you think a no lynch was a good idea. I already did. VE made me paranoid that scum had an ability that they could use to change the flip today. If we no-lynched, there wouldn't be a flip to change. But, I said that without reading the op again to see if it was even possible to vote no-lynch. The only role in the game that could feasibly change a lynch flip was likely the coroner. Given that it is extremely unlikely scum had more then 1 of that role, I think we should be able to trust lynches at this point. Coroner hasn't flipped though? If you believe VE at all (you seem to via you believe mafia has an ability that fucks with flips) then kush would have been said role and self used. The only reason anyone has ever thought that coroner could change a flip was because VE FUCKING SUGGESTED IT. In my experience, people only speculate about roles that they should have no fucking clue about when they actually have some information about said role.
On October 14 2012 11:12 VisceraEyes wrote:
Kei I do.
I HAVE A FUCKING MOD REPORT THAT SAYS MAFIA CORONER.
Thats the information I have that you're suggesting.
Yeah. This is just going to keep on being an issue. I feel like a VE is the best lynch today. Then we know his alignment. Potentially discover MMtoss and coags alignments. Reduce the pool of potential scum. Have some Idea of what the fuck is going on.
I don't know if he is lying or telling the truth. But I feel like If it is even 50/50 that he is lying it is best we lynch him. If he is scum we catch scum. And can move on from this shit storm. If he is town. We trade VE for 2 confirmed townies. and we can move on from this shit storm.
I implore you all to vote Viscera Eyes.
##Unvote
##Vote: Viscera Eyes
|
On October 14 2012 11:16 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2012 11:09 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 11:00 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:59 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:58 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On October 14 2012 10:56 Keirathi wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 iamperfection wrote:On October 14 2012 10:53 Keirathi wrote:
I'll put my vote on whoever I damn well please, thanks.
I already said the people I would be eilling to vote for. I have 2 hours to make up my mind on if I want to change. can you explain why you think a no lynch was a good idea. I already did. VE made me paranoid that scum had an ability that they could use to change the flip today. If we no-lynched, there wouldn't be a flip to change. But, I said that without reading the op again to see if it was even possible to vote no-lynch. The only role in the game that could feasibly change a lynch flip was likely the coroner. Given that it is extremely unlikely scum had more then 1 of that role, I think we should be able to trust lynches at this point. Coroner hasn't flipped though? If you believe VE at all (you seem to via you believe mafia has an ability that fucks with flips) then kush would have been said role and self used. The only reason anyone has ever thought that coroner could change a flip was because VE FUCKING SUGGESTED IT. Fuck yeah you did. Represent. In my experience, people only speculate about roles that they should have no fucking clue about when they actually have some information about said role. I came to that conclusion on my own before ve mentioned it. well at least thought of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
