Newbie Mini Mafia XXIV - Page 50
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On August 24 2012 11:12 Stutters695 wrote: If anyone else was roleblocked now is the time to claim. And if there is a counter claim I would like to hear it. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
A roleblock from night 1 I was roleblocked, No other claims, Z-B didn't roleblock. We are minus 1 RB claim. we are missing nothing from night 2 I was roleblocked, Obvious was roleblocked (Why does Z- B state this was a roleblock from Your Harry? when the more likely scenario is that I was Roleblocked by Harry.) And Z- B roleblocked YH. 2 roleblock claims from night 3. Solar has not claimed RB and we are still missing the other roleblock. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
| ||
Solarsail
United Kingdom538 Posts
Thus Z-Boson is lying and I am forced to ##Vote Z-BosoN | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On August 24 2012 12:13 Solarsail wrote: I was not informed of any roleblock last night. Thus Z-Boson is lying and I am forced to ##Vote Z-BosoN Excellent Now If Z- boson flips roleblocker we auto lynch Solarsail. | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
| ||
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
@Z-Boson: On August 24 2012 10:34 Z-BosoN wrote: As expected, you would be the first to answer this. Let's learn to count first. YourHarry, Obvious, and You. That requires one jailkeeper and two roleblockers. Unless you wish to claim roleblocker as well, lol. goodkarma jailed you. I roleblocked YourHarry. YourHarry roleblocked Obvious. Three. This makes zero sense. Feel free to ask host in-thread, but my understanding is this: If one role-blocker role-blocks another role-blocker that role-blocker's role-block doesn't happen. So in this case if you did role-block YourHarry, YourHarry couldn't have role-blocked Obvious. Which means there's a third role-blocker to make this believable. But there's also DarthPunk being role-blocked, which means there's actually a fourth role-blocker... In a mafia game of this size, I find it very hard to believe there's four role-blockers. So at this point I would say it's more likely either you or Obvious is lying... I look forward to your defense, but I'm not really buying it. Also, did you see what I wrote against you just before the start of today? I would highly recommend you take some time to defend yourself against what I wrote there. | ||
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
On August 24 2012 12:13 Solarsail wrote: I was not informed of any roleblock last night. Thus Z-Boson is lying and I am forced to ##Vote Z-BosoN The plot thickens... SolarSail doesn't seem to agree with you. Any explanation??? | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On August 24 2012 12:33 goodkarma wrote: We absolutely need to hear from SolarSail now, as SolarSail can confirm or deny being RB'ed today... @Z-Boson: This makes zero sense. Feel free to ask host in-thread, but my understanding is this: If one role-blocker role-blocks another role-blocker that role-blocker's role-block doesn't happen. So in this case if you did role-block YourHarry, YourHarry couldn't have role-blocked Obvious. Which means there's a third role-blocker to make this believable. But there's also DarthPunk being role-blocked, which means there's actually a fourth role-blocker... In a mafia game of this size, I find it very hard to believe there's four role-blockers. So at this point I would say it's more likely either you or Obvious is lying... I look forward to your defense, but I'm not really buying it. Also, did you see what I wrote against you just before the start of today? I would highly recommend you take some time to defend yourself against what I wrote there. I thought that way about the roleblocks also. However in the OP it says that All roleblocks will result in the target being notified. I suppose we need some resolution in to how Roleblocks are handled this game. How are multiple roleblocks resolved, Particularly in the following scenario: Will Roleblocker A roleblocking Roleblocker B prevent Rolebocker B's roleblock of Player C? | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
| ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On August 24 2012 12:50 DarthPunk wrote: Z- Boson mysteriously silent after I explain why his scenario may require four role blockers in the game. Depending on how role-blocks are handled this could be quite damning. I started to type up some speculation about the composition of the game but I realized that I would just be making an exercise in futility and WIFOM and that's the last thing we need here. While waiting for that response you've requested I'll re-read the goings-on of the past few hours and hopefully something will stick out to me. | ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On August 24 2012 04:14 Stutters695 wrote: I haven't gotten a RB notification all game. Ditto as in I don't understand the NK on Jhuyt. GK seemed like the obvious lynch from a scum perspective (remove the most voal person) unless they were trying to blue hunt at night which is the only way I can reason it out currently. I figured at the time if they were trying to throw us off I'd be dead because although I've posted a couple of cases no one has really questioned me at all outside of GK informing me Shady was dead because I messed up the formatting in my post and your current question. Walls of text incoming shortly. I want my walls of text, Stutters, por favor. | ||
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
@Z-Boson: I'm not here to insta-condemn you. I'm here to carefully weigh the evidence against you and determine if your actions fit a scum agenda. Right now, I strongly believe they do. Instead of addressing my case points in the night post, you completely derail any discussion on you with a roleclaim and (what I consider to be) a weak case against DarthPunk. On top of that, your roleblocking claims make little sense. If you're truly town, you should stay in here and address the case points still standing against you. And you should be providing your scum reads. The absolute worst thing you can do for yourself is just sit there and say nothing. | ||
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
This is now (at least) the third time you've said something along the lines of "will analyze the thread," and then posted absolutely nothing. We need to hear much more from you. Discuss your impressions on Z-Boson and Golbat. That would be a good start... | ||
Golbat
United States499 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On August 24 2012 12:45 DarthPunk wrote: I thought that way about the roleblocks also. However in the OP it says that I suppose we need some resolution in to how Roleblocks are handled this game. How are multiple roleblocks resolved, Particularly in the following scenario: Will Roleblocker A roleblocking Roleblocker B prevent Rolebocker B's roleblock of Player C? Uh, never came across the situation. Will have to investigate and get back to you | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On August 24 2012 20:54 marvellosity wrote: Uh, never came across the situation. Will have to investigate and get back to you So Marv has not come across the situation yet this is the exact situation that Z- Boson is claiming. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On August 24 2012 20:57 DarthPunk wrote: So Marv has not come across the situation yet this is the exact situation that Z- Boson is claiming. That's more of a reflection that I haven't hosted very much, don't read anything into it ![]() | ||
DarthPunk
Australia10847 Posts
On August 24 2012 21:00 marvellosity wrote: That's more of a reflection that I haven't hosted very much, don't read anything into it ![]() It's a bit hard not too when this exact situation has supposedly occurred 24 hours ago. But I understand you do not wish to influence the game and I apologise if I put you in that position. | ||
| ||