Mad Men Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
This is the first game I've played with a mason, and it seems to be a variant no less, so my thoughts on the subject: Do not claim immediately. The role is not alignment indicative and really just paints a target on you. There is no guarantee that there are both town and scum masons. I do not see a benefit to masons claiming. @talismania, when you say we must claim masoned, we're identifying ourselves but not the actual mason, correct? If this is the case, I can't think of a good reason not to do this. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 03 2012 23:34 Toadesstern wrote: I wanted WBG to answer the questions... On August 03 2012 23:36 JingleHell wrote: Ah. My apologies. Maybe I should finish my caffeine, I missed that. I'd rather have an answer quite quick than giving VE some time to write something up ...Jingle, you can read just fine. On August 03 2012 23:33 Glasse wrote: Why are you defending him so much? Is he your scum buddy? All he did so far was randomly call 2 names without any proofs. All you have done so far is provide a series of one-liners that are non-committal and dismissive towards prplhz's accusations of your actions thus far. He looks significantly more "town than town can be" by comparison, since he's actively pressuring and trying to get discussion out of you. He asks precisely WHY do you not like wbg, and you throw it back in his face, and expect that to look townie? You kiddin me? ##Vote: Glasse (I still think we should post our votes in this thread for filter/quoting purposes...just don't pull any fake vote shenanigans plz) | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
Meanwhile, ##Unvote: Glasse Sounded like a straightforward read of wbg, considering wbg just shat all over the "mason claim" discussion. I don't like that he jumped to the conclusion that bugs is scum, but at least something to back it up, so Glasse checks out so far. EBP (Edit before post) and oh crap we already lost a townie. Role of Zorkmid is Townie or 'unknown'? Its green so I assume townie, but I'd like to confirm. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
Countdropula himself has literally two posts in his filter, so I'll reserve judgement for now. Erandorr, I doubt there is much you could do to refute Hier's case on you without going OMGUS on him, but it would be nice if you'd give a go. Also, where is the second go round of your case on Zeph? Seriously, Filter links in the OP? Sloosh already did the legwork. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=15687213 | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On wbg. perhaps I'm missing something due to not knowing his meta at all, but that part of the discussion went right over my head. Based on what I've seen in this game, I think he's town. It was a strange play to immediately out masons without telling them, but I don't think it can be conclusively anti-town. Creating sub-par targets for KP is the biggest benefit I see. Right now that seems to leave Grush, Talis and prplhz for current lynch candidates (of people I'd be willing to lynch). I don't know what grush is, but everyone seems happy to let a vig take care of him if we have one and his death doesn't give us anything to go on other than perhaps a quieter environment to play. I don't think he's worth wasting a lynch on today. Talis has been undoubtedly more active than prplhz, but about as useful in the active discussions of the thread. He posts requesting reads from other people without contributing any of own. His filter contains many posts pertaining to setup questions (i.e. more than once) and in general it looks like he's skirting the sidelines of the conversations. Despite his relative activity, I don't really know who he might vote for or who he is really suspicious of anymore. Prplhz got some vote pressure done early on, and has since disappeared into hangover land. I really don't see how this is considered so very scummy, and I don't see enough of a case to justify voting for him yet. Still, he's scummier than bugs so I may end up switching my vote to avoid wbg's lynch. ##Vote: talismania | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
My reads today are that between Erandorr, VE and Bugs, there is likely to be scum and I think that it's Erandorr right now. The case against bugs is largely his meta, which I am not familiar with. His mason debacle could go either way, his rage as well. All WIFOM and perhaps "Anti-Town" but NOT the same thing as "Scummy" to me. More trolling than anything else, and look what happened to master troll Grush. This is not enough for me to want to vote him. VE is (or was) vehemently against voting bugs:+ Show Spoiler + On August 05 2012 03:44 VisceraEyes wrote: Okay, everyone STOP. This lynch on WBG is not happening. Having PMed with him, I'm NOT of the opinion that he's scum and I think we should focus on other, actually scummy candidates. You guys are WIFOMing this lynch to shit. I fully support a talis lynch upon rereading. He literally asked for a NAMECLAIM from everyone guys. LITERALLY. ##Vote: talismania I think Bugs is town. I don't want to lynch him. slOosh, you in particular I want to hear more reasoning from. Your only gripe with him seems to be his read on prplhz - so...because you disagree with his read he's scum? Really? I don't like a grush lynch today either - it feels like a copout. But I totally can see a town Bugs wanting to lynch grush today. Grush was a key factor in the scum victory in LVI, for the same shit he's exhibiting now. However, I agree that we should give our vigs a chance to take care of him. We should be aiming for people we specifically think are scum, and for me that's not wherebugsgo. With people meta'ing, hes apparently suspicious due to his lack of activity, which he says is due to his mason role, and sounds plausible to me. His case against Erandorr makes much more sense to me than Eran's defense of it. Eran tried to accuse VE of neglecting questions and received a prompt response, and Erandorr takes it out of turn to dispute it. + Show Spoiler + On August 07 2012 10:48 Erandorr wrote: VE, wtf. Can you please look at those quotes in context? 1st quote: I respond to who seem to think that the raging started with me, not him 2nd : I think his rage is was a tool to dodge any questions he did not want to answer. 3rd: is a response to that guy accusing me of being as guilty of raging as wbg, and using it as part of a case vs me. its not me whining, its me clarifying something someone is not willing to see. 4th: the same, broodking accuses me of starting the shitstorm so once again I try to use "facts" Liar. About the "wifom" I think you are scum at this point. If you are town then you are one of the biggest morons I have ever seen called "good" at mafia. I also think you probably are scum with WBG, at least I hope you are WBG VE Jingles Broodking Some other random lurker (hassy,bio...? ) ##Vote wbg I am out, good luck with the game. The main point is he paraphrased VE in the nested quote's "I don't give a fuck" sentiment when VE was specifically referring to the MASON stuff. This occured AFTER the second quoted post, which was followed by: On August 07 2012 09:31 Erandorr wrote: 2)Did you miss the part where I explained 30 times that its not at all about the mason thing anymore? Wasn't the mason thing the whole reason Eran thought bugs was scummy at the start? (Or "anti-town") Erandorr's attempt to pass off VE's case as contradictory is incredibly scummy to me, and he immediately says "I am out", leaving no opportunity to grill him further. Based on this interaction, I find VE to be townie. ##Vote: Erandorr | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
hopeless1der - every post of his reads scummy in that he only mentions current topics in the thread and he's overcomposing his posts. Still I give him small towncred for saying he was going to look into zeph and then doing it and backing down. I should probably examine that in thread context to see if there would be scum motivation to back down since the zeph wagon inflated and deflated rather rapidly hmmm. Ok aside from that piece of thinking out loud, he also just completely ignores me, his scumread from day one, today. Read his filter. To the "overcomposing", I'm not sure how this suggests my affiliation when considering the fact that I haven't even got a full page in my filter yet. I have been severely lacking in the activity department (which I intend to improve) and I've only really given input on the current topics. However, my keeping my thoughts in line with the thread keeps things focused instead of looking like I'm trying to shift suspicions or clutter the thread. Your point there could easily go either way to paint me as scum regardless. Further to the point of my focusing on the current train of thought, you were not in any way going to be lynched today and I sincerely doubt I would have made any impact trying to get a lynch started on you after having been so inactive. I read up on the thread and posted who I felt was scum. In the future I'll know that Eran just tunnels wbg blind all day. I plan to spend this evening reading through filters and mason logs to figure out what to think now. You're null right now, in case you were wondering. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 09 2012 01:23 BroodKingEXE wrote: A townies gotta have the right info otherwise the whole town is fucked. Towns advantage is they can make consensus and informed desicions, its our job to find the scum leading us off track and look for people who have gone off track. I dont get you you keep saying you wont play the game but your still making accusations (small if that). Townies need that info BEFORE they make decisions not after they already made them. And just because bugs is not as active as everyone would like him to be doesn't diminish the fact that what you posted makes you look bad. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
I don't know about the 'make up for my folly tonight'. I'm expecting an epic case near the deadline right now. tbh I'm expecting 3 or 4 cases right around the deadline tonight, plus the rest of the mason logs. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 09 2012 02:17 talismania wrote: what do you mean "if I flip town" and then "lynch tomorrow"? You know something about the NKs that I don't? I don't know anything about the NK's. I was making an inference based on the situation you described with him coming up with a vig shot on you. If you were to somehow get shot tonight, you said you suspect VE of having a hand in it, though you can't understand how thats possible if he's a mason. You being shot (by him) would assume hes scum. My comment about the lynch tomorrow was that in no way does you flipping town confirm him as scum. I'm still of the opinion that at least one of VE-Bugs-Eran is scum, and since eran has flipped town my choices there are down to two. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On August 09 2012 10:00 VisceraEyes wrote: VisceraEyes Thoughts, And Lack Thereof I'm gonna open with the important stuff. talismania, Zephirdd, Toadesstern Yes, that's right - THREE names. Not Five. Why? Because in my opinion, the last 2 scums can be found in the pool of players who haven't been posting, like, at all. There have been too many town flips of active players for me to entertain the notion that ALL of the scum are playing visibly. Therefor, at least 40% of the scum team can, by my estimation, be found in that group. Now, my reads. talismania has been very confusing to me over the course of the game. After D1 I agreed with slOosh's points on talismania - lots of questions that seemed to go nowhere, very little what I would consider actual scum hunting. However, D2 talis turned on the town with a bright and shiny case on me. Generally speaking, I automatically think "SCUM!" in cases like that, as many of you are well aware - however this time it was different. This time, talismania had valid concerns about my activity and my case against him…and considering my main contention with him was about the whole questions that go nowhere thing, I decided to assent to masoning him. That's where things changed, for me. Over the course of those conversations, I was left with the feeling that he wasn't REALLY after information at all - that he was looking for something specific…something that I'd referenced earlier in the game. All Talismania was interested in during the WHOLE of our conversations was my read on Zephirdd. Why? What about Zephirdd was so important for me to comment on? What about my Zephirdd read intrigued him so? So I tried something out… I intentionally avoided talking about Zephirdd at all. :OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Here is the result of this experiment. + Show Spoiler + On August 07 2012 12:06 talismania wrote: VE you out there? waiting for a pm reply. On August 08 2012 02:38 talismania wrote: The extent of my communication with VE. Yes I wanted to more or less interrogate him about every player in the game, I think he's scum. Never really got to though. If he's innocent he shouldn't have a problem with that and should also probably want to interrogate me about a lot of things. He never responded to my zephirdd question despite posting in the thread after I had sent it, so I asked him in the thread. + Show Spoiler + Removed per request of host - for full logs in text form see this post: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=352668¤tpage=57#1127 On August 08 2012 03:24 talismania wrote: How is this a town attitude, toad? He writes this, but do you see it in the logs? He asked me about erandorr, I responded. I asked him about zephirdd after he brought zephirdd's name up... and nothing. If he had asked what I thought about zeph I would have gladly answered. He only showed interest in picking my brain about erandorr. The "people" I asked about? I only asked about one, and he never answered. I asked a grand total of two questions of him in PMs as they "dragged on". On August 08 2012 06:28 talismania wrote: ah sorry. I would argue that they are all around the same level of interest to be honest. Whatever happened to your thoughts on xsebt and zephirdd? You said in PMs you were going to look into them yesterday. WHO CARES?! He's barely playing and is probably scum! But if he doesn't do scummy things then I can't lynch him! talismania, in an attempt to distract town, has focused on my read of Zephirdd for almost an entire cycle. If he thinks I'm scum and Zeph is town, what could he possibly want to know what I think of Zephirdd for? Here's my theory: that he and Zephirdd are scum TOGETHER. I think he was interested in getting my read on Zephirdd in the thread to either vilify me for thinking an "obvious townie" is scum, or to solidify sentiment that he's town when I died D2 and flipped town by me stating a town-read on him. My guess is that scum roleblocked someone they killed N1 and talis claimed it in an attempt to gain town-cred. Zephirdd has spent the whole of the second cycle being pressured by CD. The result of this pressure, I think, speaks for itself - but I'll speak for it for those of you who are wondering what I'm talking about. He reacted BADLY. REALLY badly. Like, as a townie, how would you react to someone continually calling you scum based on nothing and trolling you? If your answer is anything but "ignore it and hunt scum" then you're scum. I'm sorry, but that's my opinion. Zeph's answer would apparently be "FREAK THE FUCK OUT AND RAGE IN-THREAD AND OMGUSSSSSSSSS"…if he were town. However, I think he's scum that can't handle pressure. And golly gee, he didn't vote for me, talismania's "#1 scum read". Hmmmm, I wonder what's going on here. :/ Toadesstern is on this list because he's a mason, and because I'm town the pool of possible scum masons is shrinking. Ultimately he's null, but I'm thinking scum probably have a mason and I don't think it's JH - especially after reading his logs with talismania. It's possible there ARE no scum masons and BC threw in a ton of town masons to fuck with town - but I find it really unlikely, and if that's what's going on here then BC is truly a bastard. So my lynch-order preference would be: 1. talismania/Zephirdd (I'm equally sure on both and would support either lynch equally. . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Toadesstern. I don't want to lynch Toad tomorrow, but I will if town wants to because he's a mason that's not JH or myself. Pretty much no other reason. :/ Those cases are atrocious. TALIS - Talis has consistently been following up on his reads and his 'questions that go no where'. His constant attempts to get you to respond to his questions are scummy? WTF? That's bullshit. He tunneled you when you refused to answer him and I think such a move is completely justified. I have a hard time believing you tried to set up such a shitty trap when the results are not all that damning against talis anyways. - He constantly drones on about the setup and wants character names? From the pm log between Toad and SnB: (SnB) I also think anyone who's played a game or two with talismania should know that his trying to get setup information and character name claims isn't alignment indicative, he always pushes some kind of plan like that as any alignment. (Toad) 2) Yeah I agree on Talis. There's some things I don't like about him but pushing those weird plans is not alignment indicating at all. The amount of "effort" he's putting in this game however made me reconsider a bit. He wasn't that much talkactive when we both played mafia in PYPoison. He's strange alright but he usually enjoys the "trying to understand the game" way more than "trying to figure out mafia"either way, so that's normal. Not really the most conclusive scumtell on talis you had there. ZEPH You're baseline suspicions of Zeph stem from Day 1 due to his list of lurkers, or so it seems. The main point of you thinking he's scum now is his response to CountDropula. Guy literally lurks the shit out of the game, had more posts in the voting thread than the actual thread at one point in time and then completely out of the blue tunnels into zeph like a goddamn freight train. His posts are so obnoxious I'd have either responded similarly to how zeph did, or not at all. Zeph didn't vote in line with talis - TEHY MUST BE SCAMS TOGETHURR. Meanwhile, Zeph actually sheeped your vote on Erandorr (so did I for that matter) because he felt you and bugs were producing better arguments. Does this mean the two of you **le GASP** created a bandwagon together on Erandorr to save yourself?! TOAD Obviously the weakest part of your case, but Toad is maybe kind of scum according to you because SOME of the masons have to be scum right? Well you're just as likely to be scum as any of the others at this point, including JH. None of this WIFOM 'vets must be scum' garbage for me. I'm reading town from Toad through his mason logs with snb. The same can't be said for you from your logs with bugs and talis, at least in my opinion. RAILROADING TOWN, DO WHAT I SAY, KILL SO AND SO, BLAH BLAH FREAKING BLAH There's plenty more to dissect if you want to start connection theories and confirmation bias. Your case alone however, is more than enough for me to vote you today VE. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
Jingle, whats your current take on VE? | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
Unless we get some direction from BC/Rasta on what the hell just happened this discussion needs to be tabled for later imo. Reads, cases, all that good stuff. Let's get back on course here. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 10 2012 10:16 Toadesstern wrote: now I can't sleep ![]() Well the message emphasizes d1 3 times, and it has "default scum" in quotation marks after talis' name. Why did he say he's a "default scum" read instead of just saying Talis is one of his mafia reads? Why the quotation marks out of nowhere? Check is filter and you'll see that he starts tunneling Talis like CRAZY ever after that post and does nothing besides voting him. Read the spoiler. + Show Spoiler + On August 05 2012 18:33 talismania wrote: summary thoughts after re-reading: toad has moved from scummy to townie in my head. many small things that suggest more effort than I see him putting in as scum. VE I think is scum both from his attitude, his lack of promised scumhunting, and the reason he picked for voting me. Hassybaby I think is scum for being too cautious sounding and not actually contributing novel stuff. He also gets baited by my setup talk. xsebt is default scum in my mind until he does something besides show up and make one incredibly wishy-washy post near deadline. wbg has an outside chance of being scum and wanting to sacrifice himself for some reason but I actually think he's more likely to be town. strongandbig and jinglehell both need to stop digging their tunnels and talk about other stuff for a while. jingle in particular has moved from town to neutral for his odd persistence. hopeless1der makes scummy posts but overall seems townie to me. Like his post composition soudns like scum, but what he's doing seems townlike. In particular the part where he said he was going to check into zephirdd and then he actually did. synystyr I think is scum until proven innocent for his excitement/activity discrepancy. I have my eye on glasse/dropula even though both are sort of loosely in my neutral/town category in my mind. I'm eager to see their promised activity in the future. From glasse, his promised read on toad. And from dropula, living up to this call to action for a more active thread. I think that's it, time for bed. On August 05 2012 21:00 XsebT wrote: I agree that countdropula's voting pattern and reasoning during d1 is pointing towards scum. He is all over the place with his accusations. Lazermonkey's analysis points this out quite well. Talismania, I was too inactive during d1, so a "default scum" accusation is probably in its place. If you keep having concerns, just ask me more direct questions. I'm not quite able to keep up with you guys when it comes to posting. I will be brief and to the point when posting. That said, I don't know why you would throw out so many scum accusations so early on, while already in the spotlight with wbg from d1. You should fear for your own survival in this game. If you're town, I consider the accusations a bad move. Does that seem like an acceptable reason for the phrase "default scum"? | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
Considering Xsebt might have had a scum read on talis, he's been surprisingly quiet about it. I have a really hard time buying into this lynch with one pm worth of evidence. I have a town read on talis based on his responses to the DT claim. I'm leaving my vote on VE until we see something a little more credible. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 11 2012 01:54 BroodKingEXE wrote: -_- He knows Talis' PM name. This has been confirmed. That isn't proof. I have another player's character name in my PM since there is a relationship between them in the show. If the scum are trying to fake a dt claim, I'd expect them to put some solid effort into making it believable, including copying the names from the pms. Talis posted his character's name to the thread. They knew what to look for. My scenario is extremely convoluted. Occam's razor says talis is either miller or scum due to the red check. But the red check is secondary information and I dont trust it coming from toad. Xsebt has not posted yet. At this rate he's getting modkilled. He's pretty much outed already. Why continue to hide? | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
IF this is an insane scum ploy, one of them is Betty Draper and their role pm has Francis' misspelt name in it. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 04 2012 05:13 talismania wrote: But I was being cute! My actual read of toad is "ugh". If I had to pick I'd say scum. It seems weird that I got the all red letter designation but I honestly can't remember sitting here now why. I think it was just because he disagreed with me about my thoughts on the masons. Oh and also it was that my post wasn't like my early game post in pyp et al. Which is true it wasn't but I was scum that game and I've kinda gotten lynched in two games since then for doing the same shit (and toad should know that from hosting ssb64) so no crazy plans or ideas from me this time. But I think that honestly you could say I was scum just as much as you could say VE was scum, yet toad has VE in alternating letters and me in all red. _________________ ps can people post their character names? I just want to satisfy my curiosity to find out who is in the game - I know that they don't mean anything since I'm VT with Henry Francis. Although I will LOL if scum has Ted Chaugh and Putnam, Powell, Lowe etc. And if WBG is veteran since Roger comes back from a heart attack in the first season. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
##Vote: talismania | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
##Unvote I want to hear it from Xsebt before I'll vote. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
1) If they're both scum of course they do 2) This is completely true and probably why I'll vote for you by the end of this. 3) Again, if they're scum no rules were broken. You keep feeding us info that we can use to try to win later, but insist we kill you. I'm all but convinced your town, but we can't risk it going into LYLO. I'm still not voting until xsebt gets his ass in here and gives some semblance of an explanation for this shitshow. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
@Marv, Lynching into Xsebt is insane to me because no one has counterclaimed and giving up a dt for a scum in that order is not the way to go about doing things. Talis presumably is not blue given his arguments this past day. If he flips VT, THEN I'd want to lynch xsebt. If Talis were to flip miller or scum, xsebt is pretty much confirmed. I'd like to believe we'd be significantly better off lynching talis today if it were between xsebt and talis. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
Oh wait can I play too? | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
1)Talis vs. Toad/Xsebt 2) Zeph vs. CD/Lazer If either of talis or zeph flip town (not miller) the 'dt' is a liar and will be killed. I have yet to get any input from xsebt and toad has disappeared. CD and Lazer have actively tried to confirm each other. Lynching the #2 redcheck gives a much more apparent conclusion on how to proceed tomorrow. We do need to lynch one of our redchecks. I'd rather it be zeph. In addition, you're just itching to believe talis is a miller due to your town read of him. We're in LYLO unless we hit scum anyways, lets kill the scummier looking of the redchecks first. The other will still be there tomorrow. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
Zeph dies. Flips Town. We lynch CountDropula followed by Lazermonkey. Talis dies. Flips Town. We lynch Xsebt followed by Toad. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE? Why is Xsebt confirmed but CD isn't? | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 11 2012 07:12 Glasse wrote: ##Unvote: VE ##Vote: Talismania The thread has pretty much just decided to take zeph over talis. You put this into the vote thread. Not even going to bother thinking through what this means until after the lynch. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
Toad second hand claimed for xsebt - Redcheck on Talis (Talis' name was misspelt in the pm's, which is why talis believes the check is legit). Went back and forth for a bit, talis insists he's miller etc. Eventually, Dropula claims dt himself - redcheck on zephirdd; lazer verifies dt claim by confirming his character name matches what dropula's "check" returned. Two redchecks to verify, most of us are in line with taking zeph today, talis tomorrow, unless whoever we lynch flips town. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
Mafia Roleblocker Once per night, you may send in a PM detailing a person you would like to block. That person will be notified that they were blocked, and if the person being blocked has a night action, he or she will not be able to use it. Please note that this ability only pertains to active actions. Passive abilities, such as the Veteran's extra lives, cannot be blocked by mafia. Easy there puppetmaster. You get notified regardless of having an ability. I'm not saying don't shoot him, but its not nearly as urgent as it could have been. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 11 2012 15:20 Hier wrote: Looking through CD's filter, I found the last line in this post amusing. It's like a whole loaf of bread. Hier I'm going to ask you to spell this out for me since I've already made a mistake in thinking I knew what we were talking about. Are you suggesting that CD scumslipped here? | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
##Vote: VisceraEyes | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
If there are any logs hanging around, can the masons at least let us know they exist even if they don't post them? | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
Hassy, Toad, VE. Logs? | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
I'm reading VE and synystyr as scum and varying degrees of town on the rest of us. Lazer and Toad are confirmed to me despite the GF conundrum. I'll have a case together soon on synystyr, but I want a VE lynch today. and also teehee I'm a joker lol. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 06 2012 09:44 Synystyr wrote: Active mode starting now ![]() grush and CountDropula are the most counterproductive people in this thread. They're being trollish for the sake of screwing with our heads and making us point fingers at each other instead of them. If they weren't scum, they'd be more helpful than they are now. Stop with the hints and talk straight at us. Oh good, activity! We could use some of that! All this post accomplishes is his displeasure with grush and CD for trolling. They've also both flipped town but that is inconclusive. The lack of a SCUM READ is what is concerning here. On August 07 2012 01:07 Synystyr wrote: Talismania is scum. He pushes this action to confuse town. If Sloosh dies in the night, it gives Talis tons of town cred because he said that medics should protect Sloosh. A little reverse psychology action too by claiming he would kill Sloosh if he were mafia. A hit on Sloosh appears to be be only negative for him and thus making him look innocent by association. He reflects heat off of his scum buddy and himself with this line. Many times throughout the thread, Talis gives WBG a onceover with a "probably town" read and then accuses someone new. Talis is scum with WBG and is trying to protect him. He also wants DTs to check other players other than himself/WBG to avoid being caught. He defends himself before anyone has even pointed a finger at him. This post feels like mafia bait to me, but is instead used so he can point fingers at the person who will make the argument and deflect heat off of him. With the death of Sloosh, it gives him an extremely concrete defense as a townie. Mafia team-roleblock him to make him look like a medic, then doublestack Sloosh in case of a medic. Talis' reasoning to medic sloosh was good, but other players like Toad, Erandorr and SnB come off as town to me and good candidates to be protected over sloosh in the night. There could have been two medics on Sloosh last night, but obviously that was not the case as Sloosh is dead. With that, Talis has everything to gain defensively and gives him a really powerful position to manipulate town as Mafia. His aggressive finger pointing without concrete evidence is his way of appearing town. I'm not buying it. ##Vote Talismana The entire basis of his case is from WIFOM'ing the NK on slo0sh. He also connection theory's that talis and bugs are scum together with very little evidence. Besides that, Talis responded to this case himself below. We know talis was town. Read his defense (nested below) and what it entails: On August 07 2012 08:38 Synystyr wrote: Weekends are simply very busy for me so I don't have time to post much during them. You'll see my activity increase over the week. Rest assured that I am green. I found you to be the person with the most to gain from Sloosh's death. I stand by my vote. This is the first case i've tried to build against someone, so there may be a few holes, but I wouldn't do it without good reasoning. Your claims on VE seem to be attacking his meta. I'm inclined to believe that you have some good points against him, but I simply don't know how VE has played in other games. I believe that at least one of the masons revealed is scum, and I lean towards VE more than anyone else. I'm interested to see what will happen with the two of you now that VE has masoned you. Talis solidly refutes Synystyr's case and in response he gets a weak excuse for activity, synystyr doubts his own case due to it being the first one made but insists he had 'good reasoning'. I do not see a well reasoned case, nor do I see any attempt to build upon the case or push his read other than 'my vote stands'. He briefly addresses the point on VE as Talis attacking VE's meta, admits he doesn't know VE's meta and as a result the case is worthless. Synystyr completely discredits Talis' entire case as "meta, not important" when in reality, Talis points out significant flaws in VE's case against them and why they are scumtells (not meta-VE tells). After dismissing the actual case on VE, Synystyr takes an incredibly weak stance on VE's scumminess, Maybe he's scum because hes a mason and one of the masons have to be scum. He distances himself from any accountability if a mason is flipped, but also has a free excuse if he ever makes a case on any mason. Finally lets look at his vote yesterday: + Show Spoiler + Made you look! Make no mistake, + Show Spoiler + His vote isn't there. Completely disappears with no notice, no explanation, NOTHING. Modkilling aside, this is scummy due to him saying he'll be more active. His case against talis is weak and his response is weaker. Synystyr's only other comments (however few) have done nothing for hunting scum. It sucks that my case can be dismissed with a quick "oh I wasn't active enough" but I see some solid scum motivation in synystyr's filter. What really triggered my thought that he was scum was that he was an outlier on the vote Day 2 on Talis. His only company was Xsebt (who had a redcheck). The vote gives us no info on other scum, and I think we've all been guilty of letting his inactivity slide, so in hindsight my initial reaction was not justified as more than an "oh, that's interesting". My digging into it, however, has given me a strong scum read on synystyr. tl;dr: + Show Spoiler + - Garbage case against Talismania - Promises oodles of activity, fails to deliver - SYNYSTYR IS SCUM | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 14 2012 02:58 marvellosity wrote: if you get a moment, could you explain why VE flipping red would make BKE more likely red? Soft defenses and shifting suspicions off of VE earlier in the game. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
Post ended up being huge...This one is completely spoilered. A second one follows with what pushed me over the edge on my read of bke. + Show Spoiler + Brood Not exactly a standard lurker with only two pages to his filter. BC has already been notified of his activity issues and he was cleared, so activity is not a determining factor in BKE's scumminess. Step 1: Find the first post that seems to have any content: On August 05 2012 08:07 BroodKingEXE wrote: This sort of stuff needs to come after the game. Ive so far found your posts to be sub-optimal town play. At this point Im against a prphlz for the reasons that his case had merit and he has been afk for a long time. In the past this is how bandwagons on Day 1 have started. Im examining those who have been throwing around their votes so far. BKE has had no impact on the game at all at this point. All he could have possibly done was read the thread. He plans to start making connection theories following the DAY 1 voting so far. This is quite possibly the worst way to look for scum that early in the game. Those votes could be random or OMGUS or pressure. Not the most convincing plan of action. Talis responds to BKE to point out his lack of a filter. The entire exchange is quoted below: On August 05 2012 08:29 talismania wrote: I ain't doing no "nailing". Just can't resist a cheap shot :-) BKE's "description" of talis' filter is blatantly wrong and just shrugs off any activity issues he might have as "RL issues" (to be fair, this seems to have been true) and goes on to focus suspicions on Talis for his setup/character questions. Read Talis' 2nd and 3rd page of his filter. It shows talis trying to get information into the thread from various players, and yes, asking inane setup questions. It also shows a huge post (2nd page) of his current reads that quite frankly...how do you miss that? BKE didn't want to get into any discussions, he wanted to get out as fast as possible and shift suspicion back on to Talis. The Erandorr Ordeal On August 05 2012 09:11 BroodKingEXE wrote: I have a problem with the top two lynch candidates. WBG: calling out the mason was a good move in my book. But it doesn't make shit sense from the scum POV, scum can kill him regardless of whether or not the town knows the mason. His feud with Eran seems to be long standing and I could believe bugs could get frustrated and rage. prplphz: Although his play has been poor I agree with his initial case against Glasse. Glasse's play was poor and lynch worthy at the time. Furthermore this lynch seems too much like a wagon on an inactive. I feel much more comfortable lynching Eran. Seems like he could be mason scum manipulating bugs, looking to create trouble. He said himself he wanted to create a scumhunting environment, yet he helps initiate a shitstorm in a mason PM. All three of those players were town. He agrees that prplhz has a decent case (or an agreeable case, whatever) on Glasse but BKE has no intention of chasing after it. Instead he wants to go after Erandorr? Somehow WBG's feud with Erand makes bugs town but erand scum because "Erandorr initiated a shitstorm". Bugs was just as accountable in that feud. Later on, BKE posts his suspicions on Erandorr: On August 07 2012 16:03 BroodKingEXE wrote: Erandorr Erandorr has been doing scummy things all game long and its time they get splayed out for everyone to see. The WBG case. Eran's points: 1) The mason out The majority of Erandorr's earlier posts addressed this issue. There were flaws in the thinking that outing is anti-town. Mafia's ability to PM each other being one of them. His main argument that mason alignment is unknown only makes sense from a town POV. A scum WBG knows mason alignment, so outing them makes no sense. You also have to remember that Erandorr outed himself as well. His explantion: Really? What was WBGs first point (the point you so thought was so blatantly wrong)? The reasoning doesn't make sense either as outing your self isn't alignment indicative. 2) Mason Logs As a mason Erandorr has two reasons for picking someone: he has suspicions and wants to get a better read on them or he wants to talk about the game with a townread without giving info to mafia. Picking WBG he already chose the second option. Yet he tries for an hour to get an answer, when it was quite clear that he wasn’t going to get shit. I dont see the advantage of asking the question in the PM at all, the thread was a much better way to get that info from WBG as it forces him to make semi rational posts. You could say that he was trying to bait out WBG, but that seems like a viable scum option. 3) Not analyzing posts: Funny cause he isn’t doing it either. Calling the townbase bad and not addressing certain cases. Point 1: Ernadorr did NOT out himself. Bugs did that for him. He expected him to, but once again Eran DID NOT OUT HIMSELF. Point 2: Nonsense? How can you determine that eran picked one of those two reasons? In the explanation that bke JUST QUOTED, erand explains how masoning bugs was a gambit that succeeded in revealing bugs as scum. The logs are inconsequential to Erand's goal in masoning bugs. Point 3: Primarily OMGUS. The short-lived battle of "Do I like VE? (Circa The Erandorr Ordeal) Bke flip flops on soft defending/accusing VE, literally two posts apart in his filter: On August 08 2012 02:17 BroodKingEXE wrote: You'e never played a game with VE have you. Establishing his innocence is something he mentions every game. I dont think anyone agrees that Talis' rolefishing had any place in this town, so why not call it out? This reasoning is too shabby for you to be making votes. On August 08 2012 12:20 BroodKingEXE wrote: Dont lie. Eran outed himself there was no intention for him to get WBG to out him again. If that's your whole case against Eran, it's pretty shitty to vote for them. Again, bugs outed erandorr. The fuck... Return to Erandorr This point got followed up by wbg: On August 09 2012 01:23 BroodKingEXE wrote: A townies gotta have the right info otherwise the whole town is fucked. Towns advantage is they can make consensus and informed desicions, its our job to find the scum leading us off track and look for people who have gone off track. I dont get you you keep saying you wont play the game but your still making accusations (small if that). However, (as I've noted already: + Show Spoiler + On August 09 2012 01:32 Hopeless1der wrote: Townies need that info BEFORE they make decisions not after they already made them. And just because bugs is not as active as everyone would like him to be doesn't diminish the fact that what you posted makes you look bad. Draws attention to Zentor's voting. On August 08 2012 14:32 BroodKingEXE wrote: Does anyone else find Zentor's voting pattern tricky at the end. Seems like he wanted to be on the townie side of the lynch. He hasn't really done much of anything in terms of scumhunting, and his vote for Eran and VE should have been crystal clear as he had suspicions about VE before. Zentor's playing to his scum meta to top it off. Specifically: + Show Spoiler + ![]() Just kind of WIFOM's the issue and draws no real conclusion other than Zentor didn't follow his own scumread. You don't say! All of one line regarding VE? That's an ironclad reason to vote someone, why in the world would he think twice?! Seriously, go read Zentor's filter. Find how many times he "suspects" VE before this point in time. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=352668&user=137099&user=137099 + Show Spoiler + It's once...maybe twice with the clarification: On August 08 2012 05:55 MrZentor wrote: If we were to lynch into lurkers, why would we allow likely scum(VE) to influence our decision? Lynching into lurkers is a bad idea, but letting scum choose who we lynch is worse. Anyways, the way VE is arbitrarily shifting the lynch from some lurkers to others has convinced me that he has a secret agenda. Lazermonkey is really suspicious too. I don't know Zentor's scum meta. I believe that if you want to use meta as a case, the onus is on you to make your case, not make a vague statement and expect it to take. On August 13 2012 15:11 BroodKingEXE wrote: Was not expecting Talis to be vig shot. Fine with the claim being held off, at least till we know the outcome of this lynch. VE, based on Talis' and marvs reasoning. My list is VE, Glasse, and Zentor. Still working on connecting up the pieces, Zentors meta makes reading him a bit tricky but I find the Zentor Zeph votes confirming an Erandorr lynch pretty damning. VE fits into the story since he was the second canidate. Zentor's meta is now simply "tricky" instead of the scum it was earlier. Still clinging to the flipflop vote from Zentor, he connects him to zeph's flip strictly by the votes and nothing else. Very weak. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
What is a well reasoned argument? Somehow I manage to convince bke to go from : ##Vote: Talismania Youre too much of a risk to take on lategame, plus everyones got a basic connection to you, and different reads. To this: On August 11 2012 02:20 BroodKingEXE wrote: Now it makes sense. Hopeless is right I have other peoples names in my PM. I have a guy named Henry Francais in my PM too. ##Unvote With a pants on head faked dt theory. How in the hell am I more credible than a redcheck? THIS MOVE DOES NOT MAKE SENSE! THIS IS THE EXCUSE TO BUS VE! On August 11 2012 02:56 BroodKingEXE wrote: Out of the two Talis has been playing more townie than VE. I wont be around for the lynch but this whole thing seems off about Talis being scum. ##Vote: VE Convenient that he goes missing. His vote looks completely natural, except for the part where he switches from a semi-confirmed redcheck to an unknown mason. On August 14 2012 00:56 BroodKingEXE wrote: Remember this post and how strange it was. It makes sense if he knows Zeph's alignment and is trying to bus him! Day 2 he comes in and votes for Zeph based on his list and the day 1 post. Why didn't he push him like Eran or Talis? This post reeeeeeeeeks of desperation to distance himself from VE and look like he was strongly pushing for his lynch all along. BKE rarely takes a strong stance throughout the game and quite frankly has not posted much of a case on anything in the game. His posting has been generally disruptive, poking at other people's gameplay but contributing little of his own to help out. He makes very weak connections using votes as the basis for his suspicions. He does not scumhunt. He busses. BroodKingEXE is Scum | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 15 2012 01:57 BroodKingEXE wrote: VE wasnt playing to his town meta, at all. Even when he isnt as active, he seems to try more than he did in this game. In all he made two cases and his scum hunting felt suboptimal for VE. He sounded a bit too apologetic at the Erandorr lynch. So where does that leave us? Why is that information beneficial? How does that assist us in finding scum? I can't even tell who, or even if your are trying to defend/attack someone in this post. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 15 2012 03:18 Glasse wrote: What did I do to you guys? I like my body without bullet holes in it. You have no right to still be alive. Do something useful please. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 14 2012 03:15 JingleHell wrote: Ask around. I always get pissed about batshit, stupid, tinfoil hat cases that ignore the information. Make a real case. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 15 2012 10:21 marvellosity wrote: no. vote for scum. Yes, Sir! ##Vote: marvellosity | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
I don't think that page 85 interaction is anywhere near good enough to push a lynch this far into the game. Why is it unfathomable to expect a legitimate case against a player who has taken very little suspicions? I'm supposed to just trust you? Hell no. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
Can we deal with your case on Jingle later? BKE is a way easier lynch to sell today. I have my reservations about Jingle, but one of the biggest things about him that isn't noted is the following: Visceraeyes as Lane Pryce the mafia mason Hassybaby as Duck philips the Godfather mason It seems like we've met our scum mason quota and I know that's trying to game the setup/host, but the odds of Jingle being scum don't sit well with me. Besides the mason numbers, I still think Jingle is town and you're barking up the wrong tree marv. If I have to discuss it today, I will, but I'd prefer to wait until after we've set today's lynch if possible as I don't want to lynch Jingle and would prefer to spend time discussing what I think is your second scum read. ##Vote: BroodKingEXE Link to my case on BKE for reference: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=15838425 I'll be back to discuss in around 4ish hours, assuming of course that there is something to discuss. | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On August 17 2012 05:26 marvellosity wrote: still nothing consctructive, still no addressing my case, still more OMGUS and swearing? you are SO pro-town dude it hurts. Yeah...pretty much this. ##Unvote: BroodKingEXE ##Vote: JingleHell | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
| ||