Bureaucracy Mafia! - Page 154
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
On July 25 2012 01:00 Mattchew wrote: Lol at rasta not knowing how to look at times of posts Bah, Your filter is too big I get lost ![]() I still think the point stands. While you were eventually able to vote for him you didn't want to. I don't think that makes you scum alone, but it is definitely not a point in your favor. My problem is that you are willing to post and argue points to defend people but other than Katina we don't see you arguing for a lynch of someone. | ||
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
On July 25 2012 01:13 Mattchew wrote: My reads + others reads Your list just said you thought they couldn't be lynched today. By reads, do you mean people who were viewed as town, or do you mean people who were viewed as lower priority? Edit - Never mind clicked through to view it and saw that one of the questions is what grade level you are at. Good luck ![]() | ||
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
Please don't kill me please | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
![]() | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On July 25 2012 01:05 rastaban wrote: Bah, Your filter is too big I get lost ![]() I still think the point stands. While you were eventually able to vote for him you didn't want to. I don't think that makes you scum alone, but it is definitely not a point in your favor. My problem is that you are willing to post and argue points to defend people but other than Katina we don't see you arguing for a lynch of someone. Thats because there has not been a candidate I have endorsed (other than kurumi) that has been up for lynch. I had a town read on BH, I was wrong, and I thought the bandwagon on Gonzaw was due to him not having enough time for this game, and I now have a town read on him. I had a null read on Palmar and there was no other lynch candidates, once again I was wrong, or atleast didn't see what everyone else so blatantly did see. I would have lynched katina, you, or zealos over Palmar yesterday, but there wasn't a second candidate. Also, I would have gladly voted Foolishness day 3 if he was still alive. On July 25 2012 01:05 HiroPro wrote: Eh, the lists aren't really the thing that make Matt scum. It's the fact that he focuses only on Katina (without really saying much other than lynch her and "wbg said this is a good way to catch katina", picks up on inconsequential things going on in the thread (like the thing about VE going "wah wah wah") and tries to use that as justification for his "reads", and doesn't really make pushes for anyone to be lynched (other than katina, who has never been a serious candidate). Are you trying to discount my analysis using WBG's method or WBG's method? If you are trying to discount my analysis you clearly did not read it (its not just 1 post in my filter). If you are trying to discount WBG's method then you are probably just plain wrong. Read above for making pushes for lynches. On July 25 2012 01:15 marvellosity wrote: Humour me then; what do you think the consensus read on austin is at the moment? Null. This was what happened to me too. If everyone actually looked at the number of people they've called scum and the number of scum left (6), they'd probably realize there isn't enough scum to go around. In my opinion, he is spending too much time trying to figure out the game, and not trying to figure out its players. This can be seen in his paranoia about sandroba and his constant discussion of roles. I don't know if this is because he is afraid to discuss players and their motives or if it is because he is just trying to figure it out the "safe" "mod-confirmed" way | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On July 25 2012 01:31 marvellosity wrote: I'll vouch that the content of your post did not change ![]() samesies | ||
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
On July 17 2012 04:08 Mattchew wrote: More evidence against Katina. She pushes Palmar for wanting the RL but doesn't mention Hiropro who also came out in favor of it. She says that she doesn't like Palmar's defense with his "I hate you guys" and "I dont want to talk to marv anymore" post but then posts this to me WBG said here (LVI Obs) the way to catch Katina She ignores others in favor of RL and she contradicts herself about Palmars defense with her own completely lacking defense On July 23 2012 10:30 Mattchew wrote: I said it before using a WBG quote on how to quote her. I think she is accusing people for things other people (or herself) are doing. I don't think a lot of the things in her cases are logical and she was told by wbg (in advice to improve her scum play) to make more cases on more people, which I think she's forced out this game. This and this? The RL thing was only a small part of Katina's case on Palmar, hardly a case of treating people differently for doing the same thing. Your second post is very late into the game - yet do you provide any specific examples or discuss in detail? No, you're merely content to say "this is way to catch katina, katina has been caught she is scum". You keep commenting "yea katina is scum" and saying we should vote for her, but do you say anything about her later behavior or posting or analyze it? No, all you do is tell other people "compare Katina's play this game to other games" and say "Katina is my strongest scum read" All of your posts on other people are very superficial. You make a comment on one small thing, say that they are scum, and then just pretty much do nothing. You see that your candidates are not up for lynch, yet you do not put effort into pushing them or seriously convincing others of their guilt. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
On July 25 2012 01:58 marvellosity wrote: Whose guilt have you been convincing us of then Hiro? ^^ BH and Zealos are the guys I've been most sure of being scum this game. If you do not get what I am talking about with regards to Matt, look at his view on MZ for example. He calls MZ scum in the very beginning, then has proceeded to do nothing about it. After day 1 all he ever does with MZ is include him on ever single scum list he makes. He's not talking at all about what MZ is posting. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On July 25 2012 02:02 HiroPro wrote: BH and Zealos are the guys I've been most sure of being scum this game. If you do not get what I am talking about with regards to Matt, look at his view on MZ for example. He calls MZ scum in the very beginning, then has proceeded to do nothing about it. After day 1 all he ever does with MZ is include him on ever single scum list he makes. He's not talking at all about what MZ is posting. Define doing nothing about it. | ||
| ||