• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:15
CEST 02:15
KST 09:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO12 Preview: Maru, Trigger, Rogue, NightMare12Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, sOs, Reynor, Solar15[ASL19] Ro8 Preview: Unyielding3Official Ladder Map Pool Update (April 28, 2025)17[ASL19] Ro8 Preview: Rejuvenation8
Community News
Maru & Rogue GSL RO12 interviews: "I think the pressure really got to [trigger]"5Code S Season 1 - Maru & Rogue advance to RO80Code S Season 1 - Cure & Reynor advance to RO84$1,250 WardiTV May [May 6th-May 18th]5Clem wins PiG Sty Festival #67
StarCraft 2
General
Map Pool Suggestion: Throwback ERA How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Maru & Rogue GSL RO12 interviews: "I think the pressure really got to [trigger]" Code S Season 1 - Maru & Rogue advance to RO8 Clem wins PiG Sty Festival #6
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO12 - Group B [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO12 - Group A $1,250 WardiTV May [May 6th-May 18th] SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025
Strategy
[G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat Mutation # 471 Delivery Guaranteed Mutation # 470 Certain Demise
Brood War
General
Battlenet Game Lobby Simulator Twitch StarCraft Holiday Bash (UMS) Artosis vs Ogre Zerg [The Legend Continues] BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Why is nobody talking about game 1 of SK vs Rush?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Ro8 Day 4 [USBL Spring 2025] Groups cast [BSL20] RO32 Group F - Saturday 20:00 CET [BSL20] RO32 Group E - Sunday 20:00 CET
Strategy
[G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player Creating a full chart of Zerg builds [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread What do you want from future RTS games? Nintendo Switch Thread Grand Theft Auto VI Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
Canadian Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Books] Wool by Hugh Howey Surprisingly good films/Hidden Gems
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Why 5v5 Games Keep Us Hooked…
TrAiDoS
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
BW PvZ Balance hypothetic…
Vasoline73
Test Entry for subject
xumakis
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 12983 users

Movie Star Mini Mafia! - Page 80

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 78 79 80 81 82 84 Next
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
July 01 2012 00:20 GMT
#1581
Again if you'd like to shorten the cycles PM ms if you haven't done so already.
prplhz
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Denmark8045 Posts
July 01 2012 00:22 GMT
#1582
[image loading]
http://i.imgur.com/M7t7egx.png
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
July 01 2012 01:07 GMT
#1583
Day 5

[image loading]

After a lazy and relatively quiet day, time seemed to pass inordinately quickly. Something seemed to be amiss.

Artanis used Arnold Schwarzenegger as his main source of income, labor, and ass-kickery. The burly former bodybuilder was incredibly adept at his job and only took the act of breaking his target's neck as his salary. As such, he made a good infiltrator to pose as a normal (albeit typecast) actor. Arnold had been hired by wherebugsgo for a chase scene during which he would jump out of a moving semi right before it crushed two baddie cars, hop from car to car to motorcycle and wrestle the driver off, then take the RPG off his back and fire a guided nuclear missile into the sky that would save the earth from the impending asteroid of doom that was actually a disguised alien mothership.

At the end of filming, Arnold was supposed to kill the director and end the blood feud. However, he was dragged to a bar by some more-famous-than-he actors where he got caught up drinking tequila shots and jäger bombs. Drunk as hell and feeling mightier than ever, Arnold picked a fight with a fellow actor who was animatedly drinking and chatting with an incredibly gorgeous blonde firecracker by the name of Jennifer Lawrence.

Arnold grabbed the actor's shoulder and lifted him off his seat, gruffly growling,

"Ey yoiuyu: git away from zat prettygirl."

He let the poor man's feet hit the ground, after which the man slowly turned around to meet Arnold face-to-face. The look of shock and confusion on both of their faces lasted only a split second as they then proceeded to fight each other.

"how funny zat I see you here, Christian girly mon!"

Arnold slammed his opponent's wrist against a barstool, breaking his fingers. The patrons were now watching intently, eyes wide with anticipation, as Brad Pitt walked around collecting bets on the winner.

Between the punches and the sounds of bar furniture breaking, the loud sound of a revving engine could be heard outside. It was then that Christian Bale caught Arnold in a half Nelson and whispered in his ear :

"I am the goddamn Batman."

An explosion of incredible force blew apart the street-facing wall of the bar as the Batmobile entered. Smoke and dust filled the room, ensuring no one really saw what happened. Ultimately when the dust was settled all that was left were the remnants of a pool table and piles of unrecognizable debris and shattered glass covering the bruised and battered bar patrons.

Luckily no one was seriously hurt, though retrograde amnesia seemed universal, but Arnold had disappeared. No one noticed.

Arnold Schwarzenegger (Mattchew, goon) has been terminated.

3 alive two to lynch, day will end with all votes in.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
July 01 2012 01:29 GMT
#1584
What happened
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
rastaban
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States2294 Posts
July 01 2012 01:48 GMT
#1585
##Vote no-lynch
Tyler: "...damn it, that's StarCraft. Opening doors is what we do. Being the first to find food is the greatest pleasure a player can have!"
prplhz
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Denmark8045 Posts
July 01 2012 02:00 GMT
#1586
##Vote no-lynch
http://i.imgur.com/M7t7egx.png
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
July 01 2012 02:02 GMT
#1587
Night 5


Another uneventful day at the studio.

Night ends when actions are received

3 alive
prplhz
rastaban
risk.nuke
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
July 01 2012 04:12 GMT
#1588
Endgame

[image loading]

[image loading]


wherebugsgo had surprisingly finished the filming and postproduction despite having had to kill almost all of the characters due to freak accidents left and right. This put Artanis in a very tight spot: how was he going to ruin his archnemesis's masterpiece if it was already completed? He schemed and schemed, day after day, night after night. Eventually he thought up the most brilliant plan in all of existence and provided his last loyal servant, Marlon Brando, with the tools for the job.

Marlon set out to complete his master's task at twilight of the night of the movie premiere in LA. He rode on his motorcycle westward, the set of keys Artanis had handed to him stowed in his leather jacket's inside pocket. Unbeknownst to him, however, he had a tail. Christian Bale had tapped Artanis's phones and stolen his private information following the fight with Arnold. He had long held a grudge against both wherebugsgo for not casting him in the movie and against Artanis for not hiring him as part of the sabotage team. So instead, he chose to hunt both men down and punish them on his own through his own psychotic machinations.

At the docks was a car with the tools Marlon needed; it was here that Christian got out of his car and revealed himself.

"Stop!" yelled the younger actor.

"You must answer to me for choosing to side with Artanis. I know what you are up to. Let me join you and if you agree to turn on your boss I promise I will split his riches with you personally."

Marlon jeered at the 38 year-old, finding his aggressive demands amusing.

"Or else?" Marlon asked.

"Or else I'll kill you and dump your body in the ocean."

The two men eyed each other carefully and silently. Nothing but the lapping of waves and gawking of seagulls could be heard. Suddenly, there was movement and within seconds the car chase had begun. Both men drove quickly and recklessly, one with the goal of catching the other and the other trying to complete his job. On the streets other cars careened wildly in different directions to avoid collisions and pedestrians screamed as the two men held no regard for the difference between road and footpath. Within minutes police were in pursuit as well, creating a real-life police chase no one could ever forget.

Both men veered onto a road lined with photographers and paparazzi. Christian had caught up to Marlon and the two were struggling against their steering wheels, desperately trying to push the other off the road. They hurtled down the crowded street, faster and faster, side by side, until finally no road remained. The cars slammed into the parked limo in front of a brightly lit building and then proceeded to careen into the glass lobby, exploding violently and instantly vaporizing anything and everything that existed within.

Once the chaos subsided, the explosions ceased, and the fire burned less brightly, the aftermath was apparent. The sign that read "Movie Star Mafia: Red Carpet Premiere!" was burned beyond recognition. Bodies lined the street and a gaping hole dominated the place where, merely hours before, a theatre had stood.

Arriving fashionably late to the premiere was one of the movie's main actors, Matt Damon. He had his driver stop upon seeing the crater that his agent said was the location of the theatre.

Matt got out of the car and called his agent. "You're fired, you son of a bitch. You think this is some kind of joke? Why the fuck do I pay you $200,000 dollars a year?! To take part in your little childish pyrotechnic stunts? Go to hell."

Little did he know that he was literally the only person involved with the movie who was still alive.

Christian Bale aka rastaban the one-shot BP serial killer and Marlon Brando aka prplhz the mafia framer have perished in a fiery car crash.
Matt Damon aka risk.nuke the vanilla town is the last actor standing.

Town Victory!


Epilogue:

Ultimately the movie was total shit, so in the end no one won.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
July 01 2012 04:16 GMT
#1589
Obs QT

Mafia QT

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvRGXY4QJLzOdFFmUk13dHBNQUZTUDcwdFRibWtvMVE

Google doc needs updating, gonna do that now.

rastaban
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States2294 Posts
July 01 2012 04:16 GMT
#1590
GG town.
Well played scum, kept me guessing to the end,
Tyler: "...damn it, that's StarCraft. Opening doors is what we do. Being the first to find food is the greatest pleasure a player can have!"
Barbiero
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Brazil5259 Posts
July 01 2012 04:20 GMT
#1591
Okay then, My absolutely flawless plan of drawing a shot night 1 fucking worked.

Basically, I went full apeshit on the miller stuff, focusing so much on "protecting our blues" and "we need to keep the possible blue pool as large as possible!" into "holy shit I'm a vanilla and I was shot n1"

Is that logic correct, rastaban?
♥ The world needs more hearts! ♥
Barbiero
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Brazil5259 Posts
July 01 2012 04:22 GMT
#1592
Also risk never rolls scum. EVER.
♥ The world needs more hearts! ♥
Barbiero
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Brazil5259 Posts
July 01 2012 04:31 GMT
#1593
Waitaminute.

Probulous' team won the game

DAFUQISTHIS
♥ The world needs more hearts! ♥
HiroPro
Profile Joined March 2012
United States2624 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-01 04:44:09
July 01 2012 04:39 GMT
#1594
lololololololololololololololololol, crazy ending to a crazy game.

Come play in GM's game guys!

And congrats to Probulous on his first win :D

And slOosh being awesome yo.
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
July 01 2012 04:44 GMT
#1595
Very incomplete, almost post-by-post notes from day 1:

+ Show Spoiler +
Day 1 Notes:

Right off the bat we have some strange occurrences. VE as usual is all over the place; his logic is nearly impossible to follow and it's very difficult for any townie on the receiving end of his pressure to adequately defend themselves (because there is nothing to defend against)

This, for example:

On June 22 2012 07:30 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 07:29 marvellosity wrote:
On June 22 2012 07:22 Mattchew wrote:
Hi All,

I want MrZentor dead.

On June 22 2012 07:16 marvellosity wrote:
On June 22 2012 07:14 VisceraEyes wrote:
Let's try and figure out a way to figure out if we're town right here and right now...

:/

Because it's going to help me a lot if I can trust you. I now know you're a fucking beast as scum. What do you suggest?


you may quiz me and i will answer your questions.

Marv, if you were to pick out the differences in your scum play and your town play, what would you point to?



I like this question a lot. I think there are a couple of possible tells. But tell me what you think first.


SCUM


merely serves to antagonize and put marvellosity on the defensive. Since VE is wrong, I predict he's going to end up wasting a very large amount of town's time in a wild goose chase.




On June 22 2012 07:31 VisceraEyes wrote:
The point of the self-evaluation was to see if you left anything out - obviously we can go and look for ourselves Marv, and we'll have our own opinion...but for you to turn the question around and ask for his answer first is incredibly scummy and immediately forces me to not trust you.


This is disingenuous for two reasons:

one, if marvellosity is actually scum he's more than capable of simply lying about his meta tells. So first of all, Mattchew's question itself is pretty loaded and it's nearly impossible for a proper townie to answer the question because most townies cannot grasp their own meta. Meta analysis is often ineffective because people don't know how to use it, and it's almost impossible for a player to accurately describe his or her own meta in the first place.

On June 22 2012 07:33 VisceraEyes wrote:
And now it's too late. Don't bother.

So Marv is scum everyone - keep this in mind as we continue to scumhunt today.

prplhz, are you going to do stuff this game? "I suck, I'll post later" doesn't fucking count bro.


again, more antagonism and a huge jump in conclusions.

VE in four or five posts has gone from calling zentor sure scum, to calling marvellosity sure scum (previously calling him town) to pressuring prplhz.

On June 22 2012 07:36 VisceraEyes wrote:
We're done talking about you Marv, unless you want to tell us who your buddies are. IS that something you're willing to share?


again, more antagonism and less logic. This isn't the way to find scum, it's just the way to piss people off.

Very anti-productive.

On June 22 2012 07:45 VisceraEyes wrote:
##Vote: prplhz

I guess he's not going to be doing shit this game.

We're not lynching people we don't like playing with, we're lynching scum. If you think he's scum, make a case.


Now, VE has a correct vote. This is correct reasoning. However, will this vote last?

I anticipate that it won't (it's around 00:45 GMT (+00:00) on day 1 that I'm writing this; 3 hours into the game. I imagine that later on in the day VE is going to switch his vote off prplhz, as this accusation won't stick (it's going to alarm prplhz into changing his approach. If he doesn't, then he'll get lynched) VE will most likely either change his vote if prplhz does not gain traction, and he will change it onto the bandwagon, OR he will change it when a townie calls out the fact that his marvellosity pressure abruptly ended. In the latter case I predict VE will simply put his vote back onto marvellosity.

At this point it's clear Snarfs is trolling (with his Probulous vote). I wonder if anyone will call him out on his lack of contribution or whether he's going to blend in and skate along for the day. If he manages to scrape by unscathed he could live for a very long time.

On June 22 2012 08:16 VisceraEyes wrote:
Also

##Unvote

to show you I'm supersrs


The VE unvote occurs as I suspected.

Any good scum who is watching VE playing at this moment knows that VE's reads are completely haphazard and based on next to nothing. Thus, if VE is pressuring them they should know that even the slightest bit of manipulation will cause VE to back off and pursue someone who is either more controversial or more “anti-town” than them. This can be very dangerous for town and it could set up VE to be lynched later.

On June 22 2012 08:25 Probulous wrote:
Guys, guys, guys....

I'm sorry but I am town this game. Snarfs, that's mean and I thought we were friends

@VE, your vote makes little sense what happened to Marv? Actually, where is Marv, he owes me my alimony?


Very valid question posed here by Probulous.

Probulous notes VE's very strange behavior regarding his votes, but I think it's going to be hard for townies this game to figure out whether VE is doing this as scum or as confused town if he keeps up his current style. It's been a recurring pattern in recent games and I'm curious as to whether VE will manage to establish himself and produce proper results.

On June 22 2012 08:25 slOosh wrote:
Could you guys please cut back on the chatter / one liners? It may be harmless now but later on its really going to hamper thread legibility.

I think millers should auto claim (cf. WBG's Emergency Mini Mafia)
I think masons should auto claim (cf. WBG's 1st C9++)

I didn't like Zentor's play (cf. Hesmyrr's SoaF) but I don't know how he currently is so I'll leave it at that.

I think Snarfs is suspicious for taking prplhz too seriously.


another good post with ideas in the correct general direction.

I'd like to see slOosh develop his thoughts more clearly and establish ideas so that the lynch pressure can move onto the proper targets for day 1. He clearly has the correct ideas but at the moment they're very weak. He needs to substantiate this with more reading and potentially a delayed vote. If he strongly votes Snarfs later he is definitely on the correct track. Turns out someone DID notice Snarfs's earlier oddly trollish post. Good on you, slOosh.

On June 22 2012 08:41 Zephirdd wrote:
This is a semi-closed setup. If there are 13 players, it's possible that 12 are medics and 1 is a scum. Of course that's retarded as fuck, but nothing is concrete and we shouldn't think "but it's not common to 2 of X" exist ever. at all.

In fact, we can't even confirm the existence of a SK until after the night phase.

I'm not sure about Millers instaclaiming. While it clears path for cops(as it's pretty obvious that they will show red), it also reduces the number of possible blues, making it easier for scum. At least what I understood from the setup is that Millers can't be blues.

If anything, Millers should be breadcrumbing and claiming in case a cop calls them guilty. For all other purposes, they should be *Vanilla*(unclaimed, aka. possible blue) to make it harder for mafia to shoot into blues.


This is half correct.

Zephirdd clearly has been thinking about the ramifications of claiming in this type of setup and based on the effort he has put into this post it should make it more evident to other players that he is town. However, he's going to get some disagreement on the miller claim issue because it's nearly always the optimal play for a miller to claim immediately upon receiving his role. As scum it's a huge risk to claim miller because it takes time to formulate such a plan (so it needs to basically be a pre-game plan) and your team may not even agree with the claim. Then, as a claimed miller generally becomes a named townie, he becomes far more likely to be shot (thus necessitating things like roleblock claims later to hint toward jailkeeper protects). Scum need to be able to justify living as a claimed miller whereas a claimed townie miller will just end up getting shot.

In addition, since mafia can do exactly what Zephirdd suggests millers should do in case of a cop check, Zephirdd's idea is actually very dangerous to town. Luckily for him, his tone has come across as town because of the thought he has put into claims.

On June 22 2012 08:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
Yeah let's lynch marv. Prob you down?

##Vote: marvellosity

Hubris does NOT become you sir.


Predictable VE, very predictable.

Pretty shitty vote once again, and I could imagine from a town perspective it could be very hard to read VE's agenda here. From the looks of it it almost seems as if the only reason VE is voting marvellosity is because Probulous made him realize he flip flopped.

Thus this could create a huge red herring and a big problem for town and VE specifically later. If this indeed does happen, let it be a lesson to all townies: think about what you do carefully before you do it. If you're haphazard and you change votes like a chicken with its head cut off, you draw very negative attention to yourself because most of the time you're voting innocent townies (who will then be dispensed toward OMGUSing you)

Shortly after VE's revote come risk nuke's and probulous's votes of marvellosity. A bandwagon seems to be forming but if marvellosity acts fast enough he can probably reverse the momentum.

As usual, this bandwagon is being started by townies on another townie. The scum are just sitting back and watching the derpage.


On June 22 2012 09:20 VisceraEyes wrote:
:OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Anyways look what I found guys!


Show nested quote +
On May 30 2012 06:16 marvellosity wrote:
On May 30 2012 06:16 VisceraEyes wrote:
Marvel, the correct response is "my thoughts are X and Y and Z"...my question of you wasn't an accusation, so there's no need to get defensive. Saying things like "I already said" and "I made a comment" are very defensive when all I wanted was your input.

:/


Much like Magic you are reading my responses as defensive when they were not. I'm just baffled you are asking questions I have already stated clear opinions on or at least alluded to.


This was his defense in LV, the Zim themed large we were just in. Marv DOMINATED that game as scum, and look at what his first act of the game was (upon replacing in)! It was using his "meta" as a personalized defense against my accusations. Look at his defense this game! Oddly enough, it's a personalized "meta" defense again!

Marv, your response?


Here is where it's clear VE has no idea what he's talking about and has managed to confuse even himself.

Originally VE called marvellosity scum because he didn't answer Mattchew's loaded question about what marvellosity perceives to be the difference between his own scum and town play. By definition this would be referring to his own meta in order to help “defend” himself (as no doubt no matter what his alignment is marvellosity would assert to everyone else that he is town)

Now, in this post, VE finds marvellosity suspicious because of his supposed-meta defense of himself. Marvellosity never defended himself using his own meta (and this part of VE's post is incredibly disingenuous; close to a lie, in fact.)

As VE has said this he has made it very clear that no matter what marvellosity would've done, VE would've found marvellosity suspicious. Hence, Mattchew's very simple but loaded question has thrown town into disarray.

In other words, if marvellosity chose to answer Mattchew's question, town would be on his back for a WIFOMy meta defense response.

If marvellosity didn't answer the question, town would be on his back for not answering the question.

The origin of this problem is Mattchew, and because VE was too quick to jump on any sort of pressure, he missed the genesis of the idea. Thus, if marvellosity dies and flips town the person who will take the fall will be VE, not Mattchew.

On June 22 2012 09:25 Zephirdd wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 08:55 Snarfs wrote:
On June 22 2012 08:41 Zephirdd wrote:
This is a semi-closed setup. If there are 13 players, it's possible that 12 are medics and 1 is a scum. Of course that's retarded as fuck, but nothing is concrete and we shouldn't think "but it's not common to 2 of X" exist ever. at all.

In fact, we can't even confirm the existence of a SK until after the night phase.

I'm not sure about Millers instaclaiming. While it clears path for cops(as it's pretty obvious that they will show red), it also reduces the number of possible blues, making it easier for scum. At least what I understood from the setup is that Millers can't be blues.

If anything, Millers should be breadcrumbing and claiming in case a cop calls them guilty. For all other purposes, they should be *Vanilla*(unclaimed, aka. possible blue) to make it harder for mafia to shoot into blues.

I find this post entirely underwhelming zephir. You have basically reiterated what Probulous and slOosh already pointed out, then proceed to suggest something completely asinine (millers breadcrumbing).

Do you have nothing else in the thread to comment on?


What do you expect me to comment on? The stupid marvellosity push that is going on atm? Whether he flips scum or town, I'll say that whatever the fuck is going here is just play stupid. I guess it does provide some discussion, but it's mostly fingerpointing and going 'ZOMG HE PLAYD GOOD SCUMZ'

About claims(ie miller claims), I'm with probulous. Let's not reduce the number of possible blues so early. A good miller should show himself to be town, and a good cop should realize when he investigates a miller. I never liked early claims anyway.


so far this is the best response by someone who is not involved in the marvellosity-VE-mattchew debacle. In fact, this is the response that EVERY sane townie should have.

For the most part the marvellosity bandwagon is simply a witchhunt based on a couple of misunderstood words. Because of all the loud yelling, however, no one is quite clear on what is happening (and thus the players on the bandwagon will continue to have a confirmation bias that their target is more and more scummy as time passes)

The last part about the miller, again, is wrong, but marvellosity responds to it quickly and Zephirdd realizes his mistake (though again has another incorrect train of thought regarding whether a good unclaimed miller would be checked—people are checked for all sorts of different reasons and as every player is different an unclaimed miller who expects not to get checked is simply naïve.)

On June 22 2012 09:34 VisceraEyes wrote:
STOP TALKING ABOUT MILLER CLAIMS

Now, Marv, my accusation was that you were being defensive when I wasn't attacking you. That's the accusation. I accused you of being overly defensive. What part about that is 'misrepresenting' what happened in that game?


From what I recall, VE did none of this. Most of VE's accusations were actually unbased assertions that marvellosity is scum.

This is documented by his numerous one-liner antagonistic posts against marvellosity.

On June 22 2012 09:37 VisceraEyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 09:23 marvellosity wrote:
I'm supposed to talk about someone else in my defence?

And in the nested quote it states quite clearly there weren't any accusations...

that's twice this game now you've misrepresented something, wilfully or not. i'm watching you


Bolded is a strawman argument that was designed to discredit my accusations.

Italicized shows MARV blatantly misrepresenting the situation, as the nested quote WAS the accusation. He's trying to use the fact that the context is not there to fool everyone, but don't worry guys...VE is here.

Underlined is an empty accusation with no evidence and an empty threat. Keep on watchin Marv, I'm sure you'll see something you like.


The bolded was not a strawman; VE simply doesn't understand what a strawman is.

What's ironic here is that VE accuses marvellosity of having an empty threat when arguably marvellosity has far more reason to be suspicious of VE than the other way around. VE's play so far has been incredibly haphazard and poor, and the statements he has made about marvellosity's post can be made 10-fold for almost all of his own.

On June 22 2012 09:44 Probulous wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 09:38 slOosh wrote:
It's absolutely imperative that we resolve this miller claim issue. If we aren't all on the same page then scum can use the miller business to screw us over later. It has to be clear. Late-claiming millers will be policy lynched on the basis of it is purely anti-town. Scum can also "look VT and pro-town", so that is just foolish Zephirdd.


How about we just ignore Millers? I mean no-one has claimed, they are just a possibility and even then, for them to have any influence on the game, they have to be checked by a DT. Like I said earlier, beware any claim in this setup. So let's drop the issue. If we get screwed because someone plays scummy, gets checked red and turns out to be miller, well so be it.

Can you do something other than go on about Millers?

Where the fuck is Mattchew? He is the one that asked Marv the original question and has nothing to say about Marv's response or the push on Marv?


Excellent. So someone DID notice that Mattchew asked marvellosity a question and then disappeared.

Can Probulous make the connection that prodding someone and then not being part of the pressuring process is a massive scumtell? Can he wade through the garbage that is the VE/marvellosity mess to come to this conclusion?

Right now the day's outcome hinges on whether Probulous and slOosh can identify Mattchew and Snarfs as scum, respectively, and then convince everyone else to kill them. Otherwise there's a very strong chance someone like marvellosity, VE, or Zentor will die at the hands of town.

On June 22 2012 09:47 marvellosity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 09:46 Zephirdd wrote:
On June 22 2012 09:38 slOosh wrote:
It's absolutely imperative that we resolve this miller claim issue. If we aren't all on the same page then scum can use the miller business to screw us over later. It has to be clear. Late-claiming millers will be policy lynched on the basis of it is purely anti-town. Scum can also "look VT and pro-town", so that is just foolish Zephirdd.


This would be true, when a miller could actually be mixed with a role(ie. miller vig, miller medic or stuff). Here, a Miller is a confirmed non-blue.

A confirmed non-blue reduces the number of targets for scum. A miller claim is scummy in itself, and it reduces the number of potential targets for the scum to snipe. I don't want to see blues dead and have to deal with millers.

If a scum is pro-town, then that scum is substantially going against his wincon. Seriously, I'm yet to see a scum that actually contributes positively to town.

Late-claiming millers will be analyzed and lynched if the players decide on a majority. Don't spill bullshit, you can't simply policy lynch someone when there are drawbacks for early miller claims.

As I see now, it's either claim miller now - have blues be more vulnerable - and be "immune" to cops, or claim miller later IF and ONLY IF you are investigated by a cop, and we can use the information at that time, just like it would be done in any other setup with unreliable cops(with framers, sanity or other stuff).

I'd prefer millers to stay shut and protect our blues.


except you need to just be quiet because you're wrong.


Correct response. Zephirdd is wasting even more discussion and creating a mess when this argument is almost completely pointless.

First of all, there have been no miller claims. Second of all, he's wrong about whether or not early miller claims (as opposed to later miller claims) should be suspect. The earlier a miller claim is, the less likely it is to be a scum miller claim. In fact, if it's not made as the first post someone makes, I would argue that it would be very unlikely to be a true claim. Why? Because scum use claims as last resorts (generally) and as a failsafe.

Any miller claim that is not the first post someone makes should be policy lynched, because such claims are too easy for scum to make. It is literally the easiest claim for a goon, framer, or Rber to make because they've already determined what alignment they'll return if a cop checks them. If you don't have this policy then scum who claim miller in reaction to a check are less likely to be lynched, making the claim far more effective for scum. If the policy exists that the only miller claims who are allowed to live are those that are made at the very beginning of the game (first post) then in order for a scum to fake claim miller it needs to be a pregame plan (and later in the game they'll have a hard time explaining why they are still alive)

In other words a d1 miller claim is treated like any other player but with the caveat that a check automatically returns red. Any miller claim after the beginning of d1 should be treated as a scum claim because it's more beneficial for scum to wait to claim than it is for town.

On June 22 2012 10:00 slOosh wrote:
VE I think you are paranoid town right now. Yes, Marv could be scum. But I really don't see it right now and it's dominating the thread in a bad way. Zephirdd, the benefits of a "possible blue" is nothing compared to the possible headaches caused by miller claims. That's why we make any miller claim D1.


Another excellent post by slOosh. While Probulous has been drawn into the marvellosity bandwagon (though his reasoning remains, for the most part, sound; he's missing a few key details in his mind) slOosh has remained calm and reasonable throughout.

If slOosh can connect the dots (as he seems to have identified that Probulous is also town already) then he should start pushing the bandwagon on marvellosity backwards so that it cannot gain any more steam.

It all depends now on how Mattchew and Snarfs continue to post in the thread. If mattchew continues to stay away from the thread, Probulous and slOosh need to take note of it and punish him for it later with a strong counterwagon to marvellosity. It may not be the best idea to vote him now, but rather to hold onto the read until the time is right and enough information has been gathered.

What may happen also, however, is that someone random will be chosen for lynch (probably a bad townie) and then the bandwagon will start incredibly quickly on the basis of the player being weak. This might happen if marvellosity is able to resist taking votes. In this situation the argument will most likely continue into tomorrow unless both marvellosity and VE somehow magically start thinking each other are town.

On June 22 2012 10:17 Probulous wrote:
1) You proactively ask people to question you so you can prove your alignment.
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 07:16 marvellosity wrote:
you may quiz me and i will answer your questions.

2) Then you dilberately obfuscate and avoid answering the question
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 07:29 marvellosity wrote:
On June 22 2012 07:22 Mattchew wrote:
Marv, if you were to pick out the differences in your scum play and your town play, what would you point to?

I like this question a lot. I think there are a couple of possible tells. But tell me what you think first.

Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 07:32 marvellosity wrote:
lol, ok dear. If people could look for themselves, then maybe just one person in the whole of LV and the obsQT might have had a tingling suspicion, no? No.

3)You explain that this was not a mistake but instead part of an elaborate plan to do something no scum would do and so therefore prove you are town
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 10:05 marvellosity wrote:
"The similar thing, VE, is that I wasn't afraid of saying something that was scummy in that game. In this game, unless you underestimate me which I think you do not, you should be aware that I know making a sidestep to Mattchew's question could be viewed scummily, and I'd avoid it like the fucking plague if I were scum."


If you are town, you are saying that you deliberately avoided answering Mattchew to cause a shitstorm to prove you're town? You don't say it was a mistake, or a joke but rather a calculated plan. You give yourself too little credit Marv. I think you're scum who tried to joke off a difficult question and didn't expect people to latch onto it. Now you are backpedalling as fast as you can.


This post by Probulous shows good intention, but large jumps from (incorrect) assumptions to equally incorrect conclusions.

Marvellosity doesn’t avoid answering the question but seems legitimately curious what Mattchew thinks first. Indeed it makes perfect sense from a marv = town standpoint to validate Mattchew’s question to confirm he’s town asking, rather than scum. Indeed, since Mattchew never responded this should’ve set off alarm bells in the head of everyone reading the thread. Instead, VE jumped on this false scumtell and buried the thread in garbage, thus reducing the chance that Mattchew would be caught to nearly 0.

So no, marvellosity didn’t seem to be deliberately avoiding to answer. He seemed to indicate a willingness to answer given that Mattchew gave a semblance of the same willingness. Since Mattchew didn’t hold up his end of the bargain, I see no reason why it is scummy for marvellosity to not have answered (particularly since this is not some serious or very valid concern like a scum read anyway)
Finally, Probulous’s third quoted part is incorrect in its assumption. It’s only true if you first assume marvellosity is scum. If you make that assumption then it doesn’t really matter what you ask him. From an objective viewpoint, though, marvellosity saying what he said is not alignment indicative at all. He’s not at all saying he planned that answer like Probulous is asserting.

In essence, from an objective viewpoint:

if marvellosity is town, then he didn’t think through his response and it accidentally came out scummy (or is incorrectly perceived as scummy by others)

if marvellosity is scum, then he avoided answering a question (debatable)

Notice here that the action itself is not indicative of anything unless you already know marvellosity’s alignment. Even if you did, at that point it would be self-confirming and completely worthless anyway.

On June 22 2012 10:22 Probulous wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 10:19 marvellosity wrote:
wrong way of looking at it Prob

if I were scum I'd have thought more before answering matt's question. even if this conversation has been quite interesting


So it was a mistake then


ding ding ding

which means what? It was NOT alignment indicative.

If anything, it was slightly townish, as scum players tend to make fewer mistakes, but even scum players make mistakes. Try my first game as scum, for example: My Little Pony Mini Mafia. On d2 I misread a host PM and it almost cost my life that day. I passed off the mistake as something a townie would do and barely lived (though that wasn’t entirely why I lived)

On June 22 2012 10:37 VisceraEyes wrote:
Wait wait.

This is his plan. His plan is to do something so oblique and scummy that I tunnel him to death. It's my meta, and I can depend on TL to not listen to me when I tunnel. Prob, this was part of the plan. What do we do now that we've figured it out though?


this post by VE is moronic and I can’t really tell as an observer whether or not it’s serious or sarcastic. If it’s serious then he’s clearly simply already labelled marvellosity as scum and is suffering from mega confirmation bias as he tries to fit everything to his incorrect read.

This post essentially twists marvellosity’s words as hard as it can to make the read work. It’s not a very objective, town-like thing to do (for a good scumhunter) and so as a vet VE takes heat because he should know better.

I would not blame anyone in this game who catches onto this and then lynches VE for it, as it’s actually incredibly misleading. It might explain why VE gets mislynched so often.

(I suppose the solution is to continue lynching VE when he says stuff like this until he learns not to)

On June 22 2012 11:03 MrZentor wrote:
I really don't think either one of VE/Marv is scum.


This is a fairly genuine post for someone like MrZentor. Unfortunately based on VE’s followup it might bode badly for him because he hasn’t accompanied it with a scumread.

On June 22 2012 11:10 VisceraEyes wrote:
Hrm...slOosh maybe. He's been focusing on this miller thing pretty hard, in spite of repeated requests that he not.


VE seems to not be reading the thread thoroughly, as it’s Zephirdd who’s going on and on about millers, while slOosh is merely clarifying and helping as well as commenting fairly regularly on other things going on.

On June 22 2012 11:16 Zephirdd wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 11:10 VisceraEyes wrote:
Hrm...slOosh maybe. He's been focusing on this miller thing pretty hard, in spite of repeated requests that he not.


I don't get it. What makes it that sloosh is more likely to be scum than me, considering the argument is "He's been focusing on this miller thing"?

At least he actually provided a good reasoning for a miller to claim other than "lol you're wrong stfu".


Zephirdd just caught what I said, good for him.

On June 22 2012 12:55 Mattchew wrote:
Hey guys the NBA game just ended I'm at a bar an will be home later I'll catch up then


Players better take note of this post and hold him accountable.

If he hasn’t contributed anything later in the day Mattchew should be on the table for a d2 lynch.

On June 22 2012 13:20 Probulous wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 13:09 VisceraEyes wrote:
Mang, I've never seen this side of slOosh before.

Prob, you take back what you said right now!


Sometimes you really confuse me.


lol.

If anyone gets in a fight over VE where VE accuses them of being scum for flip flopping, I will laugh very hard if they quote this post.

On June 22 2012 14:17 Mattchew wrote:
Maybe I am being blinded by something, but I do not see how you can get a read off of Prplhz's posts so far. I can't judge him on the MrZ policy cause I completely agree with it, and I don't see anything in his posts that has an agenda. That being said, his posting is not helping town either, so that needs to shape up immediately


This post is shady as fuck and I’ll be severely disappointed if no one notices how weak it is.

Mattchew’s previous post in response to marvellosity was also fairly weak, though I think in more subtle ways than this one.

On June 22 2012 15:23 Snarfs wrote:
Just got caught up on the thread, gonna head to bed here quick though, just wanted to throw some thoughts down.

I'm actually interested in hearing marv explain exactly what his little shitstorm has revealed:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 10:24 marvellosity wrote:
Depends what you classify as a mistake, really. I'm not really unhappy with the conversation it's caused. I'll call it a mistake if I get lynched, which shouldn't happen

Apparently it's given him some useful information and I wouldn't mind hearing what exactly he thinks that is. For now, I'll reserve judgement.


As for the question asked of marv itself, I'm not entirely sure I understood the purpose.
Mattchew, you claim that you had hoped that marv would write down some things that he does as mafia so that you can hold him accountable, yet it just appears as though the most likely thing that will happen is, if marv is scum, he will become more cognisant of his flaws as mafia and be more likely to attempt to avoid them. It seems like you didn't fully think that question through. Just trying to fit in by posting stuff?


slOosh, I'm not sure how you think me pointing out people not contributing to finding scum (i.e. doing scummy things), is, in itself, not contributing. zephir still hasn't commented on anything in the thread of importance and I may continue pestering him until he does.


zephirdd: Let's just drop the "optimal play" argument until postgame and maybe reach a gentleman's agreement that for this game millers must claim by the 24 hour mark of day 1. We have seen this work in the past and this absolutely prevents mafia from trying to claim that a red check is due to them being a miller later on. As far as blue-sniping being a problem: Check out the last wbg mini. VE was a claimed miller and he played so damn townie that the scum team I was on had to shoot him over attempting a blue snipe. Moral: If you're a miller, claim then play a damn good town game.
Now, thoughts on scum?


Similar phenomenon here.

Notice how unwilling Snarfs is to calling anyone scum. Most curious is that he has no discernible stance on Mattchew and marvellosity despite writing a block of text each about scummy things both players have done.

Once again, people need to hold this guy accountable. He’s put down some “thoughts” and it should be interesting to see how they develop into a push of his reads (what are his reads?) and his vote later.

On June 22 2012 16:46 rastaban wrote:
Just caught up on what is the "haps", here are my thoughts.

First, I agree with the Millers claim day one, and policy lynching all Millers after today. In a game where they are self aware it is a huge boon for town. The benefits far out way the negative of less people with possible blue roles. First and most importantly it guarantees our checks. Detectives know any red checks from non-mafia get lynched, since sanity isn't an issue in this game. Any Mafia will always claim miller if checked and we don't force a day 1 reveal. It will cause a lot of confusion, it is best to eliminate this by forcing day one claims. It also forces Mafia's hand, if they want to claim they have to do it now before they are in too much water. This is hard for mafia to do, they don't want to be scrutinized and that is why they claim miller as a last resort. While it is argued that Millers make it easier to snipe blues it also makes our blues more effective. Look at Bang Bang where I, as a doctor, pushed strongly for a miller claim night one.

Second, the focus of Marv makes me think of karma after seeing him do it to Gonzaw in our last game together. We need to be careful with tunneling though, when you push someone so hard day1, they will often come across as scum no matter what since the only content you have is them trying to defend themselves against accusations. He could be scum but I just want to say that we need to be cautious, as I feel the case against him is a bit biased. Now his day 1 "meta" is to spam 1 liners so I personally wouldn't mind him getting lynched if there isn't a better candidate but I feel like there is too much discussion on him this early in our day. Remember we have 48 hours, half that time hasn't even passed yet so I don't like the band wagoning on Marv so quickly.

That said I have a hard time getting anything from his filter right now. Some people analyze best when their quarry is under pressure but for me that introduces too many variables so I like to read posts where they aren't defending themselves. So marv would you mind answering the original question ( as leading as it may be) about what you feel are your tells, and second who do you feel is most likely scum?


A third, equally weak as the last two post. Again, people need to take notice of this and hold this guy accountable to what he’s writing.

Notice how, again, no scumread, but a block of text about the happenings in the thread. How can you write so much and yet say so little? There is no stance here, no direction. Just fluff.

On June 22 2012 19:17 marvellosity wrote:
lol love risk's posts, short and to the point

Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 16:46 rastaban wrote:
So marv would you mind answering the original question ( as leading as it may be) about what you feel are your tells, and second who do you feel is most likely scum?


Since you asked so nicely... I'm not really sure. I'm more careful as scum. Don't get myself into situations like these I try to play similarly as scum as to town, so meh. More carefree with my thoughts as town I guess.

I still think VE is dodgy. Probably overestimating him as usual, but I feel like he should have been able to get a better grasp on me than this, and it makes me suspicious that he hasn't. Don't really blame Probulous so much.

Not particularly moved by the pressure on slOosh, from what I've seen of him he's usually cautious like this, especially on day 1.

Unsure where to place Zeph because of his dumb posting on millers, will wait for further content. Lack of relevancy at the moment. Somewhat suspicious because of the number of posts --> 0 content.

Zentor is abdicating responsibility for providing reads until tomorrow which isn't acceptable. It feels like he's trying to whimper his way into day 2. Response to pressure pretty poor (i momentarily took off my hypocrite hat). At the moment I would favour him to be lynched.


Well, that sucks.

This is probably the first indication that neither marv nor VE will get lynched. Instead, since both opposite sides prefer a third scummy guy, he’ll get lynched. Not particularly good for town as it does nothing but kill the least-liked guy and waste a lynch all in one fell swoop.

On June 22 2012 20:39 Shraft wrote:
I'm not fine with lynching marvellosity at the moment. From what I gather, he is a good player and the case against him consists mainly of meta and him not responsing straight to Mattchew's question. I agree that it's a bit scummy, but not enough to warrant lynching a good player. I'd rather lynch someone like rastaban:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 16:46 rastaban wrote:
Just caught up on what is the "haps", here are my thoughts.

First, I agree with the Millers claim day one, and policy lynching all Millers after today. In a game where they are self aware it is a huge boon for town. The benefits far out way the negative of less people with possible blue roles. First and most importantly it guarantees our checks. Detectives know any red checks from non-mafia get lynched, since sanity isn't an issue in this game. Any Mafia will always claim miller if checked and we don't force a day 1 reveal. It will cause a lot of confusion, it is best to eliminate this by forcing day one claims. It also forces Mafia's hand, if they want to claim they have to do it now before they are in too much water. This is hard for mafia to do, they don't want to be scrutinized and that is why they claim miller as a last resort. While it is argued that Millers make it easier to snipe blues it also makes our blues more effective. Look at Bang Bang where I, as a doctor, pushed strongly for a miller claim night one.

Second, the focus of Marv makes me think of karma after seeing him do it to Gonzaw in our last game together. We need to be careful with tunneling though, when you push someone so hard day1, they will often come across as scum no matter what since the only content you have is them trying to defend themselves against accusations. He could be scum but I just want to say that we need to be cautious, as I feel the case against him is a bit biased. Now his day 1 "meta" is to spam 1 liners so I personally wouldn't mind him getting lynched if there isn't a better candidate but I feel like there is too much discussion on him this early in our day. Remember we have 48 hours, half that time hasn't even passed yet so I don't like the band wagoning on Marv so quickly.

That said I have a hard time getting anything from his filter right now. Some people analyze best when their quarry is under pressure but for me that introduces too many variables so I like to read posts where they aren't defending themselves. So marv would you mind answering the original question ( as leading as it may be) about what you feel are your tells, and second who do you feel is most likely scum?

His post a huge ball of fluff. The miller issue has already been argued to death, and everyone except Zephirdd agrees that millers should claim during D1. The second section consists of him arguing that it's dumb to tunnel players (marv in particular). In the end of it he says "Remember we have 48 hours, half that time hasn't even passed yet so I don't like the band wagoning on Marv so quickly." which initially makes him appear pro-town, but in reality it's just bullshit. What do you mean with the band-wagoning on marv going quickly? He just had 3 votes on him by the time you were writing this (2 now) and the only guys who seems very intent on lynching him is VE and Probulous (risk's vote looked more like a pressure vote). I mainly see scum posting unnecessary advice like this where they encourage everyone to be calm and collected when voting and not to rush things, especially when there isn't even any real bandwagoning going on.

@Snarfs
What do you mean with when you say that MrZentor tried to correct his errors in the recent WBG mini mafia? Did he play even worse before that? In EMM he only posted one-liners, and he could have been either scum or town; it was impossible to read him.


BAM SON.

You get points for actually reading the thread unlike the massive jubjubs all around you. Congratulations, you’re observant and at the very least literate.

Now push your case and get this guy killed.

On June 22 2012 21:07 prplhz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 13:36 Probulous wrote:
So you want to lynch Prpl then?

He seems useless to me, he seemed useless in iGrok's game and was town. I won't get in your way if you want to lynch him I just can't tell if he is scum or not right now. Convince me

I really resent how you keep saying that I was useless in iGrok's game. You try replacing into a game where everybody thinks you're scum because of something someone else did. Additionally I was busy with other stuff and my TL time somehow went to other things. I did read the thread and my first read was to lynch Radfield because he was alive. Radfield was scum and GMarshal had this to say after the game.

The second time I tried to really contribute I pointed out the last two scum, Mr. Wiggles and Radfield. I was a little flaky on GreYMisT because I hadn't read his filter but I was confident enough that Mr. Wiggles and Radfield were the remaining scum that that didn't stop me. I have no idea why you are even talking about that game in this game or why you insist on slandering me like that. Who made you a judge of anything?

Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 13:41 MrZentor wrote:
On June 22 2012 08:24 Snarfs wrote:
@prplhz: Zentor realized the errors in his ways and has attempted to correct them (see wbg's last game). Could you show me where you believe he is stifling discussion?


PRPLHZ, answer his question or I will be extremely angry with you!

Answering because I don't want to give you an excuse for anything. You said that people were being too aggressive.


Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 13:43 VisceraEyes wrote:
prplhz is good town player. I say this not because he's often right (because he's not) but because he's often very transparently town, like me.

Surprisingly Normal Mini Mafia II

My first game with prplhz. His play is much better these days, but this is a good illustration of what I mean when I say a good town player. Contributing, honest and willing to talk about things. Open with his suspicions, and reacts decently to pressure (ironically, I thought he was scum and tunneled him pretty bad.)

Furthermore, I don't think prplhz is the type of player to bring a grudge like that between games. He's not that kind of player, and has been around long enough to know that's a losing strategy. He's putting on a show. I think so because look at how he reacts to my interaction with it.

To be honest, I like my vote where it's at...I just don't want to stop scumhunting with marvel.

Why are you posting a game from like more than a year ago? This is my 21st town game in a row (not counting smurf games and requests), there are plenty of other more recent games you can pick. Also, I'm not putting on a show. While I don't want to play with zentor, he's still the best policy lynch because he is a perpetual null who plays for the scum team. I already said this and yea, I am pretty serious about this.

Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 18:31 marvellosity wrote:
On June 22 2012 16:46 rastaban wrote:
Now his day 1 "meta" is to spam 1 liners so I personally wouldn't mind him getting lynched if there isn't a better candidate


What an exceptionally stupid thing to say, well done.

Please, manner.

@risk.nuke In Pick Your Poison you put yourself in a position on day3 where everybody else thought you were scum and you couldn't defend yourself because you hadn't shown your investment in the game during the previous days. You ended up getting mislynched and you in big part responsible for this yourself. You are doing this again right now. Please be more active.


The one thing that’s really shady about this post is that prplhz wants to kill Zentor merely because he dislikes him. It’s a policy lynch, but a terrible one at that.

As town you always want to kill the guy who’s most likely to flip scum. If you’re policy lynching a guy who is, by your own admission, completely null because he plays like an ass, then you’re telling everyone when you vote him that you have no reads that are better than “null.”

Because of that, you instantly become a better lynch than the guy you’re trying to kill with your stupid little policy.

Therefore, all the townies who follow prplhz onto this lynch without questioning his zealousness for the policy are basically saying that they’re completely fine with another player having no scumreads.

On June 22 2012 21:11 prplhz wrote:
It's posts like the one slOosh also pointed out where MrZentor says that he'll contribute tomorrow because there's nothing in the thread today that makes it pretty clear that he's a solid day1 lynch. While he also said that in Wheel of Fortune mafia, you can't just let people go saying scummy things just because they also say them as town. You lynch into the scummiest guy even if he has a reputation for being scummy as town. He's just going to be a headache this game and right now it doesn't look like he cares or wants to change that.


Being a “headache” is not “scummy.” At this point prplhz is asserting that Zentor is the scummiest with no basis for the assertion. Meaningless words, essentially. Let’s see if anyone notices.

Next 10-20 posts: lurking townie von Klaust enters the thread and continues the stupid marvellosity drivel because he hasn’t read properly. Not particularly surprising given that he’s done nothing so far.

On June 23 2012 00:00 slOosh wrote:
Snarfs: You aren't thinking of the rest of town. Pointing out that people aren't contributing is a minor contribution that scum can just as easily make (and in fact no doubt are glad to make against townies) - it's not like we are totally oblivious to people who haven't posted anything / lurking. You yourself have yet to produce any read on anyone, and from our standpoint we have no idea what your alignment is.

MrZentor: You missed Prob's post here, where he points it out and I respond accordingly here.

Everyone should back off Marv for a while because as town it is difficult to produce proper analysis / reads when all your energies are expended on defending yourself. D1 will be disastrous if he ends up town as scum could easily blend in and start provoking him. Just watch what he does with his "free time" and based on that we can deem him worthy of D1 lynch or not. Also notice that if he is scum, he can easily use his defense as "contribution", while not actually helping us find scum. So back off and scrutinize what he does this game.

I really liked Shraft's first post on catching rastaban's fluff, and I'm surprised no one else bothered to comment on it. There is general neutral fluff and allusions to games that don't really help us find scum here.
Post in question:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 16:46 rastaban wrote:
Just caught up on what is the "haps", here are my thoughts.

First, I agree with the Millers claim day one, and policy lynching all Millers after today. In a game where they are self aware it is a huge boon for town. The benefits far out way the negative of less people with possible blue roles. First and most importantly it guarantees our checks. Detectives know any red checks from non-mafia get lynched, since sanity isn't an issue in this game. Any Mafia will always claim miller if checked and we don't force a day 1 reveal. It will cause a lot of confusion, it is best to eliminate this by forcing day one claims. It also forces Mafia's hand, if they want to claim they have to do it now before they are in too much water. This is hard for mafia to do, they don't want to be scrutinized and that is why they claim miller as a last resort. While it is argued that Millers make it easier to snipe blues it also makes our blues more effective. Look at Bang Bang where I, as a doctor, pushed strongly for a miller claim night one.

Second, the focus of Marv makes me think of karma after seeing him do it to Gonzaw in our last game together. We need to be careful with tunneling though, when you push someone so hard day1, they will often come across as scum no matter what since the only content you have is them trying to defend themselves against accusations. He could be scum but I just want to say that we need to be cautious, as I feel the case against him is a bit biased. Now his day 1 "meta" is to spam 1 liners so I personally wouldn't mind him getting lynched if there isn't a better candidate but I feel like there is too much discussion on him this early in our day. Remember we have 48 hours, half that time hasn't even passed yet so I don't like the band wagoning on Marv so quickly.

That said I have a hard time getting anything from his filter right now. Some people analyze best when their quarry is under pressure but for me that introduces too many variables so I like to read posts where they aren't defending themselves. So marv would you mind answering the original question ( as leading as it may be) about what you feel are your tells, and second who do you feel is most likely scum?

Says we have too much discussion on Marv. Concludes his first post by asking marv more questions.


Another excellent post by slOosh.

When will people actually start reading shit he’s saying? At this rate he’s going to get shot in the face on n1, and that’ll be a sad loss for town (as he is the jailkeeper). It’ll be even more sad because townies on TL never reread after a flip, so everything slOosh has said will be gone forever if he dies.

On June 23 2012 00:21 VisceraEyes wrote:
There are differences marv. For instance, townMarv is interested in finding scum. scumMarv is interested in lynching townies.

Also, both townMarv and scumMarv are good enough to realize that I'm very obviously town in this game, so the fact that you're calling me "dodgy" still (not scummy, not scum, not suspicious, not suspect....."dodgy") just confirms that you're not interested in finding scum today. For that, you're gonna die friend. Sorry. *shrug*


Another really stupid assertion by VE.

From an outside perspective as a townie no one knows what your alignment is. In fact it’s even more true for VE as he’s been mislynched more than any other player I can think of on this forum.

If you consistently get mislynched then how can you say that you play an “obvious” town game? At that point it’s just self delusion due to an over inflated ego.

On June 23 2012 00:38 marvellosity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 23 2012 00:21 VisceraEyes wrote:
There are differences marv. For instance, townMarv is interested in finding scum. scumMarv is interested in lynching townies.

Also, both townMarv and scumMarv are good enough to realize that I'm very obviously town in this game, so the fact that you're calling me "dodgy" still (not scummy, not scum, not suspicious, not suspect....."dodgy") just confirms that you're not interested in finding scum today. For that, you're gonna die friend. Sorry. *shrug*


This is insidious, confirming/calling yourself as town play, while calling anyone who is suspicious of you scummy. Buddy 'friend' 'sorry' justification at the end. Extremely weak.

That is not town play.

"Also both townVE and scumVE are good enough to realise that my defence is clearly townie this game, so the fact that you persist in tunneling me just confirms you're not interested in finding scum today. For that, you're gonna die friend. Sorry. *shrug*"

SEE WHAT I DID THAR


Excellent deconstruction of VE’s post, but sadly it’s not going to result in a very good response from him.

The thread is going to continue to explode as marvellosity struggles to figure out VE’s play and VE continues to tunnel marvellosity to oblivion.

On June 23 2012 00:31 rastaban wrote:
I would like to put forward a new actor into the spotlight who I feel doesn't want this movie finished. One risk.nuke! This fellow looks shady to me and he must have gotten Kirsten Stewart for his actor for the poor job he has done hiding his distain for our movie.

Check it out:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 07:28 risk.nuke wrote:
Well Zentor started out very strong but then his activity dropped which is all-in-all a scumtrait.
He spends half of his posts unnecessarily defending himself and the other half is useless 1-worders. I would very much like him to come here and explain himselves. Seeing how he can be one of the largest postcount in this game and have said so little of significance.

This is his most rounded and contributing post... And it is a joke post.

Next we get this gem:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 07:52 risk.nuke wrote:
While I agree Zentor is a scourge to have on the gamefield I don't think we should kill him to be rid of him. That's not the way. As for now I want to hear from more players.

Not much here, he defends Z but against an attack that was never going to happen anyway so a null read on this one

Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 07:57 risk.nuke wrote:
On June 22 2012 07:53 Snarfs wrote:
I have a great idea guys:

Let's lynch Probulous so that we immediately know which team is going to lose, then whoever is on that team can just forfeit and we all save a ton of time!

##Vote Probulous!

what?

What a quality contribution, but after wanting to hear more from players he certainly doesn't add anything himself or even push this thought further. The original post was a joke regarding probs penchant for losing lately but risk doesn't follow up to even find that out.

Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 08:03 risk.nuke wrote:
I say we lynch zephirdd on account of not realising we're past fun-time.

Wants to lynch zeph but like most bad actors he says the lines but doesn't have his actions (vote) match up to his words. He doesnt want to have the case lead back to him, and until more people have joined in he holds his vote. Perhaps you might think he is an actor who values life and is very conservative with his voting habits, but you will soon see that is not the case.


Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 08:55 risk.nuke wrote:
lol, ok #1 scum response
##Vote: marvellosity

Now he gets crazy like Charlie Sheen, he now throws his vote onto the marv train, but he doesn't add anything to the arguments, he doesn't even mention agreeing with others but instead he bases his vote off one post. What was this incriminating post? Well I thought it must have been the dodge marv made or perhaps his posts where he says he is confidant he doesn't get lynched, but no it is this one.

Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 08:53 marvellosity wrote:
On June 22 2012 08:41 Zephirdd wrote:
This is a semi-closed setup. If there are 13 players, it's possible that 12 are medics and 1 is a scum. Of course that's retarded as fuck, but nothing is concrete and we shouldn't think "but it's not common to 2 of X" exist ever. at all.

In fact, we can't even confirm the existence of a SK until after the night phase.

I'm not sure about Millers instaclaiming. While it clears path for cops(as it's pretty obvious that they will show red), it also reduces the number of possible blues, making it easier for scum. At least what I understood from the setup is that Millers can't be blues.

If anything, Millers should be breadcrumbing and claiming in case a cop calls them guilty. For all other purposes, they should be *Vanilla*(unclaimed, aka. possible blue) to make it harder for mafia to shoot into blues.


Thanks, I will pass this on to my scumbuddies immediately.

Marv is showing how absurd it is to have millers breadcrumb so they can be saved later, and this post is the one risk decides justifies throwing the weight of his vote behind? I think he thought the risk train was gaining momentum and wanted to get on board.


Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 19:01 risk.nuke wrote:
##Unvote: marvellosity
##Vote: von Klaust II

Here is his latest post, what!!!??? This is so out of the blue, he never says why he changes his mind, he doesn't even say why he votes for klaust though I am guessing inactivity. This is a huge throw away vote meaning nothing as he doesn't even ask for klaus to speak up. On top of that look at the time stamps, this occurs 10 hours after his Last post. So picture this, risk votes marv, 10 hours later he comes and votes klaust with no reasoning at all. Ahha, but what has changed? Well I and a few others have pushed for slowing down on tunneling marv, and he realizes that it might not happen. Prob mentions the lurkers need to get posting and names klaust as one of them, risk immediately votes for him. So he has 10 hours between his posts and apparently knows enough to change his mind on the marv lynch and that klaust hasn't posted yet and still we don't get even a single line of content from. This is a mafia mindset, all of hs targets are equally scummy since none of them are scum so he doesn't care about who gets lynched as long as it isn't them.

Let's kick this sham of an actor off our set before he changes this movie from Signs into The Happening.

##Vote: risk.nuke


Another fairly bad post that I hope people will recognize for what it is. It might get buried under the VE/marv debacle, though. More or less it’s nothing but a post by post summary, something anyone can do. Since anyone can do it, it’s pretty much just a post that appears to be a contribution, when it’s just more garbage.

On June 23 2012 00:39 Zephirdd wrote:
+ Show Spoiler [Worst-case-ever] +
On June 23 2012 00:31 rastaban wrote:
I would like to put forward a new actor into the spotlight who I feel doesn't want this movie finished. One risk.nuke! This fellow looks shady to me and he must have gotten Kirsten Stewart for his actor for the poor job he has done hiding his distain for our movie.

Check it out:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 07:28 risk.nuke wrote:
Well Zentor started out very strong but then his activity dropped which is all-in-all a scumtrait.
He spends half of his posts unnecessarily defending himself and the other half is useless 1-worders. I would very much like him to come here and explain himselves. Seeing how he can be one of the largest postcount in this game and have said so little of significance.

This is his most rounded and contributing post... And it is a joke post.

Next we get this gem:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 07:52 risk.nuke wrote:
While I agree Zentor is a scourge to have on the gamefield I don't think we should kill him to be rid of him. That's not the way. As for now I want to hear from more players.

Not much here, he defends Z but against an attack that was never going to happen anyway so a null read on this one

Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 07:57 risk.nuke wrote:
On June 22 2012 07:53 Snarfs wrote:
I have a great idea guys:

Let's lynch Probulous so that we immediately know which team is going to lose, then whoever is on that team can just forfeit and we all save a ton of time!

##Vote Probulous!

what?

What a quality contribution, but after wanting to hear more from players he certainly doesn't add anything himself or even push this thought further. The original post was a joke regarding probs penchant for losing lately but risk doesn't follow up to even find that out.

Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 08:03 risk.nuke wrote:
I say we lynch zephirdd on account of not realising we're past fun-time.

Wants to lynch zeph but like most bad actors he says the lines but doesn't have his actions (vote) match up to his words. He doesnt want to have the case lead back to him, and until more people have joined in he holds his vote. Perhaps you might think he is an actor who values life and is very conservative with his voting habits, but you will soon see that is not the case.


Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 08:55 risk.nuke wrote:
lol, ok #1 scum response
##Vote: marvellosity

Now he gets crazy like Charlie Sheen, he now throws his vote onto the marv train, but he doesn't add anything to the arguments, he doesn't even mention agreeing with others but instead he bases his vote off one post. What was this incriminating post? Well I thought it must have been the dodge marv made or perhaps his posts where he says he is confidant he doesn't get lynched, but no it is this one.

Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 08:53 marvellosity wrote:
On June 22 2012 08:41 Zephirdd wrote:
This is a semi-closed setup. If there are 13 players, it's possible that 12 are medics and 1 is a scum. Of course that's retarded as fuck, but nothing is concrete and we shouldn't think "but it's not common to 2 of X" exist ever. at all.

In fact, we can't even confirm the existence of a SK until after the night phase.

I'm not sure about Millers instaclaiming. While it clears path for cops(as it's pretty obvious that they will show red), it also reduces the number of possible blues, making it easier for scum. At least what I understood from the setup is that Millers can't be blues.

If anything, Millers should be breadcrumbing and claiming in case a cop calls them guilty. For all other purposes, they should be *Vanilla*(unclaimed, aka. possible blue) to make it harder for mafia to shoot into blues.


Thanks, I will pass this on to my scumbuddies immediately.

Marv is showing how absurd it is to have millers breadcrumb so they can be saved later, and this post is the one risk decides justifies throwing the weight of his vote behind? I think he thought the risk train was gaining momentum and wanted to get on board.


Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 19:01 risk.nuke wrote:
##Unvote: marvellosity
##Vote: von Klaust II

Here is his latest post, what!!!??? This is so out of the blue, he never says why he changes his mind, he doesn't even say why he votes for klaust though I am guessing inactivity. This is a huge throw away vote meaning nothing as he doesn't even ask for klaus to speak up. On top of that look at the time stamps, this occurs 10 hours after his Last post. So picture this, risk votes marv, 10 hours later he comes and votes klaust with no reasoning at all. Ahha, but what has changed? Well I and a few others have pushed for slowing down on tunneling marv, and he realizes that it might not happen. Prob mentions the lurkers need to get posting and names klaust as one of them, risk immediately votes for him. So he has 10 hours between his posts and apparently knows enough to change his mind on the marv lynch and that klaust hasn't posted yet and still we don't get even a single line of content from. This is a mafia mindset, all of hs targets are equally scummy since none of them are scum so he doesn't care about who gets lynched as long as it isn't them.

Let's kick this sham of an actor off our set before he changes this movie from Signs into The Happening.

##Vote: risk.nuke


Post-by-post case on a <24hr game, huuuuuuuuuuuge fluff accusing no one other than risk - I'm scummy when I'm town because I never roll scum - nuke.

Have you played other games, rastaban? link me please.


ARE YOU GOING TO CALL HIM SCUM FOR IT?

YOU’RE SO CLOSE GOD DAMN IT

On June 23 2012 00:46 Shraft wrote:
@rastaban
That case is extraordinarily weak. You could've summed it up in one sentence: "risk.nuke has not yet posted anything of value.". The part about him switching his vote is not a scum tell, and what had happened was that ten more hours passed without VK posting anything. It's just a simple pressure vote.


SAME THING TO YOU GOOD SIR

CALL HIM OUT SOME MORE

SAVE THESE JUBJUBS

On June 23 2012 02:36 Snarfs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 20:39 Shraft wrote:
I'm not fine with lynching marvellosity at the moment. From what I gather, he is a good player and the case against him consists mainly of meta and him not responsing straight to Mattchew's question. I agree that it's a bit scummy, but not enough to warrant lynching a good player. I'd rather lynch someone like rastaban:
On June 22 2012 16:46 rastaban wrote:
Just caught up on what is the "haps", here are my thoughts.

First, I agree with the Millers claim day one, and policy lynching all Millers after today. In a game where they are self aware it is a huge boon for town. The benefits far out way the negative of less people with possible blue roles. First and most importantly it guarantees our checks. Detectives know any red checks from non-mafia get lynched, since sanity isn't an issue in this game. Any Mafia will always claim miller if checked and we don't force a day 1 reveal. It will cause a lot of confusion, it is best to eliminate this by forcing day one claims. It also forces Mafia's hand, if they want to claim they have to do it now before they are in too much water. This is hard for mafia to do, they don't want to be scrutinized and that is why they claim miller as a last resort. While it is argued that Millers make it easier to snipe blues it also makes our blues more effective. Look at Bang Bang where I, as a doctor, pushed strongly for a miller claim night one.

Second, the focus of Marv makes me think of karma after seeing him do it to Gonzaw in our last game together. We need to be careful with tunneling though, when you push someone so hard day1, they will often come across as scum no matter what since the only content you have is them trying to defend themselves against accusations. He could be scum but I just want to say that we need to be cautious, as I feel the case against him is a bit biased. Now his day 1 "meta" is to spam 1 liners so I personally wouldn't mind him getting lynched if there isn't a better candidate but I feel like there is too much discussion on him this early in our day. Remember we have 48 hours, half that time hasn't even passed yet so I don't like the band wagoning on Marv so quickly.

That said I have a hard time getting anything from his filter right now. Some people analyze best when their quarry is under pressure but for me that introduces too many variables so I like to read posts where they aren't defending themselves. So marv would you mind answering the original question ( as leading as it may be) about what you feel are your tells, and second who do you feel is most likely scum?

His post a huge ball of fluff. The miller issue has already been argued to death, and everyone except Zephirdd agrees that millers should claim during D1. The second section consists of him arguing that it's dumb to tunnel players (marv in particular). In the end of it he says "Remember we have 48 hours, half that time hasn't even passed yet so I don't like the band wagoning on Marv so quickly." which initially makes him appear pro-town, but in reality it's just bullshit. What do you mean with the band-wagoning on marv going quickly? He just had 3 votes on him by the time you were writing this (2 now) and the only guys who seems very intent on lynching him is VE and Probulous (risk's vote looked more like a pressure vote). I mainly see scum posting unnecessary advice like this where they encourage everyone to be calm and collected when voting and not to rush things, especially when there isn't even any real bandwagoning going on.

I agree, this post is very scummy. Also notice how the general feeling of the second paragraph is that we should back off marv a bit so that we can get some better reads and not waste the entire 48 hours, but then the third paragraph is him coming right back to marv and pushing him? Now, granted he does appear to be trying to ask more "nicely", but why not try focusing on someone else if you feel too much time is being wasted on marv?

Pre-Edit: Noticed rastaban has posted a "case" on risk.nuke after slOosh also commented on his post. I really don't like rastaban's case as it is quite exaggerated. It feels to me as it was a quick case he made as he noticed he was getting flak for not commenting on anyone besides marv. risk.nuke's actions have been quite clear as marv and shraft explained here: [click]


Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 20:43 Shraft wrote:
EBWOP: @Snarfs
What do you mean with when you say that MrZentor tried to correct his errors in the recent WBG mini mafia? Did he play even worse before that? In EMM he only posted one-liners, and he could have been either scum or town; it was impossible to read him.

Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 20:44 marvellosity wrote:
Well, in WoF he self-voted at least twice and basically actively tried to get himself lynched as a townie. From there the only way is up.

Pretty much this. Unfortunately, being mafia in the last game I had a bit of a biased perspective of Zentor and naturally couldn't help but try to justify his actions from a town point of view. I didn't like how Artanis's reasoning for thinking he was town was that he wasn't trying to act townie (basically implying that all scum try to blend in) since if Zentor knows that, he can just act like he doesn't give a crap as scum. Unfortunately, I think he does know this and probably plays very similar as both town and scum because of it. I'd be absolutely okay with Zentor lynch, as I'm starting to see prplhz's point about him being perpetually null. He'll probably refuse to show any analysis unless absolutely pushed to do it and I'm pretty certain scum won't kill him for us.


I don't think we should lynch marv today. He's been attacked the entire day and hasn't had a chance to do anything but react to other people's pressure.


People I'd be fine lynching today, at this point: rastaban, MrZentor. I think rastaban is more likely scum so that's where my vote is going.
##Vote rastaban


Why MrZentor and not risk.nuke given they both have a similar playstyle?
Because, MrZentor has shown in the past, that as town he is capable of actually making towny posts, yet refused to do so his last town game which looked very similar to his most recent scum game: [towny post]
risk.nuke is risk.nuke.


Also, I'm still waiting for Mattchew to come back and explain this:
Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 15:23 Snarfs wrote:
Mattchew, you claim that you had hoped that marv would write down some things that he does as mafia so that you can hold him accountable, yet it just appears as though the most likely thing that will happen is, if marv is scum, he will become more cognisant of his flaws as mafia and be more likely to attempt to avoid them. It seems like you didn't fully think that question through.


Nice post here by Snarfs; in order to identify Snarfs’s motivations here the players are going to have to read very carefully. It’ll help him to blend in more unless there’s a townie who already has a scumread of him. In that case that player may be able to identify the deception.

On June 23 2012 04:10 Mattchew wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 23 2012 02:36 Snarfs wrote:
Also, I'm still waiting for Mattchew to come back and explain this:
On June 22 2012 15:23 Snarfs wrote:
Mattchew, you claim that you had hoped that marv would write down some things that he does as mafia so that you can hold him accountable, yet it just appears as though the most likely thing that will happen is, if marv is scum, he will become more cognisant of his flaws as mafia and be more likely to attempt to avoid them. It seems like you didn't fully think that question through.

I figured that of all people he would have more insight as to his differences and tells in his scum/town play, he would have the most information. It was extremely early in the game and was what I thought a good time to go into a self meta analysis that if he were town, he would gladly bestow upon us the things that he would use to set himself apart from scum. Instead, he sidesteps the question completely, not leaving us with anything to hold him accountable or help us get a read on him. Then he says that he knew this answer would be viewed as scummy, which if something is scummy, it is anti-town. I don't see why he would post like that knowing it would not help town.


Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 16:46 rastaban wrote:
Second, the focus of Marv makes me think of karma after seeing him do it to Gonzaw in our last game together. We need to be careful with tunneling though, when you push someone so hard day1, they will often come across as scum no matter what since the only content you have is them trying to defend themselves against accusations. He could be scum but I just want to say that we need to be cautious, as I feel the case against him is a bit biased. Now his day 1 "meta" is to spam 1 liners so I personally wouldn't mind him getting lynched if there isn't a better candidate but I feel like there is too much discussion on him this early in our day. Remember we have 48 hours, half that time hasn't even passed yet so I don't like the band wagoning on Marv so quickly.

That said I have a hard time getting anything from his filter right now. Some people analyze best when their quarry is under pressure but for me that introduces too many variables so I like to read posts where they aren't defending themselves. So marv would you mind answering the original question ( as leading as it may be) about what you feel are your tells, and second who do you feel is most likely scum?


(big post by post case on Risk.Nuke that I am not quoting)

Show nested quote +
On June 23 2012 03:47 rastaban wrote:
When I review MrZentor I see someone who hasn't contributed much, which, while scummy, isn't enough to lynch yet in my opinion.,Especially when he commits to delivering something tomorrow. I have seen players like Foolishness say the same thing so I am inclined to give him till tomorrow before I make my Judgment on him.

This all feels extremely middle of the road, I am ready to jump on a bandwagon but don't want to commit to anything scum play. He also contradicts himself about the talks about Marv, then contradicts his we have 48 hours post, by posting a case that he is pretty deadset on, about risk.nuke.

Overall I just feel like Rastaban's posting has been flaky and his case on Risk is bad. To answer his question to the thread, I read his vote switch that he was not confident in a Marv lynch, and that he wanted to pressure a lurker with no content. Also, his first 30ish hour case doesn't take into account that Risk.nuke has played many many games before

##Vote: rastaban


Same as above: a good post that makes up for the mistakes mattchew was making earlier. It may overshadow his previous scumminess for a while.

On June 23 2012 04:25 slOosh wrote:
Rastaban looks townish to me; the main case against him right now looks like "he is playing bad", rather than "he is playing like scum".

Something in the back of my mind is still clicking everytime I read Snarfs. Can you cool cats reread his last post and tell me your thoughts? It would be great to get some discussion particularly from marv, prplhz and risk.nuke.

And as for now here will be my preliminary vote to hold me accountable.
##Vote: Snarfs


5/10 but it sucks that the read is so weak that it’s obvious a slight gust of air will cause slOosh to switch votes.

Word of advice: if you have a nagging suspicion that someone is scum, let them post more (or bait them into talking about things without voting them) and then if you have the same suspicion 5-6 hours later, slam them with a concrete case that forces attention.

If you make a weak vote like this you’ll get manipulated and then the read will be lost. Thus, if you’re actually correct you’ll get shot and then no one will know you were onto something, since outwardly this particular read seemed the same as all of your earlier ones.

On June 23 2012 07:05 slOosh wrote:
Hrrmph. Alright I'll just lay out my suspicions. I wanted to hit two birds with one stone by getting reads on other people via their opinions on the matter (since I have too many null reads). Dear townspeople: step it up. If you are blue then scum know it and will snipe you, and we think you are scum and mislynch you. That's the only explanation I can think of at the appalling lack of effort by most of town right now.

Anyway, here are my Snarf concerns case. As I've looked over filters and thread, I feel like I have a good enough lead to make an actual case now.:

Show nested quote +
On June 23 2012 02:36 Snarfs wrote:
I don't think we should lynch marv today. He's been attacked the entire day and hasn't had a chance to do anything but react to other people's pressure.

This is a terrible reason not to lynch someone. You don't lynch someone only if there is a scummier candidate or if he looks town. Snarf's reasoning why we shouldn't lynch marv is that he has been busy defending himself. He didn't say "there isn't enough here to lynch marv" - he said "I don't think we should lynch marv today", and this is before even the D1 halfway mark. The reason and the conclusion does not match. And when things like that don't match it indicates anti-town agenda.

Show nested quote +

People I'd be fine lynching today, at this point: rastaban, MrZentor. I think rastaban is more likely scum so that's where my vote is going.
##Vote rastaban

Snarfs fricken doctored his own quotes in the post above me. The heck make sure you see this.

Show nested quote +
On June 23 2012 02:36 Snarfs wrote:
I agree, this post is very scummy. Also notice how the general feeling of the second paragraph is that we should back off marv a bit so that we can get some better reads and not waste the entire 48 hours, but then the third paragraph is him coming right back to marv and pushing him? Now, granted he does appear to be trying to ask more "nicely", but why not try focusing on someone else if you feel too much time is being wasted on marv?


He isn't considering that rastaban could be bad town or scum - he makes it very clear that he originally thought he was scum, and now that I've called him out on why, he backtracks and says he is debating, when it is clear that his words say otherwise. Again, a mismatch of words and actions.

Show nested quote +
On June 22 2012 15:23 Snarfs wrote:
I'm actually interested in hearing marv explain exactly what his little shitstorm has revealed:
On June 22 2012 10:24 marvellosity wrote:
Depends what you classify as a mistake, really. I'm not really unhappy with the conversation it's caused. I'll call it a mistake if I get lynched, which shouldn't happen

Apparently it's given him some useful information and I wouldn't mind hearing what exactly he thinks that is. For now, I'll reserve judgement.


He says here he will reserve judgement. However, this post precedes the quote that I used in point one. Again, his actions and words misalign. He reserves judgement on the basis of he wants to hear what marv's reads / conclusions from the scrap he had were. That's fine. Yet when he says we shouldn't lynch marv, it isn't because marv's findings were legit / useful. It's because he has been "under attack", and portrays marv as a victim. Contradictions.

On top of that there's some blatant plagiarism, which is a cheap way to look like you are contributing without actually doing so.
Show nested quote +
On June 23 2012 00:00 slOosh wrote:
I really liked Shraft's first post on catching rastaban's fluff, and I'm surprised no one else bothered to comment on it. There is general neutral fluff and allusions to games that don't really help us find scum here.
Post in question:
On June 22 2012 16:46 rastaban wrote:
Just caught up on what is the "haps", here are my thoughts.

First, I agree with the Millers claim day one, and policy lynching all Millers after today. In a game where they are self aware it is a huge boon for town. The benefits far out way the negative of less people with possible blue roles. First and most importantly it guarantees our checks. Detectives know any red checks from non-mafia get lynched, since sanity isn't an issue in this game. Any Mafia will always claim miller if checked and we don't force a day 1 reveal. It will cause a lot of confusion, it is best to eliminate this by forcing day one claims. It also forces Mafia's hand, if they want to claim they have to do it now before they are in too much water. This is hard for mafia to do, they don't want to be scrutinized and that is why they claim miller as a last resort. While it is argued that Millers make it easier to snipe blues it also makes our blues more effective. Look at Bang Bang where I, as a doctor, pushed strongly for a miller claim night one.

Second, the focus of Marv makes me think of karma after seeing him do it to Gonzaw in our last game together. We need to be careful with tunneling though, when you push someone so hard day1, they will often come across as scum no matter what since the only content you have is them trying to defend themselves against accusations. He could be scum but I just want to say that we need to be cautious, as I feel the case against him is a bit biased. Now his day 1 "meta" is to spam 1 liners so I personally wouldn't mind him getting lynched if there isn't a better candidate but I feel like there is too much discussion on him this early in our day. Remember we have 48 hours, half that time hasn't even passed yet so I don't like the band wagoning on Marv so quickly.

That said I have a hard time getting anything from his filter right now. Some people analyze best when their quarry is under pressure but for me that introduces too many variables so I like to read posts where they aren't defending themselves. So marv would you mind answering the original question ( as leading as it may be) about what you feel are your tells, and second who do you feel is most likely scum?

Says we have too much discussion on Marv. Concludes his first post by asking marv more questions.

Show nested quote +
On June 23 2012 02:36 Snarfs wrote:
On June 22 2012 20:39 Shraft wrote:
I'm not fine with lynching marvellosity at the moment. From what I gather, he is a good player and the case against him consists mainly of meta and him not responsing straight to Mattchew's question. I agree that it's a bit scummy, but not enough to warrant lynching a good player. I'd rather lynch someone like rastaban:
On June 22 2012 16:46 rastaban wrote:
Just caught up on what is the "haps", here are my thoughts.

First, I agree with the Millers claim day one, and policy lynching all Millers after today. In a game where they are self aware it is a huge boon for town. The benefits far out way the negative of less people with possible blue roles. First and most importantly it guarantees our checks. Detectives know any red checks from non-mafia get lynched, since sanity isn't an issue in this game. Any Mafia will always claim miller if checked and we don't force a day 1 reveal. It will cause a lot of confusion, it is best to eliminate this by forcing day one claims. It also forces Mafia's hand, if they want to claim they have to do it now before they are in too much water. This is hard for mafia to do, they don't want to be scrutinized and that is why they claim miller as a last resort. While it is argued that Millers make it easier to snipe blues it also makes our blues more effective. Look at Bang Bang where I, as a doctor, pushed strongly for a miller claim night one.

Second, the focus of Marv makes me think of karma after seeing him do it to Gonzaw in our last game together. We need to be careful with tunneling though, when you push someone so hard day1, they will often come across as scum no matter what since the only content you have is them trying to defend themselves against accusations. He could be scum but I just want to say that we need to be cautious, as I feel the case against him is a bit biased. Now his day 1 "meta" is to spam 1 liners so I personally wouldn't mind him getting lynched if there isn't a better candidate but I feel like there is too much discussion on him this early in our day. Remember we have 48 hours, half that time hasn't even passed yet so I don't like the band wagoning on Marv so quickly.

That said I have a hard time getting anything from his filter right now. Some people analyze best when their quarry is under pressure but for me that introduces too many variables so I like to read posts where they aren't defending themselves. So marv would you mind answering the original question ( as leading as it may be) about what you feel are your tells, and second who do you feel is most likely scum?

His post a huge ball of fluff. The miller issue has already been argued to death, and everyone except Zephirdd agrees that millers should claim during D1. The second section consists of him arguing that it's dumb to tunnel players (marv in particular). In the end of it he says "Remember we have 48 hours, half that time hasn't even passed yet so I don't like the band wagoning on Marv so quickly." which initially makes him appear pro-town, but in reality it's just bullshit. What do you mean with the band-wagoning on marv going quickly? He just had 3 votes on him by the time you were writing this (2 now) and the only guys who seems very intent on lynching him is VE and Probulous (risk's vote looked more like a pressure vote). I mainly see scum posting unnecessary advice like this where they encourage everyone to be calm and collected when voting and not to rush things, especially when there isn't even any real bandwagoning going on.

I agree, this post is very scummy. Also notice how the general feeling of the second paragraph is that we should back off marv a bit so that we can get some better reads and not waste the entire 48 hours, but then the third paragraph is him coming right back to marv and pushing him? Now, granted he does appear to be trying to ask more "nicely", but why not try focusing on someone else if you feel too much time is being wasted on marv?


Yea, I'm suspicious of Snarfs.


Much better.

Now is he going to correctly identify the three other guys who might instead be lynched? slOosh needs to ensure that when this read is pushed, anyone who derails is slapped in the face.

Next page:

more VE/marvellosity derpage.

*yawn*

sadly slOosh’s case is getting buried and probably the only person who will notice it is Snarfs. This is going to weaken it considerably and my prediction is that slOosh will back off and hop on an easy bandwagon instead as his lynch takes resistance.




I'll be writing some analysis and posting it tomorrow. Most of you know what happened though.
slOosh
Profile Joined October 2009
3291 Posts
July 01 2012 04:54 GMT
#1596
A hearty lol at prplhz's freak out in ScumQT when Artanis posted the no-death day post.
Barbiero
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Brazil5259 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-01 05:02:23
July 01 2012 05:01 GMT
#1597
I rofl'd at the ARE YOU GOIN TO CALL HIM SCUM FOR THAT?

I have issues to call ppl scum, especially after I shat on the thread that way also I kinda suck at pushing people.
♥ The world needs more hearts! ♥
rastaban
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States2294 Posts
July 01 2012 05:03 GMT
#1598
On July 01 2012 13:20 Zephirdd wrote:
Okay then, My absolutely flawless plan of drawing a shot night 1 fucking worked.

Basically, I went full apeshit on the miller stuff, focusing so much on "protecting our blues" and "we need to keep the possible blue pool as large as possible!" into "holy shit I'm a vanilla and I was shot n1"

Is that logic correct, rastaban?

I killed you because people suspected you as mafia but I felt you were town. I thought it would make day 2 discussion easier without weakening mafia.

My goal was to try and get mafia lynched, but apparently I am awful at that, and then shoot townies every night that town doubted.

Sorry for tunneling you risk I really thought you were scum early on, was this a normal game for you?
Tyler: "...damn it, that's StarCraft. Opening doors is what we do. Being the first to find food is the greatest pleasure a player can have!"
slOosh
Profile Joined October 2009
3291 Posts
July 01 2012 05:09 GMT
#1599
Oh, also a big thank you to WBG and Artanis[Xp] for hosting this game! It takes much time / effort and it's very much appreciated. Another thank you for WBG running the ObsQT and his post game analysis, which I feel is very under appreciated. <3.

Oberyn
Profile Joined December 2011
United Kingdom508 Posts
July 01 2012 05:13 GMT
#1600
Where are the links to the Day/Night posts?

Now I want to read the whole story since the beginning


On July 01 2012 13:31 Zephirdd wrote:
Waitaminute.

Probulous' team won the game

DAFUQISTHIS


:O


:O :O :O

*its 2012*

It's the end of the world! Everybody run!

Oberyn was ever the viper. Deadly, dangerous, unpredictable. No man dared tread on him.
Prev 1 78 79 80 81 82 84 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 9h 45m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Ketroc 150
NeuroSwarm 137
StarCraft: Brood War
Movie 32
Sexy 19
Icarus 5
Dota 2
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1470
Fnx 427
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King108
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor255
Other Games
summit1g9741
FrodaN4962
Grubby4328
shahzam871
JimRising 582
ViBE233
Maynarde212
C9.Mang0193
AZ_Axe128
Organizations
StarCraft 2
ESL.tv161
Other Games
BasetradeTV44
StarCraft 2
CranKy Ducklings40
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 65
• musti20045 47
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki58
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• Scarra1601
• WagamamaTV247
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
9h 45m
BeSt vs Light
Wardi Open
10h 45m
Replay Cast
23h 45m
Replay Cast
1d 9h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 9h
Snow vs Soulkey
WardiTV Invitational
1d 10h
PiGosaur Monday
1d 23h
GSL Code S
2 days
ByuN vs Rogue
herO vs Cure
Replay Cast
2 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Classic vs Reynor
GuMiho vs Maru
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
SOOP
5 days
Online Event
6 days
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Nation Wars Season 2
PiG Sty Festival 6.0
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
ASL Season 19
YSL S1
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
China & Korea Top Challenge
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
2025 GSL S1
Heroes 10 EU
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

NPSL S3
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
2025 GSL S2
DreamHack Dallas 2025
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.