|
I wouldnt mind people shooting gambit tonight. It makes sense that his not coming back to post about the mason rrlated issue and his scummy as hell. Newbie scum play scared into hiding. Hell even wiggles would be a good shot. I find it funny that mz and toad are mason and yet mz pushed Ve's case and left toad to interact with Ve but generally shooting down any defense from VE without any soild claim. Just the normal seems like the general town consenus. It actually leads lazy towns to bandwagon.
I want toad to mason someone else tonight. Not mz not kita not wiggles
|
no a no lynch on a VT is better than a no-lynch. a lynch on a claimed VIG is not better than a no-lynch. We had the other option of lynching Zealos and getting VE to shoot someone.
so ur reasoning is a lazy town whose not trying. scum mb?
|
I don't understand both too but Wiggles must die soon.
|
Also I want Toad to mason someone else not wiggles not kita and not MZ
|
On June 02 2012 04:23 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2012 04:02 Blazinghand wrote: Yeah wiggle-dawg has been kinda lurking since his D1 helpfulness. I haven't been lurking, I just haven't been around and have been busy the last couple days. I can't post when I'm not home, or doing something else. Show nested quote +On June 02 2012 02:57 Mr. Wiggles wrote: BH, did you really believe you could get 14 other people to vote-switch with you within 5 minutes? Show nested quote +On June 02 2012 03:01 Blazinghand wrote: I voted for scum. Somehow, during D2 I got distracted from my tried-and-true tactic of tunnelling scum and thought "oh these people have legitimate arguments" but I will not listen to dumb ideas any more. Nothing will stop me from lynching G32 tomorrow. I have nothing more to say on the topic of the VE mislynch. You didn't answer my question. You nearly ended up causing a no-lynch, so I'm wondering what was going through your head at the time. There's no way you'd actually get enough people to switch within 5 minutes to be able to kill Gambit, but you still posted this, egging people on to switch with you: Show nested quote +On June 01 2012 07:55 Blazinghand wrote: ##UNVOTE ##VOTE GAMBITX32
LYNCH HIM
LYNCH HIM NOW BEFORE HE GETS AWAY
HURRY So I'm wondering what exactly were you trying to do? Just make a statement? What? Obviously he wasn't going to die, so what else were you trying to accomplish? The only thing it could have ended with is a no-lynch, was that what you were shooting for?
Maybe he spotted a truer scum and would rather a no lynch?
What information are you fishing for here Wiggles?
|
Toad whose your new mason?
|
but killing him wont give information. Kitaman is a better option.
|
I want to lynch Kita. more information from kita. Gambit is a dead end. Lynching him will only reduce KP but we'll be at a dead end tomorrow. Lynch Kita today,and if the information isnt good enough, we lynch gambit tomorrow.
|
What problem? isnt it a kitaman lynch today?
|
from what i know. Toad can mason someone every new day?
I would like to know your mason for day 3 and today
|
|
or i'm scum and knows extra.
|
since the cat is out of the bag. from your mayor campaign and the debate on day 1. I gather you could mason a new person every new night. And everything you quoted was from day 2 onward where you started ignoring my attempt to ask whose did you mason
|
On May 28 2012 03:40 Toadesstern wrote:Screw this, don't feel like explaining why I am town, because I don't need to LOL I'm fucking modconfirmed townie. And this is not some Toadi-confirmed this is hands down modconfirmed. I am a Mason and there is no Anti-town role that can produce a mason result according to our OP. I can tell who I wish to mason once n1 has started and once I did that I can talk to the guy. I assume that means talking to him once d2 has started. I can mason ANYONE I WANT meaning I can confirm this and as mentioned there's no mafia or 3rd party role like that. Now you might ask yourself: "But toadi, what if you are mafia and faking this by outing 2 mafias (you and your "masonbuddy", not to mention that that would be completly retarded from a mafia point of view but whatever)? We can't be sure if you really are a mason at all!" I am an awesome mason. The most awesome masons of them all, meaining I can choose a new "target" every night, meaning I can reproduce that confirmation every night if you wish me to.If you believe I am mafia fakeclaiming, fine lynch me if I'm not telling the "truth" d2, I'll flip town and you lynch the guy who said "wait, toad said he masoned me but I did not get a mason-thingy!" afterwards and you get a mafia. If I am town I'm telling the truth and can prove it d2, which means I'm going to be shot n1 again, but I'm counting on that anyways so might as well take a mafia with me and I will. That's it. Vote me pls ❤
actually screw it i just went thru your filter and it was on page one.
|
I urge the last medic to not claim and we lynch Kita today. It obvious we only have 1 saving power at night and if you claim, its a game a WIFOM at night.
or i could be wrong and Kita is the medic but i doubt so.
|
Yeah. Be brave. Save Earth
|
Im sorry but i cant find your breadcrumb.
|
Nvm found it
On May 30 2012 14:55 kitaman27 wrote: Not much substance to this post, but here are my thoughts for alternative candidates.
Hassybaby has not shared his opinion on a single player this game. I'd like to request a large post from him within the next 24 hours or he should be strongly considered as a vig target tommorrow night. Zealos has disappeared. As a lynch candidate, he needs to be extremely active today if he hopes to stay out of trouble. marvellosity's filter is far too safe for my liking.
GambitX32's two posts look as if he knew he would be expected to share his opinion, but had nothing to say, so he just made a few generic statements about a bunch of players. I don't see anything of value that his post adds to the thread.
I'm unwilling to trust Wiggles, but I'm unable to put together anything close to a valid case against him. With myself and Meapak being town, it doesn't bode well for him for him from a balance perspective, although VE could also serve as the scum leader.
S&B and Manason are still sketchy. I want a more developed case from each of them that adds something to the thread.
|
have to go school. im actually leaning to believing Kitaman27 right now.
I urge town to read this case thorough before sheeping.
Manason needs to die.
|
Kita's breadcrumb isnt just one. its neatly placed over the thread with reference to character. That's a major townie point. VE's crumb was just plain wierd.
I would like to vote Manason. All game, his remain neutral with only two targets. Zealos and Kita. Zealos had a target marked on him since day 1. While no one was really going after Kita except VE, Manason had him as a target. Throughout the play. his been sheeping the easiest case without providing any reads on anybody. Its in his gut feeling that Kita is scum but never really got around to post his case after promising to do so 2 times.
Then with VE. Didn't believe VE was scum. Then suspicious of VE as scum because of VE's crumb and jumping all over the place. Wanted VE to push for a Kita case Vote VE because I think you may be bad town and i rather lynch you then no lynch then came back full circle and says I believe VE was town and i never wanted to lynch him.
Does roleblocker gets notified if they successfully blocked an night action
|
|
|
|