EPTOn June 06 2012 08:07 marvellosity wrote:
papapanda, the wishy-washy scum:
It's harder to pick out posts for wishywashyness here, but posts like these:
Lots of questions as with much of his filter in general. This is the kind of post that's a post for the sake of it.
For further reading, here is his filter from LIV where he was town. He's more open, more engaging, less afraid to post. There's an honesty and lack of deception in his filter in LIV that does not seem present here.
papapanda, the wishy-washy scum:
It's harder to pick out posts for wishywashyness here, but posts like these:
Lots of questions as with much of his filter in general. This is the kind of post that's a post for the sake of it.
For further reading, here is his filter from LIV where he was town. He's more open, more engaging, less afraid to post. There's an honesty and lack of deception in his filter in LIV that does not seem present here.
I thought I am being less wishy washy than last game...
I FoSed Hyaach and pointed out SS, but I didnt vote because I didn't feel strong enough about them.
The definition of FoS means you are suspicious, but not suspicious enough to put your vote on him yet, is it not?
Anyhow this is how I was/am using these terms; FoS->HoS->SCUM.
That said, I voted for who I thought was clearly scum: VE and gambit
I will agree with you in that I did not clearly provide my reasoning with my vote declaration post for VE, but I assure you I was not mindlessly sheeping regardless of how silly my reasoning sounds now. At the time, as with 13 other voters, it seemed to be the right thing to do, and I think I have put more effort into explaining my vote than half of them.
On June 06 2012 08:07 marvellosity wrote:
This post is obviously the big one. It just screams scum. Don't vote for VE! Wiggles is more likely scum, vote for him! Except I will vote for VE! The reason he's voting for VE? The plan to confirm his vig shot is flawed. Well where the fuck does that say VE is scum? It just doesn't. As far as single condemning posts go, this one is pretty high up the list.
This post is obviously the big one. It just screams scum. Don't vote for VE! Wiggles is more likely scum, vote for him! Except I will vote for VE! The reason he's voting for VE? The plan to confirm his vig shot is flawed. Well where the fuck does that say VE is scum? It just doesn't. As far as single condemning posts go, this one is pretty high up the list.
This quote was a response to grush's list of scum, and his vote for VE after that post. VE wasn't in his list of scum(which included the likes of Mr Wiggles and myself)->Grush didn't provide reasoning for VE->I call him out/Grush switch votes to kita.
I also explained it here:
+ Show Spoiler +
On June 01 2012 06:19 papapanda wrote:
Not in particular, I want him to vote for someone who he thinks is scum from his list of read.
And he voted kita so nevermind i guess, just saying that voting for someone who you don't think is scum doesn't make much sense.
Not in particular, I want him to vote for someone who he thinks is scum from his list of read.
And he voted kita so nevermind i guess, just saying that voting for someone who you don't think is scum doesn't make much sense.
On June 06 2012 08:07 marvellosity wrote:
Conclusion: wishy washy
Terrible, terrible vote and subsequent explanation on VE (main point!)
less contributory than as town in LIV
Scum.
Conclusion: wishy washy
Terrible, terrible vote and subsequent explanation on VE (main point!)
less contributory than as town in LIV
Scum.
Regarding Zealous, he was targeted mainly for his useless post and lurking status, so I suggested Hyaach because at the time he was basically the same at zealous but had other posts that suggested scum.
With his recent posts, I am willing to have a further look into hyaach, and just off the top of my head he certainly is playing more town now, but I will take another look at him.
Regarding current vote:
Consider my vote on kita right now. I like the plan to switch to votes mana if no other medic claim.
