EPTSurprisingly Normal Mini Mafia XI - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
WhySoMuch
132 Posts
| ||
|
yomi
United States773 Posts
werewolves are gay | ||
|
yomi
United States773 Posts
| ||
|
WhySoMuch
132 Posts
On April 26 2012 22:51 The_Zen_Man wrote: Hey guys! This is my first game of maifa, but i have been following other games a bit. I also think that the "no lynch" option could prove useful early in the game to avoid misslynch. The other game i was following misslynched on the first day simply because they didn't have enough information. Someone already pointed this out and I've already stated my position but I'd like to take it a step further, I find this post very wolfy, more so than Varient or however you spell his name who said the same thing essentially, because you aren't thinking deeper. You say in the other game they mislynched on the first day because they didn't have enough information, but how do we expect to gain information if we "No Lynch"? Day 2 will essentially be a repeat of day 1. Also, Voting early and often leads to profit, ##VOTE: The_Zen_Man hope i did that right | ||
|
WhySoMuch
132 Posts
On April 27 2012 10:33 yomi wrote: vote## whysomuch werewolves are gay Okay. How do you quote more than 1 person though? | ||
|
WhySoMuch
132 Posts
On April 27 2012 02:51 yomi wrote: you are for lynching on day 1 you need to be about 50% sure for it to be profitable in the long run. so we should probably do it, but you just have to wait and see. right now obviously I'm not 50% sure on anyone. I don't know where you got these percentages from. But they are not correct. | ||
|
WhySoMuch
132 Posts
| ||
|
yomi
United States773 Posts
| ||
|
WhySoMuch
132 Posts
On April 27 2012 11:09 yomi wrote: what are the correct percentages No idea. But if Village correctly lynches 50% of the time, they win 100% of the time. Its closer to 33% and that's over the entire game and the chances gradually increase as the game goes on of lynching a villager. | ||
|
yomi
United States773 Posts
night 1 lose town day 2 lynch mafia night 2 lose town day 3 lynch town night 3 lose town day 4 lynch mafia night 4 lose town and now we have 1 mafia vs 3 town players day 5 lynch town, leaving 2 remaining night 5 town dies 1v1 mafia wins GG so by town wins 100% do you mean not 100%? This is the most obvious example possible and only relies on town losing the first 50/50 flip and not hitting any major power roles to create a loss scenario. | ||
|
WhySoMuch
132 Posts
On April 27 2012 11:19 yomi wrote: day 1 lynch town night 1 lose town day 2 lynch mafia night 2 lose town day 3 lynch town night 3 lose town day 4 lynch mafia night 4 lose town and now we have 1 mafia vs 3 town players day 5 lynch town, leaving 2 remaining night 5 town dies 1v1 mafia wins GG so by town wins 100% do you mean not 100%? This is the most obvious example possible and only relies on town losing the first 50/50 flip and not hitting any major power roles to create a loss scenario. I've never heard of a 12er. but in your example your point is proven But your chances of hitting a wolf increase as you go, there's no way in order to break even you need to hit a wolf 50% day 1 | ||
|
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
| ||
|
yomi
United States773 Posts
why are you voting for me? | ||
|
nreekay324
46 Posts
##vote: whysomuch | ||
|
yomi
United States773 Posts
| ||
|
WhySoMuch
132 Posts
| ||
|
O.Golden_ne
Australia204 Posts
I'm going to give my opinion on the recent voting events. My initial opinion on a first day lynch was that it was a bad idea to avoid a lynch for the sake of being scared of a mis-lynch. This opinion still stands, however i feel that with such little posting from everyone its very hard to get a good read on anyone making it very easy to mafia to twist the voting without seeming suspicious. I would postulate to everyone who hasn't voted yet to hold off until closer to the deadline and let everyone who has voted thoroughly explain themselves. I'm not against anyone's votes yet, however i am against voting without any obvious critical analysis out in the open. I want to see where you're coming from. Please show me. When i open filters, for example nreekay's; I see very little posting or speculating and then the start of a bandwagon against Whysomuch. I've seen yomi's play before and i understand he likes to be aggressive, and i like his aggression.. i just hope it isn't misplaced aggression and i want him to explain to me why he has picked WhySoMuch other than for his pro-first-day-lynch attitude and his contrary views on the percentages of lynching. i think you have to pick your battles and maybe lynching people with opposing views might not be the key, opposing views lead to discussion, which leads to correct eviction. @Jailbreaker - why the vote for yomi? please explain. @yomi - can you explain to me your position on whysomuch @nreekay - you have confused me greatly with such an unreasoned vote, please explain @whysomuch - i understand your suspicion for the_zen_man, but do you think it is grounds for a lynching? how strongly do you feel he is mafia? @the_zen_man - please rebut to why_so_much not with a vote but with a clear explanation of your innocence and your views on the people voting for whysomuch. Golden | ||
|
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
I voted for you because: On April 27 2012 00:04 yomi wrote: hi lets all be best friends and work together to solve the puzzle! and On April 27 2012 13:16 WhySoMuch wrote: nreekay's vote on me is weirder than yomi with all the hate on whysomuch, i think we need to look into other players as well? | ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
mind the bold, colon, and space before the name. | ||
|
Jailbreaker
United States62 Posts
Bold: check Colon: check Space: check User: check | ||
| ||
