TL Mafia 'Area' LIII - Page 37

On April 23 2012 08:03 layabout wrote:

I think he was co-hosting that game

Gonna go sleep.

If you are afraid of killing VE then kill BM, neither of them care about the game anyway.

On April 23 2012 08:03 layabout wrote:

I think he was co-hosting that game

Gonna go sleep.

If you are afraid of killing VE then kill BM, neither of them care about the game anyway.

On April 23 2012 07:59 BlazingJitsu wrote:


This is a fair point. I'll do my best to consolidate replies and posts and increase the legibility of this thread. I can get a bit out of hand at times.

Regarding what could convince I was wrong about Marv: at this point, very little. If you take a look at Marv's development as a player, in the past few hours he's been posting like a regular guy, an acceptable contributor-- everything seems normal. if he had been posting like this all game, I wouldn't be on his ass like this. But at the beginning, at the time of my first case, he was super scummy-- posting several times and saying nothing. my initial case was to pressure him. He responded by trying to appear active, but still being worthless. i kept on pushing, and bit by bit he stepped up his game. Only with enormous pressure was I able to make him contribute. If he had become useful after my initial pressure, that would have been fine-- but his continued attempts to lurk were scummy.

At this point, I am convinced Marv is scum and I will likely not be unconvinced unless something amazing happens. I will consider lynching someone else who is scum in an attempt to avoid mislynch, but voting Marv and getting him lynched is priority #1 for me.

On April 23 2012 08:06 marvellosity wrote:


Alrighty, I'm done being angry with you. I would love for you to consider scenario 2 though, which I did try to explain at some point:

I sadly have a social life, and my original one-liners were due to not having the required time to make a thorough analysis of what's at hand. Last night I was playing mafia and not socialising as much as I could have because actually I'd rather not get lynched for something so silly. Now the game has got rolling, I'm back home, I have more to comment on and say, and as you say, this is more 'normal'.

Long story short - I didn't have much time and posted a couple of one-liners (obviously i should have just posted nothing). Now I have more time I am posting more sensibly and it is more thought out.

It was not 'your pressure' that made me contribute, it's the fact that I spent time I previously did not to try to contribute.

Please consider this instead of just a dismissive wave of the hand where everything I do simply confirms the previous thing. Because that's just not good logical thinking.

On April 23 2012 08:15 marvellosity wrote:
Gonna ask again, why is giving up a valid town defence?

On April 23 2012 08:15 Mementoss wrote:
The fact that people that haven't contributed ANYTHING to this game. BM and Zephridd are just stopping by and like SUP? Ima last minute vote VE he is scummmmmmm. Then Zephridd was like wait, I fucked up that last minute part we actually had an hour LOL gg.

On April 23 2012 08:18 Mementoss wrote:


It's not but does disagreeing to directing blues, a day 1 blue claim, and ragequitting, give you enough confidence that he is scum, to go about lynching our possible JK, when there are other scummy suspects?

Also BJ, I don't think the marv is gunna happen at this point TBH. The fact that he took his vote off VE, his main competition for getting lynched makes me think he is indeed looking out for the towns interests. (unless you think VE and marv is scum which I doubt)