| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
This game will be remembered. Your part in it remembered... I claimed D2 because I'm done defending myself when I should be killing the scum I've ALREADY found and continue to find the scum until we win. In case you didn't notice, scum fucking REAMED us N1, and we reamed ourselves more than likely. And your stubborn unwillingness to read the fucking thread is going to be LEGENDARY. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 12 2012 04:08 VisceraEyes wrote: I have no idea what my sanity is. I'm independently suspicious of Toad, the check only confirms it for me. Obviously when Toad flips we'll know what my sanity is, but I think he'll flip scum and therefor I predict my sanity will come back sane given the information I have now. Everyone go back and READ TOAD'S POST. Then, please. I'm begging you. READ MY RESPONSE. Please do so. I'll wait. The check confirms nothing, jesus. There are only two sanities where the read comes back different depending on the alignment of who you are checking. If toad is guilty - as sane cop, he reads guilty. As insane cop, he reads innocent. Vice versa is true if toad is innocent. | ||
|
Katina
United States454 Posts
On April 12 2012 03:53 gonzaw wrote: So, FourFace nor BH have posted at all this D2, let that be noted. Wherebugsgo is awefully silent since the beginning of D2, nor commented on what people think about him at all. I'd like Adam to weight his opinion more, he hasn't spoken too much since D2 started. Of course Katina has just barely posted and hasn't posted any reasonings at all, same with Kenpachi. Grack has not posted any thoughts regarding Toad nor VE, the ONLY thing he posted since the beginning of D2 was that mafia could have a vig and speculated about the night kills, nothing else. Let this be noted for the future when we try to analyse this day. So far, these 7 players are all flying under the radar and not being active or participating in the discussion at all, or just plain inactive. ET, I'd like your thoughts on this whole issue. Not just what you think about VE or Toad, about the town atmosphere, what's going on in the thread, about how many lurkers are doing nothing this day (for instance the ones I just mentioned), etc. Mods, could you add Nisani's, prpr's and mavellosity's filters to the OP? I have stated my reasons for wanting to kill Toad day1 take a look at my filter. Everyone has basically been saying everything for me today. If there's something you want me to give then please feel free to ask. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25555 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On April 12 2012 04:14 Jitsu wrote: Because of the way you worded your response to me. The middle part begged for me to ask, since I read it as you implying that you think he's actually a DT, but are unsure of his sanity. I made a little change to my orignial posts. Only [b] and [big] tags. nothing else. Read it again and tell me again how could you think so | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I have faith. | ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
On April 12 2012 04:11 wherebugsgo wrote: HAHAHAH I was thinking the exact same things as you :D Kill VE; no DT would claim D2 with a red check and claim he's "probably" sane because there's no way for any DT to know his own sanity before he gets 2-3 checks on FLIPPED players back. In other words if he were actually a DT the likelihood of him having an incorrect check on Toad is astronomical. If toad is actually green it could mean paranoia, framer, insanity, miller; four things a town DT would consider before claiming he is "probably" sane. I just finished reading the entire block of 10 or so pages but honestly VE's reactions to everything have made this really easy. Hells YEAH. Probably the best player in this game agrees with me. Come on bitches (Mementoss, and marvellosity) nitpick on him as well, I dare you, you no good bastards! Thank god there is a sane voice in this crowd, because playing with the likes of those two make me want to tear my eyes out. Instead of focusing all you do is nitpick and post fluff. Telling people what not to do, instead of actually contributing. Thats it /end rant. WBG made my day! | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 12 2012 04:17 VisceraEyes wrote: This isn't over. There are still thinkers in the thread. People willing to read the thread and see the truth. I have faith. On April 12 2012 04:17 marvellosity wrote: EBWOP: the point I'm making is, toad has NO MORE CHANCE of returning a guilty check just because he is guilty. Think about it. Your claim on toad here is destroyed by the above fact. Respond please. | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On April 12 2012 04:16 marvellosity wrote: The check confirms nothing, jesus. There are only two sanities where the read comes back different depending on the alignment of who you are checking. If toad is guilty - as sane cop, he reads guilty. As insane cop, he reads innocent. Vice versa is true if toad is innocent. medal #3,5 going out right now. You got ninjaed by me as I said the same thing + Show Spoiler [clicky] + On April 12 2012 04:13 Toadesstern wrote: COME ON. You're telling me I'm unreasonable assuming Jackal got single-shot but you're saying that? You're telling me I am suspicious for saying I am confirmed and there's nothing confrimed in here when you're calling a 33% to have a right check "confirmed"? get ouf of here but I still like people repeating (no idea if you saw that) good stuff in a thread with gonzaw and VE going crazy. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25555 Posts
On April 12 2012 04:18 Tunkeg wrote: Hells YEAH. Probably the best player in this game agrees with me. Come on bitches (Mementoss, and marvellosity) nitpick on him as well, I dare you, you no good bastards! Thank god there is a sane voice in this crowd, because playing with the likes of those two make me want to tear my eyes out. Instead of focusing all you do is nitpick and post fluff. Telling people what not to do, instead of actually contributing. Thats it /end rant. WBG made my day! I must say I was not a huge WBG fan until that post. I'm still not a huge WBG fan. But now I am also not a fan of VE, or Jitsu. So fun times all around. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25555 Posts
On April 12 2012 04:21 Kenpachi wrote: Can i also get the one who accused Sputnik Theory first? id like to call him out That's me! | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25555 Posts
I get started right around here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=325046¤tpage=18#348 enjoy | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
I never actually agreed with Toad's case or his reasoning. I thought VE was scum for independent reasons and simply told Toad that I thought he was correct. No doubt Toad's case is bad; the reason it's bad is because Toad wasn't thinking when he wrote it. It's the same reason his gonzaw "case" is bad. And, in fact, I would venture to say that Toad is completely and utterly wrong about gonzaw. On day 1 I was curious as to why VE was buddying me, but decided that, since I couldn't read him well at the time, I'd assume he was town and try to get a case on a scummy person going and see if he would follow. I knew that wouldn't help unless the guy actually flipped scum, but it was something. Even into the night I really didn't see any reason for VE to be scum, which is why I defended him against what midnightgladius was saying. When I went back and reread after those five players flipped (but not Jackal) I realized somewhere along the line I made an egregious error that probably made scum comfortable with leaving me alive. At the same time VE was alive too, which was somewhat perplexing. When I went back on VE's posts I noticed he never actually had reasons for calling people scum. So, I chose to test it out and ask him why he was suspicious of Toad. His response had no reason in it , and was a post no townie VE would ever make. Since then he's been overreacting to a purportedly weak case, which if I were presented I would simply ignore. As town if there's a weak case represented against you usually you just refute it simply and move on to actual scumhunting. VE has destroyed the thread in the meantime with his walls of text, making discussion nearly impossible. This is like the battle of the self-centered guys in VE and Toad; VE because he's rolled scum and wants desperately to live, and Toad because he's Toad. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25555 Posts
On April 12 2012 04:25 Kenpachi wrote: you fool ah yes how could I possibly call out a paragon of towniness like S.T. Oh how useful he was. it should have been clear he was town d1 oh no wait that's all wrong, just like you are | ||
|
FourFace
701 Posts
On April 12 2012 04:21 Kenpachi wrote: Can i also get the one who accused Sputnik Theory first? id like to call him out That would be me.. I'm open for questioning and will answer to the best of my ability without emotional interference. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
johnnywup,Katina, Zealos, Blazinghand, Toadesstern, Jitsu Fuck yeah, let's do this. | ||
| ||
|
|
StarCraft2.fi
PiGosaur Monday
Wardi Open
StarCraft2.fi
Replay Cast
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
SC Evo League
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
