|
Voting rules:
1. Voting is done in a separate thread, located here. Please keep votes there, and only vote there. Do not PM me your vote.
2. Please vote in the following format: ##Vote Qatol. Votes not done in the correct fashion will not be counted. I will update vote counts whenever I get the chance.
3. No conditional voting.
4. You may vote for yourself. You may not vote for anyone dead or outside the game.
5. In the event of a tie the person with the most votes first wins (or loses).
6. Voting is mandatory. You may (NOT) abstain.
Its in the OP.
Player with the most votes gets lynched, 5. In the event of a tie the person with the most votes first wins (or loses).
|
It's sandro here. Good point, just looked at his filter and evantrees is a nice lynch too. However layabout is recieving some resistance with no good reason, which entices me even more to get him lynched. I'll leave it up to you guys, but I wouldn't mind lynching evantrees either.
|
##vote Alderan
I don't think he really thinks i am scum
|
I am part of the push back on layabout. While he is not pushing his reads in a manner I particularly like, I agree with 2 (3ish) of the people he has labeled as scum (xatalos, evantrees and alderan). I don't agree with him that we should be lynching ald today because he has not been as scummy as evantrees (or xatalos for that matter). I would like alderan to start posting a lot more otherwise I will head the charge for his lynch in the upcoming days.
|
EBWOP: i meant to add in that i don't like lynching someone that i agree with that heavily day 1. i would like to see more from layabout
|
Gwaaaach, I hate making sense of the voting thread. If I count from VE's post onward, I think I come up with the following count. Counting votes fucking sucks, but I need to know.
Alderan: Greymist (1)
Acrofales: Risen (1)
Mattchew: Evantrees, MrZentor, Acrofales (3)
Gumshoe: Xatalos (1)
Greymist: Oberyn (1)
Risk.nuke: Chaoser (1)
SLJ: ON (1)
Layabout: Alderan, Gumshoe, SLJ (3)
Alderan: DYH (1)
Oberyn: Greymist, Mattchew, Zealos, DYH (4)
DYH: WBG (1)
Which basically means you all suck. It is not only spread out, but the only guy with a majority is not Mattchew, Gumshoe, or Zealos. The three people who have by far the most points in my scumometer. /smacks scumometer. Nope. still gives the same read.
I'm not sure how this normally works, but if the idea is to kill Oberyn based on a vote that is all over the map, it seems fucked up. Can Greymist, Matt, Zealos or DYH please post a decent case on why the hell we should vote Oberyn since his latest post? It seems like a fucked up Mafia bandwagon to me.
|
EBWOP: specially with both Matt (imho scum) and Zealos (seriously suspicious) on the bandwagon.
|
On March 24 2012 04:59 Mattchew wrote:
EBWOP: i meant to add in that i don't like lynching someone that i agree with that heavily day 1. i would like to see more from layabout
So would i but i need to clear my head first.
|
On March 24 2012 05:01 Acrofales wrote:
EBWOP: specially with both Matt (imho scum) and Zealos (seriously suspicious) on the bandwagon.
i am voting evantrees read the thread before you call the entire game stupid
|
Also, Oberyn is one of the worst candidates right now, lynching him would be terrible.
|
On March 24 2012 05:02 layabout wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2012 04:59 Mattchew wrote:
EBWOP: i meant to add in that i don't like lynching someone that i agree with that heavily day 1. i would like to see more from layabout So would i but i need to clear my head first.
Lol, join the club. Btw, you all suck and my gf is telling me to do the shopping. Be back in a while.
|
WTF, I hate counting votes. I thought I was meticulous, but I wasn't. In that case ignore my analysis, except that Oberyn is a terrible vote. Take it from me.
|
On March 23 2012 15:50 Sinensis wrote:
I need to get to work pretty much as soon as I wake up tomorrow so I want to at the very least get my vote for today in now.
Xatalos come back, I insist. I don't care if you just paraphrase some more obvious facts with the occasional smiley, I would really like to see you post more, and I would also like you to answer my question of "How many games of mafia have you played?"
evantrees why do you think Mattchew is scum? Because you haven't said why yet.
While I'm at it, MrZentor, I hope you'll forgive me being on your back when no one else seems suspicious of you... but why are you voting for Mattchew?
This is the second time you either misinterpreted my entire post or skipped it. It makes me sad. Please try harder to read. 
On March 22 2012 05:32 MrZentor wrote:Hello people of Mafia! It is I, MrZentor! Anyways, I thought this started a day after it did, so I am a little late to the party. Let me tell everybody my opinion, so you can get a good read on me! First we have Acrofales overreacting to a vote that didn't have a basis. Show nested quote +On March 21 2012 22:54 Acrofales wrote:
Okay seriously WTF. I know I'm new to this game, but voting me for that reason alone makes no sense. In fact, it seems quite a scum move to cast suspicion on people right at the start of the game.
Or am I going overboard and it's just a way of getting people to post at the start of the game? Either way, I'm watching you and risk.nuke. Voting off the bat seems fishy. He then votes for Mattchew. Show nested quote +On March 22 2012 00:04 Acrofales wrote:
Hodor's terribly talkative all of a sudden.
Luckily I have better sources than that. The Ghost of High Heart told me that you are scum.
##vote: Mattchew Lyter defends Acrofales. Show nested quote +On March 22 2012 02:15 Lyter wrote:
I'd say ignore wbg at least for now, we have absolutely no idea what his motives/intentions could be, when more of a picture is formed then we should come back to it by all means.
I'm not sure on Acrofales, yea he could be flipping a shit cos he got called out so early, but his actions are hardly unlikely for a new guy anyway. Then Mattchew, bad spelling in hand, attacks Lyter for defending Acrofales Show nested quote +On March 22 2012 02:21 Mattchew wrote:On March 22 2012 02:15 Lyter wrote:
I'd say ignore wbg at least for now, we have absolutely no idea what his motives/intentions could be, when more of a picture is formed then we should come back to it by all means.
I'm not sure on Acrofales, yea he could be flipping a shit cos he got called out so early, but his actions are hardly unlikely for a new guy anyway. oh so your his scum teammate? I really don't like that Mattchew attacks Lyter for defending Acrofales, who I think at this point is innocent. It also seems silly that Mattchew is 100% positive that Acrofales is innocent over one nooby overreaction. If you look at Mattchew's filter, you will see he only said something slightly helpful when he was asked to; everything else is just him attacking other people without any real reason.
For now, I think he is most likely to be scum.
On March 23 2012 05:46 MrZentor wrote:Show nested quote +On March 22 2012 19:08 Sinensis wrote:Finger of Suspicion at MrZentor. One of the first things he said in his first post is this: Let me tell everybody my opinion, so you can get a good read on me! And something about it just doesn't sit well with me. It's as if he's defending himself before he's even said anything yet. He goes on to attack Acrofales who is nothing but pure lynch bait so far in my eyes. In he second post he says this: Gumshoe skips the day post, says we should talk about policy, doesn't discuss policy, asks some questions, and then accuses the person who is easiest to attack, Acrofales.
My guess as to why he skipped the day post is that he got a powerful role(blue or scum) and was excited to use it. He is either a lazy townsperson with a powerful role or scum. Overall, I think he seems a little less scummy than Mattchew. I'll point out below, Gumshoe does in fact discuss policy. Oberyn, who I also still have a big Finger of Suspicion at went after gumshoe for the same baseless claim. MrZentor's theory about gumshoe getting a blue role and being "excited to use it" (wtf?) is stupid. On March 22 2012 01:50 gumshoe wrote:On March 22 2012 01:35 SamuelLJackson wrote:On March 22 2012 01:20 GreYMisT wrote:
Guys I say we lynch Wherebugsgo, just to be certain.
Sand/Syllo can you guys sign you posts? It makes it a lot easier for the rest of us to keep track of who thinks what.
Xatalos, I'm interested on what you think about Wherebugsgo/littlefinger. How do you think we should go about interacting with him now that we know he is 3rd party?
Also i would like to assure everyone that even though I am hosting Aperture Mafia, the science will not keep me from being active here. What part of MODCONFIRMED UNLYNCHABLE/UNKILLABLE do you not understand? Next person that discusses wbg or engages in any useless conversation with him get's my vote. Consider it like he is not even playing in this game. /sandroba Thank you Jackson ( : but keep in mind it is possible(though unlikely considering scums hate for flashy play early on) that Where is scum, we shouldnt just take his word for anything but I agree talking about Baelish is pointless and benefits scum the most. For now we can just ignore Where as if he was just a dumb poster. moving on lets discuss policy(it'll only take a bit and we may as well get it over with early on) do we set a preliminary lynch deadline? (im leaning 8 hours in advance if we do) Do we policy lynch hardcore lurkers?( by hardcore I mean like 3 one liners a cycle, personally for this because lynching lurkers always helps clear the air a bit and they werent helping anyway so nothing really lost) are we going to elect a mayor?( I've never done this before so I dont know how that works) After that he gets into his pointless little tiff with Mattchew. That makes him three for three going after the posters that were the most lynch-bait-y-est early on. I have so many problems with you and this post that I will make a list about them! YEAH! 1. I always like to start the beginning of my first post with a little joke. That was it. 2. You say I attack Acrofales. The only place at which it may seem that I am attacking him is the beginning of my first post. Did you not read the rest of the post, the post where DoYouHas asks me why I think he is innocent, or the giant post after that in which I discuss why I think Acrofales is innocent? 3. You say I attack the three posters that were most lynch-bait-y-est early on. a. I didn't attack Acrofales. b. I basically started the case against Mattchew. The only person who accused him with evidence before was Acrofales, and everybody at the time just ignored him because they assumed he was a nooby mafia. c. I agree with nearly everybody that gumshoe looks scummy. In summary, you need to actually read the thread before going out and accusing people. Thanks! Show nested quote +On March 22 2012 10:39 GreYMisT wrote:On March 22 2012 09:41 MrZentor wrote:On March 22 2012 09:36 wherebugsgo wrote:On March 22 2012 09:35 MrZentor wrote:On March 22 2012 09:33 wherebugsgo wrote:
I'm fine with killing GreYMisT.
I'm also fine with killing DoYouHas. Let's kill them all! Would you like to kill me? I dunno, do you want me to kill you? I don't care if I die or not. I just want to know what you prefer. Why do you care what he prefers? and why would you just ask the unkillable 3rd party randomly if he would like to kill you? There is plenty to talk about now, its beginning to look like you are just communicated for the sake of increasing your filter. I am interesting in how he wins, so we can know how pure his motives are. I know he can't explicitly state it, but we can get an idea. If you talk just to fill your filter, you say a bunch of useless stuff and everybody assumes everything you say is just filler and never actually thinks about what said. Why would I want that? Why would I want to be like Mattchew? That is all.
I say all these things, start the case against Mattchew, and you ask why I vote for him.
*facepalm*
|
On March 24 2012 04:43 Acrofales wrote:
So what's the vote rule anyway? Does it have to be an absolute majority? Or is it just whoever has the most votes? I can't find it in the Rules section
On March 24 2012 05:00 Acrofales wrote:
Gwaaaach, I hate making sense of the voting thread. If I count from VE's post onward, I think I come up with the following count. Counting votes fucking sucks, but I need to know.
Alderan: Greymist (1)
Acrofales: Risen (1)
Mattchew: Evantrees, MrZentor, Acrofales (3)
Gumshoe: Xatalos (1)
Greymist: Oberyn (1)
Risk.nuke: Chaoser (1)
SLJ: ON (1)
Layabout: Alderan, Gumshoe, SLJ (3)
Alderan: DYH (1)
Oberyn: Greymist, Mattchew, Zealos, DYH (4)
DYH: WBG (1)
Which basically means you all suck. It is not only spread out, but the only guy with a majority is not Mattchew, Gumshoe, or Zealos. The three people who have by far the most points in my scumometer. /smacks scumometer. Nope. still gives the same read.
I'm not sure how this normally works, but if the idea is to kill Oberyn based on a vote that is all over the map, it seems fucked up. Can Greymist, Matt, Zealos or DYH please post a decent case on why the hell we should vote Oberyn since his latest post? It seems like a fucked up Mafia bandwagon to me.
On March 24 2012 05:04 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 24 2012 05:02 layabout wrote:On March 24 2012 04:59 Mattchew wrote:
EBWOP: i meant to add in that i don't like lynching someone that i agree with that heavily day 1. i would like to see more from layabout So would i but i need to clear my head first. Lol, join the club. Btw, you all suck and my gf is telling me to do the shopping. Be back in a while.
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/il7Yt.jpg)
|
On March 24 2012 04:45 SamuelLJackson wrote:
It's sandro here. Good point, just looked at his filter and evantrees is a nice lynch too. However layabout is recieving some resistance with no good reason, which entices me even more to get him lynched. I'll leave it up to you guys, but I wouldn't mind lynching evantrees either.
Seems to me that you're not interested in taking much responsibility for this lynch,
|
I'm not, I'm not confident in my scum reads at this point.
|
Acro is correct about one thing, our voting situation is a mess and we are about to be in a time crunch. Especially since there is a good amount of content out there right now I see no reason why we should no-lynch. Some people are going to have to swallow their pride in order to make this lynch happen. I hope I am not one of those people because I believe Alderan to be a good lynch for today. But even I am starting to consider my second and third options. I suggest that everyone does the same, and quickly. If there is no bandwagon strong enough to carry a lynch today, we are going to have to accomplish one with compromise.
|
On March 24 2012 04:39 Acrofales wrote:
WTF Lyter. He drops in 4 hours before the vote to give us his expert opinion after like 2 days of absense. /bow down to master lurker.
Well its certainly no expert opinion so i doubt its worth much to the rest of you, you make it sound like you'd rather see me say nothing at all lol
Initially I was pretty set on Mattchew, because he gave off an impression of general disruptiveness and just being a damn pain, but the more I think about it, I think he was just attempting to get reactions. Like when he called me out really early on for defending acrofales, I don't really see a case for doing that if he is mafia, the only reaction worth anything to anyone at that point is an overreaction from me in response, because then at least there is something to read, and isn't useful to scum imo, because they want to get the problematic people killed.
I'm far from set on anyone being scum at the moment, but I feel the person who I'm gonna vote for is SLJ, I think having 2 people share an account is dumb as fuck, people write differently and think differently and it makes it really difficult for everyone I think as a basis. Also he seems really wishy washy in his posts, though whether that is down to the whole 2 person thing or because he wants shift attention around I'm not sure.
|
I'm in a state of shock that with acro's horrible play he isn't the number one target right now...
|
On March 24 2012 05:44 Risen wrote:
I'm in a state of shock that with acro's horrible play he isn't the number one target right now...
Please, be so kind to point out to me what in acro's play that makes him scum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
