|
On March 20 2012 02:25 VisceraEyes wrote:
What has changed between last night when you said Snarfs is "the most suspicious of the semi-lurkers" and now when TIPD is "the most suspicious of the semi-lurkers"? I didn't say last night that Snarfs is "the most suspicious". Last night I felt the 3 were essentially equal and I picked Snarfs to vote for randomly. As you can see if you go read my filter.
|
On March 20 2012 02:22 Tobon wrote:
Morning, all. I am reading TIPD scummiest of the three (TIPD/Snarfs/Dirkzor) semi-lurkers so far, because he's attempted to look the most involved while also contributing the least. And if you guys do end up lynching me today, and I flip town, be sure to notice how both TIPD and Snarfs are band wagoning to get it done.
Dude, you're all over the place.
On March 19 2012 10:12 Tobon wrote:
oh yeah, boldness:
##vote Jackal58
On March 19 2012 14:12 Tobon wrote:
EBWOP:
##unvote
##Vote: Snarfs
and really not giving much to back up your claims. You have some little "oh this is scummy, that is scummy" fluff, but nothing really very compelling.
|
True story...but has something changed to make yo go from "they're equal" to "nvm, TIPD is most suspicious"?
|
Just a little more thought and review. And yeah, jcarlson, if I had anything more compelling, I'd share it.
|
I changed my mind about xsksc and I'm willing to give jackal time to step up. However Snarfs dude needs to die. I played last game as scum with him as town and he went around questioning people and trying to find scum, which is not what he is doing right now. His post on nemesis is pretty retarded and now his switch to tobon does not feel genuine at all and it seems he is just trying to get his vote somewhere and try to rise the minimum amount of suspicion.
Remember people, the ones that we are really looking after are people that are actively avoiding to say anything that could be considered scummy, trying to blend in and hide, while not actually doing anything thing useful and that's what can be observed about Snarfs posting.
##Unvote
##Vote: Snarfs
|
On March 20 2012 02:22 Tobon wrote:
Morning, all. I am reading TIPD scummiest of the three (TIPD/Snarfs/Dirkzor) semi-lurkers so far, because he's attempted to look the most involved while also contributing the least. And if you guys do end up lynching me today, and I flip town, be sure to notice how both TIPD and Snarfs are band wagoning to get it done.
I love the irony in that last sentence. Weren't you the guy who, in one of his very first posts, said he would be happy to band wagon anybody in order to ensure a lynch?
Besides, I said in my post why I was voting for you. In order to reach a majority lynch, people need to "band [wagon] to get it done". I don't think there is anything wrong in lynching someone who a large portion of the town feels could be scum and whose only saving factor right now is the fact that they're a new player. If we don't lynch you today, then you'll just take up more of the conversation in the coming days when we could be trying to find more scum.
It's the same problem with people like Bluelightz, except for you, there is no past history to gather. If Bluelightz had no past posting history (and he wasn't working with layabout), I would want to lynch him just to clear up the town atmosphere.
While I agree that this is not the only reason to lynch somebody, I think you're yet to contribute much besides pointing your finger at whoever might be an easy target. While I can't say that I've exactly contributed a ton, I wasn't even around. You've been around and not contributing.
|
Nah snarfs you just want to get rid of your vote on some random townie.
|
I'm with sandroba on this vote. Snarfs' post on Nemesis was pretty pitiful (I missed it the first time around).
In every one of your accusation posts, it really feels like you're reaching, just trying to make something to shed guilt.
##vote Snarfs
|
What game was that Sandroba? If that's legit, I'm down with a Snarfs lynch.
|
Tobon, TIPD is not bandwagoning. Bluelightz thought you were scummy after two posts, i asked him to wait a little since you had mostly been joking around (and that is what i usually do day1) before trying to reach a conclusion.
Oh and snarfs, bluelightz basically won purgatory mafia for town, so less of this "lets lynch him to clear the town atmoshpere and give scum a free nightkill."
+Slo0sh VE was an sk in storm so it is not a great example of his town play.
/laya
|
|
|
On March 20 2012 02:05 Snarfs wrote:
First off, I don't think Nemesis is going down today, and I liked how collected he was in responding to my vote so that's off. He didn't get overly emotional or respond irrationally, which is what I would have expected from scum in his position.
##Unvote Nemesis
I liked Nemesis and Probulous's votes on VE. I think since thoses votes we've seen a bit better VE.
Mentions that Nemesis lynch is unviable for today in his explanation of unvote and in the same sentence says that he likes Nemesis' response and vote on VE (from which I infer he is leaning town read?). You can unvote someone because you now think they are town or if you want to avoid no-lynch and vote another mafia but I don't see how you can do both.
Plus town Sandroba is boss.
##Unvote: xsksc
##Vote: Snarfs
Probulous can you weigh in on Snarfs' posting this game? I know you played with him in Wiggle's mini not too long ago as well.
|
Good catch sir.
##Vote: Snarfs
|
On March 20 2012 02:53 VisceraEyes wrote:
What game was that Sandroba? If that's legit, I'm down with a Snarfs lynch.
Yes please. I have never played with him before. Would like something to compare to.
|
On March 20 2012 02:56 Toad_in_Pink_Dress wrote:
+Slo0sh VE was an sk in storm so it is not a great example of his town play.
I don't understand this statement. Are you confusing me with someone else?
|
On March 20 2012 02:37 sandroba wrote:
I changed my mind about xsksc and I'm willing to give jackal time to step up. However Snarfs dude needs to die. I played last game as scum with him as town and he went around questioning people and trying to find scum, which is not what he is doing right now. His post on nemesis is pretty retarded and now his switch to tobon does not feel genuine at all and it seems he is just trying to get his vote somewhere and try to rise the minimum amount of suspicion.
Remember people, the ones that we are really looking after are people that are actively avoiding to say anything that could be considered scummy, trying to blend in and hide, while not actually doing anything thing useful and that's what can be observed about Snarfs posting.
##Unvote
##Vote: Snarfs
Sigh, I'm sorry. I'm tired and am rushing things because deadline is in 4 hours. Another reason I'm suspicious of both johnny and Tobon, one which I alluded to earlier when I said that johnny's claim was off, is because they both claimed "Vanilla Town". I'm a "Vanilla Towny". See that? With a 'y' at the end? Why would they have a different title if they're actually townies? It looks like they were trying to match it up with the posts at the beginning of the thread, when that's not what the title that was sent out says.
|
Wow. Night and day.
##Unvote: Dirkzor
##Vote: Snarfs
|
On March 20 2012 02:37 sandroba wrote:
I changed my mind about xsksc
Could you explain your read on xsksc?
I want to improve my scum-hunting skills and I feel like I could learn much from you.
|
Are mafia given example PMs of town roles? Also are we allowed to talk about this or is this infraction of
rule 6. Posting or sharing any PM you receive from a host. ?
|
On March 20 2012 03:03 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2012 02:56 Toad_in_Pink_Dress wrote:
+Slo0sh VE was an sk in storm so it is not a great example of his town play.
I don't understand this statement. Are you confusing me with someone else?
I think it was nemesis that stated that VE was town (blue) in storm when he was infact the SK 3rd party.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
