Jayjay, will we know when the death will happen? Or can you not reveal that?
Aperture Mafia - Page 61
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Jayjay, will we know when the death will happen? Or can you not reveal that? | ||
Grackaroni
United States9835 Posts
On March 20 2012 09:12 blubbdavid wrote: From the OP. And now we have three times "burned to death"? hmm... I guess that means the same person killed all 3 of those guys. Nice Catch. | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On March 20 2012 09:14 Hassybaby wrote: Sooooo, are we gonna get role descriptions? Jayjay, will we know when the death will happen? Or can you not reveal that? Nope | ||
blubbdavid
Switzerland2412 Posts
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Janitor Most probably we have a janitor here. And thx JJ, this wiki is most helpful. ![]() | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
Jayjay54
Germany2296 Posts
On March 20 2012 09:14 Hassybaby wrote: Sooooo, are we gonna get role descriptions? Jayjay, will we know when the death will happen? Or can you not reveal that? I could, but I'd rather not. It's somewhere within the next two days. The good part is that the kill is completely independent on my role. I can be lynched, stabbed or squirreled, the kill will still occor. So, I'd say, we just treat Sinani as dead man walking and other than that, continue to play as we would have done otherwise. on a different note: Wheatley wants to kill Glados? Yea, that feels comforting. I say we leave Glados alive, so Wheatley doesn't get superpowers / mad. | ||
Jayjay54
Germany2296 Posts
On March 18 2012 03:23 Velinath wrote: @gonzaw I have a non town read on Kenpachi because he's been pushing this "vote GLaDOS" agenda so hard without giving any real justification other than "it gives me a superpower". He's even trying to manipulate Drazerk into going along with it - he even says he isn't necessarily going to get a majority day 1, which I think really shows the lack of faith that the town has in him in addition to his dedication to posting a personal agenda even against the general sentiment (so far) of the thread. On March 18 2012 07:41 Velinath wrote: Man, your credibility is already shot. Give us something more than this to explain why this is a good idea. ==> On March 20 2012 08:50 Velinath wrote: GLaDOS seems pretty sadistic from what I've seen so far in the day/nightposts. I don't see a way, even if Ken is third party, that killing her off would be bad for town. ##Vote: GLaDOS seems legit and has nothing to do with new information you got concerning your rule, right? @david: you're welcome bro <3 | ||
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=319120¤tpage=58#1143 As I said, I like reactions. You didn't react at all at that point. A lil' bit of extra pressure and you give a satisfactory reaction. You were, however, asking for vigi's to claim their vigi role and then claim their shots; if that isn't blue-fishing, idk what it is. Also, I'm surprised with the amount of deaths right on night 1, especially the abnormal amount of deaths with the same kill flavor. Somehow, these are all lurkers/undesirable players(based on day1/night1) for town, so I believe "burned to death" is a kill flavor of a town aligned KP. And I hate the fact that someone activated a flip-cleaner or something. I hate that a lot. Also, Wheatley asking GlaDOS to die puts me on the fence. Given the information so far, I don't think it's hard to believe that Kenpachi is actually one of the Drazerk-esque 3rd parties, and that his target is GlaDOS(just like it was Gandalf for Drazerk or w/e), and Wheatley would obviously benefit from a dead GlaDOS. So, with many lurkers shot over night, who do you think are valid lynch targets for today? IMO Kenpachi is a good choice atm. Earlier I thought that he was actually town, but he hasn't done anything useful but to ask for the GlaDOS snipe. | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Looks like tomorrow I'll be rereading all the remaining filters! The burned to death aspect is interesting though. | ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
| ||
MidnightGladius
China1214 Posts
The 3 "burned to death" deaths have a detail that seems unlikely to be coincidental: the three players are right next to each other on the player list. This sounds exactly like the RPG item described in the original "Blackaller Market," which leads me to a few conclusions: - "burned to death" is probably not the mafia kill flavor - The original target was Cyber_Cheese. Cwave and RayzorFlash were collateral damage - The mafia killed one of gonzaw, Blazinghand, or Foolishness. As gonzaw was obviously killed by KALTHAZAR, the mafia must have killed one of BH or Foolishness, and the other was more likely hit by 3rd party or a 2nd mafia KP than a town-aligned vigilante. Ultimately, I highly doubt that mafia has 3 KP right now. I don't want to kill GlaDOS. I think doing so would be an excruciatingly bad idea. I'm still not impressed with ghost's posting since after I noted him as lurking. He clearly didn't read properly about Kenpachi's campaign to kill GlaDOS, and he's only been making some general comments, without making any direct scum reads. That offer still stands, by the way. | ||
Velinath
United States694 Posts
On March 20 2012 09:27 Jayjay54 wrote: ==> seems legit and has nothing to do with new information you got concerning your rule, right? @david: you're welcome bro <3 And then a night post and a day post happened, and GLaDOS is acting just as sadistic as she did in Portal. It doesn't sound healthy. Plus, I can see "sent to android hell" being a GLaDOS kill flavor, and I had a town read on Foolishness. | ||
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
Android hell? Nope, that's not GlaDOS. | ||
Velinath
United States694 Posts
On March 20 2012 11:06 Zephirdd wrote: hmmm GlaDOS kill flavor would be something of the kind "killed during testing", "tore in thousands of pieces by turrets", "punished for jumping into toxic water" or simply "neurotoxined". Android hell? Nope, that's not GlaDOS. You don't think so? It was something that she threatened during Portal 1, as has been previously mentioned. I wouldn't immediately eliminate the possibility | ||
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
"Well done, android. The Enrichment Center once again reminds you that android hell is a real place where you will be sent at the first sign of defiance." is the full quote. | ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
Wheatley (in Portal 2) was a very lucky core. Theoretically, every core can replace GLaDOS. So, Wheatley has a chance to take over if GLaDOS dies, but all those other cores do too. I think that if Velinath won't necessarily turn evil, voting GLaDOS seems like a good idea. ##Vote: GLaDOS | ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
| ||