Storm Mafia - Page 4

On February 22 2012 16:56 wherebugsgo wrote:


did you just accuse me of tunneling chaoser?

LOL.

I guess you don't know what tunneling means. If you want to see me tunneling chaoser, look at Steamship.

On February 23 2012 03:17 prplhz wrote:
So what about the timing?

I don't have a lot of time, try read the game carefully, make a ton of notes, see that you're pushing me and I say that I'm here. Would it be more townie of me not to say that I'm here when I'm about to get lynched or what are you getting at?

I don't think that redFF is scum because his claim timing and his lack of activity was announced in the thread beforehand, his activity and putting-himself-outthere seems very townie. The wagon is also rolling too easy. It was stupid of me to say that we'd have to lynch him at some point, you have pointed out that we don't and that's a pretty simple conclusion and I support that. I think BloodyC0bbler is more scummy, but I think there might be better targets today that I'm more comfortable with. This is like Responsibility Mafia! where BloodyC0bbler was just gone, but he has been scummy so far.

On February 23 2012 03:43 Blazinghand wrote:


;_; man I don't see what the issue here is with the redFF lynch

On February 23 2012 05:19 syllogism wrote:
There's no one arguing against the BC lynch, which I guess is bad. Getting the votes hasn't been particularly easy, but still now would be the time for there to start being some resistance in terms of thread activity. I suppose some people may not be around yet and I still think the lynch is better than redff one.

On February 23 2012 05:36 Jackal58 wrote:


Try reading instead of listening to the voices man. I know red has been online since this.

On February 23 2012 05:42 Dirkzor wrote:
I've thought about the whole RedFF thing. Whatever allignment he is doesn't matter right now. There are no indication that he wants to play. When/if he returns we can take a stance on him. Should we lynch him today we gain nothing going forward anyway so I would much rather lynch someone else.

I'm still want BH to hang. I think my case on him was pretty solid and he have done NOTHING to convince me otherwise.

I'll read up on BC now and the posts made against him. (It is Syllo, prp and who else who have made cases on him?)

On February 23 2012 05:50 layabout wrote:

Sheeping you is a vote for hypocrisy.

On February 21 2012 13:06 VisceraEyes wrote:


I'm mulling over this post.

The first thing I noticed about it is that it still doesn't answer my question. I mean, yeah. Okay. I get it. It's early in the game. But you don't even have a read on the guy? Regardless of the fact that he has almost 25% of the posts since the game started? I realize that's a gross exaggeration, but you see what I'm getting at - you should have more of a read on him than "bad" in my opinion.

The next thing I noticed is that you respond to my soft accusation of you coloring the discussion surrounding red as 'policy discussion' by boiling down the argument against him I've made to "his push on tyrran via policy is bad". I get that he's kinda a tool outside this thread, but my argument has to do with his actions/decisions in THIS thread. If anyone is voting for him on policy based on his behavior out-of-thread, that's their thing...but that's absolutely not why I'm voting for him, and that's absolutely not what the discussion for the last few pages has been about. Is it possible that people are voting him on policy? Sure I guess. Has that been the subject of discussion, like, ever? Not so much. This is why I said you "colored" the discussion recently as "policy discussion"...because by my estimation, we've been talking about lynching red because he's scum, and you come in and say "why are we still talking about policy-lynch?"

I mean, am I missing something here?