|
Less then an hour to lynch.
I've read BC filter and Lay's case.
I don't particularly find BC's filter scummy. He havent done anything townie though. He have been indifferent. Yes he is a better lynch then RedFF since he is a non-issue until he returns.
The best lynch today is still BH! GO vote for him!
|
Edit: RedFF is a non-issue until he returns.
|
Its not like the BC wagon is forming quickly. Scum voting for RedFF can just sit there and hope 7 votes are enough to hang RedFF.
And to be precise we have 3 wagons.
RedFF Bloodyc0bble
-------------->Blazinghand <--------------![](/mirror/smilies/redcard.gif)
RedFF is a non-issue. He don't want to play anymore. If he returns we can take the discussion again. There are argument for and against keeping him alive even if he is scum.
Bloodyc0bble is gone. He don't care. He is indifferent. He have been a target for some time now but he don't want to defend himself. Okayish lynch.
Blazinghand is so far of his meta and have been sheeping thought troughout the game. He is the best lynch today and everyone should vote him.
|
BH... WHAT?! I posted the exact same arguments against you (no single origional thought) yet this is the first legitimate critism against you?!? Are you not reading what i write about you!?!
|
I never said the case againts you is good. I actually said your filter did not look scummy. But you have also not contributed at all the entire game. Which make you an okay lynch.
You have a point that I'm giving RedFF a free pass. It was never meant to be "never lynch RedFF until he post". Merely a way to get people to vote where I want them, BH. I will of course reevalutate my position on RedFF as the game goes on but right now I don't think he is a good lynch.
|
On February 23 2012 06:37 Palmar wrote: Votecount
redFF: 7
RebirthOfLeGenD Kitaman27 Wherebugsgo chaoser BloodyC0bbler layabout Blazinghand
BloodyC0bbler: 5
DoctorHelvetica syllogism risk.nuke VisceraEyes prplhz
Toadesstern: 1
redFF
Blazinghand: 4
Dirkzor Tyrran Jackal58 Toadesstern
Dirkzor: 1
Jitsu
This is the standing right now
|
On February 23 2012 06:40 Blazinghand wrote: Also all you guys who think redFF shouldn't be lynched need to reconsider the split wagons between me and BC, just from a tactical perspective lol Its to late for hidden messages. Say what you want instead of writing riddles.
|
15 min to lynch.
Risk you are around?!? Any thought instead of just voting BC?!
|
Need 3 more on BH to get him hanging.
Lay? DrH? BC? Risk?
|
Well you voting him isn't reall helping is it?!
I also don't like that risk come swinging in from the left votes BC and then leaves...
|
shit. I'm not sure about BC but I think lynching RedFF is a waste.
Íts 6/6/4 in votes now. We can still hang BH.
|
Hahahahahahahhahahaha... Fuck that was a hilarious "flip" :D
|
On February 24 2012 05:32 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Dirkzor [1]Unlike BH? Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 06:01 Dirkzor wrote: @Chaoser now you're just argueing semantics...
I called what Kita did double sided. I called what you did flip floppy. Basicly the same thing.
And how can you compare my posts that was done 5-15 in into the game with someone made 12 hours later?
You say that I don't take side. That is correct because I found both sides stupid and none of them particularly more scummy then then other. You called what chaoser did lying. Read the post before this one in Dirkzor's filter: Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 05:56 Dirkzor wrote:I want to continue on Toad's case on Chaoser. Because Chaoser is lying! Read the whole case and chaoser defence here. Below is the end of that post. On February 22 2012 04:48 chaoser wrote:Yeah I agree with you and kita that redFF looked weird but that swap was so out of the blue. One moment he's supporting red and his policy lynch and the next moment it's on redFF? Once again, not a random swap, once I acknowledged that I misread VE and DrH's posts, I realized VE is 100% correct in not only calling out redFF but also saw that redFF was misrepresenting facts (one of the reasons why I misread/switched VE and DrH's post) Add in his bullshit defense and the vote was justified. So it was AFTER you realized you had misread that you changed your vote? Not quite. + Show Spoiler +On February 21 2012 08:56 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 08:38 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 21 2012 08:29 chaoser wrote:On February 21 2012 08:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 21 2012 08:19 redFF wrote: PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE
The game has been going on for an hour, my suggestion of a policy lynch does not mean I don't want anyone to scumhunt. It's an excellent way to generate discussion, which it has.
VE's post is hypocritical because he's calling me scum for pushing a policy lynch when he himself was pushing a policy lynch up until that post, when it arbitrarily became a scum lynch. Consider him my first moderately scummy read. You're better than this. He never ever said your PL position was bad, but that you are spammy. Please read posts before you start OMGUSing. Considering you have time to spam you should have time to read. And you need to read better. red is saying VE's vote on him was him pushing for a policy lynch while at the same time he is criticizing him for pushing a policy lynch on tyrran. Re: Spammy RedFF Never fails to live up to expectations. Red you really don't have to comment on every little thing with a 1-liner response. My PL on you stands until I get a scum-read on someone. That is a big problem. Care to respond VE? No, it's not a problem. I disagree with the policy lynch in general but I really don't see how VE is contradicting himself at all. Supporting a policy lynch does not mean you can't be critical of RedFF posting a lot of one liners and talking about it/defending it so vehemently. He isn't accusing of redFF for being scum for supporting a PL anyway, or even for "pushing" it. He never said those words. It's an invented case. I'm voting for red. VE said he was voting for red as a policy lynch. He then criticizes red, not for his one liners, but by saying: Show nested quote +Putting votes on inactive townies/policy lynches generates almost no real pressure on a player over whether or not they are scum but only creates arguments over whether or not a policy lynch is justified. That is a direct criticism of red's policy lynch push on tyrran. Show nested quote +He isn't accusing of redFF for being scum for supporting a PL anyway, or even for "pushing" it. He never said those words. It's an invented case. I never said that he accused redFF of being scum for supporting a PL, I'm only saying that he's criticizing redFF of doing something that he himself did as well (Putting votes on a policy lynch). That point is factual. At the same time, I understand the nuanced subtle difference between the two given VE's immediate switch from policy lynch to scum-read. That's just good pressure play. Either way, I want to clarify what actually happened so as to not misrepresent the situation. Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 08:40 redFF wrote: Nothing I've done is scummy and this is not going to get off the ground so enjoy your lonely wagon ve and drh. lol, this is scummy as fuck. ##vote: redFF In that post you are still arguing with VE/DrH about whether or not VE was being a hypocrite or not. Also in that post you vote for RedFF. Next post: On February 21 2012 09:05 chaoser wrote: Also, your unvote of tyrran was pretty bad redFF and seemed extremely defensive. His post wasn't a good enough post to un-pressure vote. I would never get off him from my vote because his post was NOT good. You seems to have changed your mind about RedFF here. Next: On February 21 2012 09:08 chaoser wrote:On February 21 2012 09:03 VisceraEyes wrote: Why are you lumping up DocH's posts with mine? I didn't criticize red for his vote on Tyrran at all. Come on chaoser... Oh lol, my bad. I went back to check and indeed you did not say that. My fault. sorry lol This is were you realize something is wrong and you quoted the wrong dude. Some few post later: On February 21 2012 10:33 chaoser wrote:On February 21 2012 09:43 VisceraEyes wrote: Ho boy, the thread died fast. That worries me a little, but that could just be paranoia.
chaoser - so by your correction and apology, should I assume that you're no longer agreeing with red's assessment that I'm being a hypocrite?
kitaman27 - what are your thoughts on chaoser?
Jackal, BC, syllo, WBG, you guys care to weigh in on this? I mean, it's early but I'd have expected to hear what an idiot I am at least twice between those 4 players.
yes. i take it back, i misread. I dunno why WBG is buddying me though. I think I'm playing decently well though, but I think you're doing better (aka I think you're townine ATM). Now that the mixup have been cleared VE is suddenly a player doing good. While I admit that its not a huge issue I don't understand why you would lie about it? Why not just "I thought VE was being a hypocrite but then RedFF's posting turned to shit so I voted him. Later i realized I was wrong and VE was right." [2]You didn't call him flip flopping. You used a strong word, lying, then backed off later. I don't see what is scummy about Chaoser misreading something and then making a posting mistake because of it. That seems more town to me than anything unless he is doing some incredibly complicated roleplay where he pretends to be unaware of what's going on and play badly. I've known Chaoser to be inactive and absentminded as town before so I'm not really shocked or upset by this, I don't think anyone really should be. [3]Dirkzor spent the remainder of his filter tunneling BH, who is probably the easiest lynch I've ever seen. He's acting like a really bad village idiot or some kind of serial killer who is just trolling to draw people out. He is definitely worth a DT or a Vig. Dirk can tunnel BH as hard as he wants and whatever BH flips doesn't matter. If he flips town everyone will agree that BH was playing really bad and would have gotten lynched or shot anyway. If he flips scum then Dirk gets some town cred. If he flips third party of some sort then Dirk gets a little bit of town cred. He can say "I was close, at least we got the SK out of the way now, it could have been worse it could have been town". [4]Dirkzor plays very wishy washy and conservative until Kitaman27 calls him out for it. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=303505&user=193595The posts in this filter in which he is a town blue come across as far more natural, reactive, and there is clear progress in his thoughts. He doesn't ignore anybody and is pretty talkative. His posts in the Storm Mafia filter come across to me as more jilted and planned? I'm surprised he didn't call BH out on his behavior a bit before, he seems like the kind of player to try and foster a good pro-town atmosphere which he hasn't done in this game at all. Read Kitaman27's post on him for more analysis of his early game behavior: Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 12:23 kitaman27 wrote:Dang it, I'm a sucker for blue claims. Funny to see the votes pile up on red after the claim, rather than before. On one hand, a mafia player who is set to die should always be claiming blue, but on the other, his claim ties up a potential roleblocker. Tracker is a tricky claim because even confirming it doesn't necessarily mean he isn't a mafia stalker or something. I'll be keeping my vote on him for the moment. Now to everyone else: I've enjoyed comedy hour with Jackal, but his filter is completely void of content. Not a single post showing he isn't just along for the ride. Toad appears to be going through post-Arkham depression or something. A lot of fluff and he isn't very willing to share his reads. On February 22 2012 11:14 prplhz wrote: Okay I don't think that redFF is scum because he's been pretty out there. The scummiest he has done in my opinion is his claim which was oddly timed. Right now he's a terribly easy lynch, because we'll have to lynch him at some point. I'd like to see wherebugsgo explain how everything redFF has done can be explained by scum motivation and can not be explained by town motivation. The worst thing about this whole redFF thing is that the lynch is so easy that everybody can just pile onto him and then the day is kinda ruined, we aren't going to find anybody else. I don't think that redFF is scum because he's just been putting himself too much in the line of fire. On February 22 2012 11:14 prplhz wrote: I'll vote redFF to avoid no lynch. I kinda assume that this is an extended majority lynch where we can end up in a no lynch sitaution, but the OP doesn't really say anything about that. But like, redFF probably isn't scum, come on. There's also plenty good in having him around since scum can't role block anybody else no matter redFF's alignment. The lynch today comes down to "We very likely have to lynch redFF at some point, should it be today or do we have something better?". Right now, I think it's too early to say. These two statements by prpl completely contradict each other. You argue how you don't think red is scum, but you're willing to vote him to avoid no lynch? How does that make sense? If you're going to argue that he really is blue, then of course a no lynch would be more beneficial. How about push a different lynch if red isn't your priority? This is really poor from him. I know I already picked on Dirkzor for his language, but I'm going to do it again. On February 21 2012 07:03 Dirkzor wrote: The positive part is that I already have something to critisize... Good job on starting discussion.
"Hey guys. Look at me and my protown attitude!" On February 22 2012 02:39 Dirkzor wrote: I'll give my honest opinion so far... Only scum say this. On February 22 2012 05:03 Dirkzor wrote: Wat? I'm glad you have that big confidence in my ability as town but I can't magicly make me notice scum... I notice what I notice when I notice it. And when I do I post it. So far this game I got jack. Lack of aggression and confidence. These are fair points. I wish Kitaman was more active but I don't remember him having a strong presence in the last game where he was town. I agree with the things he is saying here, this is the sort of thing I'm used to seeing from RoL.
[1]Yes RoL was an easy lynch yesterday compared to BH. BH was active and posting but still incredibly useless. There was actually post to read from BH where the only thing we had on RoL was the lack of posting, which imo is not much day1. Since RoL still havent posted (only 1 post saying he will post later the case on him is now stronger).
[2]I did call Chaoser a liar. But I didn't "back down" My post after that was a response to chaoser post one me (clicky). So it was not a continuation of my case but a response to a post made before my case. I wanted to see his reaction to me calling him a liar. He did respond calmly and said it was a mistake. Nothing bad there. I havent pushed him since and I don't intend to.
[3]You agree that my case on BH have some merits but at the same call me scum for making said case. Wat? BH have played very poorly so far. His actions on day2 have only proved me right (will go into that in another post). This doesn't really make sense for me. I actually think my case on BH was really good. It was original, clear and with substance. Whether he flips town/scum/3rd party doesn't really matter since my case was good = good town play.
[4]I've already covered this. I had no read and no clue in the beginning. Thus my meek and poor posting. But I think I've changed it around with my posting before lynch time.
|
I still think that BH is playing scummy. But he is playing so scummy that he appear as if he wants to gets lynched.
BH have still not have an original thought of his own. Mimicking others case on BC and vote him. Then de-vote him instantly when BC makes 1 post to defend himself. He votes for Risk.nuke which WBG pointed out is useless and other then that he have posted a lot but he haven't really done anything worthwhile.
I just know that BH can play way way better then this but he apparently chooses not to. He may very well be the role where you win if you get lynched (is that village idiot?). Not sure if a lynch on him would ake us take advantage of our lynch or just waste it.
|
On February 24 2012 13:02 prplhz wrote: You are kind kitaman27. Probably even too kind, I made plenty of bad reads/decisions in Responsibility Mafia! and I ended up claiming scum in XLVII after being figured out by wherebugsgo, syllogism, Palmar, possibly sandroba? and probably a bunch of other people I don't really remember.
I pushed BloodyC0bbler around the time I said that so it's not true when you say that I didn't provide an alternative. I just wanted to guys to know early on that I was most likely going to switch my vote to redFF if the alternative was a no-lynch so it wouldn't cause any unnecessary panic in case I would end up doing it.
Not getting lynched is first priority for me when the townie who was making the most sense until then suddenly suggests me for lynch, especially when I was painfully aware of how bad I looked. I also thought people would be more willing to change away from redFF than they ended up being.
I was hoping I'd get ignored (yea, you're probably going to jump on that word) until I had some more confidence in my reads. I did chime in to support syllogism who I found pretty town, who has good day1 reads and probably is one of the better players in this game, stacked as it is.
On February 24 2012 14:54 prplhz wrote: Because I'm bad. I remember you pointed this exact same thing out in Responsibility Mafia! too. While the meta is available to everybody, not everybody has it readily available to them in their memory. You don't seriously expect everybody to go read everybody else's old games when they join a game? Only a few people do that. My point is that it's a pretty valid excuse "BloodyC0bbler looks scum, and I didn't have the meta that would allow me to see that he often just looks scum as town". I'm surprised not any more scum switched to him.
While you're right that the BloodyC0bbler train picked up more steam, I don't think syllogism is scum, I think DoctorHelvetica is actually putting a ton of effort into this game, I'm not very scum, VisceraEyes looks pretty town to me. That leaves risk.nuke and Blazinghand to get the votes to 6 which BloodyC0bbler had at his wagon's highest point, also making these two scum. I've already said they both look bad and I'd be up for lynching either of them today.
Why are you downplayer your abilities prplhz? Seems scummy to me. Combined with "I was hoping I'd get ignored (yea, you're probably going to jump on that word) until I had some more confidence in my reads" (yes i'm jumping it) it sound like you just want to lurk and it was a pain for you to get called out on it.
|
On February 25 2012 12:14 Jackal58 wrote: Is this the Kaller game?
I'm hammered and will spend the rest of the evening embarrassing myself there. This game requires thought. That one not so much.
Might aswell be Kaller game the way people are acting.
##Vote Blazinghand
Even though his posting have improved during day 2 he is still much worse then he can be. He is scum.
|
Shit I actually believe that claim =/ (haven't reread though)
|
On February 26 2012 01:04 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On February 25 2012 19:13 Dirkzor wrote: Shit I actually believe that claim =/ (haven't reread though) why, it wasn't factored into the vote at all What do you mean? I was talking about BH's claim. What vote? My vote?
It was just my gut feeling when I read it the first time..
|
Well we don't really know if his vote was counted twice or not. At the time of lynch it was 8 votes for RedFF and 5 for BC. So even if BH vote was counted twice we won't know since it was then 8 to 6 and RedFF still dies (goes missing).
If I had time (I haven't) I would go back and check if his claim to change his vote around so that no one would see that he had a double vote was for real.
I don't know much I can be online tonight since I'm at a friend. I'm keeping my vote in BH since he is/was acting scummy and a 2 vote role can be either scum or town.
|
On February 27 2012 07:30 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2012 07:23 layabout wrote: Toad, how could he answer your question?
he's not supposed to. It was rhetorical and I'm just saying it looks really strange that we have not a single suspicious guy flipping because of vigs. At least both syllo and Jackal look like mafia work.
I disagree: Jackal could very well have been a Town vig... Jackal is hard to read and he havent really been Mr. Helpful.
|
|
|
|