|
Pointless, if we were scum we'd have coordinated this anyway.
|
On February 09 2012 20:32 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2012 20:30 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:25 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:15 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:01 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 19:59 Tyrran wrote:On February 09 2012 19:49 Forumite wrote:
[quote]
No, you ruined things for Schworz. If you were trying to defend Two-Face, then you wouldn´t have taken back your claim when Schworz claimed. You made him a bigger target, when what you should have done is still claim Two-Face, then explain in the morning. Taking back your claim suggests that either you are the true Two-Face, or you don´t care about Schworz being nightkilled. I´m leaning towards the second one.
[quote]
Bullshit, breadcrumbing parts of your rolePM is a modkill offence, lying about breadcrumbing is not however. I don´t believe BC gave you two a free pass until I see it in the thread.
[quote]
Or the two of you and Toades are lying. Except for his read coming up as Quilty, rather than a role, is the only thing that looks weird about Schworz, otherwise he acts exactly like I would expect a Town Newbie seeing someone else fakeclaim his role would do.On the other hand you and Toades are giving off several scumsigns, drawing out a blue and then trying to get him killed. If either side is scum, then I´m leaning towards DocH and Toades.
##vote DoctorHelvetica Why would Toad&DocH sacrifice two mafia to get rid of two face, who is going to get killed sooner or later by catwoman anyway ( more likely sooner since he has claimed) ? Why we can argue a long time on whether or not they should be modkilled, what they are doing makes Zero sense as mafia. And even less as third party. Unless someone comes up with a good explanation, i'd rather lynch rGTheSchwortz. see that's how you confirm yourself as a townie to me. Forumite 'sup? OMGUS much? You still haven´t explained why you didn´t just keep claiming Two-Face yesterday. If you believed Schworz was Two-Face then you´d keep claiming. I kept claiming. Palmar retracted his claim and everything was going down so I stopped it and he even explained to everyone that I'm a vet who's trying to catch bullets to protect Two-Face. There was no way to stick with it at that point in time. EBWOP So? If you wanted to catch bullets, then say Palmar was lying, say he was just trying to protect you with the talk about mason, and keep claiming Two-Face. he fucked up. he can't actually go back and redo everything to make the best possible move so what exactly do you want? He want to hang him for it, and you to. I agree... For making a suboptimal play? Would you be happy if I just nameclaimed?
Him for playing a really really confusing game, which I can only belive to be non-townie. And you for getting DT checked comming out red, and after that filling this post up with alot of confusing stuff. You are the one who said either you or rgTS is lying. I belive it to be you, am I wrong, then we would by your logic kill him.
|
On February 09 2012 20:36 Forumite wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2012 20:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:25 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:15 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:01 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 19:59 Tyrran wrote:On February 09 2012 19:49 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 18:36 Toadesstern wrote:
My play was ingenious and Schworz ruined it for no good reason. I also think if he really is Two-Face he would have known what I'm up to. No, you ruined things for Schworz. If you were trying to defend Two-Face, then you wouldn´t have taken back your claim when Schworz claimed. You made him a bigger target, when what you should have done is still claim Two-Face, then explain in the morning. Taking back your claim suggests that either you are the true Two-Face, or you don´t care about Schworz being nightkilled. I´m leaning towards the second one. On February 09 2012 18:49 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
[quote]
Because the language I used in my posts refers to Toadessterns role PM specifically. I checked with BC a great deal to make sure that we would have enough similarities in our PM for me to be able to confirm myself to him as well. Bullshit, breadcrumbing parts of your rolePM is a modkill offence, lying about breadcrumbing is not however. I don´t believe BC gave you two a free pass until I see it in the thread. On February 09 2012 16:16 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Alright, BC also says that no mechanics of a persons own role will be hidden from them. Meaning if you are an insane DT you would know it. Is there any chances that your checks are not completely reliable rG?
BC also confirmed that there are no outside influences that could change the result of a check on me (framing power). If I'm wrong about any of this BC pleas
So as far as I see it there are only two possibilities. rGTheSchworz is lying or rGTheScworz is insane. Or the two of you and Toades are lying. Except for his read coming up as Quilty, rather than a role, is the only thing that looks weird about Schworz, otherwise he acts exactly like I would expect a Town Newbie seeing someone else fakeclaim his role would do.On the other hand you and Toades are giving off several scumsigns, drawing out a blue and then trying to get him killed. If either side is scum, then I´m leaning towards DocH and Toades. ##vote DoctorHelvetica Why would Toad&DocH sacrifice two mafia to get rid of two face, who is going to get killed sooner or later by catwoman anyway ( more likely sooner since he has claimed) ? Why we can argue a long time on whether or not they should be modkilled, what they are doing makes Zero sense as mafia. And even less as third party. Unless someone comes up with a good explanation, i'd rather lynch rGTheSchwortz. see that's how you confirm yourself as a townie to me. Forumite 'sup? OMGUS much? You still haven´t explained why you didn´t just keep claiming Two-Face yesterday. If you believed Schworz was Two-Face then you´d keep claiming. I kept claiming. Palmar retracted his claim and everything was going down so I stopped it and he even explained to everyone that I'm a vet who's trying to catch bullets to protect Two-Face. There was no way to stick with it at that point in time. EBWOP So? If you wanted to catch bullets, then say Palmar was lying, say he was just trying to protect you with the talk about mason, and keep claiming Two-Face. he fucked up. he can't actually go back and redo everything to make the best possible move so what exactly do you want? I want to know if there are any Town reasons for him doing what he did. If there is no Town reasons then I must assume there are scum reasons. Messing up happens, at least we didn´t loose a Blue because of it, but we could have. Toades, I don´t care who, just tell me, do you have a read on a Two-Face that isn´t Schworz?
My guess is he thought he'd use his invulnerability to save the person he thought was two-face. Knowing he can't die at night, he'd soak up whatever hits would have gone to someone else. He could have made a better play with that, but probably didn't think things through well enough. The fact that 2 other people came out and claimed the same role is confusing, I didn't even know what the fuck was happening without thinking about it for a while.
|
On February 09 2012 20:37 Tunkeg wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2012 20:32 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:30 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:25 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:15 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:01 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 19:59 Tyrran wrote:
[quote]
Why would Toad&DocH sacrifice two mafia to get rid of two face, who is going to get killed sooner or later by catwoman anyway ( more likely sooner since he has claimed) ?
Why we can argue a long time on whether or not they should be modkilled, what they are doing makes Zero sense as mafia. And even less as third party. Unless someone comes up with a good explanation, i'd rather lynch rGTheSchwortz.
see that's how you confirm yourself as a townie to me. Forumite 'sup? OMGUS much? You still haven´t explained why you didn´t just keep claiming Two-Face yesterday. If you believed Schworz was Two-Face then you´d keep claiming. I kept claiming. Palmar retracted his claim and everything was going down so I stopped it and he even explained to everyone that I'm a vet who's trying to catch bullets to protect Two-Face. There was no way to stick with it at that point in time. EBWOP So? If you wanted to catch bullets, then say Palmar was lying, say he was just trying to protect you with the talk about mason, and keep claiming Two-Face. he fucked up. he can't actually go back and redo everything to make the best possible move so what exactly do you want? He want to hang him for it, and you to. I agree... For making a suboptimal play? Would you be happy if I just nameclaimed? Him for playing a really really confusing game, which I can only belive to be non-townie. And you for getting DT checked comming out red, and after that filling this post up with alot of confusing stuff. You are the one who said either you or rgTS is lying. I belive it to be you, am I wrong, then we would by your logic kill him.
Not quite correct. There is still a possibility that rg is insane or has unreliable checks.
|
On February 09 2012 20:36 Forumite wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2012 20:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:25 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:15 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:01 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 19:59 Tyrran wrote:On February 09 2012 19:49 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 18:36 Toadesstern wrote:
My play was ingenious and Schworz ruined it for no good reason. I also think if he really is Two-Face he would have known what I'm up to. No, you ruined things for Schworz. If you were trying to defend Two-Face, then you wouldn´t have taken back your claim when Schworz claimed. You made him a bigger target, when what you should have done is still claim Two-Face, then explain in the morning. Taking back your claim suggests that either you are the true Two-Face, or you don´t care about Schworz being nightkilled. I´m leaning towards the second one. On February 09 2012 18:49 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
[quote]
Because the language I used in my posts refers to Toadessterns role PM specifically. I checked with BC a great deal to make sure that we would have enough similarities in our PM for me to be able to confirm myself to him as well. Bullshit, breadcrumbing parts of your rolePM is a modkill offence, lying about breadcrumbing is not however. I don´t believe BC gave you two a free pass until I see it in the thread. On February 09 2012 16:16 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Alright, BC also says that no mechanics of a persons own role will be hidden from them. Meaning if you are an insane DT you would know it. Is there any chances that your checks are not completely reliable rG?
BC also confirmed that there are no outside influences that could change the result of a check on me (framing power). If I'm wrong about any of this BC pleas
So as far as I see it there are only two possibilities. rGTheSchworz is lying or rGTheScworz is insane. Or the two of you and Toades are lying. Except for his read coming up as Quilty, rather than a role, is the only thing that looks weird about Schworz, otherwise he acts exactly like I would expect a Town Newbie seeing someone else fakeclaim his role would do.On the other hand you and Toades are giving off several scumsigns, drawing out a blue and then trying to get him killed. If either side is scum, then I´m leaning towards DocH and Toades. ##vote DoctorHelvetica Why would Toad&DocH sacrifice two mafia to get rid of two face, who is going to get killed sooner or later by catwoman anyway ( more likely sooner since he has claimed) ? Why we can argue a long time on whether or not they should be modkilled, what they are doing makes Zero sense as mafia. And even less as third party. Unless someone comes up with a good explanation, i'd rather lynch rGTheSchwortz. see that's how you confirm yourself as a townie to me. Forumite 'sup? OMGUS much? You still haven´t explained why you didn´t just keep claiming Two-Face yesterday. If you believed Schworz was Two-Face then you´d keep claiming. I kept claiming. Palmar retracted his claim and everything was going down so I stopped it and he even explained to everyone that I'm a vet who's trying to catch bullets to protect Two-Face. There was no way to stick with it at that point in time. EBWOP So? If you wanted to catch bullets, then say Palmar was lying, say he was just trying to protect you with the talk about mason, and keep claiming Two-Face. he fucked up. he can't actually go back and redo everything to make the best possible move so what exactly do you want? I want to know if there are any Town reasons for him doing what he did. If there is no Town reasons then I must assume there are scum reasons. Messing up happens, at least we didn´t loose a Blue because of it, but we could have. Toades, I don´t care who, just tell me, do you have a read on a Two-Face that isn´t Schworz?
Palmar's Two-Face isn't he?
Also you yourself said there's no reason for Schworz to claim Two-Face after I claimed two-face yesterday. Yet you keep telling me you want to lynch me because I fucked up (still doubt it) but you're totally fine with Catwoman (Schworz) claiming Two-Face?
|
I need to wait for BC to claim my name. There is an issue with my role that is potentially confounding and I need to make sure BC is okay with me alluding to it. I will PM him with that.
|
On February 09 2012 20:39 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2012 20:37 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:32 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:30 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:25 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:15 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:01 Toadesstern wrote:
[quote]
see that's how you confirm yourself as a townie to me. Forumite 'sup?
OMGUS much? You still haven´t explained why you didn´t just keep claiming Two-Face yesterday. If you believed Schworz was Two-Face then you´d keep claiming. I kept claiming. Palmar retracted his claim and everything was going down so I stopped it and he even explained to everyone that I'm a vet who's trying to catch bullets to protect Two-Face. There was no way to stick with it at that point in time. EBWOP So? If you wanted to catch bullets, then say Palmar was lying, say he was just trying to protect you with the talk about mason, and keep claiming Two-Face. he fucked up. he can't actually go back and redo everything to make the best possible move so what exactly do you want? He want to hang him for it, and you to. I agree... For making a suboptimal play? Would you be happy if I just nameclaimed? Him for playing a really really confusing game, which I can only belive to be non-townie. And you for getting DT checked comming out red, and after that filling this post up with alot of confusing stuff. You are the one who said either you or rgTS is lying. I belive it to be you, am I wrong, then we would by your logic kill him. Not quite correct. There is still a possibility that rg is insane or has unreliable checks.
Yes, this I have allready advocated earlier. But you said that unless BC is lying to you this isn't true...
|
On February 09 2012 20:42 Tunkeg wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2012 20:39 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:37 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:32 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:30 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:25 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:15 Forumite wrote:
[quote]
OMGUS much?
You still haven´t explained why you didn´t just keep claiming Two-Face yesterday. If you believed Schworz was Two-Face then you´d keep claiming. I kept claiming. Palmar retracted his claim and everything was going down so I stopped it and he even explained to everyone that I'm a vet who's trying to catch bullets to protect Two-Face. There was no way to stick with it at that point in time. EBWOP So? If you wanted to catch bullets, then say Palmar was lying, say he was just trying to protect you with the talk about mason, and keep claiming Two-Face. he fucked up. he can't actually go back and redo everything to make the best possible move so what exactly do you want? He want to hang him for it, and you to. I agree... For making a suboptimal play? Would you be happy if I just nameclaimed? Him for playing a really really confusing game, which I can only belive to be non-townie. And you for getting DT checked comming out red, and after that filling this post up with alot of confusing stuff. You are the one who said either you or rgTS is lying. I belive it to be you, am I wrong, then we would by your logic kill him. Not quite correct. There is still a possibility that rg is insane or has unreliable checks. Yes, this I have allready advocated earlier. But you said that unless BC is lying to you this isn't true...
Nope. I just said there's no chance that rG is insane without knowing about it. He hasn't commented on the matter.
Toades, do you think it would be fine to say we're both the same person for the purposes of the town understanding without getting modkilled?
|
On February 09 2012 20:39 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2012 20:36 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:25 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:15 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:01 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 19:59 Tyrran wrote:On February 09 2012 19:49 Forumite wrote:
[quote]
No, you ruined things for Schworz. If you were trying to defend Two-Face, then you wouldn´t have taken back your claim when Schworz claimed. You made him a bigger target, when what you should have done is still claim Two-Face, then explain in the morning. Taking back your claim suggests that either you are the true Two-Face, or you don´t care about Schworz being nightkilled. I´m leaning towards the second one.
[quote]
Bullshit, breadcrumbing parts of your rolePM is a modkill offence, lying about breadcrumbing is not however. I don´t believe BC gave you two a free pass until I see it in the thread.
[quote]
Or the two of you and Toades are lying. Except for his read coming up as Quilty, rather than a role, is the only thing that looks weird about Schworz, otherwise he acts exactly like I would expect a Town Newbie seeing someone else fakeclaim his role would do.On the other hand you and Toades are giving off several scumsigns, drawing out a blue and then trying to get him killed. If either side is scum, then I´m leaning towards DocH and Toades.
##vote DoctorHelvetica Why would Toad&DocH sacrifice two mafia to get rid of two face, who is going to get killed sooner or later by catwoman anyway ( more likely sooner since he has claimed) ? Why we can argue a long time on whether or not they should be modkilled, what they are doing makes Zero sense as mafia. And even less as third party. Unless someone comes up with a good explanation, i'd rather lynch rGTheSchwortz. see that's how you confirm yourself as a townie to me. Forumite 'sup? OMGUS much? You still haven´t explained why you didn´t just keep claiming Two-Face yesterday. If you believed Schworz was Two-Face then you´d keep claiming. I kept claiming. Palmar retracted his claim and everything was going down so I stopped it and he even explained to everyone that I'm a vet who's trying to catch bullets to protect Two-Face. There was no way to stick with it at that point in time. EBWOP So? If you wanted to catch bullets, then say Palmar was lying, say he was just trying to protect you with the talk about mason, and keep claiming Two-Face. he fucked up. he can't actually go back and redo everything to make the best possible move so what exactly do you want? I want to know if there are any Town reasons for him doing what he did. If there is no Town reasons then I must assume there are scum reasons. Messing up happens, at least we didn´t loose a Blue because of it, but we could have. Toades, I don´t care who, just tell me, do you have a read on a Two-Face that isn´t Schworz? Palmar's Two-Face isn't he? Also you yourself said there's no reason for Schworz to claim Two-Face after I claimed two-face yesterday. Yet you keep telling me you want to lynch me because I fucked up (still doubt it) but you're totally fine with Catwoman (Schworz) claiming Two-Face?
I know Schworz messed up, if he was the real Two-Face he should have just shut up and waited until the next morning. The difference is that that move looks like a Newbie mistake, you taking back your claim looks more deliberate. That´s why I understand Schworz claiming, but not you taking back your claim.
I´m willing to let it be for now, as long as there´s something to discuss until later in the day.
|
On February 09 2012 20:47 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2012 20:42 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:39 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:37 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:32 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:30 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:25 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:
[quote]
I kept claiming. Palmar retracted his claim and everything was going down so I stopped it and he even explained to everyone that I'm a vet who's trying to catch bullets to protect Two-Face. There was no way to stick with it at that point in time. EBWOP So? If you wanted to catch bullets, then say Palmar was lying, say he was just trying to protect you with the talk about mason, and keep claiming Two-Face. he fucked up. he can't actually go back and redo everything to make the best possible move so what exactly do you want? He want to hang him for it, and you to. I agree... For making a suboptimal play? Would you be happy if I just nameclaimed? Him for playing a really really confusing game, which I can only belive to be non-townie. And you for getting DT checked comming out red, and after that filling this post up with alot of confusing stuff. You are the one who said either you or rgTS is lying. I belive it to be you, am I wrong, then we would by your logic kill him. Not quite correct. There is still a possibility that rg is insane or has unreliable checks. Yes, this I have allready advocated earlier. But you said that unless BC is lying to you this isn't true... Nope. I just said there's no chance that rG is insane without knowing about it. He hasn't commented on the matter. Toades, do you think it would be fine to say we're both the same person for the purposes of the town understanding without getting modkilled?
what are you talking about? I don't need to claim, it's enough to claim your name and you don't need to claim your special power. If you pick the right name that's fine with me and I'll confirm it. This is going to be so hilarious and see massive amounts of shitstorm comming.
|
On February 09 2012 20:41 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
I need to wait for BC to claim my name. There is an issue with my role that is potentially confounding and I need to make sure BC is okay with me alluding to it. I will PM him with that.
I think you should wait before claiming. As for now, I think town as no reason not to beleive you. If rgTheSchwortz comes back into this thread, maintain his 2face claim, and keep accusing you/ then maybe it will be necessary for you to claim.
As for now, i would like to avoid mafia/third parties getting more information than they already have.
|
And I'm still standing by everything I said. I still think I did a good move but I thought everyone else would shut the fuck up and just roll with it. Now we've got schworz fakeclaiming, palmar fakeclaiming and I think I know what DocH is but maybe he's a thirdparty who knows my role pm as well.
I am literally as confused as you guys are right now. I did not see anything of this bullshit comming and I don't understand anything palmar, Schworz or DocH did. Well I understand what DocH did but you don't have to rub it into peoples faces.
To get another topic discussed: I still think sheth, Hori and opz all make good lynch targets for today if we leave what's happening around me for a second and think about alternatives.
|
On February 09 2012 20:52 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2012 20:47 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:42 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:39 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:37 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:32 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:30 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:25 Forumite wrote:On February 09 2012 20:17 Toadesstern wrote:
[quote]
EBWOP So? If you wanted to catch bullets, then say Palmar was lying, say he was just trying to protect you with the talk about mason, and keep claiming Two-Face. he fucked up. he can't actually go back and redo everything to make the best possible move so what exactly do you want? He want to hang him for it, and you to. I agree... For making a suboptimal play? Would you be happy if I just nameclaimed? Him for playing a really really confusing game, which I can only belive to be non-townie. And you for getting DT checked comming out red, and after that filling this post up with alot of confusing stuff. You are the one who said either you or rgTS is lying. I belive it to be you, am I wrong, then we would by your logic kill him. Not quite correct. There is still a possibility that rg is insane or has unreliable checks. Yes, this I have allready advocated earlier. But you said that unless BC is lying to you this isn't true... Nope. I just said there's no chance that rG is insane without knowing about it. He hasn't commented on the matter. Toades, do you think it would be fine to say we're both the same person for the purposes of the town understanding without getting modkilled? what are you talking about? I don't need to claim, it's enough to claim your name and you don't need to claim your special power. If you pick the right name that's fine with me and I'll confirm it. This is going to be so hilarious and see massive amounts of shitstorm comming.
If you don't know you don't know. I'll need to talk to BC before it really matters how I claim my role.
|
I agree with Tyrran, wait with the claim, if you have to do it at all.
|
Thoughts on hiro, sheth, risk.nuke, opz anyone?
I'd like to see all of those 4 dead.
|
On February 09 2012 20:56 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2012 20:52 Toadesstern wrote:On February 09 2012 20:47 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:42 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:39 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:37 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:32 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:30 Tunkeg wrote:On February 09 2012 20:26 DoctorHelvetica wrote:On February 09 2012 20:25 Forumite wrote:
[quote]
So? If you wanted to catch bullets, then say Palmar was lying, say he was just trying to protect you with the talk about mason, and keep claiming Two-Face. he fucked up. he can't actually go back and redo everything to make the best possible move so what exactly do you want? He want to hang him for it, and you to. I agree... For making a suboptimal play? Would you be happy if I just nameclaimed? Him for playing a really really confusing game, which I can only belive to be non-townie. And you for getting DT checked comming out red, and after that filling this post up with alot of confusing stuff. You are the one who said either you or rgTS is lying. I belive it to be you, am I wrong, then we would by your logic kill him. Not quite correct. There is still a possibility that rg is insane or has unreliable checks. Yes, this I have allready advocated earlier. But you said that unless BC is lying to you this isn't true... Nope. I just said there's no chance that rG is insane without knowing about it. He hasn't commented on the matter. Toades, do you think it would be fine to say we're both the same person for the purposes of the town understanding without getting modkilled? what are you talking about? I don't need to claim, it's enough to claim your name and you don't need to claim your special power. If you pick the right name that's fine with me and I'll confirm it. This is going to be so hilarious and see massive amounts of shitstorm comming. If you don't know you don't know. I'll need to talk to BC before I claim. It really matters how I claim my role.
Editing to make the post clearer.
|
I want radfield dead. He seems to care very little about this game. In addition, I think his list during the night is both terrible and incriminating. Also, I think he's scum.
|
Scummy bastards. GG.
I was having fun 
|
Yes, wait with your claim. And for the veterans in this games (or whoever it is that consider themself the top of the pops in here). If DrH claims by name, and he claims a role someone else allready have. Should there be counterclaim?
The reason why I am asking is that I fear that if DrH is scum, he might do a desperate nameclaim to either:
A) Save himself (best scenario for himself)
B) Draw out another blue before he dies.
To avoid anymore premature claims, please make a general consensus about this.
|
On February 09 2012 21:02 Tunkeg wrote:
Yes, wait with your claim. And for the veterans in this games (or whoever it is that consider themself the top of the pops in here). If DrH claims by name, and he claims a role someone else allready have. Should there be counterclaim?
The reason why I am asking is that I fear that if DrH is scum, he might do a desperate nameclaim to either:
A) Save himself (best scenario for himself)
B) Draw out another blue before he dies.
To avoid anymore premature claims, please make a general consensus about this.
I'll tell you after his claim. If it's the right name yes we need a counterclaim asap if there's one. If it's a wrong claim I don't want a counterclaim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
