EPTSleeper Cell Mafia II - Page 17
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/XHxrn.png) Mass Lurkers | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On January 28 2012 04:17 bumatlarge wrote: Lanaia is always wishy washy. Every game regardless of alignment. Nice try to everyone stuffing their vote on her, but she should not be the lynch. I'd definitely lynch radfield over her. I don't have a proper read on navillus or cwave, but I have no problem lynching them. And how is this not a direct contradiction of what you said not to do. You are essentially calling him town here. One strike too many. ##Vote: Radfield Radfield, under the combined weight of ignorance and misunderstanding, crashes to the floor helpless | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
Also... there is only one way to deal with lurkers. ![[image loading]](http://i.qkme.me/35si8p.jpg) | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.qkme.me/35si8l.jpg) | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On January 28 2012 04:17 bumatlarge wrote: And how is this not a direct contradiction of what you said not to do. You are essentially calling him town here. One strike too many. ##Vote: Radfield For the last, and I do mean last time, it's not about an embargo on the word town, it's not about never stating you don't think someone is worth a lynch, it's not about semantical statements. It's about not giving the mafia juicy lists of who we collectively think is most townish(because that directly helps them determine whom to kill, and increases the likelyhood of getting that kill). You're case is bullshit, and so is everything about your play this game. You're doing false scumhunting, and trying to look like you are contributing, when in fact you are just bandwagonning a strong player. ##Vote Bumatlarge | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On January 28 2012 03:39 Radfield wrote: You're either being obtuse by refusing to explain to me why you think I am scum, or I suppose I am obtuse for failing to understand where you have laid out your problems. Assigning varying degrees of scumminess is ALWAYS useful. It happens every game, and I don't understand how you can object to it. Lets say I have 4 players I think are scum, obviously I don't think they are equally likely to be scum. They all have degrees of scumminess, and I'm going to indicate that when I post my reads. What are you even arguing here? Can someone else please explain to me what Jackal is objecting to, because I really don't see it(or understand it). Dammit man. It's not what you said. It's the language you used. Scum need a means to identify each other through their messaging. Your one little line of scumminess is in my mind a means of communication. There was absolutely no reason for the way you worded that. It served no purpose. It conveyed no meaning that "Don't call others town" would not have. Sorry but I can see no reason for inventing a scummy scale that basically says town or not town other than as a reference to use in your anonymous messaging to your teammates. | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On January 28 2012 05:07 Jackal58 wrote: Dammit man. It's not what you said. It's the language you used. Scum need a means to identify each other through their messaging. Your one little line of scumminess is in my mind a means of communication. There was absolutely no reason for the way you worded that. It served no purpose. It conveyed no meaning that "Don't call others town" would not have. Sorry but I can see no reason for inventing a scummy scale that basically says town or not town other than as a reference to use in your anonymous messaging to your teammates. That makes much more sense, and actually gives me an idea to why the line put you off. Realize that I probably spent about 3 seconds writing that line. I disagree that the line "don't call others town" would have done the same purpose. It likely would have for some people, but look at the sheer volume of people who misunderstood my post, DESPITE me putting in the extra examples, etc. I strive for clarity in my posts(and I obviously failed hard with that one) and I tried to make my point crystal clear. That is the reason that line exists. It's not a code, it's not a breadcrumb, it's just an example in an effort to illustrate my point. aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!! Look, just forget about that, and take my posting as a whole. If you still feel like this is somehow scum-radfield, then fine, but please don't vote me on the basis of one throw-away line - A throw away line that no one else(that i can tell) even finds scummy. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
Reread the thread, changed my mind. I don't like Navi's vote on red, but I do like the one on meapak. Still don't really like cwave, but I'll leave him be. Considering igrok said he's changing the way cell members communicate, I do not really understand why he assumed it would still be a message of 5 words or 20 characters. It doesn't logically follow. Now that I fully understand what rad was trying to say, I agree. However, if he'd actually said "don't call people town" I probably would have understood more quickly. Not touching his wagon with a 20 foot pole. I do not want him lynched today. Bum I don't like. He's been saying things that I really think aren't good for us, but radfield pointed some of it out earlier. Now, I'm not terribly good at reading bum, but he's realllllllllly rubbing me the wrong way. Especially after iso'ing him. I also don't see why he felt like he needed to post those images. Not like they're helping anything. I'm voting bum. I may or may not be back before lynch (depends how long staff meeting is). | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On January 28 2012 05:17 Radfield wrote: That makes much more sense, and actually gives me an idea to why the line put you off. Realize that I probably spent about 3 seconds writing that line. I disagree that the line "don't call others town" would have done the same purpose. It likely would have for some people, but look at the sheer volume of people who misunderstood my post, DESPITE me putting in the extra examples, etc. I strive for clarity in my posts(and I obviously failed hard with that one) and I tried to make my point crystal clear. That is the reason that line exists. It's not a code, it's not a breadcrumb, it's just an example in an effort to illustrate my point. aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!! Look, just forget about that, and take my posting as a whole. If you still feel like this is somehow scum-radfield, then fine, but please don't vote me on the basis of one throw-away line - A throw away line that no one else(that i can tell) even finds scummy. For what it's worth people posting pictures put me off as well. Scum are forced to use this thread to identify and communicate with each other. | ||
|
vaderseven
United States2556 Posts
On January 28 2012 05:43 Lanaia wrote: Now that I fully understand what rad was trying to say, I agree. However, if he'd actually said "don't call people town" I probably would have understood more quickly. Not touching his wagon with a 20 foot pole. I do not want him lynched today. Not touching his wagon? What do you mean? | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On January 28 2012 05:54 vaderseven wrote: Not touching his wagon? What do you mean? I mean I will not vote him. | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
| ||
|
vaderseven
United States2556 Posts
I feel good about this vote now. ##vote Lanaia | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
On January 28 2012 04:17 bumatlarge wrote: Lanaia is always wishy washy. Every game regardless of alignment. Nice try to everyone stuffing their vote on her, but she should not be the lynch. I'd definitely lynch radfield over her. I don't have a proper read on navillus or cwave, but I have no problem lynching them. And how is this not a direct contradiction of what you said not to do. You are essentially calling him town here. One strike too many. ##Vote: Radfield Now first remember that scum in this game are playing in the dark like us, so to identify scum they need to go on the same reads that we have. With that in mind, we had just decided that it lurking day1 is very scummy this game and pointed our lurker-lynch at Lanaia, no sooner had we done that than bum decided to jump to her aid. Now the fact is that he literally cannot know any more about her than we do at this point, he's also not stupid, this means that he should have the same conclusion that everyone else has come to, lurkers are scummy, Lanaia was lurking. He then chose to defend him/her, (lanaia = m/f?) this only makes sense if he himself is scum and realized that one of his own was likely about to get lynched, he even goes so far as to be ok with lynching ANY of the other people brought up for lynches and pushes for a rad lynch while rad is one of my town reads. Agreeing to anyone else just stinks of him trying to avoid the Lanaia lynch, which is just weird, Lanaia had been lurking there's no way he could've even had a strong town read for him/her. Bum is scum QED + Show Spoiler + and that rhymed - vote for him | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
Vote: bumatlarge | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
| ||
|
vaderseven
United States2556 Posts
| ||
| ||
