EPTHammer Mini Mafia - Page 37
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
I agree that either Palmar or VE have to die. Or both due to No flip. I would vote VE now, but I don't want to hammer (my vote won't be the hammer i know) until everyone have had a chance to claim the hit on either one. If no one claims it could still be a scum nightvig. How likely do you find that mafia have a nightvig? If no one claims the hit I think the jailer should claim. Because if no one claims the hit or the jail we would have lynch both to be sure. in which he discredits his OWN reason for not voting VE: "but I don't want to hammer (my vote won't be the hammer i know)" and then adds in a weird suggestion about how the jailer should claim. He then continues to criticize VE with: lol! That changed your mind? What about the late claim to get hit? Which was equally late. Yet you have been vague up until this post of VE. Just minute before you had yet to make up your mind... when he himself has been equally noncommital: VE looks way more scummy then palmar. Why not claim directly after night post? Why wait? Palmar posted instantly and VE have had more then enough time to think it over. But I still hate being unsure. I'll mindfuck myself until the game ends =( | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
Chaoser, node and Prp (he gave a little, but bad, reasoning)... | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
I also can't see why I was non-committal. I said I found VE way mroe scummy then Palmar and would put my vote on him - but didnt due to hammer mechanic. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
He then continues to criticize VE with: lol! That changed your mind? What about the late claim to get hit? Which was equally late. Yet you have been vague up until this post of VE. Just minute before you had yet to make up your mind... I meant layabout. I'm sorry. I want to expand on this point that this was said during the ending part of the day, and along with his posts on a VE lynch, seem like a distancing act to me. He wanted to distance himself from the rest of his team but was unsure if they could still be saved or not. So he kinda did both. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
if you don't have anything useful to say chaoser.... Dirkzor is town. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
anyway, he's town for now. LSB is dying tomorrow. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On February 01 2012 04:25 Dirkzor wrote: The reason I did not want to vote was to not give someone else the oppotunity to hammer. I wanted the day to last longer and posted about that later aswell. That post you quoted about me criticizing VE was a post to Lay not VE. I also can't see why I was non-committal. I said I found VE way mroe scummy then Palmar and would put my vote on him - but didnt due to hammer mechanic. You yourself stated only that you didn't want to hammer the vote even though your vote wouldn't have hammered. This added reason of "I did not want to vote because I didn't want SOMEONE ELSE to hammer" was not mentioned then and so I can not willingly believe this point since it has only just now been introduced. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On January 31 2012 06:34 Palmar wrote: ♥ Layabout should probably be next, seeing he has the most voting power of the scum. On January 31 2012 21:09 Palmar wrote: yeah, what's better? living scum with 4 votes or dead scum with 4 votes? On February 01 2012 04:30 Palmar wrote: oh right, you corrected that. anyway, he's town for now. LSB is dying tomorrow. What's with the sudden change? I don't really see an explanation between the change in ideas. Can you expand on your reasons for thinking LSB is scum aside from the layabout vote giving event? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On February 01 2012 04:41 Palmar wrote: yes I can, but I don't intend to. Will you do it after night has ended? Or should we just assume it's ok to just listen and follow you now for the rest of the game? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
It'd be awesome if people just did that all the time. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On other accounts I view both LSB and Layabout as just about the same. *Alot of act, little under the hood. *Questionable behavior. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On February 01 2012 05:09 risk.nuke wrote: LSB was palmars target when VE played his crazy move which to me seems to have been made out of desperation. That makes LSB look really bad. On other accounts I view both LSB and Layabout as just about the same. *Alot of act, little under the hood. *Questionable behavior. But palmar's only real argument against LSB is that he gave his vote to layabout. When compared to what layabout has done and posted, I don't think it's the same condemning thing at all. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
LSB was palmars target when VE played his crazy move which to me seems to have been made out of desperation. That makes LSB look really bad. Hmm, I'm going to relook at this event. | ||
|
Paperscraps
United States639 Posts
On February 01 2012 04:30 chaoser wrote: You yourself stated only that you didn't want to hammer the vote even though your vote wouldn't have hammered. This added reason of "I did not want to vote because I didn't want SOMEONE ELSE to hammer" was not mentioned then and so I can not willingly believe this point since it has only just now been introduced. You are reaching. I did the same thing. I pulled my vote on VE because the votes on VE were nearing majority. I didn't want someone to accidentally hammer, like layabout did. Side note: When quoting it is nice to have the name at the top of the quote to see who is saying what. On February 01 2012 05:15 chaoser wrote: But palmar's only real argument against LSB is that he gave his vote to layabout. When compared to what layabout has done and posted, I don't think it's the same condemning thing at all. Possibilites for VE's actions: 1. VE sacrificed himself for LSB. 2. VE is telling the truth and was hit by a vig. Note: vig has not come forward. 3. VE is telling the truth and was hit by mafia, thus Palmar is fake-claiming a hit in some elaborate mafia scheme to become virtually confirmed town. 4. VE just decided to start trolling out of nowhere. I differ to occam's razor here. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On February 01 2012 05:25 Paperscraps wrote: You are reaching. I did the same thing. I pulled my vote on VE because the votes on VE were nearing majority. I didn't want someone to accidentally hammer, like layabout did. Side note: When quoting it is nice to have the name at the top of the quote to see who is saying what. Possibilites for VE's actions: 1. VE sacrificed himself for LSB. 2. VE is telling the truth and was hit by a vig. Note: vig has not come forward. 3. VE is telling the truth and was hit by mafia, thus Palmar is fake-claiming a hit in some elaborate mafia scheme to become virtually confirmed town. 4. VE just decided to start trolling out of nowhere. I differ to occam's razor here. are you serious? | ||
| ||
