|
On February 01 2012 07:46 layabout wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2012 07:18 MeatlessTaco wrote:On February 01 2012 07:16 layabout wrote:
wouldn't you prefer to see my flip? We can have the coroner dig you up. the coroner that we know exists? Don't you think it's strange that : in this game lynched players do not flip. there was minimal lynch discussion day1 and town rushed the lynch ending in a ??? flip. there were no night kills. there were two claims + no scumhunting day2, we lynched a claimant, who flipped ???. And now there are individuals that are trying to draw conclusions about players based upon their reads of the players that are interacting with them. Speculating about the set-up and drawing links between players whose alignments we do not and may never know in order to lynch other players is very anti-town.
Okay then, if you're so against the current chain of events, what's your idea?
|
I'm about to go to sleep.
Layabout last damn time. We have two ways of neutralising players we suspect are scum. Removing their vote-power or lynching them. You choose tonight which one will happen to you.
|
On February 01 2012 08:08 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2012 07:46 layabout wrote:On February 01 2012 07:18 MeatlessTaco wrote:On February 01 2012 07:16 layabout wrote:
wouldn't you prefer to see my flip? We can have the coroner dig you up. the coroner that we know exists? Don't you think it's strange that : in this game lynched players do not flip. there was minimal lynch discussion day1 and town rushed the lynch ending in a ??? flip. there were no night kills. there were two claims + no scumhunting day2, we lynched a claimant, who flipped ???. And now there are individuals that are trying to draw conclusions about players based upon their reads of the players that are interacting with them. Speculating about the set-up and drawing links between players whose alignments we do not and may never know in order to lynch other players is very anti-town. Okay then, if you're so against the current chain of events, what's your idea?
You lot start trying, thinking, reading, posting or analysing with pro-town goals.
I get to stop playing without getting myself mod-killed.
|
On February 01 2012 08:21 layabout wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2012 08:08 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On February 01 2012 07:46 layabout wrote:On February 01 2012 07:18 MeatlessTaco wrote:On February 01 2012 07:16 layabout wrote:
wouldn't you prefer to see my flip? We can have the coroner dig you up. the coroner that we know exists? Don't you think it's strange that : in this game lynched players do not flip. there was minimal lynch discussion day1 and town rushed the lynch ending in a ??? flip. there were no night kills. there were two claims + no scumhunting day2, we lynched a claimant, who flipped ???. And now there are individuals that are trying to draw conclusions about players based upon their reads of the players that are interacting with them. Speculating about the set-up and drawing links between players whose alignments we do not and may never know in order to lynch other players is very anti-town. Okay then, if you're so against the current chain of events, what's your idea? You lot start trying, thinking, reading, posting or analysing with pro-town goals. I get to stop playing without getting myself mod-killed.
Trying to lynch potential scum is not pro-town?
|
Every player is potential scum.
Not providing reasoning, not establishing your innocence, deliberately misleading or misinterpreting to kill other players is not pro-town and it's what you have all been doing.
|
On February 01 2012 08:27 layabout wrote:
Every player is potential scum.
Not providing reasoning, not establishing your innocence, deliberately misleading or misinterpreting to kill other players is not pro-town and it's what you have all been doing.
We have provided reasoning. And this reasoning is pointing to you. And all you have to do to deflect the FoS is give your votes to the town. We'll give them back, anyone who doesn't give them back is the scum.
|
On February 01 2012 08:27 layabout wrote:
Every player is potential scum.
Not providing reasoning, not establishing your innocence, deliberately misleading or misinterpreting to kill other players is not pro-town and it's what you have all been doing.
We need another, better target. Was VE right and Palmar is scum/playing us? Who should hang besides LSB or you? Answering those questions will help us as town. Simply saying, "all your analyses suck" isn't helpful. We need a better option on who to hang.
|
Wow layabout you're just digging your grave deeper and deeper. You have contributed nothing to the discussion, all you say is that town is not thinking, town is not reading, town is not posting, and town is not analyzing. We are planning to lynch you because:
A. You have contributed absolutely nothing to the discussion, this last night or so.
B. You refuse to trade your votes and instead want to keep them all to your self
KNOWING FULL WELL THAT TOWN WILL LOSE THOSE VOTES.
If you don't want to get lynched then start a case on someone. Find someone scummy. These are pro-town things to do. But instead you go on and on and on. About how the town is lynching you and it's bad.
If this is your defense then you might as well hang your self. 
|
On February 01 2012 08:27 layabout wrote:
Every player is potential scum.
Not providing reasoning, not establishing your innocence, deliberately misleading or misinterpreting to kill other players is not pro-town and it's what you have all been doing.
Give your votes to Palmar. He's town. If he's not town I'm going to fly to Iceland and kick his little Euro ass.
|
On February 01 2012 08:33 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2012 08:27 layabout wrote:
Every player is potential scum.
Not providing reasoning, not establishing your innocence, deliberately misleading or misinterpreting to kill other players is not pro-town and it's what you have all been doing. Give your votes to Palmar. He's town. If he's not town I'm going to fly to Iceland and kick his little Euro ass.
The mental image of this made me lol.
|
I'll be back later. It's Tuesday. I gotta go play with my balls.
|
Ah good old bowling night.
How do I know this. o.O
Uh lucky guess?
|
On February 01 2012 08:33 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2012 08:27 layabout wrote:
Every player is potential scum.
Not providing reasoning, not establishing your innocence, deliberately misleading or misinterpreting to kill other players is not pro-town and it's what you have all been doing. Give your votes to Palmar. He's town. If he's not town I'm going to fly to Iceland and kick his little Euro ass.
Bitch please
Bring it on
+ Show Spoiler +
|
@layabout I just want to point something out. There are 4+ players that want you to trade all of your votes away. Even if you are green and the mafia is ganging up on you with the whole VP trade idea, there has to be town players that want you to trade the votes away as well.
Obviously if you are town you will have the same vested interest as these town players. Stop posting filler and find someone that is scummier than you! Convince us!
I understand I am repeating things said above, but pride is a dangerous thing in mafia. Sometimes repetition and emphasis is the best medicine.
|
I have a feeling I am going to die tonight.
Popcorn time!
|
On February 01 2012 09:37 Paperscraps wrote:I have a feeling I am going to die tonight. Popcorn time!
Why's that?
|
It's dawn. I sent 1 vote to palmar, because he is my strongest green read. For obvious reasons
|
My money is on you too Paperscraps :D. Either you Jackal58
|
I gave one to prplhz because I like him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://mail.is/palmar/derp.jpg)
