Well we can discuss whether counter claiming is worth it. It means that if RoL is an angel and not the acolyte, they can definitely kill the channeler after tonight. We can still jail HoD however

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 21:57 GMT

#1765

There is no way RoL proposed that dumb blue claim plan AND claimed VT if he is the channeler. It's also unlikely that he would have jailed me n1

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 21:59 GMT

#1769

I think we should just lynch him now. He would have claimed earlier if he really was the channeler and it's incredibly convenient that he just happened to read the thread when we were discussing hammering. He is also not giving us anything

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 22:01 GMT

#1773

Near the bottom of this post http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=13054857

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 22:03 GMT

#1778

I'll hammer then

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 22:07 GMT

#1791

Well that's boring

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 22:09 GMT

#1797

If the channeler is alive (which he is), send HarbingerOfDoom into purgatory tonight

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 22:18 GMT

#1803

I haven't reread filters, but currently I'm still liking HoD/RoL/Zephirdd as the angel team and Grackaroni and/or Tyrran as demon(s) and then one or two others. If HoD/RoL both flip angel, which should be clear by the end of tomorrow, there's a high chance of Zephirdd being the third and not just because his strange behaviour before the lynch.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 22:22 GMT

#1804

Wait I can't count, one demon is dead so obviously not two others

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 22:26 GMT

#1806

Well that channeler claim certainly makes more sense for an angel, but yes that is one of the reasons

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 14 2012 22:32 GMT

#1808

Fine, a dumb townie then but certainly the situation will be re-evaluated tomorrow

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 15 2012 00:03 GMT

#1813

Then he would have claimed way earlier, please think. Or is this a really bad attempt of a demon trying to get townie cred by pretending not to know what he fllipped

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 15 2012 00:03 GMT

#1814

Jackal58: demons can conceal a lynch flip once per game

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 15 2012 10:38 GMT

#1825

HoD: I don't know why you bother arguing about your role as if you aren't the AoD, you will be cleared by the day post. You keep making excuses for your activity and still find yourself unable to call anyone scum. Are you going to be busy tonight? Can we expect you to make some real cases in which you actually reach a conclusion? You know something like this

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=12135649

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 15 2012 11:30 GMT

#1827

Yes, AoD killing certainly wouldn't confirm him as town, just confirm him as non-AoD

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 15 2012 17:21 GMT

#1831

Why don't you tell us? Asking what we are going to do in a specific situation that isn't particularly likely to occur and not providing your own insight is quite annoying. Such a right is earned when town already considers you innocent. You appear to keep expecting things not to go as we think they will, which is puzzling

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 15 2012 19:29 GMT

#1835

That's not a meta argument at all; you can pretend the link isn't there and it is just as valid reason to believe your play isn't consistent with that of a townie. What you wrote about Tyrran applies quite well to you as well

His passivity and seeming lack of confidence in his reads and overall disinterest in the lynches just seems unlike most townies

Even when you were in danger of being lynched you didn't particularly care

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 15 2012 19:49 GMT

#1838

On January 16 2012 04:43 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:

Show nested quote +

Just like Risk didn't care, amiright?

Yes, you realize these are heuristics and can not conclusively determine alignment. Anyway, the hostility seems unnecessary considering it's your own lack of commitment to the game that has lead you to this point if you are town. Whether you have been busy is irrelevant and I strongly dislike people who keep making excuses for their activity day after day. You chose to join this game. Moreover, day post should clear some suspicion of you if you are town, so again you should concentrate on what matters rather than attacking someone who is clearly town.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 15 2012 20:12 GMT

#1840

You are right about those players and I've a problem with pretty much every single player that you listed. At least they don't keep making excuses for their activity, but I suppose most of them haven't been pressured. None of them appear to care about the game at all and the townies among them are doing what they can to make us lose the game. I'm putting considerably less effort into reading the thread than I should due to the fact there are so many non-entities playing.

You don't have to convince me of anything during the night and what you are saying isn't particularly relevant anyway.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

January 15 2012 20:16 GMT

#1841

If you are town, you should examine the wagon on you before you claimed and what people were saying. Actually I'm now reading it a bit and this is somewhat changing my view on things