Election Mafia - Page 75

On December 16 2011 12:47 Refallen wrote:
I'm no scum and I'm quite confused why I've been labelled as scum. I know radfield suspected me because of my first post (says I'm starting with an apology??) and also because I asked clarifying questions, but that's just what I do. I had been lurking during the first day, but that was because I was busy, as I've already pointed out. Jitsu pointed out that I "conveniently appeared" 2 hours before voting time during the first day, but that was simply because of timezone differences. Next, I hopped on the bandwagon because 1. I didn't know it wasn't majority lynch so I was afraid of a no-lynch situation that I thought would not be good for town at all, and 2. Many people were bandwagonning him already so I decided to go along and vote Spaackle (admittedly not exactly towny but as I said, I really had no time).

Hope I've addressed your points.

On December 16 2011 12:31 VisceraEyes wrote:
Evantrees

I had to read through his posts twice before I found anything worth even mentioning. Also, I'm having a hard time discerning what he's voting people for - as his reasoning is almost universally nil…so I had to go back and look at the posts in context to find out what he's talking about a lot of the time. Also, there's a distinct lack of trying to find scum, so don't even try to look for it.

So you really felt the need to go over it ok.

Here though he claims he'll look at zeks and GreYMisT. Doesn't.

Doesn't come up with anything to mention.

Does, however, claim to vote for my slot. For funsies.
see below.

RNG's his election vote…that's not only bad for town, but simultaneously makes him absolutely free of accountability for his choice!

Should I have just joined the bandwagon for someone I'm still not fully sure of for no reason?

WUT? Honestly, I'm not sure what this post is supposed to be saying. At the time, there was a vote-switch in the works. My slot was being voted by a lot of people and Rad (I think) came in and said that someone else should be lynched instead. Not sure why, but my guess is the whole 'don't lynch lurkers'…also my slot didn't vote, so maybe he was hoping for a better replacement. AT any rate, I don't know what evan is commenting on in this post, but resolves to look at Spaackles.

response to this from the looks of it and again didn't see anything.


This post…this post is something. He defends his RNG for Pardoner by saying 'I didn't start that'…I think. Also, defends his choice of Nisani as a lynch by saying 'Palmogism told me to'…which isn't the worst reason in the world (for fun, arguably, is). And defends his decision to not defend himself because "we had a bigger problem".

'I rnged out of the 3 other hydras only why I didn't say that I don't know. As a place to start and has been stated didn't start the rng discussion.'
Is what I said. Apparently Zeks started the rng discussion which gave me the idea to use it to decide which of the three Hydras to place a vote for. Well him and someone bugging Arctocod asking why he hasn't suggested a day 1 RNGed lynch yet.

I Voted to lynch Nisani as a place to start, since yes that's who Arctocod was voting for when he was withdrawn.

PAUSE

I'm assuming the "bigger problem" was Arctocod being removed from the electoral race. Why would that be a problem for him?
Finding a good lynch target seemed like a bigger problem than trying to defend myself, sadly didn't end help at all with that.

1) he wasn't voting for Arctocod,
voted for arctocod here.
why is that point even in here, most of the rest of this come as reasonable complaints.

2) he didn't care who won (lolRNGlol), and
didn't want to vote forProfBA at the time had no better option to offer.
3) he wasn't talking about it at all. So why would that be a valid excuse to not defend the accusations against him?
too busy trying to read filters and finding squat.

RESUME

He then goes on to say 'for goodness sakes, don't waste a check on me' qualifying it with 'at least use it on someone who might cause town a problem if they were scum'.

Really? REALLY?

1) No one was even talking about checks that I can see,
there's these two why I responding to people saying don't bother checking me I don't know.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=291720&currentpage=54#1071
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=291720&currentpage=54#1073
2) You're not contributing, so how are we supposed to gauge your alignment?
trying to, and seem to keep getting asked questions.
3) 'for goodness sakes'…like it would be some kind of huge mistake.
Huge mistake perhaps not a waste yes.
4) any scum are a problem, you included. If you're scum, we need to know because you're going to cause a problem. Saying DTs should check someone else because you're a 'weak player' is…weak bro.
any scum are a problem, true particularly when there are still five of them, sadly for you I'm not one of them.
and it was partly me realizing yes I looked like a damned easy lynch.

Verdict: leaning Scum