EPTElection Mafia - Page 77
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
|
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
|
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
|
Jitsu
United States929 Posts
I also think a 3rd candidate would be a good choice, but not at the loss of time deciding on who to lynch. My vote is still Comprissent, but it might change depending on what the day brings. | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
|
Arctocod
Norway251 Posts
| ||
|
Jitsu
United States929 Posts
On December 17 2011 02:15 Refallen wrote: I'm not sure if that'll change my decision. When the pardon is used, I think Mafia automatically gains, since now we've wasted a Day cycle while Mafia can go on killing people at night. If someone were to suggest ProfBadass to use his pardons as a way to prove his innocence, I wouldn't sign off on that. I'll probably still vote ProfBadass, based on Arc's analysis. Why would we need ProfBA to use his pardon as a way to prove innocence? We voted him in as the pardoner. Nothing is saying he isn't the mafia alignment though. | ||
|
Refallen
452 Posts
On December 17 2011 02:26 Jitsu wrote: Why would we need ProfBA to use his pardon as a way to prove innocence? We voted him in as the pardoner. Nothing is saying he isn't the mafia alignment though. We voted him in as pardoner in hardly the most relaxed of circumstances. And upon reflection there appears to be some suspicions based around him (see Arctocod). So yes, we do need some proof that he's not mafia, though using a pardon is hardly a smart way of going about that. Anyway, I'm heading to bed. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Palmogism, assuming that Prof.Badass is absolutely unlynchable today, who would you want to lynch and why? | ||
|
Arctocod
Norway251 Posts
| ||
|
DEUS-ex-MAFIA
Vatican City State258 Posts
You can see right now why I was against a Profbadasslynch: Every other discussion stopped and Palmogism stops every other discussion about alternative lynchcandidates because they won't share their reads. They may be good at diverting between town and scum, but they obviously don't see the game as a whole. I am afraid we'll lose this if Curu flips town. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Arctocod
Norway251 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
| ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On December 17 2011 03:05 Arctocod wrote: The analysis won't be wasted just because we lynch Curu today. I think you make some good points, but the problem with the players I gave you to analyze is that we don't know them at all, while we know Curu quite well and know what we can expect from him. By the way I fully admit the lack of real answer above is due to me being exceedingly lazy and unwilling to put any effort into a more detailed re-assessment of those players. Right now we consider Curu a very very likely scum and once Palmar is around we will present a real case. Probably. How can you expect us to agree to lynch curu when you openly admit to being lazy and not putting effort info other cases, and then saying you will only "Probally" give your reasoning. Just because you are very likely town does not excuse you. | ||
|
Arctocod
Norway251 Posts
On December 17 2011 03:10 GreYMisT wrote: How can you expect us to agree to lynch curu when you openly admit to being lazy and not putting effort info other cases, and then saying you will only "Probally" give your reasoning. Just because you are very likely town does not excuse you. Haha we have spent hours going through the filters, I'm just not going to read them for the 10th time because I don't think there is nothing particularly damning there, besides the fact they've done little to make themselves look town. Curu on the other hand has played in a way that makes him very likely scum, rather than a null or slightly scummy. The "probably" part was a joke. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
The more interesting stuff: I've had a bad feeling about the professor ever since Arctocod got withdrawn and he was elected. If we keep assuming it was a scum abillity they probably have a limited number of uses, I guess 1 max 2. They wouldn't had wasted this abillity which means they have an agenda. The professor was the one who got elected instead, there wasn't any question about that he would be elected. The only logical reasoning is the mafia knew this. Which leaves us here. Either the mafia elected the professor because the professor is scum. Or they elected the professor to make us come to the conclusion that he is scum. These are the only two logical reasoning. Personally I think the first one is the likeliest but that isn't the only reason. If the professor is scum he can hurt town. He knows he is heavily suspiscious and if we don't lynch him today we will likely lynch him soon unless he starts busing. If we choose to lynch someone else and by luck hits a mafia. The professor can pardon him giving them an extra night. I approve with lynching The Professor today. Still want greymist dead. | ||
| ||
