TL Mafia XLVIII - Page 3

On December 05 2011 21:51 Corrupt wrote:

Already wrote about that post in the previous page. I'm curious why you keep making a big deal out of it.
I answered both of your questions and you claim I ignored you? I listed 2 people, not 1.
You convinced Zephirdd to vote against me based on.. let's say.. nothing.
Now all of a sudden you suspend your case on Palmar, unvote and go for me? Sounds like a plan.

On December 05 2011 23:54 hyshes wrote:


Nice way to create a base to try to lynch those guys on day 2..



Anyway, I'm sorry for my current inactivity. It's my birthday and there was a supriseparty yesterday. Today i have dinner with friends so won't be posting much either. I thought i would only lose 1 night due to my birthday (tonight) but a supriseparty made that 2. I read through the thread and have a question. The palmar case seems to be a gathering of little things to me, could someone (preferable one of the voters) explain the case to me?

On December 06 2011 00:14 Mattchew wrote:
Syllogism - This game

Last Game (Town)

Also is a ton more activity and aggressiveness out of Syllogism this game. Scummy

On December 06 2011 00:17 prplhz wrote:
I think TruthBringer and vaderseven are best lynch candidates for today. I will vote TruthBringer over vaderseven because I think he's more likely to flip scum. I don't like lynching Zephirdd or Corrupt.

I think Palmar has been uncharacteristically useless so far but I wouldn't consider him for day1 lynch. sandroba and syllogism are basically confirmed to me and I think that Radfield is looking good too.

@supersoft What do you think about my case on TruthBringer? You commented on one case on TruthBringer but not the other.

On December 06 2011 00:33 Mattchew wrote:

Its not a direct contradiction.. just "feels" different.

Also,
Prplhz, Draz, and redFF were all mafia in the last game and are playing completely different this time around. So far they all come off as town to me.

On December 06 2011 00:34 vaderseven wrote:
@corrupt

By posting style I mean that I have played with people that post short 1-2 liners and then don't scum hunt while voting in a randomish fashion. I was hoping you would vote and put down some real reasons if pressured. At least you joined the conversation.

##unvote

I was waiting for Palmer to post his defense before I pointed out the fallacy of the case (his list was an answer to a question) and I like his defense. I hate his current vote.

Redff-

So your case on Palmer is defunct and was based on a missreading of things. You are now voting corrupt in what I would say was the first true bandwagon vote of the game.

I think you are acting scummy with this set of actions.


About me-

I don't really get the case on me. If someone would spell it out ill reply to it.

Let the day of posting via phone begin (aka good morning thread).

Oh and ##vote redff

On December 06 2011 00:40 vaderseven wrote:
Did draz explain his bandwagon corrupt vote I see in the voting thread?

On December 05 2011 19:28 Palmar wrote:


I know you know how syllogism and I play with each other. If I want him lynched people are going to notice. And not to mention, I have no interest in lynching syllogism day 1 as scum or town, I know he can be lazy as either alignment, and his scumplay isn't particularly scary so far, while his town play is some of the best on TL.

So yeah, this statement doesn't hold any value, your case is irrelevant. Please pull head out of ass.

On December 06 2011 00:47 Mattchew wrote:


in this game he is supporting a veteran naming "zodiac list" where as last game he was against acting on veterans and it seems like his stance on pointing out veterans to new players has changed.

On December 05 2011 14:20 redFF wrote:
haha
he made this post


on page 68 of xlvii, and he was town.