EPTTL Mafia XLVIII - Page 24
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
vaderseven
United States2556 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 06 2011 00:33 Mattchew wrote: Its not a direct contradiction.. just "feels" different. Also, Prplhz, Draz, and redFF were all mafia in the last game and are playing completely different this time around. So far they all come off as town to me. how does it "feel" different, that's incredibly vague. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 06 2011 00:34 vaderseven wrote: @corrupt By posting style I mean that I have played with people that post short 1-2 liners and then don't scum hunt while voting in a randomish fashion. I was hoping you would vote and put down some real reasons if pressured. At least you joined the conversation. ##unvote I was waiting for Palmer to post his defense before I pointed out the fallacy of the case (his list was an answer to a question) and I like his defense. I hate his current vote. Redff- So your case on Palmer is defunct and was based on a missreading of things. You are now voting corrupt in what I would say was the first true bandwagon vote of the game. I think you are acting scummy with this set of actions. About me- I don't really get the case on me. If someone would spell it out ill reply to it. Let the day of posting via phone begin (aka good morning thread). Oh and ##vote redff i was the first and main person to call corrupt out. yes i misread the list but there was more than just the list in my case so i do not consider my case on him defunct. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=285690&user=122881¤tpage=3 Red's last game where he is mafia. A ton of 1 liners that basically say nothing. This game he has been hoping all over people aggressively and been contributing a lot more. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 06 2011 00:40 vaderseven wrote: Did draz explain his bandwagon corrupt vote I see in the voting thread? drazerk isn't voting corrupt. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 00:41 redFF wrote: how does it "feel" different, that's incredibly vague. in this game he is supporting a veteran naming "zodiac list" where as last game he was against acting on veterans and it seems like his stance on pointing out veterans to new players has changed. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 05 2011 19:28 Palmar wrote: you don't even respond to my point here. I say you subtly put suspicion on him, and you don't deny that you did that. You also don't give a reason as to why you did that.I know you know how syllogism and I play with each other. If I want him lynched people are going to notice. And not to mention, I have no interest in lynching syllogism day 1 as scum or town, I know he can be lazy as either alignment, and his scumplay isn't particularly scary so far, while his town play is some of the best on TL. So yeah, this statement doesn't hold any value, your case is irrelevant. Please pull head out of ass. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 06 2011 00:47 Mattchew wrote: in this game he is supporting a veteran naming "zodiac list" where as last game he was against acting on veterans and it seems like his stance on pointing out veterans to new players has changed. in the last game he was against having a list for detectives iirc. I don't remember him being against giving medics a list of veterans to consider protecting. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
##unvote consider now a vote on radfield. he has 3 pages of posts right now and almost all of them are either him playing poorly ("RNG sucks. therefore RNG vote on prplhz!") or him trying to elicit answers from other players and providing very little of his own. i mean recently i see him say things like "corrupt isn't good enough of a kill target for a lynch but we should waste vigs on him though!" ... does this make any sense? its like set up for him to be able to take both sides of the shit and whatever alignment corrupt flips into he has a way out of it and an air of supporting his death. equivocation = red. passivity = red. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 00:35 Mattchew wrote: Also, can someone explain to me the options Mafia has for night KP. I know there can be a range but I am wondering if it will be like 3 KP (like the half living mafia of last game) or is there other set ups for killing can someone please explain this? If there are specific "killers" in the mafia, will role blocking stop them? | ||
|
vaderseven
United States2556 Posts
| ||
|
vaderseven
United States2556 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22630 Posts
On December 06 2011 01:01 vaderseven wrote: I take notes on everyone and I don't want to post them. They are shorthand and sloppy and for me. Any time I have a conclusion I post it. ok I'm a dayvig. Post your notes, every single one, unedited in the next 1 hour or I kill you. | ||
|
vaderseven
United States2556 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
| ||
