EPTTL Mafia XLVIII - Page 22
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
[big]FOR GLORY[/big ![[image loading]](http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4001/4414494166_53023716fd.jpg) On December 05 2011 13:11 Soap wrote: I don't get day start, no one did nothing and we have nothing to analyze. I'm rnging. ##Vote Drazerk ##Vote Drazerk | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
FOR GLORY On December 05 2011 13:11 Soap wrote: I don't get day start, no one did nothing and we have nothing to analyze. I'm rnging. ##Vote Drazerk ##Vote Drazerk | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On December 05 2011 23:16 Palmar wrote: [big]FOR GLORY[/big fail :D | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On December 05 2011 23:20 sandroba wrote: Seriously palmar? How about you tell me what you think about the cases people are pushing. vadersen to be more specific. Do you have an issue with lynching Drazerk? | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
On December 05 2011 13:23 Risen wrote: Is this for real? I called Zephyrdd out for this kind of shit earlier, but at least he ended up having a real reason. Can we get any kind of analysis? I'm not seeing it. I almost shit myself when I read annul agree. Thankfully he was just being a troll. Huh, kind of shit? I didn't vote without a reason or out of RNG. I genuinely thought Corrupt looked scummy, and went with voting before a response from him. + Show Spoiler [Corrupt's post] + On December 05 2011 19:10 Corrupt wrote: I didn't really thought that my very first post would draw that much attention. To be honest, I didn't had THAT many suspiciouns in mind. You know, first game and all.. the start sure was exciting for me, especialy with those 2 or 3 early cases that went on. The reason I didn't made an actual case about any of the people I got involved with was fear of making a very wrong decision about them in such early stage of the game. (Being bold and useless once again..) @vaderseven You said you were familiar with my posting "Style". I don't have any style man, I'm only trying to get into the game and I'm having a hard time establishing. Like I said, I'll be trying to improve as fast as I can. Sorry for looking like scum in peoples eyes.. it's not easy being Corrupt. Okey, I'm not sure how truly important day1 lynching is and I can't decide if a no lynch is good for the mafia or bad.. but here's what I think about that hint purplehaze gave about being blue (on Page 9). Like if you're one of the bad guys, isn't the best way to cover yourself up to post something like that and imply to be one of the good guys? The thing that he hasn't put his vote in the voting thread is also bothering me, altho the reason for this could be that purplehaze indeed is one of the good guys and he is afraid to pick up on TruthBringer cuz it's very possible they are on the same side. *sigh* Now that is a decent response, and that is what I am looking for on a town. [WARNING: massive WIFOM incoming] There is also the possibility that scum buddies did help him on writing a decent response; and now that I'm unvoting him I'm just look like scum that tried to bus him in order to make him gain credibility; it doesn't helps that I'm also the first to unvote him. *sigh* no matter what I do it will look horrible. Especially because now I'm back nearly to the zero mark on scumhunting. ##unvote On December 05 2011 21:51 Corrupt wrote: Already wrote about that post in the previous page. I'm curious why you keep making a big deal out of it. I answered both of your questions and you claim I ignored you? I listed 2 people, not 1. You convinced Zephirdd to vote against me based on.. let's say.. nothing. Now all of a sudden you suspend your case on Palmar, unvote and go for me? Sounds like a plan. Don't get me wrong; he didn't convince me to think you were scum, he just convinced me that throwing votes on a non-hammer game(where it depends on the deadline for the lynch, not on a certain number of votes), it's okay to vote on someone like that. I'd have voted you just after the first response anyways. Anyways, out of that topic, what's with all the RNG? I thought it had been established that RNG votes are terrible? Surely Drazerk didn't post anything useful, but shouldn't you at least have a reason for the vote? *sigh* although for me, at this point, Drazerk is closer to scum than most players as he had little contributions, but that's something like 100% = full scum and Drazerk is at 0.09% while everyone else is below that. Random thoughts: vaderseven and Jackall look weird to me. I have nothing to back up on their cases, so I won't go on them. Final words: Ask me anything. Sorry if I am looking bad for you. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On December 05 2011 23:18 sandroba wrote: @ss I don't think he is scum. If you go back to his previous game (xlvii) and filter him there you will notice the exact same trend of making huge posts and being very prolix when arguing something simple. Can you explain to me what exactly makes him suspicious to you? 1. His vote on a new player for no good reason 2. His vote on Palmar. 3. His big posts with no content. | ||
|
Refallen
452 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On December 05 2011 09:40 vaderseven wrote: More people should vote. Votes are the one thing that make you accountable to evidence and motives. The lack of votes makes the conversation more abstract. I like that post from vaderseven. The rest looks pretty bad. Also his vote on that other guy I don't even know. I don't like that votes on players who won't react to that vote anyway... You can vote these guys and justify your vote with the overdue reaction. It's something rather scum does than town... | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On December 05 2011 23:27 sandroba wrote: Yes, I do. I went to his filter and I can't tell if scum or not. I think the case on vader is stronger. I am a kite. I went to v7's filter and I can't tell if he's scum or not, I think the rng on Drazerk is stronger. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On December 05 2011 22:44 supersoft wrote: So do you think it's superior to be passive as scum compared to actively organising the discussion? I don't like your logic right there - I grant you that this assumption is widely spread among us TL-players - but it's wrong. WBG for example is extremely active as scum and because of that a very good scumplayer. Syllo is smart enough to try a new style as scum. agree. That post is completely empty. All you prove is that Truthbringer is a newbie. We already know that. That's a horrible reasoning for voting someone!!! It's not priving truthbringer is a newbie what I'm about, it's abut he wanting everything a mafia would ask for. Therefore I voted him to get some pressure and tell him I think otherwise. If he comes in this thread to explain his thoughts and why he thinks a town with less information is a good town I'm willing to change my vote if it sound reasonable. I want those people who are not posting at all to start posting and truthbringer is one of them. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
 The only one who said it's fine was wbg after I said I should post less in a postgamediscussion | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
If you call them out for this stuff, they only get paranoid and stop posting any more thoughts. It's a lot easier to convict them if you ask them out about their thoughts on certain players. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On December 05 2011 23:36 Palmar wrote: I am a kite. I went to v7's filter and I can't tell if he's scum or not, I think the rng on Drazerk is stronger. A null tell on vaderseven is 6/25, an RNG on Drazerk is 6/25, why is the Drazerk case stronger? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
Brofield, get in here and tell me what you think about v7. | ||
| ||
