EPTTL Mafia XLVIII - Page 119
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
| ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
On December 12 2011 10:48 Zephirdd wrote: unless mafia decided it's a good idea to kill itself in order to achieve credibility, and that's why you can't trust votes in order to claim credibility; what's your point? My point is that based on the current situation in this game I can't see mafia allowing a double lynch. If all of the viable lynch candidates were mafia there would a false case made to introduce a new candidate. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On December 12 2011 10:59 Mattchew wrote: whats the counts at? You're seriously too lazy to go check the auto-update? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=291512 RedFF has 10, annul has 6 | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
10/10 would be achieved if redFF, VisceraEyes, kingjames and sandroba all voted annul within the hour. I don't believe it's gonna happen though. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
is that a good enough reason lol | ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
depending on what happens with various power roles (specifically as it relates to palmar) he might be my target. see what happens with the parity cop (who has called palmar town-aligned) and the like. i have wanted him gone for his horrible OMGUS play all along. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
On December 12 2011 11:03 Mattchew wrote: redFF, VE and Kingjames you better have damn good reasons for not voting annul right now. Mattchew: What is your stance on redFF? | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On December 12 2011 11:03 Mattchew wrote: redFF, VE and Kingjames you better have damn good reasons for not voting annul right now. If they don't think he's scum, why should they vote him? I'd say it's a pretty damn good reason to NOT vote him. Mattchew, do you think annul is scum? It feels like the only reason you think he's scum is because he claimed to be hit n1, which has been confirmed. That's literally the only reason I see in your filter for you yelling about annul being scum. How do you feel about the medic who claimed protecting annul? I haven't seen you mention that so I'm curious. Does it change your opinion You only voted annul because you didn't think red would be lynched. As soon as it looked like it, you switched. Why? Why not just be on the person you think is most scum the whole time? I'd really like to know that. I think I'm starting to agree with annul in regards to drazerk, though. I know LaL isn't always the best, but it's kind of always been something I agree with. Now that I look back on it, draz's claim was kind of insane. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 12 2011 11:38 Lanaia wrote: If they don't think he's scum, why should they vote him? I'd say it's a pretty damn good reason to NOT vote him. Mattchew, do you think annul is scum? It feels like the only reason you think he's scum is because he claimed to be hit n1, which has been confirmed. That's literally the only reason I see in your filter for you yelling about annul being scum. How do you feel about the medic who claimed protecting annul? I haven't seen you mention that so I'm curious. Does it change your opinion You only voted annul because you didn't think red would be lynched. As soon as it looked like it, you switched. Why? Why not just be on the person you think is most scum the whole time? I'd really like to know that. I think I'm starting to agree with annul in regards to drazerk, though. I know LaL isn't always the best, but it's kind of always been something I agree with. Now that I look back on it, draz's claim was kind of insane. I think that annul is scummy and a leach on town. He takes a ton away from scum hunting and causes repetitive and circular conversation that leads to nowhere. He's literally 70% of the last 2 days of discussion. Lynching him and redFF would just lead us to work towards new scum. I have said for a while that redFF is scum to me. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 12 2011 11:35 kingjames01 wrote: Mattchew: What is your stance on redFF? lol | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On December 12 2011 11:41 Mattchew wrote: He's literally 70% of the last 2 days of discussion. lol you say this as though this is a negative mark on me trust me i obviously would rather it not be the case that 70% of the last two days revolved around me if this fact bothers you you should look at palmar for being the one to cause 70% of the last two days to revolve around me. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On December 12 2011 11:41 Mattchew wrote: I think that annul is scummy and a leach on town. He takes a ton away from scum hunting and causes repetitive and circular conversation that leads to nowhere. He's literally 70% of the last 2 days of discussion. Lynching him and redFF would just lead us to work towards new scum. I have said for a while that redFF is scum to me. What if they were to both flip town? How would you feel, having advocated a double-lynch? WHY do you think annul is scummy? How do you FEEL about the medic claiming to have saved him? Is something wrong with someone being a huge part of the discussion? Would you prefer he lurks? You don't have that many fewer pages than he does. (I can't make that last statement grammatically sound :/) .... Why do you bother quoting someone only to say lol. How is THAT productive? | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
| ||
| ||
